Google disavow DMOZ/ODP spam sites?
-
Hello
Looking into links to my one of my sites (over 10 years old) I've found that along with some bad spammy links, around 80% of my inbound links are from directories that are exact copies of ODP. Should I be concerned about / asking for removal / disavowing these links? Normally I would be trying to get rid of low quality links like this, but since they are ODP clones I'm not sure it's worth the effort. The sites openly state that their data is from ODP (Open Directory Project), but does this mean Google ignores them? I could spend my whole life swatting these links.
Thoughts?
Edit: I'm hoping for suggestions that specifically reference the ODP clone site situation. I did not create these links, I guess I should have made that more clear.
-
Contact the site owner and request removal.
More specifically, make every possible attempt to locate the site owner. Use the following:
WHOIS e-mail address, e-mail address from website, contact form on website, social media pages, and phone number, physical mailing address. Make a sincere effort to reach each site owner.
-
What is best way to get rid of bad inbound links in your opinion?
-
Hi Nelson,
I am glad your question was addressed.
I apologize if my perspective has become hardened over time. I actually work with many aspects of SEO but manipulative link issues have consumed the majority of my time this year. When my phone rings it is often a client who has an issue related to manipulative links.
To be clear, I am not passing any judgment here or taking sides. I do understand Google did not enforce their guidelines in the past with respect to manipulative links. Many topics arise during this conversation about what Google should do, can't do, perceived abuses, etc. In order to best service clients I focus on a single question - - - what steps need to be taken to restore site rankings so they are not artificially suppressed.
Once we clear the air and reach that point, we can move forward productively. I want to help you and other site owners impacted by this issue which is why I share my time here. I hope you are able to receive complete and accurate information, then put it to use.
Best of luck.
-
"In your case, it is different based on your manipulative activities. "
You seem to really want the scenario to be one in which I'm manipulating links either directly or indirectly. I read some of your other posts and I see that's your niche, fixing manipulative links, so it's understandable but it's not necessarily useful for this bias to colour every answer. You may or may not remember that 10 years ago it was considered desirable and normal to get listed on ODP. Google was barely more than a search provider to Yahoo then.
For the record, the site I'm referring to is not commercial, nobody has ever worked on it for me so nobody was building links on my behalf. I have not received communication from Google about a penalty (never on any site as a matter of fact), and this particular site's traffic has never been high enough to notice a drop in traffic in April. I was just wondering if it was possible the scraped sites and their links to me were diluting my site's rankings and if I should but a bunch of effort into having them removed and/or disavow.
Anyway, thank you very much Ryan, I managed to filter out an answer to my question
-
For you, yes. For most site owners, no.
Based on your interpretation, I am going to assume your site is manually penalized by Google or you have your rankings are being suppressed by Penguin. If that is the case, either you or an agent (employee, "SEO", developer, etc) acting on your behalf has built manipulative links to your website. If that is the case, you intentionally tried to cheat the system.
To be clear, no laws were broken. It does not mean you are a bad person or anything on that level. Rather it means there is a process which everyone who desires to rank well in search engines should follow, and that process was intentionally broken for your site. So yes, there are negative consequences to cheating and getting caught.
The overwhelming majority of site owners are not negatively impacted by the links you mentioned. Google simply devalues those links and that is it. In your case, it is different based on your manipulative activities.
I know that may be hard to hear so I will try another analogy. In California, if anyone drives with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08% or above they are violating the law and can be arrested. Most of the public does not have a DUI on their record so they can drive with a 0.07% BAC and not worry about a DUI; however, if you are convicted of a DUI then you are likely on probation for several years. During that probationary period, you may not drive with even a 0.01% BAC you can be arrested. The point being the rules are not the same for those who have been caught breaking the rules and those who have complied with them.
The links from 99% of general directories are indeed manipulative. Whether those links were built by the site owner or, in the case of a DMOZ clone site, a directory owner, the links were built with the purpose of manipulating search engines. Sometimes a new directory is attempting to fill up with some data to give visitors the illusion it has numerous in the hopes they will pay for service. Others attempt to earn money with AdWords. Either way, they are manipulative links.
-
So, what I'm getting from this is even though I didn't create these links (and therefore I was not participating in manipulative link schemes, unless getting myself listed in ODP/DMOZ in the first place was "manipulative"), I should try by any means necessary to get the clone links removed because they look manipulative to Google.
-
**Is your site under a manual penalty or impacted by Penguin? Have you participated in manipulative link building? **
If the answer to these questions is no, then Google has clearly stated you should not be using the Disavow tool at all.
**Have you contacted these sites via multiple methods (WHOIS email, email address on site, contact form from site, phone, mail, social media, etc) requesting the links to be removed? **
If not, you may be wasting your time. Google has clearly stated they expect site owners to use the Disavow tool as a last resort when all other methods fail.
I've found that along with some bad spammy links, around 80% of my inbound links are from directories that are exact copies of ODP.
If your rankings are being suppressed by Google due to manipulative links, then any manipulative directory links should be removed. Google likely devalues all those links, but they must be addressed in order to remove a penalty.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
In-depth/longform content DEFEAT backlink, DA/Trust score!
Hi all, There is a new way to defeat the big boys. Build a releated topic with minimum 4000 words and focus on in-depth content and use the target keywords more than 2,5% of each content. So its game over for linkbuilders and happy end for the copywriters? Ofcourse every factor of seo is important, but its better to focus on in-depth content. To score good with your target keywords in SERP. What are the challenges for a big webshop? Create a related deeply content? that separated from your webshop?
Link Building | | Dreamgame2016
Because it will be coatic with a lot of deeply contents on your webshop Is there more additional advice for a webshop with a big assortiment? Ps. Specifiec, the big webshops sells game/software keys.0 -
Looking for a dedicated Backlinks/Disavow Platform
Hi Guys, Can anyone recommend a good backlinks program. One which is able to detect spammy backlinks and which has a disavow feature. I've tried Monitor Backlinks, Would appreciate any further suggestions. Priorities are ability to monitor new links and their value, loss of links, link opportunities, with the ability to create recommended opportunity lists and disavow files - ideal if can be used in some way for client reporting also - dashboard or pdf etc. Help with access to contract link builders (perhaps star rated for quality and efficacy) to go after the opportunity lists also a bonus etc. Basically what are people using out there and really liking!? NB: we use moz for some stuff and have a mix of other tools available but nothing seems to be really nailing this for us. Thanks!!
Link Building | | OnlineAssetPartners0 -
Backlink Disavow strategy
Hi, I would like to know what are the things to check when Disavow backlinks? Should we disavow all the low PR and DA backlinks ex: disavow all the backlinks under 4PR? Thanks alot !
Link Building | | bigrat950 -
Satellite Sites ?
Hello, One of my competitors has a large amount of sites/blogs, similar to the attachment/screenshot. Is it possible that they own these are are using them to boost their rankings? Thanks! ICZTX.jpg
Link Building | | TP_Marketing0 -
Open site explorer does not work
Hello, we are trying to work with http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/ but it does not work both in chrome and IE, what seem to be the problem? thanks, Sam.
Link Building | | bwrecycling0 -
What is white hat seo for google penguin and google panda?
Hi, This is my 1st question to some experts. I need advice on link building. Are following good and white hat seo? 1: Bookmarkings on top sites 2: Top directory submission, or directories that seomoz recommended? 3: Top article directories, yahoo voices, ezine etc.. 4: Top web 2.0, wordpress, blogger, tumblr 5: Guest posts on quality blogs. I was use to with black hat methods (by mistake) , that i was not aware, Some are pure blackhat, that i never did. some time it hard to judge which are black hat. In past google like some links, now most are devalue or got penalty. Now i want to do quality seo work and slow process. any advice will be great regarding quality seo. Thanks.
Link Building | | chsajid110 -
One client, one b2b site and one b2c site - linking relationship
I have a client that has 2 websites in a particular industry. The first website concentrates on advertising services and products to other organisations/companies but does not sell anything online. The second website is an ecommerce site with many products from the same industry and is more a b2c operation. Would it be considered ok to add maybe 5 footer links from one to the other and vice versa? considering that they are footer links and will ultimately increase total links pointing to both site exponentially. Both sites are hosted in the same location.
Link Building | | Gareth_Cartman0 -
When is Google going to sort their act out?
I work with a couple of clients in the finance and debt area. I've been doing loads of work examining the link profiles of the commercial sites at the top of the rankings and 70% of the links I am seeing are low value directories and sites obviously built for links with multiple outgoing links to completely unrelated sources! When I examine the other links their isn't enough value in them to outweigh what looks to me like very obvious and spammy low quality link building. Why can't Google see what I'm seeing - it's so obvious? I know there are multiple factors at play but links like these should offer no value or get a site penalised (isn't that what Google tell us) but these sites still seem to be ranking because of them rather than despite them!
Link Building | | SearchEngineRescue0