Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Anyone using CloudFlare on multiple sites?
-
We are considering using CloudFlare as a CDN for a large group of sites. The fees are $5 to $200 depending on many factors. We tried the free trial on one site and were impressed with the results. I am wondering if any of you have any longer term experience with this and performance metrics, etc.
-
Does anyone know how many domains you can have under the business plan? Is that just for one site?
-
Since im here im going to respond to this with a couple of things.
"While Cloudflare offers many optimization services and DDoS protection, many of them break Magento and Wordpress functionality."
I've not had any issue with this. Typically if something does break in WP or Magneto its pretty simple to fix. Personally, i dont run WP sites without cloudflare, its too much of a security issue.
" Implementing caching and Google PageSpeed with Nginx or Apache shows much better performance,"
You should do this anyway....
" Worse though, Cloudflare doesn't allow you to use your own SSL on any plan under $200/moth"
Sure it does, i run 40 + sites on standard Comodo SSL certs on Cloudflare pro without issue.
"If you're a Pagespeed/YSlow nut, they you'll really be upset to learn Cloudflare adds a security cookie to everything, so there is no way to have serve content on a cookie-free domain when using Cloudflare DNS"
Thats a fair point, though perhaps not such an issue in most situations.
"Customer service is also slow and mostly automated, so don't expect great service on unpaid plans."
Again i dont really find this. Most of my accounts are CF Pro but for those that arn't, i dont notice any difference in support level. I know Business and Enterprise plans get faster support but for $200 + a month, i'd expect that anyway.
-
Old post but wanted to add a little. Been with Cloudflare for years but want to switch, so I searched Moz to learn what might happen to site ranking. I'm now neutral about Cloudflare and actually turned off extra services just to use their DNS for a few sites. While Cloudflare offers many optimization services and DDoS protection, many of them break Magento and Wordpress functionality. Implementing caching and Google PageSpeed with Nginx or Apache shows much better performance, especially in Asia. Worse though, Cloudflare doesn't allow you to use your own SSL on any plan under $200/moth. So if you have your own EV SSL, plan on dishing out for this. If you're a Pagespeed/YSlow nut, they you'll really be upset to learn Cloudflare adds a security cookie to everything, so there is no way to have serve content on a cookie-free domain when using Cloudflare DNS. Customer service is also slow and mostly automated, so don't expect great service on unpaid plans.
-
I just looked and....Out of the top 100 pages by views, 90/100 have decreased load time by one half. Pretty serious stuff there. 10 have increases of like 10 to 30% but nothing alarming.
Best
-
Since this seems like this is a pretty active site, how is the GA pagespeed tab showing that things are doing since the switch?
As for as the threats blocked, they just blacklist ip addresses, they are not usually actual threats. Think about when you run a virus scan and it says it protected you from 125 threats and then you just see that it is talking about tracking cookies. Most of the threats are known TOR exit nodes. Which some people use them for things like that, but others use them because they can access content that is blocked in their country.
As far as the file requests, it does help shed file load, which is good. But that is what a CDN would do as well. Both of them do not cache page requests either, so they do not change the actual processing and page loading time of the site. They just change the asset loading time.
-
That sounds like a great plan. Furthermore, on the high-performance sites that you have the higher CF plan on, you'll also get Railgun. I've had a chance to utilize CF's railgun technology through a partnership with a hosting company, and i can say that its quite effective with even dynamic content (unlike most CDNs). Furthermore, it may decrease your overall technology budget by mitigating the need for a separate CDN. Visit https://www.cloudflare.com/railgun to read more about it.
Good luck!
-
Our intent is to subscribe to pro, go with the lower option $5 per month on less critical sites and the much higher options on critical high performance sites. I really appreciate the input and time, I am glad I had one last good answer to give.
All the best,Robert
-
I've been using Cloudflare for about 2 years now with 10+ sites (including 2-3 that receive 20k+ unique visitors monthly), and to be quite honest I have not found a DNS provider that provides the same level of optimization and security as them. I've tried some of the top companies in the DNS industry (including Dyn, which I still use for enterprise DNS redundancy & fail-over), however they all seem to be missing functionality that I regularly use within Cloudflare, which I ended up moving back within a week. Furthermore, performance-wise, I've yet to find a service that can match site load times accomplished with an optimized CF setup.
It does take some time & experimentation to dial in the optimization/security settings within Cloudflare for your particular site(s)/technology, however once dialed in, everything runs quite well. My favorite features are the DNS-based smart redirects (you can create URL patterns which will automatically redirect pages for you at the DNS-level.) along with their DNS-based firewall. The latter stops malicious attacks at the DNS level (it can cut off the hacker/spammer at the DNS level before it hits your serrver, as long as the user accesses your site using the protected domain), and has been quite effective for us for the past 2 years. Furthermore, Cloudflare reduces load times in various ways (caching at the DNS-level, JS/CSS minified, etc). They also allow you to integrate apps such as Google Analytics without having to directly add the JS code into your site.
In regards to Cloudflare optimization, after implementing the proper settings for one of my clients ecommerce sites, we've seen load times decrease by about 3 seconds on avg. Like I've said, it does take some time to get the optimal settings for your specific site, however I feel that its definitely worth it.
I'd recommend subscribing to CloudFlare Pro ($20/month for first site, and $5 for each one afterwards), as it comes with the WAP firewall at the DNS-level (which works almost TOO well. Sometimes detects actions on the backend as SQL injection due to the query patterns), along with SSL support (really cool, you can have SSL connected at the DNS-level). I believe you also get a LOT more slots for the smart redirects, which is invaluable to me. I know I probably sound like I work for CF, but to be quite honest I've experienced nothing but great service from them. The one time I had an issue, I contacted them on Twitter (which they actively check) and they replied/fixed the issue for me within a few minutes.
Hope this helps you make a more informative decision. Feel free to send me a private message if you have any other specific questions. I'll see what I can do to help out.
-
I forgot to post before I hit good answer and it wiped out my comments. Thanks for the detailed response. I will show our info to our head of dev.
Best -
jStrong,
Thanks for the info. I think responded to both you and Prestashop at once, sorry. I like the security features a lot given some client sites are fairly sensitive.
Best -
Thanks so much for the help here. That is the other piece that we liked about what we saw in the initial tests - security. Here is the data (sorry a bit redacted due to confidentiality needs) from our head of development. It is a reasonably large site with quite a bit of traffic over a short time interval ( a few days)
- 126k total pageviews
- 105k regular visitors
- 20k crawlers/bots
- 1.5k threats (which Cloudflare forces to jump through hoops to access the site, and if failed they are denied)
- 523k total requests for files and pages - 207k were handled by Cloudflare rather than having to be handled by our server
- 8.3 GB of bandwidth total - 2.0 GB of which were handled by CloudFlare, reducing our usage and allowing other sites to deliver faster.
I appreciate the info re cookies, I will have to look into that as there may be client concerns. Great help!
-
I personally do not like cloudflare. All is fine and well until a site on your DNS starts getting DDOS'd. Then it will affect your site as well. I tend to optimize a site how I want it and then use MaxCDN as a CDN network. Then you do not have to worry about compatibility issues either, like mentioned above. I do keep a cloudflare account however, I use it to move in front of sites that are actively being attacked.
One thing I don't care for is that cloudflare tracks your users and is basically building up a tracking database. If you look on your served resources there are a couple of cloudflare cookies for this purpose.
-
Hi Robert,
We use them on a couple client sites, more for security then CDN, but the service worked as advertised and their support was helpful when needed. Also, it did not conflict with any of the sites functionality. The client has been using the service since late last year and is satisfied as well.
-
Hi RobertFisher,
I've recently integrated Cloudflare Business into a large ecommerce site (top 50k Alexa). The site had several issues that impacted page load speed, our new visitors were experiencing very long load times in the 4-7 second range.
Cloudflare is amazing for the price. at $200/month it greatly reduced the amount of HTTP requests, minification reduced our page size, and it even saved a lot of bandwidth (which translates to server cost savings and/or more for your money).
Their support service has been consistent, however, I know their Business and Enterprise customers are priority.
Most other CDNs are going to cost far more than $200. It reduced our page load speed around 50%, before optimizing the other performance configurations they have available.
You do need to do some quality and assurance testing. With any CDN, when you deliver certain things differently, like javascript files, a new conflict could arise. For example, our sliders were having trouble rendering after integrating CF, so we had to adjust the settings to get them loading properly again.
Is there something more specific I could tell you about it?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to find out that none of the images on my site violates copyrights? Is there any tool that can do this without having to check manually image by image?
We plan to add several thousand images to our site and we outsourced the image search to some freelancers who had instructions to just use royalty free pictures. Is there any easy and quick way to check that in fact none of these images violates copyrights without having to check image by image? In case there are violations we are unaware of, do you think we need to be concerned about a risk of receiving Takedown Notices (DMCA) before owner giving us notification for giving us opportunity to remove the photo?
Web Design | | lcourse1 -
My news site not showing in "In the news" list on Google Web Search
I got a news website (www.tapscape.com) which is 6 years old and has been on Google News since 2012. However, whenever I publish a news article, it never shows up "In the news" list on Google Web Search. I have already added the schema.org/NewsArticle on the website and have checked it if it's working or not on Google structured data testing tool. I see everything shows on on the structured data testing tool. The site already has a news sitemap (http://www.tapscape.com/news-sitemap.xml) and has been added to Google webmaster tools. News articles show perfectly fine in the News tab, but why isn't the articles being shown on "In the news" list on the Google web search? My site has a strong backlink background already, so I don't think I need to work on the backlinks. Please let me know what I'm doing wrong, and how can I get it to the news articles on "In the news" list. Below is a screenshot that I have attached to this question to help you understand what I mean to say. 1qoArRs
Web Design | | hakhan2010 -
Interlinking using Dynamic URLs Versus Static URLs
Hi Guys, Could you kindly help us in choosing best approach out of mentioned below 2 cases. Case. 1 -We are using: We interlink our static pages(www.abc.com/jobs-in-chennai) through footer, navigation & by showing related searches. Self referential Canonical tags have been implemented. Case. 2 -We plan to use: We interlink our Dynamic pages(www.abc.com/jobs-in-chennai?source=footer) through footer, navigation & by showing related searches. Canonical tags have been implemented on dynamic urls pointing to corresponding static urls Query 1. Which one is better & expected to improve rankings. Query 2. Will shifting to Case 2 negatively affect our existing rankings or traffic. Regards
Web Design | | vivekrathore0 -
Can anyone recommend a tool that will identify unused and duplicate CSS across an entire site?
Hi all, So far I have found this one: http://unused-css.com/ It looks like it identifies unused, but perhaps not duplicates? It also has a 5,000 page limit and our site is 8,000+ pages....so we really need something that can handle a site larger than their limit. I do have Screaming Frog. Is there a way to use Screaming Frog to locate unused and duplicate CSS? Any recommendations and/or tips would be great. I am also aware of the Firefix extensions, but to my knowledge they will only do one page at a time? Thanks!
Web Design | | danatanseo0 -
What's the point of an EU site?
Buongiorno from 18 degrees C Wetherby UK 🙂 On this site http://www.milwaukeetool.eu/ the client wants to hold on to the EU site despite there being multiple standalone country sittes e.g. http://www.milwaukeetool.fr & http://www.milwaukeetool.co.uk Why would you ever need an EU site? I mean who ever searches for an EU site? If the client holds on to the eu site despite my position it's a waiste of time from a search perspective is the folowing the best appeasment? When a user enters the eu url or redirects to country the detected, eg I'm in Paris I enter www.milwaukeetool.eu it redirects to http://www.milwaukeetool.fr. My felling this would be the most pragmatic thing to do? Any ideas please,
Web Design | | Nightwing
Cioa,
David0 -
One Page Guide vs. Multiple Individual Pages
Howdy, Mozzers! I am having a battle with my inner-self regarding how to structure a resources section for our website. We're building out several pieces of content that are meant to be educational for our clients and I'm having trouble deciding how to layout the content structure. We could either layout all eight short sections on a single page, or create individual pages for each section. The goal is obviously to attract new potential clients by targeting these terms that they may be searching for in an information gathering stage. Here's my dilemma...
Web Design | | jpretz
With the single page guide, it would be nice because it will have a lot of content (and of course, keywords) to be picked up by the SERPS but I worry that it is going to be a bit crammed (because of eight sections) for the user. The individual pages would be much better organized and you can target more specific keywords, but I worry that it may get flagged for light content as some pages may have as little as a 150 word description. I have always been mindful of writing copy for searchers over spiders, but now I'm at a more technical crossroads as far as potentially getting dinged for not having robust content on each page. Here's where you come in...
What do you think is the better of the two options? I like the idea of having the multiple pages because of the ability to hone-in on a keyword and the clean, organized feel, but I worry about the lack of content (and possibly losing out on long-tail opportunities). I'd love to hear your thoughts. Please and thank you. Ready annnnnnnnnnnnd GO!0 -
From Google Sites to Wordpress - Anyone Ventured this SEO terrain?
We have a few sites in Google Sites - and they are ugly! We have a majority (40+) of websites in Wordpress. But we have a few websites just stuck on Google Sites, and since Google won't let you fully edit the HTML, add scripts, or implement any technology since 2000, we want to move. The sad problem - the Google sites are ranking well. We rank well in Manhattan, Atlanta, Dallas, and Philadelphia. The problem is - the sites do not give much room for growth - and the bounce rate is high because they are so ugly. Has Anyone moved from Google sites to Wordpress? Should we just stay with Google and bite the ugly bullet? My fear is that these sites will not allow for growth. It is hard to update them and even harder to make them look nice. To get a sample - beware: www.counselingphiladelphia.com Even another reason to leave: The slider is non-semantic and terrible SEO. Google won't allow a slider script with tags and a hrefs, so the only way to implement a slider is through a Google Docs Presentation that keeps sliding. I know - terrible SEO (#donthate) but we needed something. Any advice and thoughts would help! Thanks Mozzers!
Web Design | | _Thriveworks0 -
Infinite Scrolling vs. Pagination on an eCommerce Site
My company is looking at replacing our ecommerce site's paginated browsing with a Javascript infinite scroll function for when customers view internal search results--and possibly when they browse product categories also. Because our internal linking structure isn't very robust, I'm concerned that removing the pagination will make it harder to get the individual product pages to rank in the SERPs. We have over 5,000 products, and most of them are internally linked to from the browsing results pages in the category structure: e.g. Blue Widgets, Widgets Under $250, etc. I'm not too worried about removing pagination from the internal search results pages, but I'm concerned that doing the same for these category pages will result in de-linking the thousands of product pages that show up later in the browsing results and therefore won't be crawlable as internal links by the Googlebot. Does anyone have any ideas on what to do here? I'm already arguing against the infinite scroll, but we're a fairly design-driven company and any ammunition or alternatives would really help. For example, would serving a different page to the Googlebot in this case be a dangerous form of cloaking? (If the only difference is the presence of the pagination links.) Or is there any way to make rel=next and rel=prev tags work with infinite scrolling?
Web Design | | DownPour0