Effect Of Restoring Old Website After Implementing 301 Redirects
-
After redesigning my old Drupal website and launching a new "improved" Wordpress version the new version is performing badly. Ranking is poor and conversions don't occur. I realize that my new design is bad (no call to action, poor structure, text heavy). New business inquiries have ceased. The site contains 450 pages.
After spending $25,000 and a year of my life I see the new version is not an improvement!
What would be the effect of reinstating the old version of the site and doing 301 redirects back to it? Would the old rankings be restored?
I need to decide whether I should revert or focus on fixing flaws in the improved design.
Any thoughts??
Thanks,
Alan -
Hi Chris:
Thanks for your response.
301 redirects were implemented properly. The redirects were to pages that contained the same content as the original ones.
Previously out of 50 target phrases maybe 15 were in Google's top ten ranking. Now maybe 3 are.
You are probably right, no going back need to focus on improving the Wordpress site.
Thanks,
Alan -
- I'm not getting a sense that you dealt properly with the transition from the old site to the new one. Did you look at the old site's back links and the search traffic it received and make decisions on the 301s that had to be implemented? If not read these:
- Moving your site - Webmaster Tools Help
- Redirection - SEO Best Practices - Moz
- 301 Redirect Relevance
The things you're talking about aren't the typical topics involved in transitioning from an old site to a new one. It may be best to relax a bit, make the decision to move forward with the new site and begin the process of learning the SEO process. The benefit of using a wordpress site is that you can do most everything you need to do yourself, where your Drupal site wasn't that friendly. Still, you'll have to understand what's what, as far as SEO, and proceed in an orderly fashion. A good place to begin is with The SEO Guide From Moz. You can still evolve the site into the one you want it to be but that won't happen by accident--you're going to have to develop your search marketing knowledge and apply it wisely--it's what your competitors are doing, you've just got to learn to do it better than they are. Moz is a good place to figure out how to do that.
If I've misunderstood, and you're more advanced than that
-
Thanks Chris:
The URL is www.nyc-officespace-leader.com
On an positive note the following is pretty good:
-Code validates
-Site speed is fastThe following is weak:
-Yoast has not yet been uses to optimize for keywords on the vast bulk of the 500 pages
-The way CDN on Amazon has been set up, Google only sees photo filename as alphanumeric tags. Also, I can't edit more than the first ALT tag of photos. The ALT tag repeats on each photo. More than 800 of 1100 images have yet to be indexed. Out of 290 property listings, 110 have yet to be indexed. CDN (Amazon) was supposed to be an improvement. It is turning into a nightmare. DOn't know if it is contributing to the drop in rank.
-My developer did not use useful ALT tags in the header. My name is used for two images. Very wasteful use of SEO real estate.
-In terms of general design, it looks aesthetic but I don't think it is clear to the visitor what they need to do. Very weak design. A nightmare, and an expensive one at that!!Am I missing something really obvious about the site?
THANKS!!!
ALAN -
Kingalan,
If you had reason to leave the old site behind, those reasons will still be there if you return to it. Without knowing any more than what you've said, I'd lean towards keeping the new site, making sure all the transitional SEO tasks were taken care of when you moved to the new site and just press hard on optimizing/marketing the new wordpress. Did you make sure you followed through on all the SEO that had to take place when you moved from the original site?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can anyone please explain the real difference between backlinks, 301 links, and redirect links?which one is better to rank a website? i am looking for the help for one of my website
Can anyone please explain the real difference between backlinks, 301 links, and redirect links? which one is better to rank a website? I am looking for help for one of my website vacuum cleaners
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | hshajjajsjsj3880 -
Does removal of internal redirects(301) help in SEO
I am planning to completely remove 301 redirects manually by replacing such links with actual live pages/links. So there will be no redirects internally in the website. Will this boost our SEO efforts? Auto redirects will be there for incoming links to non-existing pages. Thanks, Satish
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz0 -
Ecommerce catalog update: 301 redirects?
Hello mozers, We run an ecommerce store and are planning a massive catalog update this month. Essentially, 100% of our product listings will be deleted, and an all new catalog will be uploaded. The new catalog contains mostly new products, however there are some products that already existing in the old catalog as well. The new catalog has a bunch of improvements to the product pages, included optimized meta titles and descriptions, multiple language, optimized URLs and more. My question is the following: When we delete the existing catalog, all indexed URLs will return 404 errors. Setting up 301 redirects from old to new products (for products which existing previously) is not feasible given the number of products. Also, many products are simply being remove entirely. So should we go ahead and delete all products, upload the new catalog, update the sitemap, resubmit it for crawling, and live with a bunch of 404 errors until these URLs get dropped from Google? The alternative I see is setting 301 redirects to the home page, but I am not sure this would be correct use of 301 redirects. Thanks for your input.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yacpro130 -
Launching a new website. Old inherited site cannot be saved after lifted penalty. When should we kill the old site and how?
Background Information A website that we inherited was severely penalized and after the penalty was revoked the site still never resurfaced in rankings or traffic. Although a dramatic action, we have decided to launch a completely new version of the website. Everything will be new including the imagery, branding, content, domain name, hosting company, registrar account, google analytics account, etc. Our question is when do we pull the plug on the old site and how do we go about doing it? We had heard advice that we should make sure we run both sites at the same time for 3 months, then deindex the old site using a noindex meta robots tag.We are cautious because we don't want the old website to be associated in any way, shape or form with the new website. We will purposely not be 301 redirecting any URLs from the old website to the new. What would you do if you were in this situation?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | peteboyd0 -
Multiple 301 redirects for a HTTPS URL. Good or bad?
I'm working on an ecommerce website that has a few snags and issues with it's coding. They're using https, and when you access the website through domain.com, theres a 301 redirect to http://www.domain.com and then this, in turn, redirected to https://www.domain.com. Would this have a deterimental effect or is that considered the best way to do it. Have the website redirect to http and then all http access is redirected to the https URL? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jasondexter0 -
Does this require site-wide 301 redirects?
I have an old site that we are re-building, and also moving form Yahoo Stores to Big Commerce. yahoo uses site.com/page.html and BC uses site.com/page. Is there any SEO benefit to keeping the old .html format? some of the pages on the old site have no links to them from external sites. Do they even need re-directs, or should I just let Google find the new page equivalents when they crawl the new version of the site? While some of the old pages (primarily product pages) have OK urls, others have obscure product numbers as the URL. Obviously the latter need re-directing to a more relevant page, but what about situations like this:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Grabapple
_/accessory-product.html _ > product-accessory
In this example, the existing URL is fine, except for the .html extention. If I just used the old URL, would having a mix of /sample.html and /sample pages hurt me? Thanks in advance for your help and input! Dave0 -
301 Re-direct Implementation & Its Possible Aftermaths
Hi all, I'm currently working on a domain that seems to be 'unofficially' blacklisted by Google. The reason behind my belief are, Ranking process of KW became stagnant. Current crawling and indexing rate has been decreased. Site performance deteriorate after every Search engine update or major data refreshes. And few major indications pointing out that search engines might started doubting its authority. The site is live n running for about 10+ yr and consists of 6000+ pages out of which 5000+ pages are indexed. The site also have some serious issues like, The site has been 2 times penalized by Google. The link ratio & inbound link quality of the site is quite unnatural (mostly directory links, links form spammy sites, bad-neighborhood links etc. ) The site is in flat file and not CMS, thus making it extremely difficult to maintain and update it. Due to the above reasons I was thinking of implementing 301 re-direction. I would like to redirect this poor performing existing domain to a new fresh one keeping the URL structure and files same and maintaining 1:1 redirection rules. I've read an awesome article by Danny Dover on 301 Re direction of a site here in SEOMOZ. It seems that if any one follow the steps mentioned there can actually get benefited by the overall re direction process. Now I'd like know your suggestion about following points: 1. Considering the factors that I've stated, do you think that it would be good to go with this re direction idea? 2. If 301 is implemented then what can be its immediate effects on current rankings and site performance? 3. Assuming that the ranks drowned or gets completely vanished from SERP, after what approx time period can be regain back? 4. Any other suggestion that might help me out to better understand the situation.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ITRIX0 -
Questions about 301 Redirects
I have about 10 - 15 URLs that are redirecting to http://www.domainname.comwww.domainname.com/. (which is an invalid URL)The website is on a Joomla platform. Does anyone know how I can fix this? I can't figure out where the problem is coming from.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JohnParker27920