What do you when the wrong site links to you?
-
In doing research of our backlink profile, I've found a couple dozen of links from off-topic websites linking to us. You see, our domain is Voices.com and tends to scoop up links from unrelated sites that are clearly trying to link to another site such as evp-voices.com or areavoices.com or dozens of others.
What would you do? Ask the webmaster to remove them because they are completely unrelated? Or would you keep them if you believed they aren't causing any harm?
-
While I'm certainly not engaged in any form of blackhat techniques, we were severely affected by Penguin. Needless to say, we suffered a 50% drop on April 24 and have not risen back since. For that reason, yes, I do have link paranoia - good term
I'm thinking of making another post on the subject (YouMoz) because I've finally figured out what happened. I'm hoping this next update will catch my fix.
For the record, they are not spammy but rather topical sites and directories related to Ghosts or New Age stuff. Again, we have nothing to do with these topics.
Seems like the consensus is just leave them. There are about two dozen out of 2000 links I manually reviewed in a spreadsheet.
-
I have to disagree with the monetization sentiment. One presumes a business plan is based on the servicing core topics of the business. Monetizing off-topic traffic may give you some short term money but it would do nothing to serve your target audience and long term growth. EPV has nothing to do with voice overs - unless one of their actors is a ghost. Any pages on his site about EPV would only water down his messaging and confuse his audience. It would be distracting and disingenuous to try and monetize this traffic.
As to the first part, again: outcome of cost/benefit analysis (which should include opportunity cost).
-
I've noticed a lot of "link paranoia" lately. Ever since Google started to take action on sites that are seriously trying to game the SERPS webmasters are paying a lot more attention to their backlink profile.
A few unrelated links are not going to get you penalized.
Penguin and manual unnatural links penalties are not intended to granularly punish every single unrelated or anchor texted link. Rather, the idea was to punish sites that are actively engaging in webspam.
If you are not actively engaging in webspam, then there is no need to worry about your backlinks bringing you down. The one exception could be negative SEO. But, I personally believe that 99% of the people who think they are being negatively SEO'd are not. People look at their backlink profile and think AGH! There are links here that I didn't make! It must be a competitor trying to bring me down! When in reality, every site is going to attract unusual links from unusual sources.
I do believe that negative SEO is possible, but rare. In order to effectively do negative SEO you would need to bombard a site with followed links containing their desired anchor text. A few links here and there aren't going to do it. A campaign like that would be obvious. And if you are seeing a pile of anchor texted spammy links then just disavow them and that disarms the attacker.
Should you disavow or try to remove these links? I would say no. Should you write to the webmaster and say, "Hey, I think you meant to link to this other site, not me?" I suppose you could if you wanted to try to help the webmaster out. But given that those links could actually be helpful to your site, I would just leave them.
-
When I say that my site has about a million of these links that is not an exaggeration.
My rankings are great. If I decided to do something about these links I could spend tens of thousands of dollars fighting a problem that does not exist.
I'll wait until they prove to be a problem.
**If he's getting traffic from SEs on the wrong topic, the benefits of solving a few of the more authoritative back links would be worth the time. **
I'd enjoy that traffic and try to monetize it. I doubt that these links are causing any rankings that are unrelated.
-
At first glance I would not be worried about it. I tend to think those types of links won't hurt unless they're extremely excessive/abusive.. else negative SEO could really get out of hand. And you're website has some very strong relevant links pointing to it already.
-
Which would be the answer to your cost/benefit analysis.
If he's getting traffic from SEs on the wrong topic, the benefits of solving a few of the more authoritative back links would be worth the time.
-
I don't enjoy these links pointing at my site.... but I don't think that it is a good use of my time trying to chase down invisible people in another hemisphere who are probably behind the links and would not take them down if I could get in touch with them.
-
I agree but only after doing a link profile and cost/benefit analysis. Assuming away spam, if a significant number of sites are linking to him on the wrong topic, that would be something I would want to correct.
-
Every website with any amount of traffic and spider action will pick up unrelated links.
Some of them are from blackhats, some are from scrapers, some from people building some type of conglomerated site, some even from university experiments.
One of my sites has about a million of these links.
I don't worry about them. I rarely even look at my links because these are so numerous I have a hard time finding the good ones.
You have a great domain, looks like you have a fantastic website. I would not worry about this for a minute.
-
This case is a little tricky in that there are degrees of 'wrong'. I'm assuming these are not spam links but just off topic. Here you have to weigh the value of the general link equity vs potentially confusing SE's about your site's topic.
Rand just finished a Whiteboard on how important topic is becoming.
If you decide they are hurting, I suggest contacting the site to outline how the link isn't serving their visitors. Even provide a couple alternative site that would be better (ie, make it worth their time)
I would hesitate to use the disavow tool. It's supposed to be a last resort for spam links and that doesn't really apply here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Internal Link Building and Link Juice Quality
Hi There! I manage the website for a law office that covers many geographical locations. For very specific niche content, we would prefer to create one piece of content and link to the various geographic locations where we would handle that topic instead of posting multiple variations of the same content for each specific geographical area. If we put a button on these pages that has links to each location, will that have the same "link juice" effect to the pages we're linking that linking directly in the text would? (example: the Where can we help you? button on this page : http://www.zdfirm.com/volkswagen-recall/) Thank you!
Link Building | | ZDAdmin0 -
How much time does it take for the links to be forwarded to redirected link?
Hi there,
Link Building | | MoeezLodhi
Thank you for taking out some time for this question; I have changed the permalinks last week for a website.. I forgot to redirect old permalinks to the new one.. So I did 301 redirection, it has been 4-5 days since I did that but the links are not forwarded to the new Permalink so far.
How much time should I wait for the links to be forwarded to the new permalinks? Secondly, I am sure I have done the 301 redirect correctly, as when I go to the old url / permalink it directs me to the new permalink. So I am sure 301 is done correctly. Do I need to submit the sitemap again?0 -
The No of Sites linking to www.apollopowersystems.com is 50 as per Alexa, but Moz shows that the no of sites linking is 23\. The no has increased in Alexa but in Moz the no is 23 since 3 months. Why is this Difference?
Hi There, As I am new to SEO, so the problem that I am listing below may seem very naive. Please help me out. Please explain me the difference between the no of backlinks of the website, www.apollopowersystems.com as per the websites below. The nos are completely different as per the websites below: As per www.moz.com the no is 23 As per www.ahrefs.com the no currently is 586 As per www.alexa.com the no is 50 Please tell me why these nos are different. Looking forward to hear from you at the earliest. Thanks in advance.
Link Building | | KDKini0 -
Should you avoid links from infographic sites?
Suppose you have an interesting infographic that you are promoting. Should you be cautious about having it published on sites that only publish infographics? Do you think these sites pass any link value?
Link Building | | ProjectLabs0 -
Blogs that Link to Random Sites
Posting articles on the MyBlogGuest article gallery can lead to several sites offering to publish your guest post on their blog. However many of these sites will accept any guest post that links out to anything from socks to hotels. Would you avoid guest posting on these sites? (if it would take very little time to do)
Link Building | | ProjectLabs0