What am i not spotting?
-
A client i'm working with is desperate to rank top for the term 'wholesale jewellery' (it's a UK company and that's the UK spelling). He previously held the top spot but got hit with a penalty and is now bottom of page 1.
So far nothing I have done has had much of an impact despite this being a relatively low competition term. We've fluctuated around the first page for the last few months but the highest we got was 4th before dropping again. The site's domain authority is on par with the site ranking top (who have no content to speak of) and is superior to most other sites on the first page. The site also has similar social metrics to the top ranking site and superior to most others on the first page.
I've focused on building fewer good quality links and some of them have been excellent - DA 80+ and yet, still no movement. On-page optimisation is spot on as well.
A couple of things I have spotted that might be having an impact:
-my client's site has a .com domain where most others have .co.uk
-most sites on the first page have either jewellery, wholesale or both in their domain names
-relevance of linking istes could be playing a part here. My client has links from wholesale sites but few from jewellery-related sites
-within my client's link profile there are very few, if any exact anchor text links for the term 'wholesale jewellery'
-legacy of a penalty could be making ranking progress that much more difficult?
I'd appreciate your input because I've hit a brick wall. The site is http://www.parklaneonline.com
-
Hello there,
Answers to your questions below
- My client's site has a .com domain where most others have .co.uk
I suspect this isn't the issue. but provided your client is only targeting the UK you might considering setting up geotargeting in Google Webmaster Tools - see: http://moz.com/community/q/geographic-target-set-up-in-google-webmaster-tool
- Most sites on the first page have either jewellery, wholesale or both in their domain names
This is unlikely to be the issue.
- Relevance of linking sites could be playing a part here. My client has links from wholesale sites but few from jewellery-related sites.
Attracting relevant links is never a bad idea, plus even if you don't see ranking improvements you'd hope that relevant links sent good quality traffic. I'd definitely do this if I were you
- Within my client's link profile there are very few, if any exact anchor text links for the term 'wholesale jewellery'
I'd suggest it's unlikely that this is the issue - anchor text is not the ranking signal it once was.
- Legacy of a penalty could be making ranking progress that much more difficult?
I think this is the most likely answer, but I don't quite agree with your phrasing. You mentioned a past penalty - given that you're ranking on the first page I suspect you're not suffering from said penalty any more. However, if you do still have a lot of 'low quality' links, then further clean up might be the way forward.
However, you'll also need to continue to build the sorts of links that Google want to reward (i.e. links which are editorially given from quality sites) in order to improve your rankings.
Incidentally, you mentioned you've disavowed a bunch of links. 3rd party tools (ahrefs, majestic, moz) aren't able to filter these out because they've no access to your disavow files
I hope this helps,
Hannah
-
Thanks for your response Matt.
A lot of the bad links have been disavowed. Does Ahrefs filter these out?
Perhaps a second round of link cleanup is in order?
-
It's backlinks holding the site back.
Tons of link spam - check out Majestic historic info. 1926 referring domains, 12,000+ backlinks. Of the 1926 domains, only 800 different subnets. That's a pretty high spam ratio.
If Ahrefs is your tool of choice, check out the referring IPs. Link networks aplenty.
- 36 domains on one IP
- 34 domains on another IP
- 30 domains on another IP
- 29 domains on another IP
- Blogspot spam
As far as onsite, remove the meta keywords, ensure you've geo-targeted in WMT and the onsite should be ok. This is very, very likely backlink network related.
-
My Take on this:
-my client's site has a .com domain where most others have .co.uk
Google does rank regionally, .com is great, .co.uk would probably be better for UK specific listings. (301 from .com .co.uk would be your best bet)
-most sites on the first page have either jewellery, wholesale or both in their domain names
This is less of a thing than it used to be. Google seems to be starting to favour brand identity over direct keyword rich domains (EMD) - http://moz.com/blog/are-exact-match-domains-in-decline
-relevance of linking istes could be playing a part here. My client has links from wholesale sites but few from jewellery-related sites
Probably not going to be a penalty from this, but relevance might make a difference to just how much extra juice those links provide.
-within my client's link profile there are very few, if any exact anchor text links for the term 'wholesale jewellery'
Probably some effect from this, how much though im not sure (Exact anchor text isnt something i've had to look into before)
-legacy of a penalty could be making ranking progress that much more difficult?
Depends how long ago this was. So long as whatever caused the penalty is fixed, this is probably not an issue now.
-
I can confirm in Incognito mode you are ranked at the bottom of page 1, but only us SEOs use Incognito mode - not your average Google user.
We had a similar problem and no matter what I did I couldn't get the ranking to change constantly.
The strategy I took, was to look at keywords people we're searching for before the 'money' term and get content to meet the searches needs. Less competition usually so rank higher.
Google will rank sites higher where users have visited before and had a good experience, so if you can get people to your site before they know they are looking for wholesale jewellery, when they come to search the terms as well as you ranking higher, you will also have some brand loyalty so more likely to get clicked.
If we still had keyword data in GA we could prove this theory but I get more organic traffic to the page I was trying to improve.
Hope this helps. While you might not improve in Incognito mode - you will get more organic traffic and more sales.
Hope this is useful.
Thanks
Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why has my website been removed from Bing?
I have a website that has recently been removed from Bing's index, but can't figure out why. The website isn't new, and it is indexed just fine on Google. These are the steps I've tried: The website is verified in Bing Webmaster Tools and successfully submitted the sitemap. I tested the URL to ensure that Bingbot is allowed to crawl the site I submitted URLs to Bing via the URL Submission tool There isn't a "noindex" on the site preventing it from being indexed When I do a URL Inspection, an error message comes up saying "The inspected URL is known to Bing but has some issues which are preventing us from serving it to our users. We recommend you to follow Bing Webmaster Guidelines." I contacted Bing to ask whether the website was removed in error, but received a reply that the website doesn't comply with Bing's quality guidelines, but they wouldn't go into detail as to which guidelines the website isn't meeting. The website URL is https://www.pardeehospital.org. Can anyone offer any advice or insight as to why Bing won't index our site? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lindsey.steinkamp0 -
Optimization for "Search by Photos" feature
Howdy, fellow mozzers, Does anyone know what affects a given company photos show up in the "Search by Photos" section? I can't find any decent info.. Here is the link to SEL, describing the feature (not even google themselves seem to have an announcement about it). https://searchengineland.com/google-showing-mobile-search-by-photos-option-in-selected-local-verticals-323237 Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DmitriiK0 -
Any Tips for Reviving Old Websites?
Hi, I have a series of websites that have been offline for seven years. Do you guys have any tips that might help restore them to their former SERPs glory? Nothing about the sites themselves has changes since they went offline. Same domains, same content, and only a different server. What has changed is the SERPs landscape. I've noticed competitive terms that these sites used to rank on the first page for with far more results now. I have also noticed some terms result in what seems like a thesaurus similar language results from traditionally more authoritative websites instead of the exact phrase searched for. This concerns me because I could see a less relevant page outranking me just because it is on a .gov domain with similar vocabulary even though the result is not what people searching for the term are most likely searching for. The sites have also lost numerous backlinks but still have some really good ones.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CopBlaster.com1 -
Ogranization Schema/Microformat for a content/brand website | Travel
Hi, One of our clients have a website specific to a place, for eg. California Tourism in which they publish local information related to tourism, blogs & other useful content. I want to understand how useful is to publish Organization Schema on such website mentioning the actual Organization, which in this case is a Travel Agency? Or any other schema would fit in for such websites?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ds9.tech0 -
Showing up in Bing and Yahoo, but not Google? - Spa Spot
Spa Spot Edmonton is a Client of ours and while it seems that they are performing very well in Bing and Yahoo search engines, the same can't be said about Google. 9 or 10 keywords are on the 1st page with another 9 or 10 on the second pages of Bing and Yahoo, whereas Google is only ranking 3 keywords and the rest do not show up even in the Top 50. Any ideas?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Web3Marketing870 -
Can you spot the differences?
Well, I have been scratching my head on this for days, I will try throwing the ball to you with hopes someone more experienced than me can help. The scenario is: e-commerce -> brand page -> SERP -> comparison between how two pages rank; one from my website, one from a competitor website. The brand is Michelin, the keyword is "pneumatici michelin" (equivalent in italian of “michelin tires”). I am not looking at SERP first page, where competition is surely much more fierce. I am looking at position 11: http://www.cambio-gomme.it/marchi/michelin/ And my page (not in the first 50): http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/michelin My page: MOZ Page Grade (for keyword “pneumatici michelin”): A External backlinks to the page: 1 Domain Authority: 29 Page Authority: 24 On-page SEO optimization: keyword density: 0.87% internal links: 145 external links: 3 page size: 108kb html size: 24kb words on page: 2077 link-words: 408 non-linked words: 1669 time to first byte: 0.419s Competitor page: MOZ Page Grade (for keyword “pneumatici michelin”): A External backlinks to the page: 0 Domain Authority: 26 Page Authority: 13 On-page SEO optimization: keyword density: 0.75% internal links: 70 external links: 1 page size: 31kb html size: 9kb words on page: 1521 link-words: 168 non-linked words: 1353 time to first byte: 0.373s Domain age is very similar, both websites launched close to each other in 2012. Ideas? Suggestion on other metrics to compare?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | max.favilli0 -
Okay. So I had the top spot for organic rank ( # 1 position ) above the places section. Now it has been eliminated and I am in the top spot for just the places section. What gives?
So i dont just want to be number in the places section.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NWExterminating0 -
How to beat Wikipedia article from the top spot on SERPS?
Hi Guys, One of our clients has a good web site with lots of content that is ranked already on #2 for the top keyword (singular and plural) on Google UK. The keyword itself is a competitive one. The top spot is occupied by a wikipedia article that doesn't have much content in general. Can anyone come up with an advice what strategy we have to apply to outplace that article? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | myclicks-1636030