EMD vs brand? I'm new to moz
-
Hi to all
so this is my first month using moz tools. When I check my competitors and keywords, everyone close to google #1 is a emd site
But with google always getting smarter, is it smart in order to compete to get an emd?
So say I rank first page #9, or not at all for my brand, if since my site is a construction site, if instead of say abc construction.com I find colorado home builders.com etc would I maybe do better? Or would google give me a bad ranking?
I am just so lost?
One last question? If I did build a emd site then just pointed my brand to it, would this be good or stupid for seo?
thank you for all advice and tips
chris
-
Thanks for the answers, EGOL and Andy. Really appreciate the time you both spend in here!
-
But its hard to know what is right and what is wrong. For years a phone book is all we needed, now we want to be found.
I understand. When I was starting out I spent a lot of time reading the basics of SEO. Moz has lots of resources for people who are learning. You can read the beginner's guide and ask questions here. It is also a good idea to record the changes that you make on your site, what works, what doesn't and use that as a source of learning.
The most valuable thing that I did was to start a site and then hire an experienced person to do a study and review. That person spend a couple hours learning about my business, looking at my website and then gave me an opinion of what I might do. That kept me going down the right road. Still, now, after about ten years and a nice amount of experience, I am still working on websites and still getting paid advice from people who are smarter than me and people who think differently than me and people who know how to do technical work that I don't want to spend time learning. I do 98% of the work myself but smarts, opinions and tech savvy from others are very important.
-
Thank you for the help.
It is truly appreciated.
This is why I am here in the first place to try and learn seo stuff, and Moz seems to be the best site around. So I am playing around with the tools and such, and it is all very scary, and confusing.
Like do I go with wordpress for a construction website that does not get updated very often because it needs new content, or is this exactly what Google wants, new content? So create content to stay afloat and survive the rankings game?
Basically I feel like I am at the bottom of the food chain with all of these big brands, with big advertising dollars eating companies up left and right for online rankings.
I understand that a site must be made for visitors first, then maybe Google. But its hard to know what is right and what is wrong. For years a phone book is all we needed, now we want to be found.
If I may ask, and this is left field - I have two Google + pages. Business and Local. Is it smarter to create posts and get likes and followers for the Business page or Local Page? I have read they may combine them one day, so don't worry about it much, yet I feel like I am in a boat that has a hole in it, so again just trying to survive.
Thank you again so very very much
Chris
-
I'm just a small local company trying to survive.
If this is the case... if you get most of your business from a certain city then you should be putting your time and brains and effort into local search.
** if a company has facebook likes, twitter posts, great backlink profile and content, then you should be able to go by whatever domain I would think?**
You have to beat your competitors by having a stronger web presence. The domain is only part of it or maybe none of it. Right now if people know you by our name and you plan to remain a small local company then your name might be a better choice of domain... like EgolsConstruction.com. I might not use that (or ColoradoGarageBuilders.com) if I was a younger person because I might decide to build homes or barns or do paving someday... and people who want those services might say.... :"EgolsGarages.com"... don't get them, they can build garages but would probably screw up building a house. Keyword domains can be very limiting.
I know a guy who does roofing in my community who has no web presence, does not advertise, does not give estimates, doesn't even have a truck with his name on it and he is flooded with work because he has been in business a long time and has done great work and everybody knows him.
The sign of an established business is a good reputation and immediate access to lots of work. You don't even need a website, in fact it might cause phone calls and queries that eat your time.
-
Wow great insight.
i have a lot to learn and I am truly grateful for your help. The reason I used the example as I did is because with using these moz tools if I put the state at the end, it showed traffic. If I put the state in the beginning, it showed a competition percent of 29, but no traffic.
so if I may venture to say, if a company has facebook likes, twitter posts, great backlink profile and content, then you should be able to go by whatever domain I would think? So maybe emd are helpful, but if you do not bring it, somebody else will.
As I research I find sites in my competition that do not even have the name colorado or term searched showing, yet they have a huge national following.
I'm just a small local company trying to survive.
-
a few years ago he is quoted to have said how Google was going to crack down on EMD's
Matt did say that and Google did do that. But they mainly hit EMDs that had crap content. EMDs that had robust content were not really hurt. The value of the EMD might have been diminished a bit but they are still slightly favored.
Slightly favored means that they will rank well in low competition with few links, however, against major competition the advantage is very small. They still have to earn their position.
I think to myself, as long as I get a good social, link, and content profile, I am going to compete with them.
If they have any strength at all that will not happen. I advocate EMDs but not for that reason. If you think you can buy an EMD and loaf, you will be disappointed.
I think that domain sounds spammy. Very few people are going to type "garage builder colorado" into search. That is the exact match. What will it get you? Sounds like somebody talking who doesn't know proper English. I would not use it. It sounds like a spammy domain and not the domain of a business.
I would use ColoradoGarageBuilders.com if I owned a business that lived up to that name by building garages all over Colorado. buildergaragescolorado and garagebuildercolorado are domains registered because somebody wants to stuff keywords. Just my two cents and personal opinions.
-
Thank you for your thoughts.
I guess my main worry is that I have Google + local, and Business, Facebook, twitter and social stuff that all point to my main brand, which is my business name. Yet there other sites, for years have never left the #1 through 4 positions just based on having so many keywords in their domain name.
Now these are not keyword-keyword-keyword.com These are like garagebuilderscolorado type of domains. So when you type in a variations of this name, the site is always ranked well. Even though a company might be 123 enterprise or whatever.
I am just nervous because I watch Matt Cutts video's almost to the point where I look at him like the all knowing Google prophet. So if he says something, do it. So here a few years ago he is quoted to have said how Google was going to crack down on EMD's so I'm like well if they are doing it, I'm going to do it. Say I buy the un-plural version of the EMD. So in this example, which is completely an example, I go and get garagebuildercolorado to compete with garagebuilderscolorado. I think to myself, as long as I get a good social, link, and content profile, I am going to compete with them.
But this whole thing seems like a chess match. I am just trying to rank at a state level. Colorado is my state. So by adding Colorado to a keyword domain name seems smart, yet now with Google Local, maybe it does not matter?
I just thought well I will get a EMD, and then point my company domain to it. So people will still find me by company name, maybe those backlinks follow a pointed domain, and play this game of keyword rich domains?
Again I appreciate all of your thoughts and advice. I am new to the tools here, and I am having fund with them.
Chris
-
I use all EMDs and have spent good money to obtain them. I believe that they compete better if you place good content on them. In my opinion they convert better and are easier remembered by your visitors.
It is really hard to create a brand if you are competing nationally or globally, however, an EMD can make it easier for you to be remembered, in my opinion.
A lot of people think that EMDs are penalized. In my opinion that is BS. They still give some advantage if you have the Exact Match Domain and not a partial match or an exact match and a word. If I thought that EMDs were penalized or any disadvantage I would be out of them, instead they are kicking butts.
Most important, the EMD gives me mental energy to work on the site. If I have that the competition is in trouble.
I think that you are going to get a lot of "opinions" on this question.
-
Hi Chris,
There is a lot to consider in the purchase of a domain, but you will not get any SEO benefit from having an EMD to a brand. Your positions are all to do with how good your site, content and link profile are.
The trouble with your example of an EMD, is that this then means you are completely tied to that as you move forward. Google have also started to give preference to Brand vs EMD, so I would say you should purchase the brand domain and then work on getting that brand known.
I hope this helps a little.
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel=canonical vs noindex/follow - tabs with individual URLs
Hi everyone I've got a situation that I haven't seen in quite this way before. I would like some advice on whether I should be rel=canonicalzing of noindexing/following a range of pages on a clients website. I've just started working on a website that creates individual URLs for tabs within each page which has resulted in several URLs being created for each listing: Example URLs: hotel-downtown-calgary hotel-downtown-calgary/gallery?tab hotel-downtown-calgary?tab hotel-downtown-calgary/map?tab hotel-downtown-calgary/facilities?tab hotel-downtown-calgary/reviews?tab hotel-downtown-calgary/in-the-area?tab Google has indexed over 1500 pages with the "?tab" parameter (there are 4380 page indexed for the site in total), and also seems to be indexing some of these pages without the "?tab" parameter i.e. ("hotel-downtown-calgary/reviews" instead of "hotel-downtown-calgary/reviews?tab") so the amount of potential duplication could be more. These tabbed pages are getting minimal traffic from organic search, so I've got no issues with taking them out of the index - the question is how. There are the issues I see: Each tab has the same title as the other tabs for each location, so lots of title duplication. Each individual tab doesn't have much content (although the content each tab has is unique). I would usually expect the tabs to be distinguished by the parameters only, not have unique URLs - if that was the case we wouldn't have a duplication issue. So the question is: rel=canonical or noindex/follow? I can see benefits of both. Looking forward to your thoughts!
On-Page Optimization | | Digitator0 -
Microsoft SEO Toolkit vs MoZ
Hi MoZ Community, Does anybody know how well is Microsoft SEO Toolkit. As far i have noticed this tool reports around 20 violations under three broad areas like : SEO, Content and Performance. On many violations I have found MoZ to be silent like : 1-unnecessary redirects 2-Invalid mark ups 3-Missing Tag 4-like vilations and others Important is that it tells solutions as well against each violation on how to fix that. Any body can give insights while comparing it with MoZ. Tanveer
On-Page Optimization | | Sequelmed0 -
301 redirects. If new website is a different business does it still send link authority?
Hi Guys. I'm a music producer and studio owner. I want to start a new business for online music mixing. Instead of starting from scratch I want to use a 301 redirect from my previous site that has built up a little authority over the years. However, the old site is purely for my music studio, there is no mention of online mixing services. Will Google consider this 'odd'? Pass less link juice? Or perhaps pass no authority at all if Google 'decides' the 2 business are unrelated? Cheers in advance guys. Isaac.
On-Page Optimization | | isaac6630 -
Moz shows page has no meta description but it does
Hi We recently worked on optimising one of our product pages, we created a new meta description, new unique content and a ensured it was optimised for our keyword. Despite all of this its ranking is still significantly lower than competitors eventhough the page authority is as good as theirs. I have just noticed that Moz crawl diagnostics is showing it up as having no meta description - but it does! when you check the source you see:http-equiv="description" content="Buy the robust and reliable Canon imageRUNNER 2525 from Copyfaxes. Learn more about the Canon 2525 before you buy." /> The page is: http://copyfaxes.com/product/2552/Canon-ImageRunner-2525-Digital-Copier I would appreciate any ideas.
On-Page Optimization | | copyfaxes10 -
I have home tab in 2 menu's which calls the same hompage article. How do I get over this
I am getting duplicate content for this article. I need 'home' tab on two menus.
On-Page Optimization | | rajendraksh0 -
Can't canonical, but need pages to show in Google News
We are a news media site in which much of our content is third-party, and already published by several other sources. Our current version of our CMS doesn't expose head tags, so I can't canonical to the original and avoid a duplicate content penalty. Is it ok for news sites NOT to use canonical, or do I have to NOINDEX until our CMS is fixed?
On-Page Optimization | | Aggie0 -
SEOmoz's On-page Checker upto date?
Helllo Mozzers, Just wondering if SEOmoz's on-page optimisation checker is upto date with google recent updates? If not... what do you suggest?
On-Page Optimization | | Prestige-SEO0 -
Should I be afraid to launch new website?
I have been redesigning my website in the last 2 months. I'm almost ready to finally launch it. Now I wonder how it will effect my rankings. I have taken a few measures to avoid problems such as: I kept the page names as they are. I kept the structure of the website Optimized the structure of my pages which should benefit my SEO rather then harm it. Yet, if I would experience a drop in rankings, could I regain my rankings by switching to the previous website?
On-Page Optimization | | wellnesswooz0