Strange meta description shown in SERPS
-
Hi there,
I recently stumbled upon a strange phenomenon in the SERPs. Here's the situation:
A customer’s website is ranking for a keyword with the root domain. Strangely the actual meta description (as implemented in the source code) is not shown. Instead Google takes the H1-Header and a part of a short element from a contact form.
Any clue/hint, how this could have happened and can be changed?
Sorry, that I can’t name the domain and the keyword (in German), but I hope, the above explains the problem.
Thanks in advance and cheers from Germany
Sven
-
All the very best
-
No, there's only one relevant meta description for every page. The snippet used by Google is less relevant than the one provided in the Meta Description. But I think, we've found the problem and wait what the recrawl shows in the SERPs.
Thanks again for your help/input.
Sven
-
Hi Khem,
and thanks to you, too. I think we found the problem with the hint of checking for other important areas.
Take care and cheers from Germany
Sven
-
Is the snippet Google is using less relevant than what you've provided in the META DESCRIPTION or is it still okay? As description isn't used for rankings it won't harm your SEO, but could impact your click-through if Google's choice is not as hot for encouraging clicks. They don't always make the best decisions.
The only other thing is to make sure you have only one meta description per page. I'm hoping that sounds obvious, but it occurred to me that I have seen a site with more than one, so Google makes its own mind up.
-
Generally it doesn't happen, but you can check with Meta Tag 'Syntex', may b there is any error.
another reason can be, that meta tag has just been created and will be indexed soon.
another reason, webmaster has deliberately instructed to not to show that latest cached screen shot by using:
Besides, The description snippet that Google picks to show in SERPs would the mis of various chunks of text from the page, which include the search terms. If the page meta description fits exactly the search terms, then it may be used as is. Otherwise Google can check other important areas/keywords/section in website, like bold keywords, H1 tags, etc.
Please Note: The description meta tag is not only used for indexing and ranking purposes, it also serves as AD Copy to your visitors in SERPsSo, the Google will pick the most appropriate content only. Hope it answers you query properly
-
Hi Tom,
thanks. The contact form text is in no way relevant to the actual query. That would be my first guess. Neither it has a wrong H-tag or something like this. Anyway, thanks again and cheers.
Sven
-
Hi Martin,
thanks for your quick reply. Yeah, I observed only a few cases when Google ignored the actual given Meta Description.
We checked the Meta Tags and they are different for every single page and the start page. But you're right, we should have a second look and wait for the re-crawl.
Thanks again and cheers from Germany
Sven
-
Depending on the query, Google very occasionally decides to override the meta description to make the SERPS snippet more relevant. As far as I know there is no way to tell Google to always use the meta description. How relevant is the contact form text to the query?
-
The only instances I've come across of Google ignoring a META DESCRIPTION is when it decides that something from the website's content is more relevant than what has been written in the META DESCRIPTION.
I don't know if this is others' experience though?
Review the meta tags and ensure they're not spammy, they are unique across all pages and are a valid summary of the page's content and then wait for re-crawling to see if it makes a difference.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is the meta title written only for google (try to stuff in as many keywords as possible) or is there a user experience aspect as well?
Is the meta title written only for google (try to stuff in as many keywords as possible) or is there a user experience aspect as well?
On-Page Optimization | | whiteonlySEO0 -
Different meta-description per country?
I have this .com domain which is the corporate website. Next to this domain, we also have local domains. We would like to test with a different meta-description per country on this one corporate .com domain. Does anyone knows if this is possible and how we could integrate this?
On-Page Optimization | | WeAreDigital_BE0 -
How the hell do you get microformat to show up on google serp?
Preface: I implemented Microformat aggregate review (http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate) for our e-commerce website and included only on the homepage. The vote and count are actually coming from real reviews we are getting from our customers, and in the homepage some reviews are shown prominently and a link points to the full list of all the reviews. Microformat markup is correct, validated in GWT. Have been online for a while (probably a couple of years). Our website: http://www.gomme-auto.it The star rating never showed up. When checking competitors I could see their microformats where not showing up either. But now things changed, if I check one competitor (the market leader www.gommadiretto.it) searching for it with their brand name “gommadiretto” no star rating is showing, but if I search for tires of a specific manufactured like “pneumatici barum” I can see their result in serp is showing the star rating for that specific internal page (the brand page) where they simply put the website overall aggregate review microformat mark up, they actually put it on every page. And that make me scratch my head and start asking myself some questions: is google showing their microformats because they manually awarded them somehow? no other competitor seems to have got the star rating in serp is google showing their microformats because they have so much more reviews than I have? I have around 1700, they have around 11000. is google showing their microformats because their reviews are certified by TrustPilot? is google showing their microformats because they put it in the product page? well of course since I am not putting it there (in the brand page) it's a factor, but isn't it recommended to put the website aggregate reviews microformat only on one page? and shouldn't we show the brand reviews on the brand page? isn't it best practice/recommended to put the website aggregate review microformat only on one page? is google showing their microformats because of some other reasons I can't see? What the hell is google criteria for showing the star rating? Does anyone know?
On-Page Optimization | | max.favilli0 -
Meta symbols
Hi Mozzers, Which symbol do you prefer "-" or " | " (Hello Mozzers - Question or Hello Mozzers | Question)? Does it ever matter? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | AcroSEO0 -
Duplicate meta and title in Google Webmaster Tools not updated?
Our canonical tags were removed by mistake for some time and our duplicate meta and title warnings in Google webmaster tools html improvements went up. We fixed the issue a week ago. I made sure the sitemap is picking up the canonical URL. Still the number went up after we fixed it (from around 5000 to around 7000 now) but when I click on details, it shows around 2000 in detail page. How long does it take for Google to update this? RB
On-Page Optimization | | rbai0 -
Selling Products with a similar meta description
Wondering if anyone can help when selling similar products with very similar meta description and product descriptions in general. Have around 500 products - a lot of products have around 10-20 products which are very similar only different is sizes and a maybe a few lines of text if that. Is this a problem in search engines? How does other ecommerce stores selling similar products solve this problem...
On-Page Optimization | | royRR0 -
Ecommerce On-Site SEO: Keywords in Category Descriptions
Hello, I'm doing on-site SEO for a client's ecommerce site. Are 160 words enough for a category description? I'm using the keywords once at the top of the description, and once at the bottom of the description, with the ones at the bottom reworded so that they are the keywords with a different word order. I used to put the keywords in 3 times but it just feels like stuffing. Is twice, worded differently the second time, enough for a category description? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | BobGW0 -
Do I need a unique post meta description
Just wondering what the best practise is for unique meta desriptions on blogs. When I post a blog on my wordpress, clicking the title takes you to an individual page with that blog on it. I understand how important the title tag is on this page but when I create a meta description: a) is it useful? b) Should it be unique or is it ok to copy part of the post and insert that as the meta tag? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | acs1111