Uncontrollable Spammy Backlinks - Disavow or Not?
-
Hey Mozzers,
I have ran a few different backlink reports, and I noticed that one of my sites has an incredible amount of spammy backlinks. These were not done by a prior SEO, they are simmply spammy links that were scraped and inserted on terrible sites, forums, directories, etc. 100% uncontrollable. The anchor text includes anything from the domain to "live sex" and "victoria's secret coupons". There are probably close to 700 or so of these backlinks from around 150-200 domains.
I have read that one should contact the webmaster, and use disavow as a last resort, but I am not sure if that advice is for spammy link building techniques, which we have no history of doing.
Is this normal? What is the best way to handle this? Is it likely that these are affecting this site's ranking at the moment? The number of spammy links drastically affects the ratio of quality backlinks to spammy backlinks.
This is so frustrating...
-
Thanks for your response Marie,
That is very helpful!
-
Google employee John Mueller has been asked about this type of thing several times in Webmaster Central hangouts. Here is an example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEAQyHtRQxg&feature=share&t=23m30s (23:30). His answer is always to say that Google is usually pretty good at ignoring these links but that it's not a bad idea to disavow just in case.
You do not need to contact site owners and try to get these links removed. I mean, if you really wanted to try, you could, but you're likely to spend a huge amount of time doing this with very little reward. You will not get a manual penalty for having links like this. Manual penalties are given to people who cheat, not those who have been hacked. (The exception would be if you have malware on the site...but then that's a different warning and link cleanup is not a part of recovery.)
Most likely these links will not affect you in the Penguin algorithm, but because there's so much we don't know about Penguin, it's not a bad idea to disavow these. A quick way to do this is to gather your links on either ahrefs if you have a membership or majestic (it's free if you verify your site) and sort them by anchor text. (You can use OSE, but OSE tends to ignore these super spammy links so it's not the best choice for this type of analysis.) Filter them so that you only see the spammy links. Then, disavow those links on the domain level.
-
YES absolutelly, (Always at domain level) it prevents future new pages from the spammy domain linking your pages, only you can use subdomain level where the links comes from authority domains, for example blogs on blogspot ie: linking.blogspot.com in this case you should include on your disavow file only the subdomain linking.blogspot.com and at the TLD level ".com" which includes all the regional like .com.tw , .com.ar etc
Use to detect bad links as many tools as you can starting with Google WMT, bING WMT, yandex WMT, SeoMOZ, ahref, linkdetrox etc.
Hope it helps
-
Disavow the whole domains !
-
My friend Evan,
Google get thousand of innocent reconsideration request, saying "I'm innocent" for example if you tag any page with the robots meta tag "OINDEX,FOLLOW" it always will consider it as NOINDEX,FOLLOW they assume the pesimistic option, so if you has spammy links, you has two options, the first is remove all of them which will save your site or leave it and be penalized or rank low .....
Again my experience is assume that Google will think you're the responsible (the pesimistic option) and try to remove all the possible links and the rest should be disavowed and never try to joke the links to your site, think Google has the 90% of the market on the internet, so your site and mime are not the most important.
Recently Google has penalized to ebay and many others ....
Hope it helps
-
Hey Claudio,
I don't mean to be difficult here, I just need to be diligent.
I thought the disavow tool was more of a "i messed up, so now I will fix it" kind of a tool. We have not done any unnatural link building or directory submissions. I don't want to indicate to Google that I messed up if... well... I didn't do anything wrong... does that make sense?
I really do appreciate your answers and time with this.
Evan
-
You'll probably be okay, it appears most of it is ebbing. Though I would definitely look at your folder level traffic. Penalties can happen on the folder and page level as well. It's not so bad as to merit a domain level penalty.
I would be more concerned if the anchor text targeted something you do want.
In regard to disavows, disavow early and as often as necessary.
-
I was dealing with DISAVOW for a long time and my conclusions are:
1. Remove as many links as you can.
2. The remaining links (bad or suspicious) should be included into a DISAVOW file and upload it to Google Disavow tool.
This allow your site to keep safe for future and coming penalties or rank issues.
PS.: Google can detect all the un-natural link schemes better than you and me ....
Hope it helps
-
Hey Claudio,
I looked into this, and I have posted this question on a few different forums. The challenge is that I am receiving so many different perspectives.
I am told by some that I should not disavow. They say not to draw attention to an issue, especially if these links are not related to my industry.
Some say "well, if you get penalized, you won't rank for victoria secret coupons, so... so what". Others like EGOL say that Google is smart, and will recognize these as spammy links, and can just be ignored.
I am curious if anyone has experience with disavowing spammy links, and what their results are. It seems like the SEO community is not entirely sure how to handle this issue... nor am I.
I welcome any further comments or suggestions.
Thanks!
-
Dear Evan,
You could get a Google manual-penalty, or simply be affected by an algorithm penalty (Penguin), so the best practice is:
1. Contact the webmaster of these sites and ask for link removal.
2. The remaining links should be included on the DISAVOW file at domain level.
You should be use to construct your link profile several sources, such as Google WMT, Bing WMT, Yandex WMT and of cours several tools such as ahref, SeoMoz, LinkMajestic and LinkDetrox, and other tools, each bad link you detect and get remove from there is a goal and prevent future penalties or gradual downgrades of your rank.
Good luck
-
Hey EGOL,
I really appreciate your feedback. Thanks you so much!
I would also like to here others weigh in on this question too...
-
My concern is that the number of these scraped and spammy links is getting close to the number of good links.
I agree. Some of my content is related to commodities and investments and those pages can be linked to from thousands of these crap sites.
In my opinion, most webmasters are not looking at their backlinks and if Google started slapping people down for these types of links there would be very few sites left standing.
So, I am not worrying about them.
-
Yeah, there seems to be a lot of those. I am finding a lot from sites with other languages as well.
My concern is that the number of these scraped and spammy links is getting close to the number of good links. Granted the good links have a much higher DA and trust flow. I am mostly concerned about what the link profile looks like to search engines, or do they just understand these situations and ignore them?
Thanks EGOL!
-
Is this normal?
Lots of people run scrapers and use the data to make phony directories and mash-up pages. They mostly have keyword links to websites and bits of content (kinda like Google
My sites all have lots of these links. I am not doing anything about them. I think Google understands how these sites are made.
-
Hey Travis,
I was doing some research, and I saw that it is generally advised not to use disavow unless the site has been penalized. This isn't the case - in fact it is doing quite well. I just want to keep the link profile clean, and I am wondering if something so uncontrollable is something to worry about...
-
Hi Evan,
I would probably disavow the domains. Though it's pretty hard to thoroughly answer without a reference to any domain.
To the question of normal, I would say it isn't terribly uncommon. I've seen scenarios like this enough over the years.
I'm unsure whether or not this is adversely affecting your site. I don't have a site to reference. Though if you would like to private message 'the deets', I can take a closer look. If you would like to post it publicly, so all the other kids can play, that's fine too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disavow links established in 2009??
Sorry for the length, but I believe this is an interesting situation, so hopefully you'll enjoy thinking this one over a little. Thanks for taking the time! Historical Information We’ve owned and operated printglobe.com since 2002. In late 2009, we acquired absorbentprinting.com and operated both sites until Mar, 2015, when absorbentprinting.com was redirected to printglobe.com. The reason we chose to redirect absorbentprinting.com to printglobe.com is that they were same industry, same pricing, and had a lot of product overlap, although they did have unique product and category descriptions. We saw a long and steady decline in organic traffic to absorbentprinting.com in the last couple of years leading up to the decision to redirect. By the way, while I understand the basics of SEO, neither I nor anyone else at our company could be considered an SEO practitioner. Recent Information An SEO firm we used to be engaged with us reached back out to us and noted: “I started looking through your backlink and it looks like there has been a sharp increase of referring domains.” They included a graph that does show a dramatic increase, starting around November, 2015. It’s quite dramatic and appears anything but natural. The contact from the SEO firm went on to say: “After doing a cursory review, it looks like a handful of these new links are the type we would recommend disavowing or removing.” We do little in the way of “link building” and we’re in a relatively boring industry, so we don’t naturally garner a lot of links. Our first thought was that we were the victim of a negative SEO attack. However, upon spot checking a lot of the recent domains linking to us, I discovered that a large % of the links that had first shown up in AHREFS since November are links that were left as comments on forums, mostly in 2009/2010. Since absorbentprinting.com was redirected to printglobe.com in Mar, 2015, I have no idea why they are just now beginning to show up as links to printglobe.com. By the numbers, according to a recent download from AHREFS: Total # of backlinks to printglobe.com through mid-Feb, 2016: 8,679 of backlinks “first seen” November, 2015 or later: 5,433 Note that there were hundreds of links “first seen” in the months from Mar, 2015 to Oct, 2015, but the # “first seen” from November, 2015 to now has been 1,500 or greater each full month. Total # of linking domains through mid-Feb, 2016: 1,182 of linking domains first seen November, 2015 or later: 850 Also note that the links contain good anchor text distribution Finally, there was a backlink analysis done on absorbentprinting.com in April, 2013 by the same firm who pointed out the sharp increase in links. At that time, it was determined that the backlink profile of absorbentprinting.com was normal, and did not require any actions to disavow links or otherwise clean up the backlinks. My Questions: If you’ve gotten through all that, how important does it seem to disavow links now? How urgent? I’ve heard that disavowing links should be a rare undertaking. If this is so, what would you think of the idea of us disavowing everything or almost everything “first seen” Nov, 2015 and later? Is there a way to disavow at the linking domain level, rather than link-by-link to reduce the number of entries, or does it have to be done for each individual link? If we disavow around 5.5k links since Nov, 2015, what is the potential for doing more harm than good? If we’re seeing declining organic traffic in the past year on printglobe.com pretty much for the first time in the site’s history, can we attribute that to the links? Anything else you’d advise a guy who’s never disavowed a link before on this situation? Thanks for any insights! Rob
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PrintGlobeSEO0 -
What Links to Disavow?
I am looking through my website's link profile that I pulled directly from Google Webmaster Tools. What is the best way to determine the links to disavow? Maybe the Webmaster Tools list is not the best list for this process but I really need to clean up the links that are hurting the site's SEO. Does anyone have any insight?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PartyStore0 -
Disavow- What Happens and What Should I Do?
We have a site that got hit by a non-manual penalty in July really hard. I submitted a disavow file for the site placeyourlinks.com which had a bunch of clearly spammy links to the site listed in Webmaster tools. But the site itself was down for a long time so I couldn't see where the links even were. Then those links disappeared from the links file. I thought the urls were removed or the site was seen as being blank. But now they're back...and the site itself is shown as just being a blank page. I don't know what to do since I don't want to disavow those links again if it wasn't even addressed the first time and there is obviously no way to contact the site. Help! Also, I've done a bunch of work on the site to increase the amount of content while I was waiting to see what happened with the link disavow. But now all that is done and our rankings are still waaaay down. I'm considering getting really, really aggressive with link removal and disavowing if needed but I'm not sure what I should focus on removing/disavowing. Really bad sites with only one or two links? Sites that have a lot of links to the site? Sites with keyword stuffy anchor text? Any help on this would be much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Fuel0 -
Link Building, when to give up on a possible backlink provider
Hello, I'm doing content marketing, it's working but it's slow and steady. I'm looking for some wisdom here from people that have done a lot of linkbuilding. Phone calls are tending to be a great resource in our niche. But I've got about 10 sites that I've called about ten times each and they're taking up a lot of time. I've mostly narrowed down who to contact but that person won't answer the phone. My question is, when do you give up on a good lead? Do I just try to contact a good person 5?, or 10? times then leave a message, leave a message a week later, then give up? I don't think leaving a message for content marketing in this case would help much. Thanks for the advice.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
Links from random sites: Disavow?
I am looking at the links to my site from GWT. I see a bunch of random sites I've never heard of. I never made an effort to get links from these sites. Sites like | http://www.xlx.pl | Also found one porn site! Should I just ignore these or disavow them?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | inhouseseo0 -
Thoughts on Proactive Link Disavow
One of my newish hobby sites has began to attract some crappy links - as per Google Webmaster Tools, Links To Your Site report. The typical .ru and .pl kind of crap that seems to seep into all somewhat successful sites' link profiles. I have not received any notifications or penalties, BUT I am considering proactively disavowing these, but wanted to bounce this idea off some other SEOs before proceeding. Cheers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | David_ODonnell0 -
EDU Backlinks wrapped in Wiki worthwhile?
I asked below question yesterday and got some answers, but am still looking for more justification whether such links are worthwhile getting or not. Here is the question: An SEO expert offers my site backlinks from .edu's wrapped in wiki. Structure as follows "wiki.xxx.UNINAME.edu/etc..etc" - the pages have authority of 1 (domain obviously high with the dot edu) but there is no relevant info on the pages and obviously wiki links are no follow. This does not sound right to me, but can anyone share some insight since it is wiki + edu combined it sounds on surface like credibility, but with page having no relevant content I feel it isn't right.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen0 -
Spammy Link Profile Questions. What do you think?
I'm trying to dilute the link profile for a website. But have a couple of questions on the best way to achieve this. Current link profile, www.mysitename.com Keyword 1 Keyword 2 Keyword 3 Keyword 4 Keyword 5 Keyword 6 Keyword 7 Keyword 8 Keyword 9 Keyword 10 Keyword 12 Keyword 13 Keyword 14 Keyword 14 Keyword 15 mysitename.com Desired link profile, www.mysitename.com mysitename.com www.mysitename.com http://www. mysitename.com/ My Site Name http://mysitename.com Click Here my site name More Info mysitename.com/ www.mysitename.com/ Keyword 1 Keyword 2 Keyword 3 Keyword 4 Keyword 4 Keyword 5 Questions 1. Do you think Google looks at this on a domain level? Or do you think this needs to be done with every page on the site? 2. What would be a good way to build links fast to the pages, need to build lots of links to be able to dilute the profile. I was considering Dripable, or a similar service, but decided i really don't want to create more spam.What would you do? 3. What would you say the % threshold for anchor text is, i have read on different sources that at least 40% - 60% of links should be branded, url, or generic anchor links. Do you think this is accurate?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 858-SEO0