Local and Organic Listings
-
Hi,
My client has a number of stores across the country (UK) and ideally I would like them to appear in both the local and organic listings - at the moment I appear more often than not on page one for one or the other - I have noticed however that some pages appear in both.
I understand that Google will not place a listing for the same page in both local and organic so I need to optimise a page on the site for organic and point my local listing to a different page (home page?). On some results though I am seeing my local result appearing with the home page URL listed but the actual link points to the internal store page which is the same page that is appearing in the organic listing (both on page one). Other local listings of mine appear with the store page URL showing in the result.
I haven't set anything up differently for these stores. Can anyone explain why this is happening?
Thanks,
Dan
-
You are very welcome, HippieChick. Glad this helped to clear up a big question at your office!
-
Thank you, Miriam! I've had my boss so mad at me for loosing page 1 ranking (we have Local ranking) and I couldn't explain what happened, even when I've worked so hard on the SEO of the site. (I'm no expert but there's a only a small budget at our company, and I'm the cheapest option). I've explained this to him and finally everyone's happy!
-
Thanks for your help guys,
I'll do some testing and see if I get any positive results.
I'll let you know if anything works.
Cheers,
Dan
-
Hey Dan,
Sorry, got ya.
You know, I am not sure how you go about this with any kind of reliability. Like you say, sometimes it crops up that someone has both but not very often in our experience. That said, the more abstract and hopeless the results then the more wacky and repetitive the organic results seem to get of late.
You could try and optimise some of your citations to get them up in the results on page one and possibly look at content on other sites to try and crowd out the results some with other pages that ultimately link to your clients site. We have had some good success with that for local clients.
Or, alternatively, like Miriam mentioned, try and create other, authoritative pages on the site that are also highly relevant but that may be a bit of a thankless task compared to the relative ease of standard local work.
Sounds like a greedy client wanting both.
Marcus
-
Obviously, not a direct answer, but you could always look at getting some of your citations to rank within the results for your targeted search terms. Also, this is where possible content on other sites can be used to further crowd out those results a little more.
It's good when all rivers run to the same place!
-
Hi Dan,
In general, you are correct that Google doesn't commonly show a double organic/local ranking on the first page for most companies. There are two main exceptions to this:
-
If the query,locale or both have little competition or Google lacks data about them.
-
The scenario in which a second page on the website is authoritative enough to gain an organic listing, independent of the page that is being linked to from the local result.
Around the Venice update in early 2012, double rankings became almost impossible to find. Slowly, it appears to me that they have become more common in recent times, typically in the above scenarios. There may be other exceptions, as well, but I believe these are the most typical.
-
-
Hi,
I suggest the following for Local SEO
- Add address in footer with local schemas
- NAP - Get your site with its address if possible in local directories or magazines or blog
- Add Site to Google's Map Maker
Good luck
Carla
-
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for your reply.
I think I pretty much have all bases covered that you mention, I probably didn't explain myself very well. Probably best I give an example:
A search for 'Self Storage Barking' brings up both local and organic listings obviously but I don't understand how Big Yellow have a local listing and organic listing pointing to the same page. A search for 'Self Storage Eastbourne' again brings up similar results this time for Safestore - both results point to the same page but a search for 'Self Storage Bristol' adds the long store page URL to the local listing, I guess stopping an organic listing too...
I don't understand why one local listing displays the home page URL and points to the store page and another displays the store page URL and blocks the organic listing if they are all set up the same.
Hope that explains better.
Dan
-
Hey Dan
That's kind of confusing to wrap my head around. Have you got an example you can post?
In essence, if you have a local business with multiple locations you are doing two categories of work here.
1. Organic SEO for the site as a whole
2. Local SEO for each location
Local SEO for each location requires a few things to work well in my experience.
2.1. A page on the site optimised for each distinct location (think address, schema, NAP etc)
2.2. An individual Google+ Local listing for each location linked back to the location page
Then the normal rules of local SEO apply and you need citations, local links, reviews etc for each of your individual locations.
A consistent address is important for businesses with a single location but here the scope for things to go wrong is greater so you have to be fastidious in your approach to keeping this consistent.
Audit existing citations, standardise everything, try to get reviews for each location and if they can mention location and service it seems to help more ("If you could mention the office location and service in your review we would really appreciate it").
Your locally optimised page for each store should be able to pop up in local and organic depending on obvious factors (competition etc) and you are creating a solid landing page for localised organic traffic and pure local results (7 pack etc).
The one point here is that you will usually have lots of citations kicking about that you have not created so be sure to audit the existing listings and treat each location as a separate entity. Competition and the approach may be different in Birmingham, Manchester, London etc and the approach may need to be tailored for each location depending on the strength of competition in each area in each location.
Hope that helps!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do Website Engagement Rates Impact Organic Rankings?
Hello Experts, 1) Do Website Engagement Rates Impact Organic Rankings? What does Website Engagement Rates means? Is it a visitor stay on my page long time? Can anyone guide me what things we can include in website engagement rates Specifically for "Ecommerce Sites" ? Can I consider - 1) Reviews 2) Video's 3) Good Images and informative description 4) video's 5) highlighting relevant blog posts at category pages 6) email subscription etc as website engagement? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wright3351 -
How to outrank a directory listing with high DA but low PA?
My site is at 4th place, 3 places above it is a gumtree (similar to yell, yelp) listing. How can you figure out how difficult it would be outrank those pages? I mean obviously the pages would have low PA and they are top based on the high DA of the site. This also seems to go back to keyword research and difficulty, when I'm doing keyword research and I see a wikipedia site in top 5 rank, or a yell.com or perhaps an article in forbes.com outranks your site. Typically the problem seems to be Google giving a lot of credit to these pages rankings based on the high DA rather than PA of the pages. How would you gauge the difficulty of that keyword then if the competition are pages with very high DA which is impossible to compete with but low PA? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | magusara2 -
Persistent listings or 301 redirects better for SEO?
Imagine these 2 scenarios for an ecommerce listing. 1. A listing that only closes once stock runs out 2. A listing that relists every 7 days assuming stock has run out and doing a 301 redirect to the latest version of that listing (imagine it relists several times) You might ask why on earth we would have the 2nd scenario, but we are an auction site where some listings can't be bid on. In other words those Buy Now only listings are also part of the auction model - they close after 7 days. For me it is a no-brainer that scenario 1 is better for SEO, and I have my ideas on why this is better for SEO than the second scenario such as age, SERP CTR, link equity not being diluted by 301 redirects not changing every 7 days when the listing relists multiple times etc. I was wondering if someone could articulate better than I possibly could why scenario 1 is better for SEO, and why scenario 1 would rank better in the SERPS....would it? Many thanks! Cheers, Simon
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sichristie0 -
Stock lists - follow of nofollow?
a bit of a catch 22 position here that i could use some advice on please! We look after a few Car dealership sites that have daily (some 3 times a day) stock feeds that add and remove cars form the site, which in turn removes/creates pages for each vehicle. We all know how much search engines like sites that have content that is updated regularly but the frequency it happens on our sites means we are left with lots of indexed pages that are no longer there. now my question is should i nofollow/disallow robots on all the pages that are for the details of the vehicles meaning the list pages will still be updated daily for "new content" or allow google to index everything and manage the errors to redirect to relevant pages? is there a "best practice" way to do this or is it really personal preference?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ben_dpp0 -
How Should We Best List Events Pages?
Hi everyone! Luke here from CHARGED.fm hoping that a brilliant mind could help me with another annoying (at least for me) technical seo question. It's about how we list the events on our ticketing site. Here's the rundown: We currently list tickets by event id, but our competitors keep the event page in the same silo and use the venue name and date of event in the url. So we do this: http://www.charged.fm/kinky-boots-tickets (disregard redirect for now) List the events where you can choose from these: http://www.charged.fm/event/tickets/2518362/kinky-boots
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | keL.A.xT.o
http://www.charged.fm/event/tickets/2511448/kinky-boots Moz lists these as duplicate content, so we're wondering how to resolve this. We're also wondering if it would be benficial to keep the events page in the same silo like our competitors: http://www.vividseats.com/theatre/kinky-boots-tickets/kinky-boots-9-20-1537274.html (notice how they go /theatre/kinky-boots-tickets/event/) Would it be beneficial to list like this? Is it inconsequential? Could we leave things the way that they are or should we at least add the venue and date to the events page URL? Thanks a lot for any help,
Luke0 -
List of Search Engines subscribing to the ajax crawling scheme?
Hi, Does anyone have a list of (major) Search Engines that subscribe to the Ajax Crawling Scheme? (https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/) Specifically interested in major international Search Engines such as Bing/Yahoo, Baidu & Yandex - if anyone knows, please let me know! Thanks in advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FashionLux0 -
Hundreds of thousands of 404's on expired listings - issue.
Hey guys, We have a conundrum, with a large E-Commerce site we operate. Classified listings older than 45 days are throwing up 404's - hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. Note that Webmaster Tools peaks at 100,000. Many of these listings receive links. Classified listings that are less than 45 days show other possible products to buy based on an algorithm. It is not possible for Google to crawl expired listings pages from within our site. They are indexed because they were crawled before they expired, which means that many of them show in search results. -> My thought at this stage, for usability reasons, is to replace the 404's with content - other product suggestions, and add a meta noindex in order to help our crawl equity, and get the pages we really want to be indexed prioritised. -> Another consideration is to 301 from each expired listing to the category heirarchy to pass possible link juice. But we feel that as many of these listings are findable in Google, it is not a great user experience. -> Or, shall we just leave them as 404's? : google sort of says it's ok Very curious on your opinions, and how you would handle this. Cheers, Croozie. P.S I have read other Q & A's regarding this, but given our large volumes and situation, thought it was worth asking as I'm not satisfied that solutions offered would match our needs.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sichristie0 -
How to position in local Google
Hello, It's been easy for me to jump in .com - English only results. But, regional google is making me problems. How to position there? What are the top 3 key elements for ranking locally that don't matter much internationally? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DaBomb110