Personalization software and SEO
-
Hi guys,
I'm just testing a personalization software in our website, basically changing the "location" text depending on the user's IP.
I can see in my software that when the Google bot comes to our site the personalization software triggers an action changing the location based text to "California". Can this make Google understand that our website targets only users in California and thereof hurt our rankings in other locations nationwide?
I'll appreciate your opinions.
-
So Mr King, would it be reasonable to say that personalizing all locations but California would keep us out of trouble?
Thanks Mike!
-
Thanks for your insights Dirk.
-
Hi Ana,
Just to clarify - if you redirect based on ip to a location based url like /newyork you can still have a link on the page going to the other locations like /sandiego - so Google can access all these pages & index them. This is not possible it the scenario you mentioned.
Not sure how old the article from unbounce is, but Google bot is able to interpret javascript (to a certain extent). Using javascript won't change the problem - as long as you have only one page that adapts automatically to the ip location you will be unable show all versions of the page to Google - it will help your Californian branch, but hurt all the others.
rgds,
Dirk
-
This is great Dirk - thanks so much for your insight as always!
-
Hi Patrick,
If the question would have been about country targeting I guess your answer would have been correct. As mentioned in the article however, the lowest level of geolocation is country. As the question was about locations "nationwide" I would conclude based on this article that at this point of time Google is unable to detect geo-targeted content based on region or city.
Even for countries I think it's a risky business - as the article doesn't indicate if this "local" bots visit the sites with the same frequency & depth as the normal ones, and they don't clearly indicate which country ip's are used.
It's a different story for languages - because you can indicate in the HTTP header that the content is depending on the user's language. A similar case is the dynamic serving for mobile (https://developers.google.com/webmasters/mobile-sites/mobile-seo/configurations/dynamic-serving?hl=en) - here you can indicate that the content is changing based on the user agent.
As far as I know, there is no way to indicate in the HTTP header that the content is varying based on ip address.
rgds,
Dirk
-
Hi both,
Thanks a lot for your ideas and suggestions. No doubt it's a tough subject. I don't really understand Google's position about this, on one hand they want you to provide a better user experience (what can be done through personalization) and on the other hand they don't seem to be providing reasonable solutions to potential SEO drawbacks.
Dirk, referencing this line of yours "What you could do is automatically redirect the user to the appropriate page based on ip - but still have the other pages accessible via normal links", don't you think if the user is directly redirected to the "location based-page" then the Google bot coming from California (as an example) will also be redirected to it and then understand that the website is targeting California?
I read something at Unbounce regarding dynamic text replacement that caught my attention http://documentation.unbounce.com/hc/en-us/articles/203661004-Dynamic-Text-Replacement-pro-
They say “It's always been possible with Unbounce to do text replacement using a little bit of JavaScript, but unfortunately the bots and crawlers that Google (and other ad networks) use to validate your landing page quality don't read Javascript.”
If the fact that the bots cannot read Javascript is true maybe using Javascript for small personalization actions such as changing the location-based text maybe the solution. I wonder if this follows google guidelines or not.
Again I'll appreciate your answers; I'll go through all the links and information and keep investigating. I really need to find some technically supported facts.
Thank again. Ana
-
Hi Dirk
Thanks for the corrections and examples here. I appreciate it and learned something new here myself.
Out of curiosity, what do you make of the following: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6144055?hl=en
After reading your explanation, and Google's suggestion in bold and red here, I understand the importance of your recommendation. I was just wondering your thoughts on this particular article and what you make of it.
Thanks so much again and well done!
-
Hi,
I don't really agree with the answer of Patrick. Depending on the level of personalisation you apply, it can hurt your rankings for locations outside California (our eventual other ip locations for Google bot).
As an example - you manage a chain of Chinese restaurants spread around the country and you have the domain mychineserestaurant.com.
If users accesses the site directly in New York, he will see the address, picture, phone number etc. from the New York restaurant. Googlebot however will never see this content - the bot will only be able to access the content from your branch in Los Angeles. While this is great for the user experience, there is no way to show Google the other locations, as you are obliged to show the bot the same content as normal human users, and hence show the information based on the ip of the bot.
The example of Groupon given by Patrick is not exactly the same - they personalise the homepage based on your ip - but if you search for Groupon New York you go to http://www.groupon.com/local/new-york-city
What you could do is automatically redirect the user to the appropriate page based on ip - but still have the other pages accessible via normal links. In the example above - accessing the site in New York I would go by default to mychineserestaurant.com/newyork but with the option to change the location. This way Google bot would be able to crawl all the locations. It's also the advice coming from Matt Cutts: https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/give-each-store-a-url/
If the personalisation is only minor (example only the local address on the homepage) and if you already have targeted pages for each location it should not really be a problem.
To be honest - it's rather my own opinion than something which is supported by hard facts.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
-
Hi there
Don't worry about this, it shouldn't be an issue. One thing you can do is target your website in Webmaster Tools if you're looking to target specific regions.
Amazon and Groupon have personalization happening on their sites as well - but that doesn't effect their ratings.
I would also take a look at:
SEO in the Personalization AgeLet me know if this helps at all!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What are the things that need update? before Appying SEO
Hello Everyone, I need Start work on for this site www.tajsigma.com, I want to know Did i need Add any things for Good ranking. what are the things that need update in This site For SEO??
Technical SEO | | falguniinnovative
i know Basic Things robots, title, discription , But i want know Any Additional Things that I need to apply?? can anyone help, please Thanx in advance0 -
Geographic location of hosting affect SEO
Can anyone confirm if its the geographic location of the web hosting or the domain hosting that can affect seo ? I have a client who has their domain hosting and Website hosting in Australia however their they have a .co.nz and their target market is in New Zealand. thank you
Technical SEO | | summer3000 -
Using RewriteRule - SEO Implications
Hi There, My client has a website (www.activeadventures.com) which they relaunched in April 2013. The company sells inbound tourism trips to New Zealand, South America and the Himalayas. Previously, the websites for these destinations were on their own domains (activenewzealand.com, activehimalayas.com, activesouthamerica.com). With the launch of the new website those domains were all retired (but had 301 redirects put into place to the new site), and moved into sub directories of the activeadventures.com domain (eg: activeadventures.com/new-zealand). There has been no indication that this strategy has improved organic search results (based on analytics) and in my opinion I believe that having this structure has been detrimental to their results. My opinion is based off the following: Visitors to the websites are coming into the site with a specific destination in mind that they want to travel to. Thus... having the destination in the URL I believe provides more immediate relevancy and should result in a higher CTR. I also feel that having the sites on their own URL's will provide a more concentrated theme for the destination based search phrases. The new site is a custom Joomla build and I want to find the easiest way to keep the current Joomla set up AND move the country specific sections of the site back onto their original URL's. It seems on the face of it that the easiest way to get this done is to use the htaccess file and use "RewriteRule" to push all the relevant pages back onto their original domains. Obviously we will ensure we also cover off pointing the existing 301's from the new site and the old sites to this new structure. My question is, are their any potential negative SEO implications of using the RewriteRule in the htaccess file to achieve this? Many thanks in advance. Kind Regards
Technical SEO | | activenz
Conrad Cranfield0 -
Is it possible to change a sitelink title by off page SEO?
Hi all, I checked a website of my company: sitelinks in SERP are with the correct url, but one of the sitelinks’ title is completely irrelevant. Is it possible that it was changed from "outside"? Or maybe it's a bug? Thank you, Imre
Technical SEO | | DDL0 -
SEO Yoast Help Needed
Anyone familar with SEO Yoast and interested in being hired to check out my settings for SEO. Thinking about 30 minute screen sharing session an helping me figure out what I am am doing wrong? Just cleaned up duplicates because of tags and now I see the images are getting duplicated as well as some of the titles. So new to Wordpress here I shine. Message me if you can help. Much Appreciated!!
Technical SEO | | Force70 -
Importance of SEO Friendly URLs
Hey SEOZ! How important do you all think SEO friendly URLs are to SEO. Here is an example: Non: http://www.domain.com/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=2964 Friendly: http://www.domain.com/product_name_here.html I have always heard mixed reviews but did an experiment comparing results on the same domain and actually noticed quite a difference with the friendly ones. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | 6thirty0 -
Best practise for updating software guide
Heya! I write a guide for a specific piece of Internet-based software which is about to undergo a major patch release. No-one's going to be using the old version, so my old-version articles are essentially going to be useless, as are keywords related to the old version number. Given that, I'm intending to update all my guides to be current with the new version. However, obviously I want to keep the Google juice for the old guides, as they rank pretty well. The three options I'm considering: Simply retitle the old guides to the latest version number - "How to use Blue Widget 2.0" becomes "How to use Blue Widget 3.0". Disadvantage - my URLs still include the old version number, 2.0. Write updated guides as seperate articles and 301 redirect the old articles to them. I've done this before with some success. So, I'd 301 the URL for "How to use Blue Widget 2.0" to the url for "How to use Blue Widget 3.0", my new article. Disadvantages - possible loss of link juice? Also, I believe redirects can be kinda tricksy. Just leave both the old and new versions up there, with a link from the old version saying "outdated, check the new version". My belief is that this would be the worst idea. Should I do one of them, or something else? And why?
Technical SEO | | Cairmen0