Ridding of taxonomies, so that articles enhance related page's value
-
Hello,
I'm developing a website for a law firm, which offers a variety of services.
The site will also feature a blog, which would have similarly-named topics. As is customary, these topics were taxonomies.
But I want the articles to enhance the value of the service pages themselves and because the taxonomy url /category/divorce has no relationship to the actual service page url /practice-areas/divorce, I'm worried that if anything, a redundantly-titled taxonomy url would dilute the value of the service page it's related to.
Sure, I could show some of the related posts on the service page but if I wanted to view more, I'm suddenly bounced over to a taxonomy page which is stealing thunder away from the more important service page.
So I did away with these taxonomies all together, and posts are associatable with pages directly with a custom db table.
And now if I visit the blog page, instead of a list of category terms, it would technically be a list of the service pages and so if a visitor clicks on a topic they are directed to /practice-areas/divorce/resources (the subpages are created dynamically) and the posts are shown there.
I'll have to use custom breadcrumbs to make it all work. Just wondering if you guys had any thoughts on this. Really appreciate any you might have and thanks for reading
-
Thank you for taking the time to respond. Makes a lot of sense, I appreciate it.
-
It is true that having pages with the same "page-name" (the last part following the final slash of a URL, e.g the page-name of this question is "ridding-of-taxonomies-so-that-articles-enhance-related-page-s-value"), which are also topically very similar - can cause 'jumpy' SERPs.
Many feel that the dangers of what is termed 'keyword cannibalisation' are over-egged. This may be true, but I have (myself) assuredly seen examples of it in action. Usually it occurs with most prominence when neither page strongly eclipses the other in terms of SEO authority (e.g: inbound signals like referring domains, citations across the web and general 'buzz' associated with a given URL).
If both pages are new with little authority (or 'popularity') bound to their unique addresses, then certainly Google can get confused. You can end up with problems like, earning a decent ranking for a related keyword - but it hops from page to page every day / week and Google's algorithm bubbles away in the background. This can make it hard to drive traffic to the correct destination.
If both pages are very specific about the keywords which they are targeting, you could turn references of those keywords on the page you don't want to rank - into hyperlinks pointing to the URL which you do want to rank! (sorry that was a bit of a mouthful)
Although TBPR (Tool Bar PageRank) was done away with aeons ago, 'actual' PageRank is still at large within Google's ranking algorithm(s). When one page links to another page with anchor text that matches a keyword, it 'gives away' some of its (ranking) value to the page receiving the link (for the specific keyword or collection of keywords / search entity in question). Think of links as 'votes' from one page to another. The difference between this and real voting is that, for Google not all votes are equal (links from more authoritative pages boost the receiving pages more than links from pages that nobody cares about). Not very progressive but still...
In general we in SEO abused this mechanic between different domains resulting in Google's current clamp-down on EMA (Exact-Match Anchor, in regard to keyword anchor text) linking. That being said: the risk from doing the same thing internally within your own website is extremely minimal, as you are just redistributing SEO authority from one page to another along a specific axiom of relevance.
That's not like when you do it from one domain to another, obviously to leech authority from an external site to your own - which in most occurrences is a violation of Google's Web-Master guidelines.
Do be careful though, don't overdo this. If the content of the page which you don't want to rank ends up stuffed full of hyperlinks, that could make the page look spammy and hurt your CRO (or earn Panda-related algorithmic devaluation).
Just don't go mental, everything should be fine.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How long will old pages stay in Google's cache index. We have a new site that is two months old but we are seeing old pages even though we used 301 redirects.
Two months ago we launched a new website (same domain) and implemented 301 re-directs for all of the pages. Two months later we are still seeing old pages in Google's cache index. So how long should I tell the client this should take for them all to be removed in search?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Liamis0 -
What's the best way to noindex pages but still keep backlinks equity?
Hello everyone, Maybe it is a stupid question, but I ask to the experts... What's the best way to noindex pages but still keep backlinks equity from those noindexed pages? For example, let's say I have many pages that look similar to a "main" page which I solely want to appear on Google, so I want to noindex all pages with the exception of that "main" page... but, what if I also want to transfer any possible link equity present on the noindexed pages to the main page? The only solution I have thought is to add a canonical tag pointing to the main page on those noindexed pages... but will that work or cause wreak havoc in some way?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau3 -
Print pages returning 404's
Print pages on one of our sister sites are returning 404's in our crawl but are visible when clicked on. Here is one example: https://www.theelementsofliving.com/recipe/citrus-energy-boosting-smoothie/print Any ideas as to why these are returning errors? Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FirstService0 -
Magento: Should we disable old URL's or delete the page altogether
Our developer tells us that we have a lot of 404 pages that are being included in our sitemap and the reason for this is because we have put 301 redirects on the old pages to new pages. We're using Magento and our current process is to simply disable, which then makes it a a 404. We then redirect this page using a 301 redirect to a new relevant page. The reason for redirecting these pages is because the old pages are still being indexed in Google. I understand 404 pages will eventually drop out of Google's index, but was wondering if we were somehow preventing them dropping out of the index by redirecting the URL's, causing the 404 pages to be added to the sitemap. My questions are: 1. Could we simply delete the entire unwanted page, so that it returns a 404 and drops out of Google's index altogether? 2. Because the 404 pages are in the sitemap, does this mean they will continue to be indexed by Google?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | andyheath0 -
Can a move to a new domain (with 301's) shake off a google algorithm penalty
we have done everything under the sun using the holy grail of google guidelines to get our site back onto page 1 for our domain. we have recovered (penguin and panda) algorithm filters for keywords that were page 1 going to page 7 and now page 2. its been 2 years and we cant hit page 1 again. this is our final phase we cna think of.. do you thin kit will work if we move to a new domain. and how much traffic/rankings can we expect to lose in the short-term?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Direct_Ram0 -
My landing pages don't show up in the SERPs, only my frontpage does.
I am having some trouble with getting the landing pages for a clients website to show up in the SERPs.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | InmediaDK
As far as I can see, the pages are optimized well, and they also get indexed by Google. The website is a danish webshop that sells wine, www.vindanmark.com Take for an instance this landing page, http://www.vindanmark.com/vinhandel/
It is optimzied for the keywords "Vinhandel Århus". Vinhandel means "Winestore" and "Århus" is a danish city. As you can see, I manage to get them at page 1 (#10), but it's the frontpage that ranks for the keyword. And this goes for alle the other landing pages as well. But I can't figure out, why the frontpage keep outranking the landingpages on every keyword.
What am I doing wrong here?1 -
Our site has been penalized and it's proving to be very hard to get our rankings back...
So I have a question. We have used nearly every trick in the book to rank our site, including a ton of white hat stuff.... but then also a lot of black hat practices that resulted in us dropping in the rankings by about 30-40 positions. And getting back to where we were (top 10 for most keywords) is proving to be nearly impossible. We have a ton of great content coming off of the site and we actually offer a quality product. We follow most of the guidelines advocated here on SEOmoz. But the black hat stuff we did has really taken a toll. And it's gonna be pretty much impossible to go back in time and erase all of the Black Hat stuff we did. So what should we do? Should we design a completely new website with a new domain? What can be done to help?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LilyRay0 -
How risky is temporarily moving high value SEO pages to a brand new domain?
Hi, I won't bore you with all the details but we may have to temporarily move part of an existing domain onto a separate domain for a couple of months. The content being moved includes most of our key branded and organic SERP pages. We've owned the new domain for years but it's never been live or indexed. After a couple of months, all the content will move back to the original domain but will move to a slightly different structure and different page names. Most of the page content will remain largely the same. I"m concerned, but don't really have any experience with this kind of thing. Can anyone shed some light. Perhaps on a scale of 1 to 5 you could give me your thoughts: 1. Should be fine, as long as you set up all the redirects properly 5. Do everything in your power not to do it! Using the new domain and other factors will be problematic. Thanks for any help you may be able to provide!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rfjc0
