Error 4XX showing by SEOmoz tool
-
Hi,
I am a SEOmoz user. Can anybody guide me how to fix 4XX errors as i got reported by "Crawl Diagnostics Summary". There are many referring URLs reporting same error. Please guide me what to do and how to fix it??
Thanks
-
Hi Vijay,
First off have you given Roger (Moz robot) enough time to recrawl the site and discover that you have fixed the errors? You can see the last crawl date at the top of the reports normally.
Google has some tips on fixing 404's - https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2409439?hl=en
You can also double check live 404's here - http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
I also bet if you take a search through the Moz community you can find some other peoples fixes for 404's
Hope that helps.
-
Yes, there is referrer column which says www.acelerartech.com/sitemap.xml. This is my website and there are almost 286 errors detected by crawl diagnostic summary.
Here is the categorization of the errors : -
-
4XX errors
-
duplicate page content
-
Duplicate page title
-
Missing Meta Tags
5)Title element is too long
- Title element is too short.
However i configured and fixed most of the errors but got to failed solving 4XX errors and rel=canonical (which says status as true). I checked on those links and found that those links should me there on website. Then why those links are reported in 4XX as these links are in use.
please check http://www.acelerartech.com/printmail/case-study/media-industry-case-study
Please provide your valuable suggestions and guide me what exactly to do?
-
-
Hi! If you download your crawl report as a CSV, there will be a column there showing you the referring site that linked to the 404.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Volume - as compared to keyword planner and other tools.
Hi in the rankings for my keywords, the monthly range is so much lower than other keyword tools I use, including google keyword planner, semrush and longtail pro (which all match and show a number much higher than Moz). Support said it's because those tools may group like keywords or singular/plural versions where Moz truly separates each term as a separate term, hence more specific and precise. My question is: If google does somewhat group plural/singular and close match keywords, then wouldn’t it not matter anyways - if someone types a close match keyword and my keyword ends up triggering/displaying as if they typed my targeted keyword - then wouldn’t it still fall under the larger number if in the end it works in displaying my website as a result? If google changes search "blue sky" to "sky that is blue", and you get the same ranking for either of those two keywords then in the end does it matter? I'm thrown for a loop as I spent time optimizing my website based on numbers I received from the other tools and now seeing a much lower number for said keywords and possibly a little higher for a different variation of it, I don't know what to do.
Moz Bar | | camoeverafter.com0 -
Why is the Moz tool bar page analysis saying my website is from Romania when we are in the United States?
So when I go to my client's website, https://www.paracore.com/ and on the home page, I use the Moz toolbar. From there I then use the "Page Analysis." If you look at the "URL" line there is a Romanian flag next to the site name. Then I scroll down within the page analysis and the "Country" line says Romania. This is a WordPress site, and the company is based in Arizona. Can anyone explain to me if this is code that I can find and change or remove? Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Moz Bar | | Striventa1 -
Keyword explorer tool - keywords by domain functionality
Hi, We have issues with the new searching for keywords by root domain functionality in keyword explorer. We are based in Australia and need rankings for google.com.au, which is what we have set up within our MOZ campaign ranking reports. The explorer tool rankings are way off and not accurate for our site's actual rankings. Also, many of the top, high volume keywords that we are tracking and for which we rank on first page for are not even appearing when I do an explorer search using our root domain. Is the root domain functionality within keyword explorer providing results based on google.com rather than google.com.au? Does this mean that if we are outside the US that we can't use the tool as it is not accurate? Cheers, Damien
Moz Bar | | Devenish0 -
Is any tool which is similar to LDA? Topic modeling
Hi friends, earlier I used to use LDA tool of Moz but now I am unable to fetch that tool. is there any similar tool in the market to analyze the content. I have already used onpage.org.
Moz Bar | | DiveshSeo1 -
MOZ crawler has been finding a lot of 803 and 804 errors
During last 3 weeks MOZ crawler has been finding a lot of 803 and 804 errors. Meanwhile all pages seem to be working fine. What could cause it?
Moz Bar | | Paruyr0 -
Perplexed by last MOZ crawling duplicate content errors
In the last crawler issues report from MOZ I can see many many pages listed as duplicate content with 0 duplicate urls. Like this: http://imgur.com/fbikRVq I am puzzled, what does it mean?
Moz Bar | | max.favilli0 -
Can the Moz tool identify variations of a Chinese language branded keyword?
We've recently started a trial of the Moz Pro service and are tracking a selection of keywords. Our primary band / product name is 功夫英语(Kungfu English), so we've set a rule that any keywords containing those four Chinese characters (功夫英语) should be marked as a branded keyword. However, in the "Non-Paid Keywords Sending Search Visits" section of our traffic report, we see a few variations on our brand name that are not being marked as branded keywords. (See attached Images). Based on our rules, shouldn't these variations also be marked as branded keywords without our needing to manually add them as such? Or have I misunderstood the intent of this rule? For the English text, the brand rule about words containing "kungfuenglish" seems to have resulted in all of "www.kungfuenglish.com", "http://www.kungfuenglish.com", and kungfuenglish being labelled as branded keywords. However, I'm not seeing the same sort of result with variations on the Chinese keyword, 功夫英语. KedTi1D.png z5bcUIt.png
Moz Bar | | PaulCoffey0