URL tracking on offline material
-
Hi there,
Hope someone can give some advice.
We are doing some magazine advertising, the main purpose of the advert is to promote one of our new products, however the URL goes something like this:
http://www.domain.com/products/new-product-libra-furniture/ which is just too long for anyone to remember, I think it should be simply domain.com/libra which redirects to the product page, however how can I track this in Google Analytics? if using a 301 that's impossible?
Any advice would be grateful.
-
Hi Gary,
Has your question been answered? You've received some stellar responses in this thread!
Christy
-
I agree! And thanks for reminding the community about to award great answers with the "Helpful Answer" status, Paul!
-
The level of thought and comprehensiveness Jason has put into each of these replies is really impressive! Such great answers around each of these specific issues. Gotta agree with him on each one.
Nicely done, IMO.
Paul
P.S. Gary, when you feel the question's been fully answered, don't forget to mark the most useful responses with "Helpful Answer" status. You got some great info here and it's a great way to reward the folks who helped most.
-
Hi Jason,
Thanks for you detailed reply.
The conversion will be for the consumer to enter a give-away on a new product we are soon to launch, which is exclusive to a particular magazine.
Yes, prints ads will be a primary ongoing marketing vehicle which will be promoting the same product but in different magazines however using different CTAs so I will have to create various landing pages for this, maybe this could be an issue in the near future?
Thanks
-
Great question. I debated suggesting that your just keep all those landing pages out of the index, but I don't know enough about your content/use-case to make a suggestion.
What's the conversion action you are trying to achieve? Are you selling a product or service right on the landing page, or are you sending them to a Product Detail page to make a purchase?
The challenge is that, you might have users see your magazine ad, and then later try to find you with "Cool thing I saw in Time Magazine"
You have to balance a number of factors:
1. Are print ads a primary and ongoing marketing vehicle for you. So you'll have an ever growing inventory of publication specific landing pages.
2. Do you get a lot of search volume that would convert better if it went to a non-publication specific landing page.
3. Is there a high converting canonical non-pub specific version of all the content that will exist on the pub specific landing page?
4. What is your sales cycle? Are you a low-consideration product that a prospect will buy shortly after consuming your landing page content, or will a prospect make numerous visits to your site, and consume dozens of pages of content before making a purchase?
Part of the fun of what we all do for a living is that every circumstance is different
-
Thanks Jason.
Would you not use a noindex tag on the page instead of rel=canonical?
-
Yep, if you're willing to set up a separate landing page for each Ad/Campaign, then by all means do that. Then you can assume all direct traffic on the URL is the campaign traffic.
That would also let you customize each landing page for the publication, which will improve your relevancy and reduce your bounce rate. I.E. If www.mysite.com/life has an image with the cover of the actual edition of Life magazine I saw your ad in, then I know I'm in the right place.
As you mentioned, if the content of many landing page is basically the same, then make sure you use rel="canonical" tags to consolidate your link juice.
My suggestion to use vanity urls linking to a landing page with campagin codes, would be if you wanted a single landing page to serve multiple campaigns (or other sources of traffic).
-
Hi All,
Thanks for all your feedback so far.
I don't think I will use a URL shortener, not memorable enough.
QR Code, not quite right for the audience.
Regarding:
Then set up a redirect for that URL that redirect to a landing page with a campaign code:
http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
Why don't I just use www.mysite.com/Life as the landing page which replicates the original product page and put a noindex on the page or a canonical?
What do you think?
-
Create a short vanity URL to put in the magazine (i.e. Life Magazine).
Then set up a redirect for that URL that redirect to a landing page with a campaign code:
http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
Now you have a campaign in GA you can track.
Alternatively, (as others have suggested) you can use a URL shortener:
bit.ly/adsf72 -> http://www.mysite.com/landing?utm_source=Life&utm_medium=Magazine&utm_campaign=Great
The shortener gives you a short url and an extra layer of tracking, but the short url will be less meaningful or memorable (unless you do a completely custom one).
If you want to go with a QRCode, do it in addition to (not instead of) printing, the short URL.
Use the shortest URL possible in the QRCode because short URL's = lower density QR Codes that are easier to scan.
-
A 301 redirect or something like bitly should work.
-
Hi Gary,
You can use Google's URL shortener to manage your campaigns and then set up Custom Segment and view it in the report in Google Analytics. I know this works for Social Media and Email campaigns but not sure about offline campaigns. http://www.mktdojo.com/how-to-track-email-and-social-media-campaigns-with-google-analytics
Another way I guess is to use bit.ly, when you shorten a link, they provide stats to track the number of people clicking on the link. Once again, I know it works for Social Media campaigns but not sure about offline.
Finally, you can try using QR codes. QR Codes are widely used in off line campaigns or events. Readers don't have to memorize the link and enter it in the url, they can simply scan it with their phone. Furthermore, you can use either method mentioned above and create a QR code with it so that you can track the number of visits.
Why create a custom link and use it for the QR Code instead of your original link? If you are using the custom link for the QR code, then you know that if you have visits via the custom link, they are definitely from scanning the QR code.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
International Country URL Structure
Hey Guys, We have a www.site.com (gTLD) site, the primary market in Australia. We want to expand to US and UK. For the homepage, we are looking to create 3 new subfolders which are: site.com/au/ site.com/uk/ site.com/us/ Then if someone visits the site.com redirect based on their ip address to to the correct location. We are also looking to setup hreflang tags between the 3 sub-folders and set geo-location targeting in google search console at sub-folder level. Just wondering if this setup sounds ok for international SEO? Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pladcarl90 -
Optimizing A Homepage URL That Is Only Accessible To Logged In Users
I have a client who has a very old site with lots and lots of links to it. The site offers www.examplesite.com/loggedin as the homepage to logged in users. So, once you're logged in, you can't get back to examplesite.com anymore (unless you log out) and are instead given /loggedin as your new personalized homepage. The problem is that many users over time who linked to the site linked to the site they saw after they signed up and were logged in.... www.examplesite.com/loggedin. So, there's all these inbound links going to a page that is inaccessible to non-logged-in users. Thus linking to nowheresville. One idea is to fire off a 301 to non-logged in users, forwarding them to the homepage. Thus capturing much of that stranded link juice. Honestly, I'm not 100% sure you can fire off a server code conditioned on if they are logged in or not. I imagine you can, but don't know that for a technical fact. Another idea is to offer some content on /loggedin that is right now mostly currently blank, except for an offer to sign in. Which do you think is better and why? Thanks... Mike
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
URL structure for SEO
Hi Mozzers, I have a site which is a combination of product pages, and news and advice pages that relate to the products. How would you approach the URL structure for this, following SEO best practice? Approach 1 Product pages:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | A_Q
www.website.com/product-category/product-page News and advice pages:
www.website.com/product-category/product-page/news-and-advice-story-1
www.website.com/product-category/product-page/news-and-advice-story-2
etc or Approach 2 Product pages:
www.website.com/product-category/product-page News and advice pages:
www.website.com/news/product-category/news-and advice-story-1 (with internal linking to relevant product page)
www.website.com/news/product-category/news-and advice-story-2 (with internal linking to relevant product page)
etc Or would a different approach be better?0 -
URL Injection Hack - What to do with spammy URLs that keep appearing in Google's index?
A website was hacked (URL injection) but the malicious code has been cleaned up and removed from all pages. However, whenever we run a site:domain.com in Google, we keep finding more spammy URLs from the hack. They all lead to a 404 error page since the hack was cleaned up in the code. We have been using the Google WMT Remove URLs tool to have these spammy URLs removed from Google's index but new URLs keep appearing every day. We looked at the cache dates on these URLs and they are vary in dates but none are recent and most are from a month ago when the initial hack occurred. My question is...should we continue to check the index every day and keep submitting these URLs to be removed manually? Or since they all lead to a 404 page will Google eventually remove these spammy URLs from the index automatically? Thanks in advance Moz community for your feedback.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | peteboyd0 -
"Category" word in URLs of blog is it SEO Friendly URL ??
Hello respected community members, I saw many times that "Category" word comes in URL of blog. So my que is that is this negative for SEO or Positive. & if we don't wanna to come CATEGORY in URL how can we remove while URL Optimization ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sourabhrana390 -
Overly-Dynamic URLs & Changing URL Structure w Web Redesign
I have a client that has multiple apartment complexes in different states and metro areas. They get good traffic and pretty good conversions but the site needs a lot of updating, including the architecture, to implement SEO standards. Right now they rank for " <brand_name>apartments" on every place but not " <city_name>apartments".</city_name></brand_name> There current architecture displays their URLs like: http://www.<client_apartments>.com/index.php?mainLevelCurrent=communities&communityID=28&secLevelCurrent=overview</client_apartments> http://www.<client_apartments>.com/index.php?mainLevelCurrent=communities&communityID=28&secLevelCurrent=floorplans&floorPlanID=121</client_apartments> I know it is said to never change the URL structure but what about this site? I see this URL structure being bad for SEO, bad for users, and basically forces us to keep the current architecture. They don't have many links built to their community pages so will creating a new URL structure and doing 301 redirects to the new URLs drastically drop rankings? Is this something that we should bite the bullet on now for future rankings, traffic, and a better architecture?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JaredDetroit0 -
What Is The Preferred Url Structure For Se’s?
Here is my issue, my domain is abcdomian.com and I’m trying to rank the site for the keyword “example”. All of my content is under “abcdomain.com/folder/example/” and building content off of “abcdomain.com/example” is not an option. So I’m thinking about moving the content to “abcdomain.com/online-example/” and 301ing the old pages . Of the two paths below, which will have a greater impact on my rankings for the term “example”? Current: abcdomain.com/folder/example/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | samp582
Proposed: abcdomain.com/online-example/ Thoughts?0 -
Does URL format affect Keyword effectiveness for a URL?
I am looking at our site structure, and don't want to have to rebuild the way the site was linked together based on it's current folder structure so I am wondering what option would work better for our URL structure. I will uses car categories as an example of what I am talking about, but you can insert any category structure you like. For example I would like to have pages like this: www.example.com/ford-convertibles
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SL_SEM
www.example.com/chevy-convertibles But instead due to the site structure I will need to have pages like this: www.example.com/ford/convertibles
www.example.com/chevy/convertibles But wonder if I shouldn't do the following to ensure the proper phrase is known for the page: www.example.com/ford/ford-convertibles
www.example.com/chevy/chevy-convertibles The "/ford/ford-convertibles" just seems odd to me as a human, but I haven't seen anything on how well a keyphrase in a URL split by /'s does and I know dashes for phrases are fine. This means I am inclined to go with the"/ford/ford-convertibles"style because it keeps the keyphrase separated by dashes even if it is a bit repetitive. There will be other pages too like "/ford/top-10-fords-ever" but I don't wonder about that since it isnt "ford/ford-xxxxx" Thoughts on whether /'s in a keyphrase are as good as dashes?0