Google's Local Search Results for Broad Keywords
-
I have a question regarding Google's local search results for broad keywords. Since Google is changing their algo to reflect local results for broad words, would it be beneficial now to start going after those words as well?
For example: we have a client ranking for 'miami security alarm', but I would like to know if it would be beneficial to start optimizing for 'security alarm' as well.
Also, since Google's keyword research tool reflects searches on a national level, how would I be able to find out how many searches a broad keyword is receiving on a local level?
Thank you in advanced!
-
Hey Alex, personally, I would focus on getting your citations put together well with ideally unique descriptions that include your keywords. Don't worry too much about building links and certainly don't worry too much about anchor text. Go for the easy wins first and we are seeing great results in local search for existing sites with just some local branded links, solid on page optimisation and a sensible site structure, citations and well put together and optimised Google+ Local profile page.
Put together a review strategy and try to get keywords and location in your reviews.
Maybe do a small bit of AAA guest blogging on a relevant site with a relevant blog topic and get a link back. Work in keywords if you really want to but be sparse, varied and sensible.
Links, links, links is not the way to do, do, do things any longer and especially not in local.
Hope that helps!
Marcus -
Thank you for the prompt and thorough response Marcus!
You discussed very helpful techniques for onsite optimization, but how about the offsite SEO and the keywords used in content marketing?
To use your example: would it be beneficial to use keywords in the content and anchor text like "commercial photographer" without also including the location ("in Birmingham"), since Google is localizing the results anyway?
"commercial photographer" will presumably gain more searches than "commercial photographer in Birmingham", even in the local arena.
-
Hey, they should be one and the same.
I am working with a commercial photographer and it is an area that is wide open in local where he operates. But, we are mostly optimising his pages for the broad term + area + brand. Obviously, we carry this through his page name, page title, meta description, breadcrumbs and actual content so we have something like.
So, home page is something like:
URL:
www.url.co.ukTitle:
Matthew Smith - Commercial, Architectural & Fashion Photographer | BirminghamService pages are like this:
URL:
www.url.co.uk/commercial-photographer/Breadcrumb:
Home > Commercial PhotographerTitle:
Commercial Photographer in Birmingham | MatthewSmith.co.ukURL:
www.url.co.uk/architectural-photographer/Breadcrumb:
Home > Architectural PhotographerTitle:
Architectural Photographer in Birmingham | MatthewSmith.co.uk
So, any citations will also at least mention the location, feature his consistent address and his main keywords (without any localisation).
So, I am not sure, if we do this the right way, there needs to be any kind of distinction and I am certainly not going to cram search keywords together like 'commercial photographer birmingham' and miss out general stop words like 'in' to somehow 'optimise' it better. Likewise, I am unlikely to want to build links with 'commercial photographer birmingham' as an anchor as it is probably completely unneeded and unnatural + possibly dangerous.
For most small businesses in the UK local SEO is so easy and so open that just build something that does things the right way
- The right keywords (commercial photographer instead of the bigger volume commercial photography)
- Well optimised landing pages and a solid information architecture
- Good content that matches the intent of the user searching
- Well optimised social platforms
- Lots of well put together citations (quality matters - think of each one as an advert for the biz)
- Unstructured citations on important sites (twitter bio etc)
- Maybe some local links
- Consistent NAP
- A review strategy that builds reviews in a sensible, steady manner (preferably steering the reviewers to include the location and service keyword in the nicest possible way)
This should not be difficult and certainly don't approach it in a spammy or manipulative way & try to build quality into your workflow and increasing visibility locally (in the UK at least) should be easy.
Some further reading that may help:
- http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/name-address-phone-number/
- http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/quality-not-quantity-citations-for-seo/
Hope that helps!
Marcusremote
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Have you ever changed the logo anchor text from "logo" to "keyword"? How Google considers?
Hi all, We know that generally logo with the website homepage link is the first link crawled by Google and other search engines. Can we change the anchor text from "logo" to "keyword"? Have any one tried or seen others doing? How Google considers it? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz1 -
New Google Update - weird ranking
Hi I wanted to get your thoughts on this keyword ranking. This page - https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/albatross-heavy-duty-office-chairs-24-stone is now ranking for heavy duty office chair 30 stone We don't mention 30 in the content anywhere, apart from the USPs at the top of the page - could this be it?! I don't know how to change this, or I guess Google is still figuring things out and maybe this will drop off? Love to get some thoughts on this! Becky
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Difference between Google's link: operator and GWT's links to your sites
I haven't used the Google operator link: for a while, and I noticed that there is a big disparity between the operator "link:" and the GWT's links to your site. I compared these results on a number of websites, my own and competitors, and the difference seem to be the same across the board. Has Google made a recent change with how they display link results via the operator? Could this be an indication that they are clean out backlinks?
Algorithm Updates | | tdawson090 -
URL Importance In Search
This may have been addressed before. If it is, please link me to the thread. I'm trying to SEO for local surrounding cities my client services. It was suggested I purchase domains relevant to those cities and create separate pages optimized for those local keywords. Wondering if this is a good tactic. For example my client's business is located in Chicago, but services the surrounding suburbs of Chicago. Whats the current, best way to SEO?
Algorithm Updates | | severitydesign0 -
Does Search Volume Directly Effect Organic Search Result Rankings?
For example, if 20,000 people searched for "seomoz toasters," do you think a page on seomoz.org that mentioned toasters would begin to rank well for the query "toasters"?
Algorithm Updates | | tatermarketing0 -
Does the Search Algorithm vary considerably locally?
Hey, i am from india and I just noticed that most of our searches are extremely different to those from the gooogle.com searches. Not some searches. I mean entire layouts. For instance, there were no google places in the search results in India. There was hardly any integration with the G+ for a long time after it launched, even though a large population on G+ was Indian. I got thinking on these lines. Any pointers?
Algorithm Updates | | rahul.bitmesra0 -
Google+ Local Optimization
What are the recommended ways to optimize the Google+ places page for clients. Do services like louder voice and customer lobby help? I'd love to get the group's opinion on what strategies are working for them on local optimization.
Algorithm Updates | | SEO5Team0 -
Google Update?
We have a website that for the past several weeks has been very consistent at between 13,500 and 14,200 daily visits and this site received 15,600 last Thursday. THIS week, Monday is at 22,200, Tuesday is at 26,200, and at mid-day today (at about our traffic halfway point in the day) we're already at 14,000 today. This was a site that was bringing about 14,000 visits as of May 16th last year and dropped to 11,000 the following week. The traffic to this site this week is so far beyond statistical analysis that there must have been something that happened.
Algorithm Updates | | sourcelinemedia0