Rel=author: Which Google+ profile do I use (personal profiles or profiles set up under company email domain)?
-
Since our organization uses Google Business Apps, everyone in our org has a Google account under our company's domain name. When Google+ came out a lot of our employees set up two separate Google+ accounts (one under their work email address and one under their personal email address). Some people use one account more than the other.
I'm about to set up rel=author on our blog, but I'm not sure which profiles to link to: personal account, business account or the account the individual uses the most?
-
I think it's possible that the company would "lose out," but that's not necessarily the case.
If I have successfully convinced the algorithm that I am an expert on widget maintenance, my articles about widget maintenance will get a rankings boost. Then I leave the widget-maintenance industry. The algorithm still believes that I'm an expert in that niche ... for a while, at least. It's quite likely that the algorithm's confidence in my expertise will decay over time if I no longer engage with that niche. My AuthorRank may drop, and the content I authored may no longer get the AR rankings boost. How far the content would fall in the SERPs depends on how much it was relying on that one ranking factor.
-
I don't see why an account tied to a particular e-mail address would have an advantage in establishing AuthorRank. But keep in mind, we're all still guessing here.
G+ does have a one-account-per-person rule. I have no idea how much they enforce it. Considering how aggressively they enforce the no-pseudonym rule, I would guess that they take all of their rules pretty seriously.
-
In the context of this question and conversation, what about using rel=publisher for the brand voice and rel=author for specific individuals?
Katie, what happens if someone who has built up great Author Rank via their personal account leaves the company. It seems the company would lose out in that scenario. Very curious to know everyone's take. From personal experience I can tell you that connecting one's personal Google account to a specific brand can make for a big mess when someone moves to another company.
-
Thanks for the clarification and reply. I've updated my original question, as you were correct, I meant rel=author set up.
From what I understand then is that it's best to link to active Google+ profiles. I guess I was also curious if there were any SEO benefits to linking to a domain-based account, but it sounds like it really is more based on active accounts that speak.
Does anyone know if Google has made any statements on having multiple Plus accounts? My assumption is that they'd rather people have one identity. It has caused great confusion within our organization. No one knows which profiles to really use.
Luckily, not many people have started using the domain-based accounts at our organization, so I think I'll go ahead and encourage our employees to use their personal accounts moving forward.
-
This is all related to another question I had about Authorship / AuthorRank:
Google Webmaster Tools will show you author stats for the sites that you are a verified contributor to. So if you have GWT linked to the same account your Google+ profile is on, you can see your own authorship stats.
But what about a corporate or client's site that you're working on, with multiple contributors? Is there a way of monitoring the impact that all your contributors' AuthorRank is having?
A common scenario will be websites commissioning content from freelancers with high AuthorRank. As the client or the agency, how will we monitor the impact of that AuthorRank without access to each individual's GWT?
This would make a very handy addition to SEMoz's Research Tools...
-
I agree....
Something else to consider....
If you are a great author but your employer has you writing quick and dirty summaries to stay within budget then you don't want to stink up your personal reputation by claiming them.
-
I think the terminology here may be a bit muddled.
AuthorRank is not something you "set up on your blog." It's a ranking factor that Google has patented and may be implementing some time soon. The thing you set up on your blog is the rel=author markup.
I'm not correcting you to be pedantic, but because it's important that you understand what AuthorRank actually is so you can make the best decision. AuthorRank is basically the answer to the question "How much should I trust what this author has to say about this subject?" Google will determine that based on your social profile on Google+. If you want Google to think you're a trustworthy expert on widgets, you need to engage with other widget enthusiasts and widget experts on Google+, and they need to engage with you.
You can use rel=author to connect your content to an inactive Google+ profile, and that will give you a pretty picture on the SERP and maybe help with CTR, but it will not help with AuthorRank. AuthorRank will only come from an active Google+ profile.
I'm not sure if it's a good idea or a bad idea to keep a personal G+ account and a professional G+ account. On the one hand, if all you use your professional G+ account for is engaging in your niche, that could be a strong sign that you're really into that subject. On the other hand, if your professional G+ account never has any off-topic, personal activity, that could ping Google as inauthentic.
-
This is a great question. I just read a blog post by Tom Critchlow about how Distilled uses Google+ for all internal communications and that they had to deal with the same issue. Here's a link to the post http://tomcritchlow.com/private-google-plus-engagement
I would set up AuthorRank on the blog from the business account, have everyone use their personal accounts for internal communications and just make sure that everyone's circles are set up accordingly. In other words, you want blog readers circling the business account circle for the blog, not necessarily individual's circles.
I'd love to hear what other people think because I think there is mass confusion over this specific issue.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Domain vs Sub Domain and Rankings
Hi All Wanting some advice. I have a client which has a number of individual centres that are part of an umbrella organisation. Each individual centre has its own web site and some of these sites have similar (not duplicate content) products and services. Currently the individual centres are sub domains of the umbrella organisation. i.e. Umbrella organisation www.organisation.org.au Individual centres are sub domains i.e. www.centre1.organisation.org.au, www.centre2.organisation.org.au etc. I'm feeling that perhaps this setup might be affecting the rankings of the individual sites because they are sub domains. Would love to hear some thoughts or experience on this and whether its worth going through the process of migrating the individual centre domains. Thanks Ian
Technical SEO | | iragless0 -
How long before I can use a redirected domain without taking back link juice?
We recently moved our website to a new domain that better matched our brand. I want to use the old domain at some point for another aspect of our business. How long after we do the domain redirect will it be safe to use the old domain again--without affecting the seo of the new domain? Thanks! Harriet
Technical SEO | | zharriet0 -
Is rel=canonical needed for URLs with Google Analytics query strings?
If a page URL has Google Analytics query strings, does the page need a canonical tag? e.g., something.com/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=mar-2013-nsl I have rel=canonical on all our pages because some of them will be accessed via URLs that have non-Google strings. The strings are only for marketing purposes, not for identifying a specific page to display. e.g., something.com/?source=acme Should I only implement the canonical tag on the pages that might have non-Google marketing strings in the URL?
Technical SEO | | WayneBlankenbeckler0 -
Google not showing profile photo in search
I seen on google snippet review and it was showing profile photo in search but when i see directly on google.com it is not showing there.. what's the problem ?
Technical SEO | | xplodeguru0 -
Setting preferred domain as www or none www
Way back before panda I used to rank for certain keywords pretty well. Of course like many others after panda I lost some of those rankings. I have been getting better since then so its not that bad. I was poking around in Google Webmaster Tools and I noticed something which I need some clarification in. History my site freescrabbledictionary.com used to be indexed as a none www. Then some time ago I can't remember when I set it to www. Tonight I was looking through my webmaster tools and I noticed something that did not make sense to me. In my content keywords section for the none www my list is as follows Content Keywords <form action="https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/keywords-list?hl=en&siteUrl=http://freescrabbledictionary.com/" method="GET"> Keyword Significance 1. scrabble 2. words (2 variants) 3. dictionary 4. cheat 5. finder 6. friends 7. maker (2 variants) 8. noun 9. letter (2 variants) 10. hasbro 11. mattel 12. spear 13. found (2 variants) 14. sowpods 15. freescrabbledictionary 16. builder 17. affiliated 18. search 19. solver 20. lists </form> Then I looked at my www lists and its Content Keywords <form action="https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/keywords-list?hl=en&siteUrl=http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/" method="GET"> Keyword Significance 1. words (3 variants) 2. scrabble (2 variants) 3. letter (4 variants) 4. points 5. cheat (3 variants) 6. friends (2 variants) 7. finder (2 variants) 8. anagram (2 variants) 9. dictionary 10. tool (2 variants) 11. hasbro 12. mattel 13. spear 14. game (4 variants) 15. mobile 16. affiliated (3 variants) 17. berkshire 18. canada 19. calculations (5 variants) 20. coming (4 variants) </form> My none www version has the order (especially the first 5 keywords) that I want, my www version is no were near it. If I change back to the none www version could I possible see an change in rank? or can it effect it if I change it? I am starting to think I shot myself in the foot when I switched...
Technical SEO | | cbielich0 -
Is there any evidence that using Google Site Search will help your ranking, speed of indexing, or traffic?
I am considering using Google Site Search on our new site. I was told... "We have also seen a bump in traffic for sites when using Google Site Search because Google indexes the site more often (they claim using the paid Google Site Search has no effect on search rankings but we have also seen bumps in rankings after using it so that may just be what they have to say legally)." Is there any evidence of this? Would you recommend using Google Site Search? Thanks David
Technical SEO | | DavidButler710 -
Does google recognize original content when affiliates use xml-feeds of this content
Hi, Concerning the upcoming (We're from the Netherlands) Panda release: -Could the fact that our affiliates use XML-feeds of our content effect our rankings in some way -Is it possible to indicate to google that content is yours? Kind regards, Dennis Overbeek dennis@acsi.eu | ACSI publishing | www.suncamp.nl | www.eurocampings.eu
Technical SEO | | SEO_ACSI0 -
Impact on domain when using a subdomain for majority opf site content
Hello, We're looking to use a subdomain for a bookings engine that will also host the majority of our site content as it wil house the details of the courses that we'll be selling online. All content is currently available on www.existingdomain.co.uk A few pages will remain here but the majority will ultimately be hosted on a different IP address under a subdomain: courses.existingdomain.co.uk I am a little concerened about search engine reaction to this content separation. Would this approach dilute the rankings of www.existingdomain.co.uk? Is there anything else we need to be mindful of? We have alternative options if this is a real SEO faux pas. Thanks
Technical SEO | | Urbanfox0