Should you leave an EMD?
-
Hi
I've never recommended exact match domain names as good SEO ; the problem being that they don't help you create brand identity and even when someone remembers your site's name (seo-question-answer-forum.com for example) they are going to type it into Google and they'll see competitors all around the link in the SERP - and you'll probably only have one link, no site links.
In a recent talk at a local Chamber of Commerce I drove this point home again with the new threat of penalties from Penguin (now and moving forward) and a reported EMD penalty that may or not be active in France.
So I've pretty much convinced everyone that EMD's are now toxic and if they are thinking of launching a new site they should avoid them.
But what if you have one already? I've had this question from people that were in the audience. Should they leave their domain now and set up a new site?
Not sure how I should answer!
The question comes from Chamber of Commerce audience and therefore people with bone fide businesses - so my gut feeling for the initial reasons above is "Yes" ; not using your company name as your main online identity was an error and you should correct it now. Create a new domain name and move to it via a simple 301 rewrite rule
But am I right? Or are there cases where this is bad advice
- Neil in France
-
Thinking it through I think that your ScrantonAutoGlass.com and ClevelandRealEstate.com suggestions are bad advice. I appreciate your opinion though!
For a local business the disadvantages from this type of name outweigh the one advantage you gain by having a better chance of ranking for popular search term. IMO.
This discussion has helped me think it through. Thanks all
- Neil
-
I agree that my examples were online business where domains can work well as a brand.
I believe that SOME local business names lend themselves well to an EMD that might attract traffic. Examples would be
There is viable search volume for "scranton auto glass" and "cleveland real estate" and these domains would work well.
Not every business has a current name that would work well, but if I had an auto glass service in Scranton I would be willing to acquire that domain and change my name (if a competitor didn't already have claim.
-
You're giving me a lot of examples of online businesses rather than what I imagine my Chamber of Commerce audience was: local businesses who have an existing highstreet identitiy
Hotels.com with the .com is a great brand for the online business that is behind it. Would hotel.com have been a good domain for a hotel in Paris ? I don't think so. But I don't think hotel-paris.com is a good domain either. It might have given you an advantage for this search term but it's crummy and cheap as an online identity.
The examples I'm seeing are like this
www.hotel-restauraunt-town-name.com
www.oil-industry-job-offers.com
Behind each site their is a business that has a business name
It's as if McDonald's had decided to go with www.hamburger-restaurants.com rather than www.mcdonalds.com
15 years down the line whould you suggest they change?
- Neil
-
Takeshi,
I'm assuming that this sort of anchor text has a negative effect since Penguin
SearchEngineLand.com is not an EMD in my opinion as I don't think that people were searching for a "land of search engines" before the site existed
SeoTools.net is a good example though and for me it's a poor domain name. If I search for "seotools" in Google (here in France) I get seobook, seomoz and a few French sites before I get seotools.net and then seotools.com
- Neil
-
You don't think that domains like Wine.com.... Weather.com.... Hotels.com... are great brands?
-
I agree with Takeshi - a hybrid of both is best, in my opinion
EMD just means you need to be extra careful with anchor text ratios and over optimization penalty. Less is more with on page exact match keyword phrases and not too much main tail anchor texts from external sites
-
There are many legitimate EMDs. They're harder to brand, but it's possible. For example, FreeCreditReport.com. They're only toxic if they're idiotic like best-pay-day-loans.info.
-
There is nothing wrong with EMD domains, as long as you're not being spammy. Having your keywords also helps with link building, since people will link to you using your keywords as anchor text.
EMDs can still be brandable if you're smart about it. Look at searchengineland.com for example, or seotools.net. A domain name should say what the site is about, and sometimes that means having and EMD.
-
The EMD update was applied to lower the added benefits of having an EMD. I would only see an issue on domains like www.aReallyLongExactMatchDomain.com or with www.key-wo-rds.com. That being said, I do recommend using the brand instead of keywords.
To answer your question, I would personally leave good quality domains as they are, even if they are an EMD.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Redirecting parent subpage but leaving children as is?
Hi there, I'm working on a website where the webmaster redirected a bunch of parent pages but left the URLs of the children pages as is. For example: domain.com**/business/** got 301 redirected to domain.com**/personal** But they left behind all the children pages of /business/ as is like: domain.com/business/trips domain.com/business/travel instead of changing these to: domain.com/personal/trips domain.com/personal/travel Is there an SEO implication to the children pages_ /business/trips_ and /business/travel having a redirecting parent? Will it affect robots crawling or link equity passing?
Technical SEO | | NikkiHernandez0 -
301 or 302 or leave at 410
I have a client who manages vacation rental properties and those properties get links. If an owner pulls their property off the rental market the current status given is a 410 which I instinctively want turned into a 301. The problem is, often those properties come back online with the same URL so the question is, when a 301 is turned into a 200 - has anyone noticed a significant delay in time for that page to rank?I know technically it should probably be a 410 or maybe a 302 but ... you know ... the link weight. 🙂
Technical SEO | | BeanstalkIM1 -
Could the EMD update affect my domain?
My domain is: http://www.freescrabbledictionary.com/ "Scrabble Dictionary" is a huge keyword in my niche where I used to rank top 4. Do you see this domain as possibly being hit by the EMD? My Google Analytics does not show that I was initially hit back in Sept 2012 when it first same out.
Technical SEO | | cbielich0 -
Whats better? A modified .COM EMD or Pure EMD on a new extension?
HI I am planing to built a site. Lets say my keyword is "playgames". I can take for example the domain playgamesnow.com, filler domain. Or I can take playgames.new extension. A pure EMD. My question is whats better?Is it worth to register the domain on a new ( but suitable ) extension just to be shorter and EMD. Or its better to take the modified.COM ( longer and not EMD ). But its a .com It will be a big site, I plan to make an authority, long lasting site. Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | Catinas970 -
An EMD with top level domain of another country. Still useful ?
Normally, EMDs (with couple of keywords in it) has more advantage over other domain names ( I understand other factors matters too & I am aware of EMD update). But what if there is an EMD with couple of keywords but top level domain is of another country. Confused? see ex - shoesinsydney.co.uk Will it STILL have a natural advantage over other domains (with no keywords in them)?
Technical SEO | | Personnel_Concept0 -
Hit hard by EMD update, used to be #1 now not in top 50, what can I do?
We have what I think is a pretty good site, unique articles a few widgets, lots of reviews, decent enough bounce rates and user times (60% and 2:15) based on drupal. Previous updates haven't touched us and an almost identical duplicate (same site compltely different content) of the site targetting a different but related EMD is unaffected which provides a control. I have seen some discussion on it having to do with link profiles. We did pay some backlinkers to link to us, much more on the site that has dropped, and quite a few for a partial match keyword. I'm supposing this is a lot of the issue. If we try and delete these backlinks will it make the situation better or worse? I have also notice some duplicate content warnings in seomoz that weren't there previously. Any ideas?
Technical SEO | | btrr690 -
New EMD update effected my mom's legit author page? From page 1 in SERP to nowhere for her name
I think my mom's site, MargaretTerry.com was hit by this update for her name "Margaret Terry". Went from bouncing around the first page on google.com and .ca all the time to nowhere on the index. The results are now very strange, a mix of Youtube, linked in, and small book stores that she has done events at recently to promote her first book. I was checking after some of my SEO buddys were freaking out about their EMD's getting hit on Sunday. She is an aspiring author with a book coming out this month. There is obviously no ads or spam content on the site... I have never done SEO for it either except a bit of on page I guess. It sucks that people might be grabbing her book soon and when they Google her name nothing shows up. This couldn't have really happened at a worse time. Not to mention the hours spent building the site to her liking, free of charge of course 🙂 Is there anyone I can contact there to help me out? Shouldn't and EMD that is someones name still rank when you search their name?
Technical SEO | | Operatic0 -
Duplicate XML sitemaps - 404 or leave alone?
We switched over from our standard XML sitemap to a sitemap index. Our old sitemap was called sitemap.xml and the new one is sitemapindex.xml. In Webmaster Tools it still shows the old sitemap.xml as valid. Also when you land on our sitemap.xml it will display the sitemap index, when really the index lives on sitemapindex.xml. The reason you can see the sitemap on both URLs is because this is set from the sitemap plugin. So the question is, should we change the plugin setting to let the old sitemap.xml 404, or should we allow the new sitemap index to be accessed on both URLs?
Technical SEO | | Hakkasan0