Is Google having trouble determining between two of my brand sites
-
I have a couple brand sites that our company uses and a couple of weeks ago one started to suddenly show up in the #1 position while searching for the other site via its brand.
If I search for "collegexpress" our other site careersandcolleges.com is in the #1 possition. If I search for "collegexpress.com" it shows carrersandcolleges.com's title and description but links to www.collegexpress.com
Could I have something messed up or is google confused with our two sites? In the past I am told that CollegeXpress referred to the careersandcolleges.com page but that has been there for many many years and this SERP change only started to show the first week in march of this year. I looked and there are a handfull of anchor text links from external sites using some form of the "CollegeXpress" brand linking to www.careersandcolleges.com but not that many, and they are not new.
If I do a search the other way for "careersandcolleges" I see it correctly return is own site #1 but www.collegexpress.com is shown to me as #3.
I checked and we dont have any redirects or mod rewrites between the two sites. They are on two different IPs
Any help that can point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
-
Oh, sorry - didn't realize those two pages were different. Can Google crawl the members page? I'm not completely clear where the ref= version is coming from.
Actually, I missed something. You have both the root ("/") version and the "/home" version being indexed, but the root version is cached as your other site. This could indicate that Google is connecting them. This is the cache of CollegeXpress, and it's the Careers and Colleges page:
I thought I had ruled this issue out, but apparently not. I'm not clear if Google thinks they're duplicated (which I'm not really seeing to be the case) or if there are some weird redirects or cross-linking causing the problem. I've seen this happen once or twice, but usually when sites were heavily duplicated.
-
Do I have to worry about putting a rel canonical between two pages that are not that similar? Our members home page has a lot more links to content and the "Home" page basically has the CTA for registration.
-
I see it now, collegexpress.com is 301ed to http://www.collegexpress.com/?ref=collegexpress.com. I will have to change that to get red of the ?ref=collegexpress.com.
Good call on the brand name as well. Since it is semi unique it shouldnt take much.
-
Can't tell why it's happening, but run CollegeXpress through this header checker:
http://tools.seobook.com/server-header-checker/
You should see a 301-redirect to an odd referrer code. It might be only happening to crawlers or it could be for new visitors (I think I saw it once, but then couldn't replicate it).
If you can update the old links, even though there are only a few of them, that should help. Since it's a unique brand name, even a handful of links with exact anchor text could be boosting the wrong site quite a bit.
-
Thanks for the input Peter, we have some very old links out there that we are in the process of reaching out to. We are trying to get everyone to change the links to point at the correct site.
Can you explain a little more about the 301 to ref=collegexpress.com? I dont see that or think that I have that setup anywhere. I am still pretty new to SEO as this was dumped on me in January.
The weakening of CollegeXpress and the existing strength of careersandcolleges really does look like what is happening here.
All of your answers really make sense and I appreciate the time you took to answer. Thank you very much.
George
-
I agree with Phil that I'd canonical that home-page - I don't think it's the whole problem, but parameter blocking in GWT is inconsistent, in my experience. For something that important, I'd want a stronger signal. I'm also not clear on why your doing a 301-redirect to ref=collegexpress.com when a crawler hits the site - it just seems like an unnecessary step that could weaken your home-page.
Although careersandcolleges.com isn't targeting "collegexpress" on-page, you do seem to be using it in inbound anchor text. For example:
http://home.epix.net/~captclint/schools.html
This sets up conflicting cues for Google, and since the Careers and Colleges domain is a bit stronger, it could be enough to cause you some problems. I'd make sure that brand anchor text is isolated, as much as possible.
In some rare cases we'll see Google canonicalize two domains, if they think the content is too similar. I'm not seeing any evidence of that here, though. Both domains are ranking, so that suggests that either the Collegexpress domain is being weakened somehow or Collegesandcareers is overpowering it.
-
"For #3 we recently added the URL parameter ref in Webmaster Tools to crawl the representative URL and ref= should have no effect."
It's still good practice to use rel canonical in case incoming links from other domains get counted for a single page rather than one for each of the following:
- http://www.example.com
- http://example.com
- http://www.example.com/index.html
- http://example.com/index.html
"For #2 /home is really a Member's landing page. It isnt what we want to display since there arent any CTA for registration."
If you want all search's to go to the true homepage, you could also put a rel canonical tag on the member's landing page telling search engines to send all link juice (PageRank) to the true homepage. The downside is that the member's landing page will not be included in search results.
Other websites just user scripts or redirects that change the when a user is logged in or not. For example, twitter, SEOmoz...
-
Thanks Phillip.
For #3 we recently added the URL parameter ref in Webmaster Tools to crawl the representative URL and ref= should have no effect. I also noticed that we didnt have www.collegexpress.com in our sitemap at the same time. I added it and resubmitted it to be crawled. It has not yet been indexed.
For #2 /home is really a Member's landing page. It isnt what we want to display since there arent any CTA for registration. How else can I tell Google that www.collegexpress.com is the place we want to use as our home page.
-
It looks like the link juice for your collegexpress site is being spread. Here is what i see in the SERP:
#2 - http://www.collegexpress.com/home
#3 - http://<cite>www.collegexpress.com/?ref=logo</cite>
Number 3 can be fixed to a root domain by using rel="canonical" tags
As for number 2, Google thinks that is a more relevant place to send users for "collegexpress", so maybe you should make that the homepage.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best review sites for SaaS vendor
My client is a SaaS developer and I would like to begin some review acquisition activity. Just wondering if there is any knowledge out there with regards to what review sites google scrapes or uses as an indicator for such products (Yelp and Yellow pages not too helpful in this scenario). I have narrowed down Capterra, G2 Crowd and GetApp as having a good following - but any insights would be much appreciated.
Branding | | P.Myers0 -
Official Site label in Bing SERPs
A colleague noticed a few major brands have labels like "official site" in their Bing listings and they also seem to get a "Customer Service phone number" included as their rich snippet under the meta title. My guess was they possibly have schema mark-up on the page, but I was wondering if anyone else knows how else they could have landed this extra snippet? Thanks in advance! mveXoj7
Branding | | ATShock0 -
Is there Schema Markup for "brand name"?
Hi Mozzers, I've been trying desperately for months to get my domain to rank #1 for its brand name in Google. This is made hard by the fact that the brand name is also a combination of two keywords, one of them being "Hire". I've actioned everything I can think of, setting up and maintaining social networks (including g+), adding the site to lots of high quality business directories, internal and external linking. I even asked right here. The site continuously rises in the ranks until it hits top of page 2 and then starts falling again. When searching [Brand name] +[Town of HQ] we get the open graph info displayed, and the g+ pin, but still only rank 3rd! My Question: Is there a schema.org markup for brand names? and would it make any difference adding this? I feel like I'm clutching at straws now... Oh were in the UK if that helps. I'd also be happy to share the domain via PM if anyone is willing to help!
Branding | | Silkstream0 -
Examples of Domain Change for Big Brands
Hi I am trying to put together a case study with big brands that have changed their domain names over the last 2 years. So far I have: t-mobile.co.uk -> ee.co.uk guardian.co.uk -> theguardian.com Are there any others you could think of? It'd be much appreciated! Thanks, C
Branding | | Carlos-R0 -
Spam in search engine results for company brand name
Hi, I'm having a strange problem with a certain comapny. When you Google their brand name the first 8 results or so are related - their site, Google+ page, Twitter etc. The rest of the results are completely unrelated to the site and much of it is in another language and looks really spammy. According to the site owner until recently the first 50-60 results were related - mostly local results, press releases, and franchise companies listing his business. They don't have a great link profile but that shouldn't have them dropping out of the results, especially since they're still ranking in the top 1-8 positions. Here's the strangest part: the company name is Libertana. All the spammy results are not so much spammy, they're related to the syllable "na". Examples: Ivanyukite-Na Mineral Data įt$koka!na's sounds on SoundCloud - Hear the world's sounds Bosiniya na Herizegovina - Wikipedia What on earth is going on? Why would they rank for the last syllable of their name?
Branding | | storemachine0 -
Knowledge Graph for brand term has stopped appearing
Hi everyone Our brand has an active G+ page (updated daily).
Branding | | bfrl
Our G+ is also linked to our site, verified, and we were lucky enough to get a vanity URL of our choice after our Google overlords confirmed it for us. When searching a specific brand term within Google UK, Knowledge Graph appeared with a link to our G+ page, logo and links to our last two G+ posts.
Much like if you search 'seomoz' This has now mysteriously vanished.
It could be a coincidence but it vanished roughly around the same time as we got our vanity G+ URL. I asked about on Google product forums but to no avail. Anyone else experienced this? Or even know how to get Knowledge Graph back to how it was? Thanks!0 -
How does link juice work? My site structure is wrong? [HELP PLEASE]
Hi guys, I sell cartridges for printers and i'm struggerling to rank a lot of printers. I've been told it's all about domain authority and it'll pass down to these pages, however I can't see it happening, nor can I wait for it to happen. Should I rethink my categorys? I've got subcategorys in subcategorys in subcategorys - probably not advised because of link juice right? e.g Epson Stylus SX130 Ink would be located below. Epson > Epson Stylus Series>Epson Stylus SX Series>Epson Stylus SX130 Ink
Branding | | Superinks0 -
Changing a "city" or "town" location in google maps
Hello Mozinators! I have a client I currently work with doing SEO that has a rare problem that I have not come across before nor have I been able to find any information on how to make changes for it. The problem being that the city/township is more of a community that has yet to officially be labeled as a city, yet is still marked as a town on google maps. This is a great step in the right direction however the google maps location is over the wrong place. I have attached screenshots of the google maps for this location. In the top is a place called "Lakewood Ranch" and it is not in the correct spot. Lakewood Ranch should instead be in the bottom corner of the overview screenshot, where the town center is and the medical center off of the "University PKWY" exit. I have absolutely no idea on where to start to get these changes put in place, nor if they can even be put in place. Please let me know! Thank you so much in advance! a86TM.png u1ipV.png
Branding | | jbster130