Something strange going on with new client's site...
-
Please forgive my stupidity if there is something obvious here which I have missed (I keep assuming that must be the case), but any advice on this would be much appreciated.
We've just acquired a new client. Despite having a site for plenty of time now they did not previously have analytics with their last company (I know, a crime!).
They've been with us for about a month now and we've managed to get them some great rankings already. To be fair, the rankings weren't bad before us either.
Anyway. They have multiple position one rankings for well searched terms both locally and nationally. One would assume therefore that a lot of their traffic would come from Google right?
Not according to their analytics. In fact, very little of it does... instead, 70% of their average 3,000 visits per month comes from just one referring site. A framed version of their site which is through reachlocal, which itself doesn't rank for any of their terms.
I don't get it...
The URL of the site is: www.namgrass.co.uk
(ignore there being a .com too, that's a portal as they cover other countries).
The referring site causing me all this confusion is: http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/
(see source code at the bottom for the reachlocal thing).
Now I know reach local certainly isn't sending them all that traffic, so why does GA say it is... and what is this reachlocal thing anyway?? I mean, I know what reachlocal is, but what gives here with regards to it?
Any ideas, please??
-
They're bidding on his brand name... so he's paying them for traffic he would have gotten anyway (as no ad would come up, he'd be the top results instead of the ad... or he could have the ad but run it himself).
I guess other than that it's no problem though... if it's sending him converting traffic. Just annoying I can't do much about the analytics, I can't see the keywords people are arriving with when they arrive through there, and ReachLocal won't share their data.
-
He said they were using someone for PPC, and that someone won't let me link the GA and Adwords accounts... that's all the info I could get on it. I assumed it was just normal PPC with another paranoid data hoarder though, not this stuff.
-
I used reach local at one point. It was all ppc traffic. Your client should know about this. It seems odd that if they are not paying reach local that reach local would continue to send them traffic.
-
The framed page is actually loading content from "namgrass-px.rtrk.co.uk" which could have been a dupe issue, but the are using a meta robots "noindex, nofollow" so I wouldn't be concerned since this should not appear in the search engine index.
Because of the framed referral issue, you should expect a 100% correlation between # of visits to ReachLocal page and # of visits in GA referral reports for that site. So if ReachLocal sends 1000 visits to that page, you'll see about 1000 in GA.
-
Thanks guys, I've just been looking into it and searched reach local on the internal search here... it seems to be as you say, reach local have made framed versions on the site which they use to send PPC traffic which they sell back to you.
Am I right in thinking that, as it's framed there is no possibility of dupe content issues?
Something (apart from the analytics) just seems wrong about it all.
Of the search terms, some are low traffic, but some are relatively high.
-
When the ReachLocal site loads the frame actually holding the site content, it will actually treat the parent window as the referral. If you look at the _utm.gif hit going to the Google Analytics servers, look at the utmr parameter (the referring URL that GA will recognize) it has a value of "http://namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/". Also, the utmz source/medium is set to "namgrass.rtrk.co.uk/referral" which is what you'll see in the Google Analytics reports.
So, what's happening is that the framed ReachLocal site IS getting traffic. It could be organic, email, PPC.... anything but we wouldn't know because the frames are dropping the real attribution and forcing a referral from namgrass.rtrk.co.uk. So, although the site may not be ranked, remember that it could get traffic through other means.
You can use tools like Fiddler or a Firefox extension called FireBug to monitor the Google Analytics _utm.gif hits and see what information is passed to the GA servers.
-
My guess is that a lot of that traffic is paid for by advertising, either online or offline. Reachlocal will do things like frame a site in their system to track incoming traffic from a particular ad or campaign. They'll also use unique phone numbers to track conversions by phone. So if your client has a significant advertising budget this could explain why lots of their traffic arrives this way.
If the keywords they rank for are really low traffic keywords, this would add some more weight to my guess. If not, back to the drawing board? Is there anything else unusual about their setup that may provide clues?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How To Stop Google's "Fetch & Render" From Showing Up In Google Analytics
Hi all, Within Google's "Fetch & Render" (found in Google Search Console) is the ability to index certain pages from my website on-demand. Unfortunately, every time I ask Google to index a page, it registers as a bounce in Google Analytics. Also, if it means anything, my website (www.knowtro.com) is a single-page application, functioning similarly to Google. If you guys know of any solution to this problem, please help! I originally thought that Google would know to block its own Fetch & Render crawler from Google Analytics but that doesn't seem to be the case. Thanks, Austin
Reporting & Analytics | | A_Krauss0 -
Multiple GA codes, one site.
Hi all, Is anyone running two GA codes on one website successfully? My organisation own a number of websites so we used to have one global GA code on all our sites to track global stats, and then we would also have site unique GA on each property to just track that one property. This worked fine, but of late we seem to be getting no data from the globally based code. Obviously, with the site-specific codes we can enter the name for that domain in GA but for the overall code, it is called 'all.com' I'm wondering if Google has now tied the GA domain to the code or if we are doing something wrong. All the codes are the same as they always were but have stopped working. As a stop gap, we have swapped to using Piwik as the all.com code. However, we are then comparing the stats in two different analytics programs so will get a different result. Also, it would be nice to be able to add the all.com to tools such as this to generate weekly reports. Anyone else having GA woe like this? Thanks. Carl
Reporting & Analytics | | WonkyDog0 -
I've hit a wall. What's next?
I've been working on creating content and optimizing my website for the past 18 months, and have seen decent gains in organic traffic. Recently my keyword ranking increases have slowed dramatically, despite adding additional content. I'm hoping a fresh set of eyes can spot something that may be holding me back. I appreciate any feedback the MOZ community is able to provide. One area of concern/confusion is the number of pages indexed according to GSC. The number tends to go up and down, and I can't figure out why. Of the roughly 8,000 pages that are submitted through the sitemap, it says only around 1,100 are indexed (sitemap page). The index status page says I've got 7,500 pages indexed. Kind of confused on that one. Anyway, my website is MetroAtlantaHome dot com. Thanks everyone!
Reporting & Analytics | | Kyle Eaves0 -
Analytics - 'other'
When i look in GA under Channels (under Acquisition) 'other' is listed What is 'other' ? I have been told its other unidentified channels as they did not allow 3rd party cookies or surfers were in anonymous/private mode. Other is usually organic traffic that couldn't be identified for the aformentioned reasons. This data is encrypted and available but it violates Google guidelines as they are not allowed to pass personal info//data to third parties so it is automatically filtered. But they are not 'Not Provided' (since that still shows under organic) but is usually/mainly some form of organic visits. Hence Seo can take credit for much of that traffic, is this correct ? Many Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Spooky goings on from bots?
Buon pomeriggio..... I have a clients whos data shows that they have very high visitor traffic between 1 AM & 5AM. Prevoisly I have been advised on this forum to search out and filter out bot traffic but i can find anything 😞 But i just want to know where can i spot theses obscure things described here:
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/09/05/filter-bots-google-analytics/#sr=g&m=o&cp=or&ct=-tmc&st=%28opu%20qspwjefe%29&ts=1380528080 in google analytics. Ive followed stacks of tutorials and all i find out is i have Browser internet explorer behing the busiest traffic at 2AM 😞 Perhaps the time report is jinxed, but illustrated here is whats triggered the concern 😞
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/vampire-data2-_zpsbe023697.jpg So if anyone could give me simple what to do in analytics and be v gratefull!
Grazie,
David0 -
Are organic search visitors always seen as organic in origin, even if their return to the site is direct?
Many of our conversions occur in a customers second visit to the site. Often, a customer will arrive at our site, submit a finance application, leave, and return at a later date to checkout. We are interested in tracking how many of our checkouts come from customers who originally found our site through an organic search result. If a customer enters the site through organic search, leaves, and returns later through an email link or directly entering our URL, will G analytics show that customer as direct or organic origin? Cheers, Ben
Reporting & Analytics | | WSPL0 -
Google Analytics Site Search to new sub-domain
Hi Mozzers, I'm setting up Google's Site Search on a website. However this isn't for search terms, this will be for people filling in a form and using the POST action to land on a results page. This is similar to what is outlined at http://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1012264 ('<a class="zippy zippy-collapse">Setting Up Site Search for POST-Based Search Engines').</a> However my approach is different as my results appear on a sub-domain of the top level domain. Eg.. user is on www.domain.com/page.php user fills in form submits user gets taken to results.domain.com/results.php The issue is with the suggested code provided by Google as copied below.. Firstly, I don't use query strings on my results page so I would have to create an artificial page which shouldn't be a problem. But what I don't know is how the tracking will work across a sub-domain without the _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.domain.com']); code. Can this be added in? Can I also add Custom Variables? Does anyone have experience of using Site Search across a sub-domain perhaps to track quote form values? Many thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | panini0 -
Any updates regarding 'not provided' organic keyword referrals in Google Analytics?
I know that the encrypted searches done by people logged into their Google accounts is causing the error, is there any workaround or any update from Google as to IF they will give us our keyword data back? I'm currently losing data on about 20% of my daily searches . . .
Reporting & Analytics | | nsauser0