Are there any negative side effects of having millions of URLs on your site?
-
After a site upgrade, we found that we have over 3.7 million URLs on our site. Many of these URLs are due to the facet options. Each facet combination yields a different URL. However, we need to do a deeper analysis into these URLs to see if this is the only reason why so many are returning.
Does anyone know if there are any negatives of having so many URLs crawled, other than the fact that Google only spends so much time crawling a site? Is the number of URLs something that should be concerning?
Any insight appreciated!
-
Agree with the points above with one exception. Yes, you have to find a way to deal with duplicate and quality content at scale. Yes, Robots.txt, nofollow links and index sitemaps are your friends. I would not use rel=canonical unless I had to. Better to get those extra pages de-indexed and then not let Google crawl the urls with the extra parameters to start with. Why waste Google's time in crawling pages that are just resorted versions of another? If you use the directives wisely you probably "only" have 200,000 pages worth crawling if you have that many sort parameters.
Good luck!
-
I'll echo Robert's concern about duplicate content. If those facet combinations are creating many pages with very similar content, that could be an issue for you.
If, let's say, there are 100 facet combinations that create essentially the same basic page content, then consider taking facet elements that do NOT substantially change the page content, and use rel=canonical to tell Google that those are all really the same page. For instance, let's say one of the facets is packaging size, and product X comes in boxes of 1, 10, 100, or 500 units. Let's say another facet is color, and it comes in blue, green, or red. Let's say the URLs for these look like this:
www.mysite.com/product.php?pid=12345&color=blue&pkgsize=1
www.mysite.com/product.php?pid=12345&color=green&pkgsize=10
www.mysite.com/product.php?pid=12345&color=red&pkgsize=100
You would want to set the rel=canonical on all of these to:
www.mysite.com/product.php?pid=12345
Be sure that your XML sitemap, your on-page meta robots, and your rel=canonicals are all in agreement. In other words, if a page has meta robots "noindex,follow", it should NOT show up in your XML sitemap. If the pages above have their rel=canonicals set as described, then your sitemap should contain www.mysite.com/product.php?pid=12345 and NONE of the three example URLs with the color and pkgsize parameters above.
-
There are several concerns to be addressed with this scenario:
- Organization
This is going to be very difficult to keep track of. If you are well-organized or the pages will not need much adjusting, this is probably okay.
- Duplicate Content
This is going to be a pain the behind. That being said, most site auditing tools will allow you to make adjustments as necessary.
- Broken Links
With a site of this size, broken links and 404's are going to be inevitable. This could lead to some negative SEO impacts and will have to be kept on top of.
- Hacking
This is a big reason why some sites have enormous numbers of URLs. This would likely be the biggest concern on my mind and worth looking in to. Going through that many pages will be impossible, so it might be worth taking a look at the link profile and determining where most of your links are coming from. If these are coming from spammy sites, you may have a problem there.
All this being said, the size of a website is normally not a cause for concern. Just make sure that your main pages (Home, Landing Pages) are properly handled and optimized and you shouldn't have too much trouble. I would add that unwieldy htaccess files (large ones) can result in slower loading times, which can impact your rankings with Google.
Let me know if there is anything specific concerning you and I will be happy to help. Congrats on the upgrade and hope it works out!
Rob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How are Server side redirects perceived compared to direct links (on a Directory site)
Hi, Im creating some listings for a client on a relevant b2b directory (a good quality directory) I asked if the links are 'followed' or no 'followed' and they said they are 'server side redirects' so no direct links. Does anyone know how these are likely to be perceived by Google ? All BEst Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence1 -
Unused url 'A' contains frameset - can it damage the other site B?
Client has an old unused site 'A' which I've discovered during my backlink research. It contains this source code below which frames the client's 'proper' site B inside the old unused url A in the browser address. Quick question - will google penalise the website B which is the one I'm optimising? Should the client be using a redirect instead? <frameset <span class="webkit-html-attribute-name">border='0' frameborder='0' framespacing='0'></frameset <span> <frame src="http: www.clientwebsite.co.ukb" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize" scrolling="yes"></frame src="http:> Please go to http://www.clientwebsite.co.ukB <noframes></noframes> Thanks, Lu.
Technical SEO | | Webrevolve0 -
Two sites
Hi there just joined had nightmere of a time trying to get a website up and running..... now i have 2 .... one marketing person did and one i did the one i did performing better on google but other onre looks more profetional is there a way i can conbine the 2 under one site..... the one that looks better and getting the benifit of the one thats performing better...... Thanks steve......
Technical SEO | | stevetemple0 -
Trying to get google to know my site is a magazine site is this wrong
Hi, i have put a line to describe what my site is at the top of my site and i want to know if this is wrong or not. We have dropped frok being number one in google for lifestyle magazine to now number seven. Before we had to redo our site we were number one and then we dropepd to around number four when we finished the site and now we are number seven and i need to try and get back up there. To help google know we are a lifestyle magazine i have put a line at the top of the site and i want to know if this looks out of place and if i should take it down. i need advice on how to get google to know we are a lifestyle magazine and get back in the top five of google my site is www.in2town.co.uk any help would be great
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Ignore Urls with pattern.
I have 7000 warnings of urls because of a 302 redirect. http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/215/44060409.png/ I want to get rid of those, is it possible to get rid of the Urls with robots.txt. For example that it does not crawl anything that has /product_compare/ in its url? Thank you
Technical SEO | | levalencia10 -
Can I redirect a URL that has a # in it? How?
Hi there - My web developer is saying that I can't do a URL redirect with a "#" in it. Currently, the URL is actually an anchored link within a page (which the URL indicates with a #). I want to change the content to a new URL, but our website links internally to the old URL, so we would need to do a URL redirect (assume 301). Can you tell me if this is possible and how? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | sfecommerce0 -
Partial Site Move -- Tell Google Entire Site Moved?
OK this one's a little confusing, please try to follow along. We recently went through a rebranding where we brought a new domain online for one of our brands (we'll call this domain 'B' -- it's also not the site linked to in my profile, not to confuse things). This brand accounted for 90% of the pages and 90% of the e-comm on the existing domain (we'll call the existing domain 'A') . 'A' was also redesigned and it's URL structure has changed. We have 301s in place on A that redirect to B for those 90% of pages and we also have internal 301s on A for the remaining 10% of pages whose URL has changed as a result of the A redesign What I'm wondering is if I should tell Google through webmaster tools that 'A' is now 'B' through the 'Change of Address' form. If I do this, will the existing products that remain on A suffer? I suppose I could just 301 the 10% of URLs on B back to A but I'm wondering if Google would see that as a loop since I just got done telling it that A is now B. I realize there probably isn't a perfect answer here but I'm looking for the "least worst" solution. I also realize that it's not optimal that we moved 90% of the pages from A to B, but it's the situation we're in.
Technical SEO | | badgerdigital0 -
Keywords in Vanity URL
If I set up a vanity URL that just 301's to the main site, do the search engines look at the keywords in the vanity URL when determing how to rank the site. For example, if I set up a vanity URL of www.coolnewtechgear.com, and redirect it to www.company.com/products/, would the search engines view the keywords of cool, new, tech, and gear and associate that with the page it's getting redirected to? Or does it ignore the vanity URL and only look at the content of the page itself?
Technical SEO | | ryanwats0