301 redirect + new website copy
-
Hi There,
We are currently redeveloping our website and we're rewriting and optimising our many of our service pages.
I think I may already know the answer but should we apply 301 redirects from our old services pages to the new versions? The content subject matter will be the same on the new versions, they will just be completely reworded.
I would be interested to hear your views.
Thanks,
Stu
-
Sorry... I just had to jump in on this since the other members of the Roberts Tribe of Moz have chimed in. I agree completely with their assessment.
-
Good advice from Tom (no relation).
The only thoughts I'd add are:
1. Can you keep the URLs the same and just update the new page content and avoid the re-direct completely. (Unless of course you feel that optimising your URLs would deliver more benefit than retaining all the link equity)
2. Make sure you have an up to date list of your old pages and their URLs before you deploy the new site! Use this list to test!
3. Watch out for internal links in any old content and make sure these are up to date.
4. A good opportunity to look at your 404 page and see how you can improve that to help people find what they're looking for (not just telling them that the page can't be found)
-
Hi Stu,
I totally agree with Tom Roberts. Something to keep in mind as well. Redirects are absolutely necessary is you have incoming links to those pages. If you have a lot of pages you can get away with only doing redirects from the URL's that have incoming links.
-
Hi Stu
In general, yes - I would implement a 301 redirect here.
One thing to consider which might alter this decision are the links (if any) pointing to those pages at the moment. If you see any links going to those pages that you think may be spammy or against Google quality guidelines, it would be a good idea not to implement the 301 redirect - as then those bad links will no longer point to your site.
If you ever have a decision on whether to bulk redirect a large number of 301s - here's two things to consider:
-
Do those pages have any external links pointing towards it? If they don't, you're unlikely to get sustained 404 errors, as nothing will direct Google/Bing to visit those URLs (providing your on-site links and XML sitemap are updated too).
-
Have you had many page views for those pages? Hop into Google Analytics and look at the number of page views for the last 3 months. If it's a strong number, it would indicate people visit the page frequently and may have it bookmarked - in which case you'd want to redirect. If the value is low or nil, then it may not be an issue if you don't redirect.
The reason why you may not want to redirect a big number of URLs is that every redirection you add to the .htaccess file makes the file size bigger - and the bigger it is, theoretically the slower it may be. This is only a real concern when you have thousands of redirects to consider - so the above points are applicable then.
But if it's a small number, implement the 301s, update your onpage links and XML sitemap, and everything should be great!
Hope this helps
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Proper 301 redirect code for http to https
I see lots of suggestions on the web for forwarding http to https. I've got several existing sites that want to take advantage of the SSL boost for SEO (however slight) and I don't want to lose SEO placements in the process. I can force all pages to be viewed through the SSL - that's no problem. But for SEO reasons, do I need to do a 301 redirect line of code for every page in the site to the new "https" version? Or is there a way to catch all with one line of code that Google, etc. will recognize & honor?
Technical SEO | | wcksmith10 -
301 Redirects Relating to Your XML Sitemap
Lets say you've got a website and it had quite a few pages that for lack of a better term were like an infomercial, 6-8 pages of slightly different topics all essentially saying the same thing. You could all but call it spam. www.site.com/page-1 www.site.com/page-2 www.site.com/page-3 www.site.com/page-4 www.site.com/page-5 www.site.com/page-6 Now you decided to consolidate all of that information into one well written page, and while the previous pages may have been a bit spammy they did indeed have SOME juice to pass through. Your new page is: www.site.com/not-spammy-page You then 301 redirect the previous 'spammy' pages to the new page. Now the question, do I immediately re-submit an updated xml sitemap to Google, which would NOT contain all of the old URL's, thus making me assume Google would miss the 301 redirect/seo juice. Or do I wait a week or two, allow Google to re-crawl the site and see the existing 301's and once they've taken notice of the changes submit an updated sitemap? Probably a stupid question I understand, but I want to ensure I'm following the best practices given the situation, thanks guys and girls!
Technical SEO | | Emory_Peterson0 -
Importance of 301 Redirects
Hello, I have been brought in at the last minute to consult for an e-commerce client who is about to relaunch their website. The site currently receives 8000 visits a month, 3100 of which are from organic search. They have a few thousand product pages. The web development firm they are using is changing all of the old product page urls and using 'search engine friendly' urls for the new site, which is expected to launch in a few weeks. However, they did not/are not planning on including 301 redirects from the old URLs. Other than simply stating 'this will be bad for your SEO', what would be a correct way of explaining to the client how much of a problem it will be if their new site launches without 301s. For example, is this a big enough issue to delay the launch of the site / get in a contract dispute with the web developer?
Technical SEO | | stageagent0 -
301 redirect new site design
Hi I'm just setting up some 301 redirects for a new site design about to go live. The old site structure had some 'overview' pages in the urls (without any content) that just 302'd to a sub page. Do i need 301 redirect these overview page urls or since they had no content theres no need and I probably shouldn't or should i ? Also for pages that have no direct equivalent replacement is it still best to 301 to nearest relevant page or just leave it. For example a thank you page that currently shows after user submits email form wont be on new site (since message shows on form page after submission rather than new page). Should i 301 to form page or just leave it ? Cheers Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
200 Redirects for SEO instead of 301
We are working with a company on re-platforming our website. On a call yesterday they outlined a strategy to use 200 redirects for our top keywords instead of 301s. I am not familiar with this type of redirect and was wondering if anyone could provide some more insight.
Technical SEO | | EvergladesDirect0 -
301 redirect .htaccess problem
Can anyone explain to me why this doesn't work? Redirect 301 /category/diamond-pendants/nstart/1/start/(.*) http://www.povada.com/category/pendants/nstart/1/start/$1 Im trying to replace everything after /start/ and insert it into the new url. Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | 13375auc30 -
IIS Server Load for 500 Page Level 301 Redirects
We are migrating content from 10 sub domains to our www site. On an IIS sever, what is potential server load impact, if any, for setting up 500 plus page level redirects?
Technical SEO | | DigitalMkt0