One post on a keyword updated frequently vs. multiple posts
-
I'm wondering - which is better for SEO: having one post which is updated frequently or multiple posts on a given topic?
Take this example: I write the ultimate guide to grilling steak. This guide should be updated at least yearly, if not more frequently. Should all the updates be applied to the existing post, or should there be a new, yearly post for each yearly guide to grilling steak?
Another related question: is it bad for SEO to have a single-page site? Let's go back to the example: what if we create a single page which is the ultimate guide to grilling steak. We don't create additional content or anything else: it's only the guide which continues to get added to over time with new photos, new comments, new ideas, more information, etc. Is that going to rank better than a blog with separate posts that address all the different things that go into grilling steak (choice of meat, cooking methods, useful tools, etc.)?
Thanks,
--eric
-
Very helpful - thanks!
-
Thanks for the very thorough response! So if I'm understanding your response correctly:
Question #1: Updating a single post vs. Having multiple posts
Obviously this depends on the content, but it sounds like the solution you're advocating is to update the content at the original URL to have the most up-to-date content. With each update, you then move the "old" content to a new URL so in essence it stays archived and available for people.Question #2: Single page site vs. Broad site
This depends even more on the content and the goals. If you have one search term you're really trying to knock it out of the park on, then OK. But be aware of the risks of putting all your eggs in one basket (when it comes to both SEO and satisfying the needs of your audience).Am I getting it?
-
I believe the first idea that was about creating a guide and update it from time to time is a better ideas as this will help you get more and more links over the period of time and people will always find it relevant so they will stick to it!
2<sup>nd</sup> Question:
There is no harm in having a 1 page website if it is about a guide but then do not expect it to rank for multiple different keywords and if you want that then you ideally should use blog for that!
Hope this helps!
-
For the example you use I go for building one totally authoritative page and keeping it up to date. Surely they can only be one "ultimate" guide to grilling steak! You want this to be the definitive resource for anyone interested in the topic. As soon as you start having yearly pages you're going to risk competing with yourself.
And besides, what's better for the visitor? Aren't they going to be confused by multiple pages?
Having a constantly updated resource like this can really grow your authority over time. Find ways to encourage comments / shares and even user generated content. (Can you get review/testimonials) to support the methods described on the page etc.
On a resource page that I maintain, I also make sure I keep the published date updated. That way both visitors and google can see that not only the most comprehensive guide, but also fresh and updated. (I'm getting quite a few searches for "{topic} 2013".
If the page is changing frequently it can help regular visitors if you keep a change log (with dates!) at the bottom of the page so they can quickly find out what's new.
Do you experience seasonality in your niche or does your get stale quickly with time? If say you had a page covering the annual popularity of steak recipes (for example) then I'd probably take this approach:
I'd have a a "Top 10 Steak Recipies" page which I'd update every year with the latest version. The previous years post would be renamed/reposted as "Top 10 Steak Recipes in 2012". I'd then link to the latest version from each old post.
The key here is to make sure you maintain the URL for your main Top 10 page.
This way it will continue to earn links, shares etc over time. The latest version becomes the most authoritative version, but the previous versions are still there for anyone that's interested. (This assumes that the topics past history is something people care about!)
If you're not maintaining a consistent URL for your main post you'll be starting again from scratch every year.
With regards to your second question - yes a single definitive resource page can work, but it's going to depend on a bunch of other factors. For instance, do you have a big, well known brand with a massively authoritative site sitting at the top of your SERPS!
By having just the one hyper-specific one/two page site you're narrowing the topics/keywords your going to be competing for and potentially limiting the reach of your site. If there's traffic there and you can compete then maybe this is exactly what you want to do - but it's a bit like having all your eggs in one basket.
A safer bet is probably a broader site, but keeping the pages specific to particular subjects but again this depends on the resources/time/money you have to develop and maintain content for a bigger site.
What are your goals for the site? What is the website going to have to do to satisfy both your goals and those of your visitors? It can be tough to do that with a one-pager. Who are your audience and what do you need to do to reach them.
-
It's an interesting idea. I think i'm going to side with having multiple pages.
1. As long as your site architecture is done right, even a new page should be supported with good authority from the domain
2. The old post can still have good content on it and receive long-tail visits that the new page will not receive
3. Wouldn't the user experience be much better for a site that you can move around in, not a 30,000 word page? Your bounce rate might seem abnormally high too, which will affect rankings.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Updating url name of a key page
One of my key pages has a url name that is completely non descriptive ('About') with no keywords in it that match the important content on that page. Should I create a new page with a proper url name and move the contents there (lose the authority of the current page), or create the url name only and redirect to the existing About page?
On-Page Optimization | | ppopov0 -
Canonicalising a product with multiple variants
I am working with an ecommerce site and have encountered an issue I haven't come across before and would appreciate some advice on how to proceed. There are multiple variation products with one master product and then up to 20 or 30 variant products, the variation could be colour, size or both. The site has been set up to canonicalise all the variations to the master variant product, which I understand to be best practice. But, this is where the issue occurs, the master variant product URL 302 redirects to one of the variant product URLs. Example below. My question is, is this harmful to our SEO efforts? Would be be best to canonicalise to a preferred colour or size variation? EXAMPLE: Master variant product: www.example.co.uk/primary-category/product-123 Seeing this product on the page and clicking will 302 redirect to www.example/co.uk/primiary-category/product-123/colour-456 On page www.example/co.uk/primiary-category/product-123/colour-456 the canonical tag is www.example.co.uk/primary-category/product-123 Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | SimonKenworthy0 -
Would you consider this title to be keyword stuffing or bad?
A competitor uses the following format for all of their meta titles: [Store Name] Voucher Codes, Cashback & Discount Codes | [Website Name] They do vary their titles slightly, depending on which keywords are searched for, for the particular store. What do you think about this title? I'm torn between it looking a little 'stuffy' but them also getting across the point that their page offers all of that.
On-Page Optimization | | vickluque0 -
Keyword and SERP Help Please
So I am curious about keyword placements etc. My main question is: So is whatever you search for in say Google must be the same in a website - to be found? So say you search for plumbers in Colorado Then you must have that exact, same phrase, in your website to be found? or does Google know based on title tags and such that a page is about plumbers and they service Colorado? I just want to make sure I am understanding how keywords work to be found. I mean you can have Colorado plumbers and plumbers in Colorado. So its hard to figure out how to use keywords. So a brief suggestion is greatly appreciated Chris
On-Page Optimization | | Berner0 -
Should a keyword be optimized on One page only?
I have a niche website that focusses on selling pizza delivery bags, the search keywords that are used by users are about 7 and their are another 15 long tail keywords. The question is do i optimize every keyword per one page only? i have a blog on the website www.prodelpizzabags.com/blog/ if i write a blog post that would "compete" internally with another keyword, what should i do, what are the best practices I would be thankful for any insights regarding keyword/page optimization
On-Page Optimization | | akramsabra0 -
Number of occurances of a keyword
At the moment my site is down due to issue at the datat centre so please don't ask for teh url as it will be some time before it is back up and running. On one of my pages I am targeting two related keyword phrases e.g. "How to use Widgets" and "Using Widgets" Each of these phrases appears once each in the Tile tag, H1 tag and meta description and two or three times in the body text. Which I beileve is current best practice. However the word Widgets appears more 60 times in total could this be hurting the rankings of the other two phrases? Many Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | spes1230 -
Lead With Branded Keywords or Descriptive Keywords in Page Title for (Niche) Site?
Our site is hingeheads.com, and our products and product catalog are unique in two ways. For one our product is not something that people are generally aware of, and secondly our entire product catalog consists of different variations of the same product. **Catalog Overview: **http://hingeheads.com/collections/all Product Example: http://hingeheads.com/products/dolphin I keep wondering if it is better to lead the title with "branded keywords" [1] or with "descriptive keywords" [2]? Dolphin HingeHead | Unique Home Decor & Gift Idea | HingeHeads Dolphin Decor Accessories & Unique Gift Ideas | HingeHeads I am currently going with the second solution, but I am always wondering if that's the right/better solution. I am curious to hear feedback from people who have more experience with this than I do. How would you structure the title for our product pages? Thanks! Kai
On-Page Optimization | | hingeheads0 -
Meta Keywords, Should I just remove them?
howdy guys, I am helping my father out with his SEO for his company. I am taking over the SEO helm so to speak and have to do a complete on site make over( offsite as well eventually soon) He has on every page meta keywords that are just stuffed with "money keywords" and they are the same on every page, Should i just delete them entirely and leave that attribute blank? Hope to hear back soon, thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | david3050