Duplicate Content / Canonical Conundrum on E-Commerce Website
-
Hi all,
I’m looking for some expert advice on use of canonicals to resolve duplicate content for an e-Commerce site. I’ve used a generic example to explain the problem (I do not really run a candy shop).
SCENARIO
I run a candy shop website that sells candy dispensers and the candy that goes in them. I sell about 5,000 different models of candy dispensers and 10,000 different types of candy.
Much of the candy fits in more than one candy dispenser, and some candy dispensers fit exactly the same types of candy as others.
To make things easy for customers who need to fill up their candy dispensers, I provide a “candy finder” tool on my website which takes them through three steps:
1. Pick your candy dispenser brand (e.g. Haribo)
2. Pick your candy dispenser type (e.g. soft candy or hard candy)
3. Pick your candy dispenser model (e.g. S4000-A)
RESULT: The customer is then presented with a list of candy products that they can buy. on a URL like this:
Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-A
All of these steps are presented as HTML pages with followable/indexable links.
PROBLEM:
There is a duplicate content issue with the results pages. This is because a lot of the candy dispensers fit exactly the same candy (e.g. S4000-A, S4000-B and S4000-C). This means that the content on these pages are the basically same because the same candy products are listed. I’ll call these the “duplicate dispensers” E.g.
Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-A
Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-B
Candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-C
The page titles/headings change based on the dispenser model, but that’s not enough for the pages to be deemed unique by Moz. I want to drive organic traffic searches for the dispenser model candy keywords, but with duplicate content like this I’m guessing this is holding me back from any of these dispenser pages ranking.
SOLUTIONS
1. Write unique content for each of the duplicate dispenser pages: Manufacturers add or discontinue about 500 dispenser models each quarter and I don’t have the resources to keep on top of this content. I would also question the real value of this content to a user when it’s pretty obvious what the products on the page are.
2. Pick one duplicate dispenser to act as a rel=canonical and point all its duplicates at it. This doesn’t work as dispensers get discontinued so I run the risk of randomly losing my canonicals or them changing as models become unavailable.
3. Create a single page with all of the duplicate dispensers on, and canonical all of the individual duplicate pages to that page.
e.g. Canonical: candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series
Duplicates (which all point to canonical):
candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series?model=A
candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series?model=B
candy-shop.com/haribo/soft-candy/S4000-Series?model=C
PROPOSED SOLUTION
Option 3.
Anyone agree/disagree or have any other thoughts on how to solve this problem?
Thanks for reading.
-
Yes, adwords CR would give you that answer. The budget required depends on so many factors. But you can reduce the list of KW sampling the complete list.
But at least at macro level if you discuss that with someone from your client who knows his market and his consumers you should start getting an idea.
Logic+common sense is a good start.
I would analyze that before to start changing the website.
But if you do the opposite is not that you are going to break any porcelain. Duplicate content is not like a manual penalization, as far as I know, once you fix it and google crawl the new version the ranking is updated.
-
Thanks Max, your feedback makes complete sense.
KW volume analysis is a big job but managable, though I'm not even sure where I'd start with analysing whether people buy or not based on certain organic KWs. I'd probably have to set up Adwords campaigns and test conversion rates? Across a long tail of keywords that's going to be expensive to get statistically significant results.
Assuming that I don't have the resources to do that immediately, but that I do have a duplicate content issue (at least Moz seems to think so) am I better off "fixing" it with my proposed solution, or would you hold off until the KW analysis was done. This section of the site gets very little organic traffic at the moment as it's also a very competitive space and it doesn't have many inbound links so the risk of causing damage is low. I'm reluctant to start promoting this section and linking to it if I know there's a significant underlying duplicate content problem.
You're right about the URL too - it actually starts /Candy-Dispenser-Candies-Refills/*, I didn't think I'd get picked up on that!
Thanks,
George
-
As a rule of thumb I would put the category before the brand in the url structure. But...
In my opinion there's much more you should research before to take a decision.
Did you analyze your consumer behavior? What keywords are they going to type in google search box?
Are they really looking for your candy dispenser brands? Or by dispenser model names? Brand+model? Or they don't know much about candy dispensers manufacturer and models and just searching by some characteristics?
Don't be tricked by keywords volume, maybe there are a lot of searches for a brand or model, but what is their intention when searching by those terms? To buy? To find information planning to buy? To find information about a product they bought and learnt the name after making the purchase?
You should find out before to design the url structure.
And before to take a decision about how to mitigate the duplicate content risk.
What I mean is... There are characteristics of those dispensers you want to use to differentiate pages to target different keywords, and characteristics you can just put all in one page with “dispenser configurator”.
-
Same scenario on our site, we have a Product Finder search that returns x results based on user criteria. My solution canonical tag the search result pages to the root page.. in my case advanced_search.php.
My thought process is this, if somebody is searching for a very specific product, I absolutely don't want them hitting a random search page, rather I want them to see my product page. This means that the search page is likely crap in the rankings and that is by design.
There is nothing wrong with trying to capitalize on the search results, but isn't that what your categories and actual product pages are for?
Hope this helps,
Don
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can anyone help me diagnose an indexing/sitemap issue on a large e-commerce site?
Hey guys. Wondering if someone can help diagnose a problem for me. Here's our site: https://www.flagandbanner.com/ We have a fairly large e-commerce site--roughly 23,000 urls according to crawls using both Moz and Screaming Frog. I have created an XML sitemap (using SF) and uploading to Webmaster Tools. WMT is only showing about 2,500 urls indexed. Further, WMT is showing that Google is indexing only about 1/2 (approx. 11,000) of the urls. Finally (to add even more confusion), when doing a site search on Google (site:) it's only showing about 5,400 urls found. The numbers are all over the place! Here's the robots.txt file: User-agent: *
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | webrocket
Allow: /
Disallow: /aspnet_client/
Disallow: /httperrors/
Disallow: /HTTPErrors/
Disallow: /temp/
Disallow: /test/ Disallow: /i_i_email_friend_request
Disallow: /i_i_narrow_your_search
Disallow: /shopping_cart
Disallow: /add_product_to_favorites
Disallow: /email_friend_request
Disallow: /searchformaction
Disallow: /search_keyword
Disallow: /page=
Disallow: /hid=
Disallow: /fab/* Sitemap: https://www.flagandbanner.com/images/sitemap.xml Anyone have any thoughts as to what our problems are?? Mike0 -
Duplicate content. Competing for rank.
Scenario: An automotive dealer lists cars for sale on their website. The descriptions are very good and in depth at 1,200 words per car. However chunks of the copy are copied from car review websites and weaved into their original copy. Q1: This is flagged in copyscape - how much of an issue is this for Google? Q2: The same stock with the same copy is fed into a popular car listing website - the dealer's website and the classifieds website often rank in the top two positions (sometimes the dealer on top other times the classifieds site). Is this a good or a bad thing? Are you risking being seen as duplicating/scraping content? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bee1590 -
Questions about Event Calendar Format and Duplicate Content
Hi there: We maintain a calendar of digital events and conferences on our website here: https://splatworld.tv/events/ . We're trying to add as many events as we can and I'm wondering about the descriptions of each. We're pulling them from the conference websites, mostly, but I'm worried about the scraped content creating duplicate content issues. I've also noticed that most calendars of this type which rank well are not including actual event descriptions, but rather just names, locations and a link out to the conference website. See https://www.semrush.com/blog/the-ultimate-calendar-of-digital-marketing-events-2017/ and http://www.marketingterms.com/conferences/ . Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks, in ..advance..
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daaveey0 -
Duplicate content on URL trailing slash
Hello, Some time ago, we accidentally made changes to our site which modified the way urls in links are generated. At once, trailing slashes were added to many urls (only in links). Links that used to send to
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yacpro13
example.com/webpage.html Were now linking to
example.com/webpage.html/ Urls in the xml sitemap remained unchanged (no trailing slash). We started noticing duplicate content (because our site renders the same page with or without the trailing shash). We corrected the problematic php url function so that now, all links on the site link to a url without trailing slash. However, Google had time to index these pages. Is implementing 301 redirects required in this case?1 -
Does Google see this as duplicate content?
I'm working on a site that has too many pages in Google's index as shown in a simple count via a site search (example): site:http://www.mozquestionexample.com I ended up getting a full list of these pages and it shows pages that have been supposedly excluded from the index via GWT url parameters and/or canonicalization For instance, the list of indexed pages shows: 1. http://www.mozquestionexample.com/cool-stuff 2. http://www.mozquestionexample.com/cool-stuff?page=2 3. http://www.mozquestionexample.com?page=3 4. http://www.mozquestionexample.com?mq_source=q-and-a 5. http://www.mozquestionexample.com?type=productss&sort=1date Example #1 above is the one true page for search and the one that all the canonicals reference. Examples #2 and #3 shouldn't be in the index because the canonical points to url #1. Example #4 shouldn't be in the index, because it's just a source code that, again doesn't change the page and the canonical points to #1. Example #5 shouldn't be in the index because it's excluded in parameters as not affecting page content and the canonical is in place. Should I worry about these multiple urls for the same page and if so, what should I do about it? Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Moving some content to a new domain - best practices to avoid duplicate content?
Hi We are setting up a new domain to focus on a specific product and want to use some of the content from the original domain on the new site and remove it from the original. The content is appropriate for the new domain and will be irrelevant for the original domain and we want to avoid creating completely new content. There will be a link between the two domains. What is the best practice for this to avoid duplicate content and a potential Panda penalty?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Citybase0 -
How canonical url harm our website???
Even though my website has no similar/copied content, i used rel=canonical for all my website pages. Is Google or yahoo make any harm to my SERP's?? EX: http://www.seomoz.org is my site, in that i used canonical as rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="http://www.seomoz.org" to my home page like that similar to all pages, i created rel=canonical. Is search engine harm my website???
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MadhukarSV0 -
Multi-language, multi-country localized website with duplicate content penalty
My company website is multi-language and multi-country. Content created for the Global (English-language only, root directory) site is automatically used when no localization exists for the language and country choice (i.e. Brazil). I'm concerned this may be harming our SEO through dupe content penalties. Can anyone confirm this is possible? Any recommendations on how to solve the issue? Maybe the canonical tag? Thanks very much!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | IanTreviranus0