One company - 2 websites
-
One of our clients decided to launch a 2nd website to market specific products and services that they provide. The trouble is, they have the same address, phone number and have a similar name. Whilst we have had some success and both websites are on page 1 for their primary keywords, I have a bad feeling that they may have hit a glass ceiling.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to perform local SEO?
-
My firm uses several websites. When I first came in house there were a lot of sites, but I took them down because of the content quality at the time. I am slowly building them back up. I find that specific area websites can be very useful for pointing ads or specific campaigns, since many people want to know just about X concept I am very careful not to reproduce content and not to try to hide that the sites are owned by the same company.
I hesitated to bring the sites back up until I got some confirmation from Matt Cutts that having more than one site is fine, as long as you follow good content and other SEO standards. http://www.brafton.com/news/cutts-on-similar-website-content-multiple-domains-duplicate-or-safe
I link between the sites, but in an organic way. I.e. if I have an article on one site that naturally links to another site, I link it. I also don't have a huge number of sites and don't expect to do so.
-
I agree with what you are saying. The issue is that Google still ranks keyword driven domains, and secondary sites very high in their searches. We personally don't engage in the practice, but it is very frustrating to see these types of actions happening when they clearly are against it, and put webmaster articles out saying it's bad.
Most of the secondary sites are created for this reason, to gain a higher rank, with less effort. Local businesses tend to "gain" the most from this, as domain names are usually available for yourcityandservicekeyword.com
I don't think it is a wise long term strategy, but anyone who denies that it still works, and often, is kidding themselves. Not being negative, just trying to voice an opinion. Most of the seos set these type of sites up due to a low budget amount from the client. Trying to create a real seo plan and create ongoing dynamic content is almost impossible for a $300-400 client. The seo knows they can register a keyword-driven domain, and after creating a ton of citations, most likely come out on top (especially since the backlinks coming from these will be an exact match for the keyword they want to rank for.) The clients see this as great, because they get an influx of new leads, but don't understand the damage they do to their brand, or the long term risks involved in a future update.
Don't get me wrong, lol. I'm not arguing with anything you said, and I agree with the items you referenced and quoted 100%. But Google, despite their public perception and webmaster quotes, is not perfect. There is a chance he could get both sites to rank, and rank well. Not with how they are currently set up, but with a lot of work separating the content, and changing one to brand focus and the other to keyword focus, it could work.
Still wouldn't do it tho. She is right. Spend the effort on the main domain you want to rank. You would most likely spend just as much time trying to get both to rank as you would getting one killer site in place, but not have the future risk of a penalty.
-
Hi Mark,
I think you're right to be concerned. The mutli-site approach is one I pretty much never recommend to local business owners. Google's own John Mueller has clearly stated that Google prefers the single site approach (see: http://www.seroundtable.com/google-one-site-locations-15454.html). As far as Google's rules go, it's not permitted to create a second local listing for a set of products a company vends. That's striclty forbidden, in fact (see: https://support.google.com/places/answer/107528?hl=en).
I've had business owners come to me in this situation and I've had to take a hard line with them and leave it up to them to take my advice or not. I tell them that they are a single company and should be running a single website backed up with a single set of citations for the business (unless they have more than one physical location, in which case, they can build out separate citations for each location). Ideally, the client should:
-
Consolidate his sites into a single site
-
Redirect his old URLs to the authoritative one
-
Clean up any citations that have been built as though this were 2 companies instead of one.
Alternatives:
-
The client can found a new business if his products are different enough to merit the effort of doing so. The new business would need a unique name, address and phone number.
-
If he insists on keeping the second site, all NAP (name, address, phone) should be removed from it as well as all references/links to the main site. He could run a blog on it or something about his industry, but he should not attempt to rank locally with this second site in any way. Content should not be duplicated in any way between the two sites. Once you start explaining this to the client, he may say, "Well then what is the point of the second site, if I can't try to promote it as though it were a second business?" That can be a sort of 'bingo' moment that can help you to help him see that he should really think hard about consolidating.
What I've found over the years is that business owners sometimes take this multi-site approach because they feel it will make them look bigger to Google and help them diversify their rankings. In point of fact, in the local business sphere, it only hampers them. Google wants an accurate representation of the business with a single, consistent set of NAP and a clear, authoritative website. This way, everything the business does goes towards strengthening their brand. The stronger their brand becomes, the easier it will be for them to rank for their various products.
Hope these thoughts are helpful. I'm wishing you luck discussing this with the client. I know it's not always easy:)
-
-
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that it is a local business and looking to rank well for local results.
1. Too late, the domains are pretty close to each other.
2. The content is unique on both websites, but some of the categories and product names are similar
3. Both sites need to rank well for local searches. Using this advice means that the 2nd website will not be able to perform well locally. Am I right in saying that the websites can not effectively co-exist with the same details?
As I say, both websites are on page 1 for their primary keywords but are struggling to get near the top of the page. Is there anything I can do or will Google always treat them as duplicates and hold them back?
-
Here is a few things to watch for with this:
1. Domain name are not closely related
2. Each site has its own unique content. DO NOT have matching pages on each, as Google doesnt take to kindly to that. Even if they don't penalize, they will index the newer version, and the older will be very difficult to get to recover.
3. Link to the local listing only off of one site. I think you will be ok displaying the address on both sites, but get creative with it. Instead of displaying live text, have the address and phone be a jpeg or png. That way, it will not be "crawlable". This isnt the most...legit way of doing it, but if you need to display it on both sites, it will work without fail. This will allow your vistors to see the contact info, and avoid an issue with Google.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google My Business: Company listing is showing in search instead of division address - similar names/same city
Hi! I have a client whose company name is very similar to one if their company divisions. This division has multiple locations but its main location is in the same city as the parent company. The problem is that when you search for the division, the parent company shows up. The parent company has a physical address, but most users searching need to be going to the division address which takes customers. They are having problems with customers coming to the parent company address instead. I have made the Google My Business parent company page to show service areas instead of their business address. Yet, their listing still comes up first when searching for the division location. This is because of part of the parent company name is in the division name. My client wants users to be able to find the division more so than the parent company. Anyone had this issue before? Any tips would be great!
Local Listings | | agrier0 -
How to tell Google My Business what area is local to my company?
Hello Mozers I've been stumped by the changes in the interface with Google My Business. I used to be able to set up the area for which I wanted a business to cover. Now I can't find anyway to tell Google. The company I work for is in St Albans and our main workload is London. It would be helpful if I could actually control what Google Local sees as Local for my company, i.e. to encompass central London which is only 19 miles away. Can someone give me an idiots guide has to how to tell Google the area I'd like our local listing to cover? Thanks
Local Listings | | Catherine_Selectaglaze0 -
How do I get Google Knowledge Graph to display my schema snippet added on our official website?
Right now, Google is connecting our company google query to a Knowledge Graph that contains Wikipedia information, and a map to the location of our place but with the name of the company spelled wrong. It also says 'Claim this business'. I would like to override this. We have a G+ page for our company , and as well i have added a Schema to display the information correctly in the Knowledge graph. But these changes have not seemed to help to change the knowledge graph. Any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Local Listings | | uthealthsa0 -
Client Being Outranked by Horrible Websites with No SEO--Help!
Hi guys, We have a client that we are having some issues with. We have done extensive directory work for them, website enhancements, etc. so this is unusual. Hermantown is an extremely small city in MN so companies there normally target Duluth. Our client is hardly ranking locally in Google maps or organically yet their competitors are showing up who have horrible websites, no SEO, and located in the same city—Hermantown yet showing up locally for Duluth searches. We just can’t seem to move up the ladder no matter how hard we try. Here is the company: www.mmtheating.com We are completely at a loss for next steps on how to help this client improve. We’re wondering if there may be a penalty against them for some reason but we always have had very ethical practices. Thanks in advance for your insights!
Local Listings | | JohnWeb120 -
2 Businesses + Same Address = Not a Problem?
Imagine someone who has 2 separate businesses with the same (home) address. Both are verified Google My Business G+ pages, each with its own separate website. Essentially the old business that is being de-emphasized is a guitar lesson teacher's studio. This G+ page is set as a storefront where people come to. The new business is similar, it is music lessons (private in-home instruction). This G+ page is set to have a service area - this goes along with their new business model. We all know that consistent NAP is essential BUT do you think these are competing against each other because they share an address even though the businesses are separate?
Local Listings | | Rich_Coffman0 -
Company with one site, name, but locations in different states
Our business has a location in Milwaukee, WI and Chicago, IL but one URL and want to keep the name the same because obviously it is a single company. I am trying to find the best way to: A. Optimize the NAP for consistency
Local Listings | | MERGE-Chicago
B. Figure out how to merge google local with the G+ for each location separately
C. What to do with the publisher tag Appreciate the help!0 -
Targeting both Dutch countries .NL & .BE --> 2 ccTLD's using rel-alternate or just one TLD?
We want to target both Dutch countries .NL & .BE (Belgium & Netherlands).
Local Listings | | Brainlane
Should we go for the 2 ccTLD's using rel-alternate, or go for one TLD, .EU or similar? We currently have an SEO project going on where DNS.be & DNS.nl are equally important. Currently we are using the rel-alternate meta data. The .be website is doing fantastic, the .nl one seems stagnant and not really getting to target. For a similar project, we are now wondering whether we should go for the same approach, or just pick one TLD (.EU or similar). Note: we cannot create content that is regionally specific, since the content is just what it is and cannot be altered.0 -
Google Places: Can't link to website
Hi, how are you? I'm Having some problems with my clients Google Places/Plus listings. Everything is OK, but I can't get my website linked. I'm talking about what I point out in the image. I tried following this instructions: https://support.google.com/plus/answer/1713826?hl=en&ref_topic=3052532, but I can't find the Link website button next to my website URL. Do you know why is this happening? Thanks! 6v1eDG4
Local Listings | | arielbortz0