Geotag city different from postal address. Can I mention both cities together in title tags?
-
This boundary thing seems to be haunting me at the mo. Oh what I'd give for somewhere within a defined boundary!
Anyway, just noticed a client has one city in its official postal address, and another city under its geotag.
So I'm looking at the title tags and I'm thinking of mentioning both cities on the main entry pages (6 of them) then dividing mention in sub pages.
Is this acceptable to Google? Might they see mention of both cities in homepage title tag (and other entry pages) as spammy. I don't want to upset Google!!!
PS. Both cities are core markets. I would say they're of equal importance in terms of current business bookings and business potential.
-
I will have another go I think
-
Hi Luke,
I'm so glad Mike replied to you. As Mike said, what you put on your website is up to you, but I was hoping you'd actually describe the scenario going on in your region a little more fully in that thread. It's good you got an answer, but bringing Google's attention to the border change issues and getting a response to that would likely be helpful to lots and lots of your neighbors. Maybe you can attempt to discuss that in their forum at some point.
-
http://productforums.google.com/d/topic/business/2b-n5hzA9EU/discussion - hope that helps > I posted it before and someone got wrong end of stick, so tried again.
The person answering here suggests it is fine, and having just looked back at SEOMoz forum notes, I've been given same advice from someone on these forums before.
That said, it might be logical in some way to have both, but it might land you in trouble as you've suggested. Would be so good to clarify this point.
A good many people will be getting this wrong.
-
Hi Luke,
Do you want to link to the thread you started in the Google and Your Business Forum?
-
Thanks Miriam. I haven't had an answer, so not holding up much hope. Is there anyone on the SEO Moz team who may have stumbled across such a specific ssue before? Do you have better access to Google? L
-
Good, Luke. I really do hope you get an answer on this. Deserves attention!
-
Hi Miriam, thanks again for your feedback. I've asked the question, so awaiting some feedback. Hope I can get their position on this (I live in hope!). Yes, it was me before mentioning some other sites. This is impacting me in several places at the moment, which is a right pain! If Google provides an answer, I'll definitely try to share it around
-
Hi Luke,
Now, was that you who started a similar thread on this recently about the great confusion of the postal service vs. administration in your country? I know that I just discussed a really similar situation in another thread, but for some reason, I can't seem to find it right now in the system. So, perhaps that was you, or perhaps a countryman of yours in the same predicament.
My thinking on this is that the postal address has to be seen as your core geo data, and thus would be the main thing occupying your footer, contact us page, and the front end of many of your titles and tags. But your situation is extraordinary. People visiting City A want to find a pizza in City A...they don't want to send mail to City B. So, Google would be crazy to penalize you for including City A in much of your optimization, but don't take my word for it.
I find your scenario with the conflict of boundaries to be important enough and curious enough to report to Google. I sincerely recommend that you do so. At the very least, you will have documentation of your efforts to play by the rules should anything go wrong in future. This just isn't an issue that comes up every day, and I believe you and your neighbors deserve an official answer from Google about how they would like you to proceed when such confusion surrounds locale in your area. I'd post about this to the Google and Your Business Forum with a very catchy title, such as:
Our Part Of England Is All Mixed Up - Please Guide Us, Google.
Something like that. Should grab some attention. Here is the link to the forum, if you don't have it handy:
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!forum/business
I'd love to know if you get an answer.
-
This problem keeps coming up at the mo, partly because I'm working for out-of-town locations. Hey, ho...
Anyway, now I'm in S.W. England. The site has a Bristol postal address. But is actually in Bath & NE Somerset County. So the post office claims them for Bristol, the administrators for Bath, and the business is about the same distance from both.
Bristol is more of a key market than Bath, but both are very important.
This is a pizza takeaway, pizza restaurant, bar, function room. There's a homepage, and 4 key landing pages for each key service, then loads of internal pages under each category.
Web developer did this in the title tags - key service (e.g Function Room)| Bristol & Bath | [then company name] on the 4 key landing pages. Then they've targeted Bristol and Bath individually on interior pages - e.g. Function Room **| **Bath | [company name] on the party venue page.
This seems OK to me, but not sure if Google will find this spammy or not (2 key cities in the title tags). In which case I will start playing with the title tags. I don't want them to take a hit from Google, particularly with all the changes coming through at the mo. I'm being very cautious.
I also question the div between, for the service (e.g. Function Room) and they city in question. I would take that first div out.
Any thoughts on this would be great. I'm finding UK boundary confusion, and how Google might deal with that in instances like this, mighty confusing.
-
Hi Luke,
Thanks for coming to Q&A with your question. Now, I want to be sure I understand what you are referencing by using the word 'geotag'. Please, give a definition of that. The language of Local remains non-standard, so we sometimes use different terms for the same elements.Doing Local SEO, one has to get into Google's mindset. Google's approach to Local is that everything is founded on physical location. So, the name, address and phone number is the core of any Local SEO campaign. In cases where a client has offices in city A, but also welcomes clients from cities B and C or goes to clients to serve them in cities B and C, the client's main data is still about city A, because that is where he is physically located and that is what Google cares about most.
I'm not entirely sure about your particular client's business model. Is he, for example, a dentist located in San Franciso whose patients come to him from Oakland and Berkeley as well, or, is he, for example, a lawn care specialist located in San Francisco who has a service radius including Oakland or Berkeley. In any case, it's his city of location that counts most, and so, this takes priority in elements such as titles, tags, headers, footers and content.
In the case of service area businesses (plumbers, carpenters, carpet cleaners, etc.) it is a common best practice to create unique landing pages for each city in which the business goes to serve. These do not outweigh his main pages optimized for his city of location, but they are a way to let humans and bots know that the business' employees travel to these other cities to render services. You typically cannot expect to outrank other companies with physical locations in these services cities, but you can hope to gain at least some visibility for these secondary geographic terms.
Now, with what I've described, would you be able to be a little more detailed about what you would like to know, Luke? You are not in any way obliged to name the client, but perhaps you can give a few more details if you have further questions. I'll be glad to stop back by. Thanks!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
White H1 Tag Hurting SEO?
Hi, We're having an issue with a client not wanting the H1 tag to display on their site and using an image of their logo instead. We made the H1 tag white (did not deliberately hide with CSS) and i just read an article where this is considered black hat SEO. https://www.websitemagazine.com/blog/16-faqs-of-seo The only reason we want to hide it is because it looks redundant appearing there along with the brand name logo. Does anyone have any suggestions? Would putting the brand logo image inside of an H1 tag be ok? Thanks for the help
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AliMac261 -
Can I post an article on my blog if it has already been published and taken down?
Hi Guys, A writer for my site has offered to let me post her article on my blog, however the article has already been published on another blog, but the blog has now been taken down. If I publish this on my blog will there be any harm to my blog? I want to stay clean and not be in trouble with penguin in any way shape or form! Cheers everyone appreciate some advice here!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | edward-may0 -
Local Map Pack: What's the best way to handle twin cities?
Google is increasing cracking down on bad local results. However, in many regions of the US there are twin cities or cities that reside next to each other, like Minneapolis-Saint Paul or Kansas City. According to Google guidelines your business should only be listed in the city in which your business is physically located. However, we've noticed that results just outside of the local map pack will still rank, especially for businesses that service the home. For example, let's say you have a ACME Plumbing in Saint Paul, MN. If you were to perform a search for "Plumbing Minneapolis" you typically see local Minneapolis plumbers, then Saint Paul outliers. Usually the outliers are in the next city or just outside of the Google map centroid. Are there any successful strategies to increase rank on these "Saint Paul outliers" that compete with local Minneapolis results or are the results always going lag behind in lieu of perceived accuracy? We're having to compete against some local competitors that are using some very blackhat techniques to rank multiple sites locally (in the map results). They rank multiple sites for the same company, under different company names and UPS store addresses. Its pretty obvious, especially when you see a UPS store on the street view of the address! We're not looking to bend the rules, but rather compete safely. Can anything be done in this service based scenario?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AaronHenry0 -
Google admits it can take up to a year to refresh/recover your site after it is revoked from Penguin!
I found myself in an impossible situation where I was getting information from various people that seem to be "know it all's" but everything in my heart was telling me they were wrong when it came to the issues my site was having. I have been on a few Google Webmaster Hangouts and found many answers to questions I thought had caused my Penguin Penalty. After taking much of the advice, I submitted my Reconsideration Request for the 9th time (might have been more) and finally got the "revoke" I was waiting for on the 28th of MAY. What was frustrating was on May 22nd there was a Penguin refresh. This as far as I knew was what was needed to get your site back up in the organic SERPS. My Disavow had been submitted in February and only had a handful of links missing between this time and the time we received the revoke. We patiently waited for the next penguin refresh with the surety that we were heading in the right direction by John Mueller from Google (btw.. John is a great guy and really tries to help where he can). The next update came on October 4th and our rankings actually got worse! I spoke with John and he was a little surprised but did not go into any detail. At this point you have to start to wonder WHAT exactly is wrong with the website. Is this where I should rank? Is there a much deeper Panda issue. We were on the verge of removing almost all content from the site or even changing domains despite the fact that it was our brand name. I then created a tool that checked the dates of every last cached date of each link we had in our disavow file. The thought process was that Google had not re-crawled all the links and so they were not factored into the last refresh. This proved to be incorrect,all the links had been re-cached August and September. Nothing earlier than that,which would indicate a problem that they had not been cached in time. i spoke to many so called experts who all said the issue was that we had very few good links left,content issues etc.. Blah Blah Blah, heard it all before and been in this game since the late 90's, the site could not rank this badly unless there was an actual penalty as spam site ranked above us for most of our keywords. So just as we were about to demolish the site I asked John Mueller one more time if he could take a look at the site, this time he actually took the time to investigate,which was very kind of him. he came back to me in a Google Hangout in late December, what he said to me was both disturbing and a relief at the same time. the site STILL had a penguin penalty despite the disavow file being submitted in February over 10 months ago! And the revoke in May. I wrote this to give everyone here that has an authoritative site or just an old one, hope that not all is lots just yet if you are still waiting to recover in Google. My site is 10 years old and is one of the leaders in its industry. Sites that are only a few years old and have had unnatural link building penalties have recovered much faster in this industry which I find ridiculous as most of the time the older authoritative sites are the big trustworthy brands. This explains why Google SERPS have been so poor for the last year. The big sites take much longer to recover from penalties letting the smaller lest trustworthy sites prevail. I hope to see my site recover in the next Penguin refresh with the comfort of knowing that my site currently is still being held back by the Google Penguin Penalty refresh situation. Please feel free to comment below on anything you think is relevant.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | gazzerman10 -
Can anyone recommend a Google-friendly way of utilising a large number of individual yet similar domains related to one main site?
I have a client who has one main service website, on which they have local landing pages for some of the areas in which they operate. They have since purchased 20 or so domains (although in the process of acquiring more) for which the domain names are all localised versions of the service they offer. Rather than redirecting these to the main site, they wish to operate them all separately with the goal of ranking for the specific localised terms related to each of the domains. One option would be to create microsites (hosted on individual C class IPs etc) with unique, location specific content on each of the domains. Another suggestion would be to park the domains and have them pointing at the individual local landing pages on the main site, so the domains would just be a window through which to view the pages which have already been created. The client is aware of the recent EMD update which could affect the above. Of course, we would wish to go with the most Google-friendly option, so I was wondering if anyone could offer some advice about how would be best to handle this? Many thanks in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | AndrewAkesson0 -
Can our white hat links get a bad rap when they're alongside junk links busted by Panda?
My firm has been creating content for a client for years - video, blog posts and other references. This client's web vendor has been using bad links and link farms to bolster rank for key phrases - successfully. Until last week when Google slapped them. They have been officially warned on WMT for possibly using artificial or unnatural links to build PageRank. They went from page one of the most popular term in Chicago for their industry where they had been for over a year - to page 8 - overnight. Other less generic terms that we were working on felt the sting as well. I was aware of and had warned the client of the possibility of repercussions from these black hat tactics (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-google-makes-liars-out-of-the-good-guys-in-seo#jtc170969), but didn't go as far as to recommend they abandon them. Now I'm wondering if one of our legitimate sites (YoChicago.com), which has more than its share of the links into the client site is being considered a bad link. All of our links are legitimate, i.e., anchor text equals description of destination, video links describe the entity that is linked to. Our we vulnerable? Any insight would be appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mikescotty0 -
Does Google Penalize for Managing multiple Google Places from the same IP Address? Can you manage from same google account or separate? Or does it matter since it's created from the same IP?
I manage a number of client's Google Places from the same IP and heard this is not a good thing. Are there Do's and Don'ts when managing multiple Google Places? Create separate google accounts for each or can you use the same account?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Souk0