What do you when the wrong site links to you?
-
In doing research of our backlink profile, I've found a couple dozen of links from off-topic websites linking to us. You see, our domain is Voices.com and tends to scoop up links from unrelated sites that are clearly trying to link to another site such as evp-voices.com or areavoices.com or dozens of others.
What would you do? Ask the webmaster to remove them because they are completely unrelated? Or would you keep them if you believed they aren't causing any harm?
-
While I'm certainly not engaged in any form of blackhat techniques, we were severely affected by Penguin. Needless to say, we suffered a 50% drop on April 24 and have not risen back since. For that reason, yes, I do have link paranoia - good term
I'm thinking of making another post on the subject (YouMoz) because I've finally figured out what happened. I'm hoping this next update will catch my fix.
For the record, they are not spammy but rather topical sites and directories related to Ghosts or New Age stuff. Again, we have nothing to do with these topics.
Seems like the consensus is just leave them. There are about two dozen out of 2000 links I manually reviewed in a spreadsheet.
-
I have to disagree with the monetization sentiment. One presumes a business plan is based on the servicing core topics of the business. Monetizing off-topic traffic may give you some short term money but it would do nothing to serve your target audience and long term growth. EPV has nothing to do with voice overs - unless one of their actors is a ghost. Any pages on his site about EPV would only water down his messaging and confuse his audience. It would be distracting and disingenuous to try and monetize this traffic.
As to the first part, again: outcome of cost/benefit analysis (which should include opportunity cost).
-
I've noticed a lot of "link paranoia" lately. Ever since Google started to take action on sites that are seriously trying to game the SERPS webmasters are paying a lot more attention to their backlink profile.
A few unrelated links are not going to get you penalized.
Penguin and manual unnatural links penalties are not intended to granularly punish every single unrelated or anchor texted link. Rather, the idea was to punish sites that are actively engaging in webspam.
If you are not actively engaging in webspam, then there is no need to worry about your backlinks bringing you down. The one exception could be negative SEO. But, I personally believe that 99% of the people who think they are being negatively SEO'd are not. People look at their backlink profile and think AGH! There are links here that I didn't make! It must be a competitor trying to bring me down! When in reality, every site is going to attract unusual links from unusual sources.
I do believe that negative SEO is possible, but rare. In order to effectively do negative SEO you would need to bombard a site with followed links containing their desired anchor text. A few links here and there aren't going to do it. A campaign like that would be obvious. And if you are seeing a pile of anchor texted spammy links then just disavow them and that disarms the attacker.
Should you disavow or try to remove these links? I would say no. Should you write to the webmaster and say, "Hey, I think you meant to link to this other site, not me?" I suppose you could if you wanted to try to help the webmaster out. But given that those links could actually be helpful to your site, I would just leave them.
-
When I say that my site has about a million of these links that is not an exaggeration.
My rankings are great. If I decided to do something about these links I could spend tens of thousands of dollars fighting a problem that does not exist.
I'll wait until they prove to be a problem.
**If he's getting traffic from SEs on the wrong topic, the benefits of solving a few of the more authoritative back links would be worth the time. **
I'd enjoy that traffic and try to monetize it. I doubt that these links are causing any rankings that are unrelated.
-
At first glance I would not be worried about it. I tend to think those types of links won't hurt unless they're extremely excessive/abusive.. else negative SEO could really get out of hand. And you're website has some very strong relevant links pointing to it already.
-
Which would be the answer to your cost/benefit analysis.
If he's getting traffic from SEs on the wrong topic, the benefits of solving a few of the more authoritative back links would be worth the time.
-
I don't enjoy these links pointing at my site.... but I don't think that it is a good use of my time trying to chase down invisible people in another hemisphere who are probably behind the links and would not take them down if I could get in touch with them.
-
I agree but only after doing a link profile and cost/benefit analysis. Assuming away spam, if a significant number of sites are linking to him on the wrong topic, that would be something I would want to correct.
-
Every website with any amount of traffic and spider action will pick up unrelated links.
Some of them are from blackhats, some are from scrapers, some from people building some type of conglomerated site, some even from university experiments.
One of my sites has about a million of these links.
I don't worry about them. I rarely even look at my links because these are so numerous I have a hard time finding the good ones.
You have a great domain, looks like you have a fantastic website. I would not worry about this for a minute.
-
This case is a little tricky in that there are degrees of 'wrong'. I'm assuming these are not spam links but just off topic. Here you have to weigh the value of the general link equity vs potentially confusing SE's about your site's topic.
Rand just finished a Whiteboard on how important topic is becoming.
If you decide they are hurting, I suggest contacting the site to outline how the link isn't serving their visitors. Even provide a couple alternative site that would be better (ie, make it worth their time)
I would hesitate to use the disavow tool. It's supposed to be a last resort for spam links and that doesn't really apply here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Link Disavow and sites with extremely heavy but poor link metrics
Need help/opinions from the SEO's out there. I am working with a site that in the past hired an SEO company out of India. Over the course of their time together, this company submitted the clients url to tens of thousands of link exchanges and directories. Around the time of Penguin, the owners told me their inquiries dried up. Literally that same week they had a new website launched (designed by a local competitor) that really butchered the site. They were convinced the reduction in traffic/inquiries was due to the new site but I am convinced otherwise (suspect Penguin). Not only does the site need to be re-structured but their link portfolio needs to be diversified. Now on the plus side, the company caters and sponsors a number of events that earns them organic, relevant links. These are overshadowed by the tons of poor, irrelevant ones though. I read a few posts recently on the Google Link Disavow tool and to proceed slowly due to the unknown nature surrounding it. I have a good idea of what links are problematic and which ones are well served. However, the number of problematic links in my estimation is quite high (thousands). I am very hesitant to dive into Google Disavow and submit such a large number of requests. What are your thoughts? How would you proceed?
Link Building | | mattylac1 -
Is it ok for a web design company to have a branded footer link on their client's sites?
Now I know that in general footer links to your site from another site are bad...this is because they are very often spammy...however I like to think that Google is pretty smart and I am of the opinion that a web design company should be able to link back to their own site. Here's why: If a visitor comes across a site that they love the design of, and they want a new website built...why shouldn't they be able to click through to the web designers site? (as long as the client is happy to link to it of course) I also feel that if there are a whole bunch of high authority/pagerank websites have been designed by a web design company and they therefore have a footer link pointing to them, it's probably a pretty good sign that they're a good web designer. Is it not? In saying this I think that the link anchor text should be branded rather than keywords. For example I usually write "Web Design by Static Shift" I'm interested to hear people's thoughts. Am I being blinded by my bias? Thoughts aside, and onto the facts...what are people's experiences with footer links for a web design company. Do they help or hinder?
Link Building | | Static_Shift3 -
Should I work on links to a specific page or site in general?
Hi Guys, I'm trying to have my page rank better for "sell my car Houston". I'm about to start working on getting links to our site and my question is should I work on getting links to that specific page or would it be OK to just get links to the home page (same seo effect)? Specific page: http://www.motorsonwheels.com/pages/sell-my-car-in-houston-tx Home page: http://www.motorsonwheels.com Thanks! -Nash
Link Building | | nkabbara0 -
Site-wide/Blogroll Anchor Text Linking
I have some blogs that I own with 10,000+ indexed pages of content. I have wondered for sometime if adding anchor text links for my clients on relevant blogs would be helpful or harmful. I realize that having an anchor text link on ONE article page in context is better than 10,000 anchor text links on my blog roll or footer, but I have been reluctant to use this strategy due to the bad press site wide and blogroll links have gotten, What has been YOUR experience with this method?
Link Building | | TheGrid0 -
Why does my website have 2,000+ links, but only 16 linking root domains?
Why does my website have 2,000+ links, but only 16 linking root domains?
Link Building | | thestudio40 -
Would notifying visitors that they can put text link ads on your site destroy you in terms of Google?
I am debating buying this product for Joomla on that note: http://www.jv-extensions.com/content/_/joomla-extensions/jv-contentlinks-r52 Would you advise for or against this purchase?
Link Building | | Uramark1 -
Links from .edu sites
I have a band website and was thinking of making some link bait pages specifically designed to get links from high page rank music colleges and then funnel that page rank to my landing pages on my band site. I am planning on finding out what these colleges link to and create great information on pages on my site that the high page rank college websites will link to thereby boosting my trust and authority. How much will the trust and authority boost my site in the search engines? Because the colleges will be music colleges they should be relevant to my band site. Does this sound like a good strategy? Take care, Ron
Link Building | | Ron100 -
Different Link Titles Linking to the same page
So I'm doing a lot of link building but my question is how do search engines treat different link titles to the same page. For example, my main page is www.musillawfirm.com If I have 20 links from 20 sites linking to it as Melbourne FL DUI Lawyer and 20 more linking as Melbourne FL immigration Lawyer and More linking as Cocoa FL DUI lawyer etc... what happens? Do the search engines just rank me higher for all the terms or would it be better to always just link to separate landing pages? Thanks in advance
Link Building | | musillawfirm0