City in title tag hurt Local Search?
-
Big city A is the target optimization for services.
Suburb city B is the location of the business.
Will having big city A in the title tag of pages confuse the NAP consistency and local SEO for the site?
-
It's my pleasure, Jason. Good luck to you with the work ahead!
-
Thank you for the awesomely detailed response Miriam! That helps a ton
-
Hi Jason,
I should have been more clear about this. I'm sorry. Let me provide a little more detail.
In my experience, most local business websites have some basic pages, regardless of whether the business is a dental clinic, or a legal firm or a restaurant. Most feature the following pages;
-
Home
-
About
-
Contact Us
On these pages, I would be adamant about ensuring that the optimization of the titles, tags and text matches the core business NAP (name, address, phone). So, if the business is physically located in Jamestown, then these pages should reflect this in every way possible so that when humans and search engine bots hit these pages, the content there matches the content you are publishing on your various local business listings, in terms of geography.
Beyond these three basic pages, most local businesses will also have a set of service/product description pages. Here, we enter some grey area, because the content and optimization of these pages will be dictated by the needs/goals of the unique business. Some possible choices:
-
If the business does serve clients in its city of location, then it's a no-brainer to optimize the product/service pages for this geo term. In other words, instead of just optimizing for 'teeth whitening', you would be optimizing for 'teeth whitening in jamestown' and such variants.
-
If the business does not serve clients in its city of location, then these pages could be optimized for the neighboring city where it does serve.
-
If the business provides services in multiple cities with equivalent values, then you could either optimize the core service/product pages for the city of location (my first choice) with the plan to build additional content for other cities, or, you could not use geo terms at all in the optimization of these pages (a somewhat iffy choice) and rely on 'cities we serve' pages to stand in for having optimized the actual product/service pages.
There may be other choices, because there are always little nuances to each businesses, but what I've described above are the most common approaches.
Now, in terms of building city landing pages for multiple service cities, I'd like to point you to an article I wrote on this some time back that many people told me really helped them understand their options. Here we go:
The Nitty Gritty of City Landing Pages for Local Businesses
Of course, a local business website will have other pages like testimonials pages, work with us pages, etc., on each one of which you'll be making a nuanced decision in regards to which keyword terms are targeted.
I hope I've provided some further insight here and that the article I've linked to will provide even more.
-
-
Hi Miriam,
Thank you for the response. That is very helpful!
When you say: "Then, build additional content on the website for additional target cities and try to build as much authority surrounding it as possible, in hopes that it will be able to achieve organic visibility." Is this typically landing pages or can it be anywhere on the website outside of basic page?
I guess I am struggling to grasp the concept of what is a "basic page" that should stay consistent with the NAP, vs what page is ok to use to try and gain organic search target city.
-
Hi Jason,
In Google's world, Local Search hinges on physical address, even for SABs (service area businesses). This means that, regardless of your on-page optimization, your business is most likely to achieve local pack rankings for its city of location - not for a different city where you are not physically located. While I'm not sure from your description whether your business is brick-and-mortar (like a dentist located in the suburbs who wishes to gain clients from the neighboring major city) or is an SAB (like a plumber located in the suburbs who travels to the neighboring big city to make house calls), it doesn't really matter. Google's bias toward physical location dictates that most local businesses must go for local rankings for their city of location and organic rankings for any other city.
Because of this, the approach that makes most sense to me is to optimize the basic pages of the website (home, about, contact) for the city of location, because you want these pages to reinforce Google's belief in the validity of the NAP (name, address, phone number) you have included on your Google+ Local page. The goal here is to achieve the highest possible local rankings for the city of location, because this is what Google cares about most.
Then, build additional content on the website for additional target cities and try to build as much authority surrounding it as possible, in hopes that it will be able to achieve organic visibility.
This would be my approach, as I feel it clearly delineates both physical location and target cities.
-
Thanks Eric! Would you suggest putting the larger metro are in the title tag and mentioning it later in the page OR just keeping the nap consistent using the physical address's city and trusting that Google will understand that the suburb serves the metro area?
-
Whenever working on local search engine rankings, I try to be as consistent as possible when it comes to the NAP (Name, Address, Phone Number) data. If you were to put the name of a larger city in the title tag (I am assuming it is in the same metro area), you'll need to mention that larger city in copy on the page. If you just keyword stuff the larger city name in the title tag and don't make it part of a larger strategy (such as getting anchor text links to the site with that city name pointing to your site), then you won't be successful.
Google knows that smaller cities are a part of a larger city or metro area, and usually it isn't a problem with the NAP data being confused. When you set up the Google Plus Local listing, make sure you specify that you serve customers in that same metro area that you're including in the Title Tag.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Improving Local Pack results across other services
A company I work for ranks well in the Local Pack under its primary service offering i.e. "primary service Bristol". And also under some other services it offers. However, under other services that are offered, it doesn't show in the local pack despite ranking No 1 in the natural SERPS for the target phrase "example service Bristol". We have pages covering all main services in the main site navigation bar. Is this just the way it is or can something be done to resolve this? Does the detail in the third-party citations have a significant impact? What about the content of the reviews? I note that we are doing better under the services mentioned within the reviews. Should I add additional categories and emulating those used by the competition under the search terms? Or am I missing something else?
Local Website Optimization | | GrouchyKids0 -
International subdirectory without localized content - best practice / need advice
Hi there, Our site uses a subdirectory for regional and multilingual sites as show below for 200+ countries.
Local Website Optimization | | erinfalwell
EX: /en_US/ All sites have ~the same content & are in English. We have hreflang tags but still have crawl issues. Is there another URL structure you would recommend? Are there any other ways to avoid the duplicate page & crawl budget issues outside of the hreflang tag? Appreciate it!0 -
How accurate are google keyword estimates for local search volume?
We've all used the Google Adwords Keywords Tool, and if you're like me you use it to analyze data for a particular region. Does anyone know how accurate this data is? For example, I'd like to know how often people in Savannah, Georgia search for the word "forklift". I figure that Google can give me two kinds of data when I ask for how many people in Savannah search for "forklift". They might actually give me rough data for how many people in the region actually searched for the term "forklift" over the last 12 months, then divide by 12 to give me a monthly average. Or they might use data on a much broader region and then adjust for Savannah's population size. In other words, they might say, in the US people searched for "forklift" and average of 1,000,000 times a month. The US has a population of 300,000,000. Savannah has a population of about 250,000. 250,000 / 300,000,000 is 0.00083. 1,000,000 times 0.00083 is 208. So, "forklift" is searched in Savannah an average of 208 times. 1. is obviously much more accurate. I suspect that 2. is the model that Google is actually using. Does anyone know with reasonable certainty which it is? Thanks,
Local Website Optimization | | aj613
Adam0 -
What more can be done to get Google to change the landing pages it uses for certain search terms?
For one of my SEO campaigns, Google is using the website's home page as the landing page for the majority of search terms being tracked. The website splits its products by region and so we want specific region pages to rank for search terms related to that region, rather than the home page. We have optimised each regional page to a reasonably high standard and we have ensured that there is a good amount of internal linking and sign-posting to those region pages, however, Google is still using the home page. The only complication is that for the first few months there were canonical tags on these pages to the home page. These were removed around 3 months ago and we've checked that the region pages are indexed properly. Is there anything we are missing? Has anyone had any success in getting Google to change its landing pages?
Local Website Optimization | | ClickHub-Harry0 -
URL and title strategy for multiple location pages in the same city
Hi, I have a customer which opens additional branches in cities where he had until now only one branch. My question is: Once we open new store pages, what is the best strategy for the local store pages in terms of URL and title?
Local Website Optimization | | OrendaLtd
So far I've seen some different strategies for URL structure:
Some use [URL]/locations/cityname-1/2/3 etc.
while others use [URL]/locations/cityname-zip code/
I've even seen [URL]/locations/street address-cityname (that's what Starbucks do) There are also different strategies for the title of the branch page.
Some use [city name] [state] [zip code] | [Company name]
Other use [Full address] | [Company name]
Or [City name] [US state] [1/2/3] | [Company name]
Or [City name] [District / Neighborhood] [Zip Code] | [Company name] What is the preferred strategy for getting the best results? On the one hand, I wish differentiate the store pages from one another and gain as much local coverage as possible; on the other hand, I wish to create consistency and establish a long term strategy, taking into consideration that many more branches will be opened in the near future.1 -
Ideas on creating location based service pages for SEO value while not worrying about local SEO?
Hello and thanks for reading! We have a bit of a rare issue, where we are a nationwide distributor but have a local side that handles all tristate area requests, the sales that happen via local basically don't impact the online side, so we're trying to not focus on local SEO but in a sense worry about abroad local SEO. We want to try the location based service pages, but not for every state, at most 5 states and inside those pages target 2 to 3 big cities. Is this a waste of time to even think about or is this something that can be done with a careful touch?
Local Website Optimization | | Deacyde0 -
Duplicate content, hijacked search console, crawl errors, ACCCK.
My company employed a national marketing company to create their site, which was obviously outsourced to the lowest bidder. It looks beautiful, but has a staging site with all duplicate content in the installation. I am not seeing these issues in search console, and have had no luck getting the staging site removed from the files. How much should I be banging the drum on this? We have hundreds of high level crawl errors and over a thousand in midlevel. Of course I was not around to manage the build. I also do not have ftp access I'm also dealing with major search console issues. The account is proprietarily owned by a local SEO company and I can not remove the owner who is there by delegation. The site prefers the www version and does not read the same traffic for the non www version We also have something like 90,000 backlinks from 13 sites. And a shit ton of ghost spam. Help!
Local Website Optimization | | beth_thesomersteam0 -
Bing ranking a weak local branch office site of our 200-unit franchise higher than the brand page - throughout the USA!?
We have a brand with a major website at ourbrand.com. I'm using stand-ins for the actual brandname. The brand is a unique term, has 200 local offices with sites at ourbrand.com/locations/locationname, and is structured with best practices, and has a well built sitemap.xml. The link profile is diverse and solid. There are very few crawl errors and no warnings in Google Webmaster central. Each location has schema.org markup that has been checked with markup validation tools. No matter what tool you use, and how you look at it t's obvious this is the brand site. DA 51/100, PA 59/100. A rouge franchisee has broken their agreement and made their own site in a city on a different domain name, ourbrandseattle.com. The site is clearly optimized for that city, and has a weak inbound link profile. DA 18/100, PA 21/100. The link profile has low diversity and generally weak. They have no social media activity. They have not linked to ourbrand.com <- my leading theory. **The problem is that this rogue site is OUT RANKING the brand site all over the USA on Bing. **Even where it makes no sense at all. We are using whitespark.ca to check our ranking remotely in other cities and try to remove the effects of local personalization. What should we do? What have I missed?
Local Website Optimization | | scottclark0