Your thoughts on page navigation
-
Hi again SEOmoz community.
What are your thoughts on mainpage navigation. How it should be handled?
Scenario 1.
- links to the main sections with a mouse rollover feature where it shows subsections of the main sections
Scenario 2.
- links to the main sections, but the subsections are hidden and only visible on the click
Scenario 3.
- links to the main sections and subsections allways visible
I would like to hear you oppinions on this. What did you find as the best featrue, or did you try to find someting new entirely. What do you think would be the best scenario SEO wise and in the light of keeping links on page in decent numbers
Imo, Scenario 2 is the option to go with.
Tnx in advance for all your replys.
Sincerely,
sinisa
-
On my site I had 117 links with sub-navigation and external links, ended up being way way way too much.
There is another scenario too you could try that I was thinking of applying to my own site which is keep the navigation in place but put nofollows on the sub-navigation. I dont know the pros and cons this completely and maybe someone could say, but maybe you could use that so your link juice isnt diluted by minor pages and you direct your link building strategy to those pages that need it regardless of location.
In your situation though (and I'm a novice), I'd be looking at the number of links you have and how diverse your sites PA/DA and other metrics. High links and not very diverse PA/DA (or profile that doesnt suit your current strategy) and I'd hide them.
In mine, I have to try and get them to the site then I have to keep them there for as long as possible as it increases the likelihood they'll buy, so I turned off third level tertiary links so only primary and secondary links were present then watched the pages per visit and time on site.
It didnt end up changing much. Maybe if the site isnt that old or well established or you can afford to experiment, build the site with all links turned on or a primarily UX strategy. Record user interaction over a couple of weeks and then remove that extra level of navigation and add it as a side bar or something that is only shows each section not the whole site on each page.
Specifically on your question though you are asking about whether you should hide a menu or not, but Google doesnt care (correct me if wrong) about whether you can see it (it knows whether you can see it or not I think) its more its presence (they can tell its part of the navigation).
I like hidden menus with obvious points of entry as it gives a less cluttered feel. The only issue is mobile. But then you server up a media specific css file and turn the drop down menu in to a select statement and you solve that one.
Adam
-
Well both...
what would be the best scenario for Google and for users. Then maybe try to find some best-option-for-all...
-
Are you asking that in terms of how it would affect your ranking on Google et al, or how users would better interact with your site?
Adam
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I change our main category pages to product listing pages?
With the thought of improving user experience, as well as rankings in Google, I'm considering changing our main category pages to product listing pages (with sub-categories remaining, still). These main category pages are very standard and don't link to any informational content, such as buyers guides, etc. What's driven this is the latest Google core update. I've noticed our main competitor (who we were out-ranking before... but not now) now uses this approach. I can see the benefit from a user perspective, i.e. less clicks to reach products. What's the pros/cons from an SEO point of view, please? Could the potential duplication of content be an issue? For context, we have about 2,000 products and website is on Magento 2.
On-Page Optimization | | alifeofjoy1 -
More Singular KW Targeted Landing Pages vs. Less Multiple KW Targeted Landing Pages
So my question is... I have a adopted a site which currently ranks quite well for some industry competitive keywords with a number of poor quality landing pages which specifically target a singular keyword. I am wondering if its worth merging some of these pages together into one authoritative, better quality landing page targeting multiple keywords (as the intent for some of these keywords are largely the same). What i don't want to do is jeopardise the existing rankings in doing so. The alternative option would just be to improve the content on the existing landing pages without merging. What are peoples thoughts on this? Are there any positive case studies out there where merging has had a positive effect? Any help would be great. Regards,
On-Page Optimization | | NickG-1231 -
Why are http and https pages showing different domain/page authorities?
My website www.aquatell.com was recently moved to the Shopify platform. We chose to use the http domain, because we didn't want to change too much, too quickly by moving to https. Only our shopping cart is using https protocol. We noticed however, that https versions of our non-cart pages were being indexed, so we created canonical tags to point the https version of a page to the http version. What's got me puzzled though, is when I use open site explorer to look at domain/page authority values, I get different scores for the http vs. https version. And the https version is always better. Example: http://www.aquatell.com DA = 21 and https://www.aquatell.com DA = 27. Can somebody please help me make sense of this? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | Aquatell1 -
What to do with removed pages and 404 error
I recently removed about 600 'thin' pages from my site which are now showing as 404 errors in WMT as expected. As I understand it I should just let these pages 404 and eventually they'll be dropped from the index. There are no inbound links pointing at them so I don't need to 301 them. They keep appearing in WMT as 404's though so should I just 'mark as fixed' until they stop appearing? Is there any other action I need to take?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
PAGE TİTLE
<title> </span>Home to home moving 4356 <span></title> page A <title> </span>Home to home moving 3723 <span></title> page B These two titles are the same?
On-Page Optimization | | iskq0 -
On-page: Over optimized images?
Hello guys. I have a small question about an on-page optimization for images. What I have: good title tag / good url structure good content (NOT keyword shuffled, its real content, for real people) images / gallery uploaded to folder named same as article name. For example: Great tips for bloggers [article name], great-tips-for-bloggers [folder name]. So my question is: Will Google harm me for this "too good" paths to images, article related image filenames, with mask like [gtips-img01], and if all images have titles / alt tags? Thank you guys.
On-Page Optimization | | infoo130 -
Old pages
I have a site where I have 5,000 new products each year, I never waned to deleted the old pages due to links pointing to them and keywords. But I now have 20,000 plus pages, does having that many pages spread out my link juice or does it effect me in any other ways over having a site with 5,000 pages or should I keep not deleting old pages so I dont loose any links? Along with that I currently do not link to my old pages from my site so Im guessing google does not get to them very often if at all, if you agree to still keep them should I link to them somewhere? Because the products are not that simiiar and they do bring added value I dont think canonical would work here
On-Page Optimization | | Dirty0 -
Getting page cached
I am reworking some content that is deep in my site. What is the best way for google to find it? Some of the pages were cached about 3 weeks ago, but I don't want to wait too long to get them to see the new content (and links).
On-Page Optimization | | azguy0