How to sift "site search" data from Google Analytics for trends
-
I apologize in advance if this has been asked a million times but I'm just not able to find anything on it for some reason. Probably the words "site" and "search" come up a lot in this area... Anyhow, my question:
How do I find trends in "site search" data from Google Analytics?
I set up "site search" a long time ago. I have thousands and thousands of searches people have made on my site logged and squirreled away. The plan was to review them on a weekly basis, find the trends and start writing content to address interests people seem to be having but not finding on our site. Sounded great at the time.
The problem I have, of course, is that among my 10,000 searches (many shown in Google Analytics as "no-results:cats and dogs", etc), there are slight differences that make it difficult to total up search trends. Let's say the list is like this:
Term | Search Count
Cats | 500
Dogs | 500
Cat | 250
Dog | 250
Cat food | 5
Dog food | 5
Birds | 1
Bird | 1
Cats are great | 1
Cats are really great | 1
Dogs are great | 1
I like birds | 1
Seriously, I like Cats | 1
Turtles | 1... 10,000 more entries, every single one only 1 search per term.
OK, so it looks like people like Cats and Dogs a lot, but also Birds and Turtles. But maybe there are snake searches. Maybe there are "cat pajamas" searches and variations on all of the above. Who knows what else is really trending in there??? The review of this data is MIND-NUMBING. Especially when you get into plurality and misspellings, this rabbit hole has no bottom.
Is there a tool people in the SEO jam use to take a big ole CSV dump and have it magically sorted by at least potential trends?
I mean, there's gotta be, right? And I'm silly for not already knowing what it is.
-
Hi Thom,
Like Mike mentioned, I think that culling through this information yourself with Excel will probably be your best bet for analyzing the data you mentioned.
I'll give you a few ideas on how I would start if I was you:
You mentioned that many of the queries were only searched once. I would start by organizing your information into two columns: one with the query, and one with the search volume. Then, I would filter those down to only queries that have been searched more than [a certain threshold]. I think that while queries that have only been searched once can give you valuable information, especially compared to others and analyzed in aggregate, you will be less overwhelmed if you start with the most important (and a smaller set of) queries first.
After you've done that, I would start to filter your data by query. You can sort by queries that contain, begin with, end with, or do not contain a term, or any sort of custom filter. Given your example, I would probably start with filtering by queries that contain the word "cat" or "dog" or "turtle," and then try to find trends within that smaller set of data. They will be much easier and less overwhelming to find when you are not dealing with so much data.
This next step is a little more tedious, but I would also recommend adding another column that you manually populate. You mentioned that there are misspellings; you could account for those by creating another column in which you populate the word "cat" for all queries that contain "cat" and also all queries that contain "cta" or any other misspelling. That way, later, you can easily sort by keywords that were about cats, but didn't necessarily contain the exact word "cat." Or, you could populate the column by grouping all queries that were about one animal, two animals, three animals, etc.
Once you have a ton of information, I would recommend creating pivot tables and charts that help you compare the data.
Ultimately, what I'm recommending is probably very time intensive and tedious, but I really think it will be rewarding once it's completed, because you will very thoroughly understand the trends going on in the data. One of the benefits of doing it yourself, rather than using a tool, is that you will understand the context around these words; you will be able to better interpret trends or make connections than an automated tool would be.
Here is a great article that walks you step by step through some of the steps I mentioned, and it also goes into depth about other ways you can use Excel to analyze this kind of data: http://www.sitevisibility.co.uk/blog/2015/09/11/4-excel-tips-applied-to-keyword-research/
Hope this helped!
-
Honestly I do it all by hand in excel using conditional formatting to highlight various core terms and change text color/bold/italicize for certain common combinations that accompany core terms. Then I sort by those variations, copy/paste them into new tabs, and break them down further as needed from there.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site explorer Issue
Hello, I'm looking to see in the Site Explorer the links coming from directories such as BOW, yahoo etc. I'm listed there from almost 1 year and these links are not listed, the same with my competitors. I'm missing something? Thank you Claudio
Moz Pro | | SharewarePros0 -
Site Not On Google, SEOmoz shows as 43
The site I'm helping with was at one time a page 1, even #1 on page 1. Lots of changes, problems when someone else did something and dropped to page 4 for keyword. After some recent tweaking I did, it no longer shows on rankings. No penalty on Google Webmaster, in Webmaster tools it shows the sitemap processed with no errors. SEOmoz still shows it at #43 in Rankings. Why does SEOmoz see it, but I don't? Site is www.plussizeplum.com (sorry, plus size women's lingerie) and keywords are "plus size lingerie".
Moz Pro | | dlcohen0 -
Big changes in site titles
So as I pour though some of the diagnostics data for over 100,000 pages of my site I see thousands of page title that "could" be changed. Could this cause some lost traffic for a while due to the big changes?
Moz Pro | | dvduval0 -
I've got quite a few "Duplicate Page Title" Errors in my Crawl Diagnostics for my Wordpress Blog
Title says it all, is this an issue? The pages seem to be set up properly with Rel=Canonical so should i just ignore the duplicate page title erros in my Crawl Diagnostics dashboard? Thanks
Moz Pro | | SheffieldMarketing0 -
Google Analytic Caching Issue?
Two weeks ago, I started testing a campaign and linked it to my Google analytics account. At the time there were 4 domains linked to the GA account. And I could see all 4 domains at the drop down menu that asked me to choose one to connect to. One week ago, I added a 5 more domains to GA. When I log directly into GA, I see the total of all 9 domains, and all are verified and collecting data. Today at pro seomoz I started a new campaign, for one of the new domains recently added to GA. When I try to connect the campaign to GA, only the ORIGINAL 4 domains are visible on the drop down menu. None of the 5 new domains are visible. So I am unable to connect to the new domain. At campaign settings, I disconnected from GA, and connected again, but could not see the new domains on the drop down menu. I tried to use both FF and IE. I can only assume that this is a caching issue at pro.seomoz. If so, how to flush cache and get current again. Please advise
Moz Pro | | microonae0 -
Google analytics account not shown
At the point where I'm asked to connect my Google Analytics account, it only shows three of my accounts, and not the one I'm trying to connect.
Moz Pro | | skittish430 -
What does the "Internal Links" data in the Keyword Difficulty SERP report represent?
What does the "Internal Links" data in the Keyword Difficulty SERP report represent? Thank you! QocBS
Moz Pro | | richpalpine0 -
Open site Explorer Findings??
On OSE, I am comparing two websites(A and B) and one has a page authority higher than the other (35(A) vs 36 (B)), but all the linking metrics are in favor for website A except for the linking C block (A has 11 and B has 12). The website B is ranked in page 1 for couple competitive keywords whereas the website A don't show up in the search at all. Why is that? Does B have better content and is more kw focused?
Moz Pro | | Ideas-Money-Art0