When do I change out my meta tags after a full website revamp?
-
We're creating a new version of our entire website - look and feel is completely different, though core functionality and results are the same. Just cleaner, faster.. etc. We're doing a temp redirect to the temporary url for testing and to slow roll the release to some of our users for a more friendly approach. Eventually, the new look and feel will be under the original url.
I've researched best practices for the site transfer, including "make sure the meta tags for title and description are exactly the same".
The concern I have is that Moz Analytics is detecting a lot of errors in the existing meta tags. They're too long, have changed and become inconsistent after being passed through different hands, & some have some keyword stuffing in there.
I have plans to change them out and really clean them up... I'm just wondering, when is the best time to do that?
Since the tags are bad, should I just do it now but make sure that the old and new are matching? Or should I wait (and for how long?) after the new site is switched over and everything is on the original URL?
-
I totally misread that one. Need to lobby for better coffee in the Moz offices!
-
Thanks so much, everyone! Very helpful.
Yes-- @Ben, you were correct in your assumption. Keep them the same as the old site.
I started revamping the tags for the new site already, as you suggested, so I'll have those ready to go after everything is set and done and being indexed on the new site.
Thank you again!
-
Ben is correct in assuming that our advice around keeping meta and title tags the same means "from the old site to the new site" and not "as each other."
In general it's a best practice to leave as many things the same as you can when revamping your site. Since you're already changing a lot of stuff it is probably best to leave the meta tag changes until after the relaunch (although Ben's suggestion of beginning to write them now is a good one - that way you'll have the new tags ready to go when you are ready to switch them over).
Once the new site is launched I would wait until it is fully indexed and until you see the new pages from the site ranking instead of the old ones for their target keywords. Then, you might consider a gradual roll-out of the new tags so it's less disruptive while your site is still recovering from the relaunch. Start with pages that either don't rank well, or lost rankings when you switched - this might be a good little boost for those. Wait for those new tags to get cached, then target your high-ranking pages (being sure to retain keyword targeting in the tags even as you fix the errors). If all goes well you should see a positive impact from these changes. Hope that helps!
-
I was answering on the assumption that "exactly the same" meant "exactly the same as on my old site". Hope I got that assumption correct!
-
I'm not sure where you're seeing that the title tag and description should be exactly the same. They serve different purposes, and don't need to be the same. We have more information at http://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-seo/basics-of-search-engine-friendly-design-and-development that can help you out.
-
Working agency-side I've gone through a few of these exercises, and I'd advise doing them as soon as you have the copywriting started. META data takes a surprising length of time to create - a 65 character title tag sounds like it shouldn't take much to write, but precisely because you're so constrained it takes some thought. So when you have your sitemap and know the gist of each page, put together the META data for it.
If you're now onto deployment and its too late for that, I'd say leave it until after the roll out. You got where you are with the titles and descriptions you have - and you have plenty to worry about without adding META data!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical tag not working
I have a weebly site and I put the canonical tag in the header code but the moz crawler still says that I'm missing the canonical tag. Any tips?
Technical SEO | | ctpolarbears0 -
How to check if my website is penalized ?
Hi all, I just went over some post that my page can get penalized for over optimizing. I realized my page has quite a lot of h1 (6 it had 30) and a lot of "bold" keywords, does the bolding affect the page seo/penalizing the page? the page im talking about it palmislander.com/dumaguete-travel-guide Thanks
Technical SEO | | i3arty0 -
Duplicate Version of My Website
Hello Again, Looking for a little help to help me understand what exactly is going on here. Ive taken over maintenance of a website and have so far fixed a lot of issues. ahrefs has shown me that a second version of my companies website exists that exists at a second url. This second website is linked to the actual company website like I haven't seen before. www(dot)#(dot)co(dot)uk is the main company website. But a second accessible version exists and is accessible at www(dot)#(dot)co(dot)uk The instruments version is a direct copy and all of the links point directly to my main site. Any changes I make on the main version are automatically applied to the other version. It shows up as a SPAM back link on moz as all of the link points to my website etc Ideally in my mind, the instruments version homepage should simply re-direct to the main homepage to solve this "duplicate content and spammy backlink" issue however, the instruments version is the same suffix that all our company emails work with. Basically, HELP lol. I have no understanding of how this is set up, and the best way in which to deal and if it could affect anything such as company emails.
Technical SEO | | ATP0 -
Website analysis for SEO
Hi, We have been trying to gain ranking for 7 keywords for a year now but have been unsuccessful We are not sure where we are going wrong, if someone could please help us out, we are happy to pay for your time.
Technical SEO | | mframing0 -
Do H2 tags carry more weight than h4 tags?
Of course H tags are key signals for relevance in search. Does an h2 tag send a significantly "louder" signal than an h4 tag?
Technical SEO | | aj6130 -
Google Places Page Changes
We had a client(dentist) hire another marketing firm(without our knowledge) and due to some Google page changes they made, their website lost a #1 ranking, was disassociated with the places page and was placed at result #10 below all the local results. We quickly made some changes and were able to bring them up to #2 within a few days and restore their Google page after about a week, but the tracking/forwarding phone number the marketing company was using shows up on the page despite attempts to contact Google through updating the business in places management as well as submit the phone number as incorrect while providing the correct phone number. And because the client fired that marketing company, the phone number will no longer be active in a few days. Of course this is very important for a dental office. Has anyone else had problems with the speed and updating Google Places/Plus pages for businesses? What's the most efficient way to make changes like this?
Technical SEO | | tvinson0 -
Google changing title tags to branded
Hi guys and gals, i noticed in the results today Google has been changing my title tags so that brand: is in the front of it all. This is not in the code but my title tag structure site-wide is keywords and then always | brand on the end. Why has this happened does anyone know? does it affect my first keyword in the title tag, i guess Google might do it as it recognises the brand and wants users to know it?
Technical SEO | | pauledwards0 -
Would you move the site to a different host or change packages at a significant expense in order to eliminate the meta refresh
When I began working with a site (http://www.visix.com) , I discovered a number of hosting constraints that hampered some SEO related changes I wanted to make. A year later, the site was teetering on the 1st page for a particular keyword of choice and when the Panda & Penguin updates happened, the site got passed by 3M & Amazon, both much bigger sites. (was #11, now #13) Now I'm thinking I should try and use the homepage to rank for keyword "digital signage software", where originally I was making progress with an inner page. Now I am revisting the homepage meta refresh and need to decide if it is enough of an issue to warrant a hosting change. http://www.visix.com has a meta-refresh "0" seconds to http://www.visix.com/index.aspx I know sites can rank well with these, although I don't know the level of handicap that it has. In an article here, http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/redirection there is a statement saying that a meta-refresh will not pass as much link juice as a 301 redirect. I have read about every opinion I can find, and would appreciate other's opinions on the matter. The host is Network Solutions and the hosting package does not allow 301 redirects, among other things. Would you move the site to a different host or change packages at a significant expense in order to eliminate the meta refresh or is it not a big deal on a well established site? Thanks very much for your feedback!
Technical SEO | | IntegralOCR30