If Fetch As Google can render website, it should be appear on SERP ?
-
Hello everyone and thank you in advance for helping me.
I have a Reactjs application which has been made by Create-React-App that is zero configuration. Also I connect it using Axios to the API using Codeigniter(PHP).
Before using Reactjs, this website was at the top Google's SERPs for specific keywords. After Using Reactjs and some changes in URLs with no redirection in htaccess or something else, I lost my search engine visibility! I guess it should be caused by Google penalties!
I tried using "react-snap", "react-snapshot" and so forth for prerendering but there are so many problem with them. Also I tried using Prerender.io and unfortunately my host provider didn't help me to config the shared host!
Finally I found a great article that my website eventually display in Rendering box of Fetch As Google. But still in Fetching box, the dynamic content didn't display. But I can see my entire website in both "This is how Googlebot saw the page" and "This is how a visitor to your website would have seen the page" for all pages without any problem.
If Fetch As Google can render the entire of the website, is it possible to index my pages after a while and it would be appear on Google's SERP?
-
Absolutely not a problem. I do think that SSR would be a really positive way forwards for your website! Hopefully that will begin to get the trend-line going up again instead of down
-
Thank you Effectdigital for this response and for your spending time to me. I read twice to get understand and it was fully explained all things in details. I'm gonna searching more about some of your keywords that you mentioned above. I have planed to run SSR in a few months later and finished this problem as well.
-
From the sounds of it, it's not a penalty - it's just a botched migration (with no redirects) to a new platform which is less search-accessible than the previous platform.
Fetch and render has many pitfalls. It (WRONGLY) makes webmaster's think that, every crawl Google does - will be to that level of depth. What you get with fetch and render is a best-case scenario, where Google are deploying all their crawling and rendering technologies for you including rendered browsing (to capture generated content)
You have your base (un-modified) source code, and then you have your modified source code. To get at that (which is far richer, especially for sites which are mostly generated) you have to run a crawler which uses a headless browser (something like Selenium or Windmill, through something like Python) in order to fire the scripts and harvest the modified source data. These days that doesn't take extreme amounts of time, but it does take extreme amounts of time when you compare it to base-source scraping (on average 10x longer). It may still seem like seconds to you, but believe me it takes much more time than near-instant source-code scraping
Google's mission is to index the web. Do you really think they're going to take a random 10x efficiency hit because, modern devs have decided that more modified content is faster and better?
Well... they will and they won't. Google have confirmed that they can and do crawl in this way. But results from moves just like yours, are constantly showing us that they don't deploy this tech for everyone - and even when they do, they don't use it all the time for every crawl (scrape)
If you're in control of a huge site that Google can't afford to lose from their index (like compare the market, Barclays, coca-cola etc) then you have a lot more room to play in this area and reap the benefits of a lightning fast CMS (and front-end deployment, obviously better UX)
If you're not in that position, don't be surprised when these things happen. You have to have some perspective on yourself and what your site is worth to the web. To you it's everything, to Google it's one grain of sand on a vast ocean-floor. And it's one grain of sand which is making Google's life harder, by hitting the efficiency of their core MO (mission objective)
There may be some stuff you can do to fix this, or it may be time to swallow a bitter pill and do a roll-back.
Looking at your source code:
^ the above link will only work in Google Chrome!
It is obvious that it's extremely bare
Let's download the 'base' source code to a PHP file:
It's actually just 3 lines of code, but it probably takes up the space of ... well, a lot more than that (hundred lines maybe)
But here's your modified source code:
It's WAY BIGGER, it's 49 lines of code and even then it's highly condensed
My assertion to you, is that not enough of your coding and content resides within the 'base' source code, most of it is in the modified source code
It's a tough lesson to learn. Yeah, Google 'can' do many things. Yeah their analysis tools put their best foot forwards and show you what they 'can' do. But 'can' and 'will'... they're different cookies man
if you have a powerful enough server (even if you don't maybe it's time to get one!) - maybe you could have all the scripts fire server-side and then just fire users (and search engines) the pre-rendered base-source. Or do something clever like that. This is not game-over, but you'll need to get really smart now. I wouldn't recommend bothering to do that without retrospectively going back (FAST) and doing a full, URL-to-URL 301 redirect migration project (using .htaccess or web.config)
The faster you act, the more likely your recover
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Old brand name being suffixed on Google SERP listings
At the end of some of our listings in Google search results pages, our old brand name is being suffixed even though it is not in our title tags. For context, we re-branded several months ago, and at that time also migrated to a new domain name. Our title tags have our current brand name suffixed, like "Shop Example Category | Example©". In the Google search results, but not in Bing nor Yahoo, about half of our pages have titles whcih instead look like this: "Shop Example Category | Example© - oldBrandName". The "dash" and the old brand name are not in our title tags, but they are being appended, even when our title tags are fairly long. For example, even with titles at 54 characters (421 pixels), the suffix is being appended. BUT, not with our longer title tags. We are actually OK with the brand name being appended if our title tags are on the shorter side, but would prefer that our current brand name be appended instead of the older one. I realize we could increase the length of all our title tags, and perhaps we may go that route. But, does anyone know where Google would be getting the old brand name to append onto the URLs? We've checked and it is not in our page source (the old brand name is used in our page source in some areas of text and some url paths, but not in any kind of meta tag). Per Google's guidance (https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-do-not-put-organization-schema-markup-on-every-page/289981/) we only have schema for the "Organization" on our home page, and not on every page. So, assuming this advice is correct to not add schema to every page, how can we inform Google of our current brand name so that it stops appending our old brand name on pages?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoelevated0 -
Would you redirect Website A to Website B, when Website B is in the middle of a HTTP=>HTTPS migration?
Hey guys, I'm curious on your thoughts around this scenario... Website A: 35,000 monthly pageviews 1,000 pages 375 root linking domains currently HTTPS focused on one topic weak rankings for competitive keywords Website B: 3M monthly pageviews 32,500 pages 3,500 root linking domains started HTTP to HTTPS migration 1 week ago. 1/3 of pages indexed as HTTPS. focused on many topics strong rankings for competitive keywords Requirement: I want to have a reliable read on how Website A's keyword rankings change after redirecting it's pages to Website A. This post-migration analysis will be used as a basis to assess the risk of redirecting another website we own that is similar to Website A into Website B. My question: Would you wait until most of the pages on Website B are indexed as HTTPS before doing a 301 of Website A to Website B? Please back up your answer with reasons why or why not 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jeremycabral0 -
Help! The website ranks fine but one of my web pages simply won't rank on Google!!!
One of our web pages will not rank on Google. The website as a whole ranks fine except just one section...We have tested and it looks fine...Google can crawl the page no problem. There are no spurious redirects in place. The content is fine. There is no duplicate page content issue. The page has a dozen product images (photos) but the load time of the page is absolutely fine. We have the submitted the page via webmaster and its fine. It gets listed but then a few hours later disappears!!! The site has not been penalised as we get good rankings with other pages. Can anyone help? Know about this problem?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CayenneRed890 -
Moving half my website to a new website: 301?
Good Morning! We currently have two websites which are driving all of our traffic. Our end goal is to combine the two and fold them into each other. Can I redirect the duplicate content from one domain to our main domain even though the URL's are different. Ill give an example below. (The domains are not the real domains). The CEO does not want to remove the other website entirely yet, but is willing to begin some sort of consolidation process. ABCaddiction.com is the main domain which covers everything from drug addiction to dual diagnosis treatment. ABCdualdiagnosis.com is our secondary website which covers everything as well. Can I redirect the entire drug addiction half of the website to ABCaddiction.com? With the eventual goal of moving everything together.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HashtagHustler0 -
Google snippet chosen why?
We have a page about buying property in the Megeve area of the Alps in France. We are No.2 on Google.co.uk for the term "megeve property for sale" and No.1 for "megeve property". http://www.prestigeproperty.co.uk/MegeveProperty/Properties.asp If you search for "megeve property for sale", Google serves our META description as the snippet: Ski chalets, homes and apartments for sale in this exclusive, prestigious Rhone Alpes village - 520000-16500000 EUR. However, we noticed that searching for just "megeve property" serves up a much better snippet taken from the text on the page: A crucial factor for potential property buyers is that there is a strong rental market in Megève and this remains high all year around with properties close to the ... Does anyone know why Google would serve this particular snippet instead of the META description. Is it the number of strong and descriptive words used, or some other reason?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PPGUKLTD0 -
Web developer won't 301 redirect to my new website....what can I do?
I want to come away from our third party web developer and use a new website with different web developers, however the web developer wont 301 redirect the old url's to the new ones. Is he required to do this by law? Is there away of doing the 301 redirects without him? Any advice would be much appreciated. Many thanks,Tom
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CoGri0 -
Dynamic URLs Appearing on Google Page 1\. Convert to Static URLs or not?
Hi, I have a client who uses dynamic URLs thoughout his site. For SEO purposes, I've advised him to convert dynamic URLs to static URLs whenever possible. However, the client has a few dynamic URLs that are appearing on Google Page 1 for strategically valuable keywords. For these URLs, is it still worth it to 301 them to static URLs? In this case, what are the potential benefits and/or pitfalls?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mindflash0 -
Rel= Author : Google suggests that we include this. Can i link to my FB profile
There have been several reference on how Google is trying to build author profiles so that it can effectively measure the authors authority based on the Rel=Author. I quite liked this idea , but my site is a user generated content website. So how can i leverage this ? . One thing which i was thinking was if its a good idea to link to the customers Facebook profile , plan to collect this during sign up.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ShoutOut0