Has MozTrust predicted fall in Google rankings???
-
The definition of MozTrust is:
"MozTrust is SEOmoz's global link trust score. It is similar to MozRank but rather than measuring link popularity, it measures link trust. Receiving links from sources which have inherent trust, such as the homepages of major university websites or certain governmental web pages, is a strong trust endorsement."That being the case it is quite disturbing that a number of websites have been hit very badly by the latest Google algorithm changes that did indeed have very respectable MozTrust rankings.
Can I ask whether anybody has carried out any sort of analysis of MozTrust versus negative impact in Google rankings? The prediction would of course be that websites suffering from a lower MozTrust would have been hit quite badly by these recent changes.
-
MozTrust isn't quite a measure of "trust" in the sense of link quality, per se. It was designed to mimic TrustRank, a factor we believe Google uses to supplement PageRank. What MozTrust and TrustRank (theoretically - we can't see in the black box) do is to take a set of trusted seed sites and determine how close in the link-graph any given site is to them. If your site is closely linked to sites like CNN and WhiteHouse.gov, for example (I'm honestly not sure what's in the seed set these days), you're more likely, on average, to be a trustworthy site.
Of course, as with Google, this is just one of hundreds of potential ranking factors. One measure we've found useful in some cases is the ration of MozTrust to MozRank. If you have ton of raw link-juice (MR) but your trust level is very low (MR), then it's often a poor quality sign.
We tend to use DA/PA more than MozRank these days, as they're based on a more complex model. Still, none of these factors look at the actual quality of the linking site or the "spamminess", per se. MR/DA/PA are primarily measures of the strength of your link profile, and MT is just one measure of potential quality.
It appears that Penguin tweaked multiple factors in the Google algorithm and may even be use them in conjunction, so even if we saw Google's own data, we probably couldn't pin it to just one thing.
-
I understand the point you are making, but the argument is that all those websites that had substantial links from 'spammy sites' have been heavily impacted by the algorithm. Those spammy sites were very often visibly poor - we could identify many of them just by casting an eye over them.
My question remains then, surely MozTrust should have picked up these metrics and downgraded the MozTrust values for those websites linking from such obvious spammy sites? Otherwise, what is the point of MozTrust?
-
I can see in Webmaster Tools that one of my clients have a 100 or more dead links from spammy sites that are targeted at pages that never existed.God only knows where they came from.
So, the principal would seem to be - target spam sites at a competitor and hit his rankings.
Also, if someone were 'warned' with the abnormal-link-message from Google then one would expect a problem was looming. If no communication was received then one could assume 'no problem'?
Surely, the algorithm has fused in a few of it's recesses and we just need to wait for the circuits to be rewired by the Google engineers.
-
Great question.
My feeling is that the tools and indicators were based on the playing field pre-Penguin and pre the ground opening up and swallowing a ton of websites (ie all the 1 million plus warnings that were sent out for unnatural links).
They lag - again in my opinion. A dog chasing its tail.
Google has changed the game for many and what was once was not penalized is now being penalized.
No matter how anyone sugar coats it and talks about always focusing on content (all good stuff mind) - this was a significant change to the algo in the area that computes link value and relationships.
My feeling is that noone (in terms of the engineers of these tools) saw it coming and now the calculations that may go into these parameters may need to be also tweaked.
I can name many websites that had good MozRank that have been axed fromt he SERPs.
That's not criticism of SEOMoz. These websites also had good PageRank
To answer your question though - from the analysis that I have been carrying out there is NO CORRELATION between MozTrust and the websites that suffered. again - I have seen websites that have had high MozTrust go just as low ones have.
I must also note though - that these seems to be NOT domain related - but more page related.
ie most of the websites I have looked at - seem as if they are doing poorly all around - but it seems to be that the domain itself has not been effected - but more the page (unless Google has penalized the home page).
We have a client (an Author) who was ranking #1 on Google for one of her books. All natural links from people linking to her book. That page was up in the rankings for 4 years. Now it is not in the SERPs at all. Her other pages are fine and her domain name is fine - but Google seems to think the links to that book page where she sells the book were unnatural. So, in some rare cases it may be the entire domain - but in most cases it seems to me that it just appears that way - since webmasters affected were over optimizing or doing bad SEO - and now all the pages that used to rank for the keywords they went after so aggressively now don't rank.
This doesn't mean their domain is toast though - unless they did this to their main home page on the domain.
I'll stop rambling now
Carlos
-
MozTrust is something SEOmoz calculates and, while it's based on what could be expected to help you rank, it doesn't always correlate with what Google does. A website could have a high MozTrust rank but could be penalized for other issues.
Danny Dover actually suggests that you use metrics like MozTrust and Page Authority and compare them to Google metrics like SERP positioning and PageRank to discover if you're being penalized. A page that SEOmoz categorizes as having a high Page Authority but that has zero PageRank can sometimes be an indication that Google is penalizing the page or website.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links to Your Site: No Data Available in Google Search Console
The site I am working on did not have their site submitted to Google Search Console (formerly Google Webmaster Tools). I submitted the site and a sitemap that auto updates. Google is crawling the site daily (about 30 pages a day). Under Search Traffic > Links to Your Site it shows no data is availible. I thought it was because it was a newly submitted site, but it has been two months now. Moz seems to have the same issue. Moz does show inbound links, but their are some that we think should really help us that are not shown. For instance, the Dallas Morning News wrote this article. They have a high DA and PA. Also, iliveindallas.com has an article about us that is still on the front page. That was a few weeks ago but also does not show up on Moz or Google SC. We are trying to be selective about the links we are getting. That they are follow links from reputable sites. Worried that both Google and Moz are not showing them.
Moz Pro | | TapGoods1 -
Complex Rankings Issue For A Law Firm Site
Be warned, this is a complex issue that I have and will require someone who has some advanced knowledge about 301s and link penalty’s. I have a law firm client whose site is having some issues. There are some very complex details here so I'm going to articulate them in bullet points in hopes of making the issues easy to understand. So here's my root problem: We have poor organic rankings (4th, 5th, 6th page for most terms) despite Domain Authority of 32 (avg. 1st page competitor is 28) and some very strong white hat link building the last 60 days or so. How's their backlink profile look, you ask? When you look at their backlink profile in OSE, their spam score is a 1/17 (not sure if that's credible in any way). Lot's of links that score 5's on the spam score make up about 10% of their OSE links. Here’s where it gets tricky; those links are not directed the client's New URL, they are links that go to some old URLs the client used to have, for which they had an SEO guy who built all those crappy links. Those URLs with the crappy links (we'll call them The Crappy URLs) were 301'd (can we all agree 301'd is a verb?) to the NEW URL for just a couple of months. Shortly after that, NEW URL dropped almost completely out of Google, so the client turned off the 301s. So despite those 301s being turned off, OSE still shows all the links going to The Crappy URLs but is giving The New URL credit for them. Keep in mind, the 301s were turned off about 6 months ago so it’s a little strange that OSE still shows those 301s. This has led me to the conclusion that the Domain Authority that OSE shows of 32, is not a “real” number since it is seemingly based off links inherited from 301s that no longer exist. So now I’m trying to create an action plan for this client that will hopefully help us start to make some real progress in our rankings. This client does not have the budget to wait another 6 months for some sign of hope so time is of the essence. Here’s my theoretical action plans I’m choosing from and would like the communities input on which, if any, they feel is best (Also, if I’m missing something or you have an idea, I’m all ears): **Potential Action Plans: ** Do nothing, keep building quality links, creating quality content, monitor crawl reports/gwt for issues. That strategy is going to win long term. #1 + Create one page sites on The Crappy URLs, setup GWT for them, submit sitemaps thus forcing Google, OSE and other web crawlers to index them, thus removing any potential residual penalties from the 301s. NOTE: Currently The Crappy URLS are just landing on GoDaddy’s default landing page which is of course not being indexed by Google or OSE. #2 + Disavow all the bad links going to The Crappy URLS. Then once the bad links no longer appear in the OSE profile for each of The Crappy Sites, 301 them again, thus inheriting the good links but not the bad. #1 + 301 the Crappy URLS back to the New URL, while also disavow any links going to The Crappy URLs. The logic here is that if the road back to recovery is going to be a few months away no matter what, when the 301 knocked them back 6 months ago no reputable link building was being done. I am cautiously optimistic the linkbuilding we are doing will eventually off set any penalty’s coming from the 301s. Plus now we’ll know the 32 Domain Authority OSE is giving us is real. This is the one I’m leaning towards quite frankly because I think it will reduce the recovery time and we’ll know somewhat quickly (30-60 days) if it’s actually working. 1-3 could each take 90 days before we know if it’s working. So please, if you have any expertise with any of this, your help or advice would be appreciated. I’d rather not share The New URL for obvious reasons but if you must know, simply message me and as long as you’re legit, I’ll share it with you.
Moz Pro | | BrianJGomez0 -
Why is my MOZ ranking better but my ranking worse
last week, I made all the recommended changes for my client's website, and our grade according to MOZ got better, but our rankings dropped?
Moz Pro | | lfrazer0 -
Are seomoz ranking in jeopardy?
A few weeks ago Raventools announced that they would no longer be able to provide tools based on the adwords API, then withdrew that. Rand commented on a thread here discussing that and made similar noises. Today Raventools made an announcement as SERP tracking with wording that sounded a lot like it had more than a little influence from Google. Would I be really paranoid to be wondering whether the Rankings tools in seomoz could be at risk?
Moz Pro | | matbennett1 -
Moztool and on page ranking matching
How does the Moztool compare and filter the search phrases you enter in your campaign? Or more correctly, will it filter out stop words or is it an exact match? For example I enter a phrase to track that say: "book ski trip austria" Identified in Google I see that most users search for just that "book ski trip austria" But in content, I cant write that as that is uncorrect english and I want to maby write something like: "When you book a ski trip to austria you get..." How will this affect my on page SEO report, will it still match and mark a "V" in done or show a an error? Even more interesting is, what happen if you do phrases in different order like "An austrian skip trip will make you feel..."
Moz Pro | | Macaper0 -
Tried to find correlation between SEOMOZ statistic and google ranking.
I've made Google US search and than tried to compare SEOMOZ data for first few result. I've used Open Site Explorer and On-Page Report Card. On attached picture you can find this statistic. Pages are sorted in order as they appear in Google search. For me is big question why position 2 and 4 is so hight and 6 is only 6. And what position 6 should do to go up. Thank you. 2s9zlu8.jpg
Moz Pro | | ctam0 -
Keyword Ranking Fluctuation
Hi, In campaigns, every week we found a big keyword ranking fluctuation. For Example: This week SEO MOZ campaign shows one keyword on 23 position and keyword change number shows 13 position down. When i have checked manually its showing on 13th position. Can you please tell me why its happen? Waiting for your reply Thanks,
Moz Pro | | pulseseo0 -
How to see rankings for a group of keywords over time?
I have around 1200 keywords in an seomoz campaign, chopped into various groups using labels. I am interested in tracking how keywords perform over time, especially groups of keywords. As far as I can tell, in the seomoz tools I can only see historical performance for a single keyword at a time. Is there a way to get a historical performance graph of more than one keyword at once? We often run optimizations for sets of words, so it seems like you would have better stats looking at groups of words vs picking one at a time. Is there a way to export historical data for more than keyword at a time? (So I could graph and analyze this sort of thing myself) Does anyone have other suggestions for tracking rankings in this way? Thanks for any help!
Moz Pro | | mlenz0