Cost affective way to automate linkbuilding?
-
I have done manual link submissions to directors and other places in the past. As a business owner i find it extremely tedious and find no time for it at all.
I have outsourced it since and seen moderate results. There are systems like linkvana etc which promise to give high pr links, are they good? is there any other way to get niche relevant links automatically & cost affectively?
Thanks
-
This is on Topic..a recent email from Robert Bruce of Copy Blogger:
By now, you know that content marketing is the new advertising.
Your readers - and those beloved search engines - highly reward those sites that consistently deliver authoritative content that is focused on a topic, industry, niche, or idea.
What does this really mean?
You've got to write.
A lot.
Sure, there's other ways to deliver the goods - audio, video, infographic design, etc.
But ultimately, the writer runs this show.
And, writing - whether in outline, script, or long form - is what underpins all other categories of media.
Writing is the cornerstone skill of all great content creation.
So, when it comes to building your business on the Internet, you're going to be spending a good amount of your time at the keyboard.
Here's a stripped-down system for getting your writing done, fast:
1. Know what you're talking about
Obvious, right?
If you're going to write authoritatively about anything, you've got to put in your time.
You've got to read relentlessly on your subject.
Study, research, painstakingly try to understand the movements and theories and motivations behind your product, service, and industry.
Stay current on, or ahead of, the news.
Get to know the players involved.
This step (which, by the way, is an ongoing process) eliminates the dreaded moments of staring out the window for ideas.
Research is writing.
2. Outline every time
If you don't know where you're going, how will you ever get there?
Don't ever start blindly typing your essay, article, or blog post without a map.
First, think through what it is you actually want to communicate.
Then, write down the skeleton of the thing.
Major points, subheads, title.
A simple outline takes the guesswork - and in many ways, the
actual work - out of the picture.
Give yourself a paved road to walk down, and then walk down that road, simply putting one foot in front of the other.
3. The secret lies in 30 minutes
I stole this technique from Eugene Schwartz, and it is the single most powerful practice for getting words on a page I've ever used.
Get a kitchen timer. Or, use the one on your smartphone.
Sit down at your desk with your notes, research, outline, and coffee.
Set that timer for 30 minutes and punch the "start" button.
DO NOT get up from your desk until 30 minutes passes and the buzzer goes off.
Here's the trick: don't try to write. Don't stress about it.
After a few minutes of sitting there, staring at the page, your cat, out the window, whatever, you'll get so bored that you'll begin to write.
When the 30 minutes is up, go do something else for a while. Then, come back for another 30 minutes of not trying.
If you get six or seven of these sessions in during a day, you'll be so far ahead of the game, you'll wonder why you ever struggled to write in the first place.
3. Write a lot
It is an immutable law of the universe.
The more you do it, the more you'll do it.
It may not get easier, but eventually you will become a writer. And that, my friends, can change your life and your business.
rb
Robert Bruce
Copyblogger Media
-
Phew, what a relief. I was half-expecting an angry mob to bust my door down.
I completely get your point, and you're right, best-on-the-web content does rise to the top, even if you don't necessarily give it a big nudge in the right direction.
I agree too that if you've got some traffic to work off of already, your time should be spent focusing on your content. The problem here is the have-nots. If you've got some traffic, you can put up a post, blast it out to Twitter, and move on to writing. From a small business perspective, it's just never that easy.
Interestingly enough, in the back of my head, all I kept thinking was that while my response is how I truly feel, I could definitely be creative enough to get Joe the Plumber's website to blow up on Reddit if I had to.
Thanks for being cool about it! I'd love to see this quality of debate on these boards more frequently.
Note: I edited out the first two lines as they were sort of disrespectful. I originally put them there to get a rise out of people, but on Dr. Pete's advice, I removed them. I didn't want people to read my response and get a bad taste in their mouth from the first couple of lines and have that taint their opinion.
-
Thumbs up Anthony... Valid post. Everyone should give you thumbs up for such a generous (and accurate) assessment.
I do hand-write each one. I am a content man. You look like a content man, yourself judging by the length and generous amount of time you put into this post.
I agree with you that the content route isn't for everyone and that even with great content you still need traffic into it to generate links. However, I think that attracting the links can be easier than many people think. For example... if you write a great article about science or tech it might be successful on slashdot and attract a lot of visitors and links from just a posting there. For other topics stumbleupon, reddit, digg might work.
Or, as long as you have just a little traffic into your site, instead of spending the time to "market" just turn out another article. I agree that links accumulate very slowly this way but they do accumulate and they are great links. Articles might launch without much rankings at all but a year later they have reached visibility without promotional effort (as long as you do have high quality content).
I think that the concerns that you describe are valid and correctly point to my method as being slower to rank. But at the same time it is building a more valuable site.
You have done a great job explaining your position and I agree with what you say. I hope that you will link to this thread frequently when you think people need to see the alternative point of view.
I'll close with adding one more point in favor of your argument.... The type of content that succeeds with passive linkbuilding needs to be above and beyond what the typical author produces. You need best-on-the-web writing with media such as great photos, data, references, and maybe some graphs. A big investment and expensive to produce. Most people don't have the resources or desire to produce it. If you don't have that then this method isn't going to work at all.
Nice post. Great debate is what makes a good forum.
-
I have nothing but respect for you and your opinion, EGOL. I've said that countless, countless, countless times. And obviously I believe in the power of content, and that's always the first recommendation I make to anybody - as I did above, by recommending content-based link building strategies.
Don't get me wrong, your response is not bad advice - not by any means. But I do have my qualms with it.
A. It's kind of misleading. We get it - your content is amazing and it attracts back links. My qualm here is that I don't think that's something that everybody can replicate easily. In order for that to work, you need either a strong community, significant influence on a social network like Twitter, the good fortune of working in an industry that really embraces social bookmarking and blogging, or a lot of elbow grease.
Even if Joe the Plumber writes an amazing resource guide to fixing any plumbing problem in the world, he's still going to have to market it to bloggers (that he doesn't have connections with), on his social media profiles (that nobody follows), and on social bookmarking sites (where nobody cares, because it's not a picture of an adorable kitten). He's still going to have to work hard to get links to that content, by networking - which IS link building and IS hard work. Just creating great content isn't quite enough, and to suggest so is misleading.
B. It's kind of lazy. Take the above poster, for instance. We both recommended that the right approach here is to write great content - you by saying so directly, and me via recommending content-based link building strategies and linking to the Professional's Guide to Link Building. But as you can tell, speed of link acquisition and cost minimization are key concerns for the original poster. Whose response do you think provided more value here?
I just kind of feel like if all you do is recommend that people write great content, and you don't qualify that by saying that you're still going to need to market that content, or by tailoring your response to fit the concerns of the original poster, at what point does this advice lose its value and just become more noise?
I don't mean to disrespect you in any way. I've seen you give amazing, amazing advice more times than I can count. And I know your time is valuable, and like the rest of us, you do this for free. And I respect that. I just felt as though I should share my opinion on this, because I know that for every thumbs down this post gets, there are going to be 20 people who completely agree with what I've said, even if they don't have the balls to say so publicly.
Sorry for hijacking the thread, OP - I just can't help but speak my mind. And for those that don't know me, I'm not some random jerk off the street that's complaining about writing great content. I try really hard to help out everybody I can on these forums, and I mean well. All I'm trying to do is make the SEOmoz Q&A boards a more helpful place.
-
I know a way to make linkbuilding happen with zero work. ZERO.
Produce kickass content. Links arrive like magic.... and we are talking about GREAT links... not the spammy links that most other methods produce.
-
I agree with Anthony, the links you can get through automated processes will provide minimal value.
Automation and Link Building shouldn't be combined.
-
Generally speaking, there is no way to automate linkbuilding and get high quality links. The links that you really want to be getting are from relevant, authoritative websites in your niche. There are a number of ways to get these high quality links, particularly content-based link building strategies. Any links that can be automatically built, such as directory submissions, forum profile backlinks, and blog commenting, are typically of minimal value.
That's not to say that you can't scale high quality link building, however. Ross Hudgens wrote a great post a while back about scaling SEO by eliminating pain points. Some of the advice in that article is greyhat, or borderline blackhat, but the general message is very valuable. Obtaining high quality backlinks is always going to be a time intensive process that requires hard work and creativity, but you can certainly make the process smoother, easier, and more efficient.
There are a number of other great resources around the web that discuss scaling link building:
- Scaling Link Building - Whiteboard Friday (SEOmoz)
- Scalable Link Building (Distilled)
- How To Scale B2B Link Building Across An Organization (SearchEngineLand)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Response rate in a linkbuilding campaign
Good afternoon, We will be starting our linkbuilding campaign in the next couple of days. Initially we will contact the authors of editorial content where our competitors are mentioned as one tool in a list of tools. We want the author to add us to the list as an additional tool. What success rate shall we expect, in terms of the % of people who include us vs the number of people we contact? Thanks in advance!
Link Building | | Pennvad0 -
Link Building Cost
Can anyone share typically what a US Based SEO Agency should or would charge for creating good quality backlinks? All of the pages we are targeting have been optimized with quality content and are ranking half decent. The keywords we are targeting are med-high competition keywords. We've located a few offshore agencies with prices in the 100$ range for 10 keywords but are leery of moving forward, currently it's the cost we are paying for 1 Keyword here in the US. Thank You!
Link Building | | TP_Marketing1 -
Easiest way to build backlinks?
I am working on lancing sites to get projects and my workers are not of that caliper to give each client Info-graphics/Guest blogging. Other than great great content.Whats the easiest way I can still apply with great care to build backlinks. -Forum posting on relevant sites with great care.Only relevant areas changing anchortext. -Blog posts with minimum OBL. -Web 2.0 properties with unique content. -Press release with open URL. -Directory submission on PR sites. -Article submission on Ezine and other article sites. -yahoo and other answering sites. Are these linkbuilding methods still I can use by giving value to others.Not add thanks this this that but working on proper relevant replies adding value.
Link Building | | csfarnsworth0 -
Article Marketing - manual vs automated or both
Hi Mozzers, Are services such as Article Samurai or Content Crooner worth the time/effort/money? On one hand, I cannot see them generating high quality links. But , they may be able to help on the quantity side of the link building equation. Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with automated article submission? Thanks, Peter
Link Building | | hawkvt10 -
Outsourcing Linkbuilding - Est. Time For Acct Creations & Link Backs From Acct Creation
Concerned about being ripped off... when maybe it takes only 1 hour but they charge instead 5 or 10 😞 Any seo benefits link building wise when creating these accounts do we get a backlink when creating an account and any value from these profile links at all or little ? ATTN: NEED APPROXIMATE TIME HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE FOR EACH IF DONE MANUAL 36 top article directories - 79 web 2.0 sites 34 video sharing sites 50 social bookmark sites 10 top social networking sites 12 rss aggregator sites The question is how do I know that they are not using software like senuke automate the creation of accounts and can this be checked I am afraid of footprints left behind if they use software to create these accounts . Isnare creates accounts for article directories except for a few they say to do on own or they do it manual is this dangerous them using software to do this
Link Building | | helpwanted0 -
Is one way link exchange still worth?
I am new to link exchange do you think that by managing a link directory and start trying same subject industry good sties link exchange one way links is good idea ? do this still works ? I am seeing many competitors of me even do link exchange to non-subject industry site while i am sure that that shall not be worthy... But do you think that it worth to do link exchance with same industry sites ?
Link Building | | anand20100 -
Average time to see results after linkbuilding?
Hello everyone, I did some linkbuilding in the last few weeks, most of these links are already indexed by Google when i check their Google-cache. But i don't see any improvements in my own positions, despite my backlinks are really good. I'm now wondering, how long does it normally take to see position improvements after your linkbuilding? (Further the on page SEO is good and i'm regulary updating my website) Regards, Yannick
Link Building | | iwebdevnl0 -
What is best way to evaluate external links to my site?
What is the best way to evaluate external links coming in to my site? I have been working on trying to build links by commenting on blogs/forums and adding to directories, etc. I've run link reports through Open Site Explorer and Yahoo and they never seem to show the same links coming in. For example, i run link eport on Open Site Explorer and it will show links coming into my site that Yahoo doesn't show, and vice versa. I guess I'm trying to figure best way to monitor each week new links coming into my site to determine if my efforts are fruitful. Also, is there a certain period of time that should pass from time I put my link on another site (ie, a blog) until it will show up in OPen Site Explorer? Thanks! Oh, and I use the NoDoFollow Add-on for Firefox to only comment on those sites that do follow. Not sure if that's really effective or not.
Link Building | | leonenobleseate0