One post on a keyword updated frequently vs. multiple posts
-
I'm wondering - which is better for SEO: having one post which is updated frequently or multiple posts on a given topic?
Take this example: I write the ultimate guide to grilling steak. This guide should be updated at least yearly, if not more frequently. Should all the updates be applied to the existing post, or should there be a new, yearly post for each yearly guide to grilling steak?
Another related question: is it bad for SEO to have a single-page site? Let's go back to the example: what if we create a single page which is the ultimate guide to grilling steak. We don't create additional content or anything else: it's only the guide which continues to get added to over time with new photos, new comments, new ideas, more information, etc. Is that going to rank better than a blog with separate posts that address all the different things that go into grilling steak (choice of meat, cooking methods, useful tools, etc.)?
Thanks,
--eric
-
Very helpful - thanks!
-
Thanks for the very thorough response! So if I'm understanding your response correctly:
Question #1: Updating a single post vs. Having multiple posts
Obviously this depends on the content, but it sounds like the solution you're advocating is to update the content at the original URL to have the most up-to-date content. With each update, you then move the "old" content to a new URL so in essence it stays archived and available for people.Question #2: Single page site vs. Broad site
This depends even more on the content and the goals. If you have one search term you're really trying to knock it out of the park on, then OK. But be aware of the risks of putting all your eggs in one basket (when it comes to both SEO and satisfying the needs of your audience).Am I getting it?
-
I believe the first idea that was about creating a guide and update it from time to time is a better ideas as this will help you get more and more links over the period of time and people will always find it relevant so they will stick to it!
2<sup>nd</sup> Question:
There is no harm in having a 1 page website if it is about a guide but then do not expect it to rank for multiple different keywords and if you want that then you ideally should use blog for that!
Hope this helps!
-
For the example you use I go for building one totally authoritative page and keeping it up to date. Surely they can only be one "ultimate" guide to grilling steak! You want this to be the definitive resource for anyone interested in the topic. As soon as you start having yearly pages you're going to risk competing with yourself.
And besides, what's better for the visitor? Aren't they going to be confused by multiple pages?
Having a constantly updated resource like this can really grow your authority over time. Find ways to encourage comments / shares and even user generated content. (Can you get review/testimonials) to support the methods described on the page etc.
On a resource page that I maintain, I also make sure I keep the published date updated. That way both visitors and google can see that not only the most comprehensive guide, but also fresh and updated. (I'm getting quite a few searches for "{topic} 2013".
If the page is changing frequently it can help regular visitors if you keep a change log (with dates!) at the bottom of the page so they can quickly find out what's new.
Do you experience seasonality in your niche or does your get stale quickly with time? If say you had a page covering the annual popularity of steak recipes (for example) then I'd probably take this approach:
I'd have a a "Top 10 Steak Recipies" page which I'd update every year with the latest version. The previous years post would be renamed/reposted as "Top 10 Steak Recipes in 2012". I'd then link to the latest version from each old post.
The key here is to make sure you maintain the URL for your main Top 10 page.
This way it will continue to earn links, shares etc over time. The latest version becomes the most authoritative version, but the previous versions are still there for anyone that's interested. (This assumes that the topics past history is something people care about!)
If you're not maintaining a consistent URL for your main post you'll be starting again from scratch every year.
With regards to your second question - yes a single definitive resource page can work, but it's going to depend on a bunch of other factors. For instance, do you have a big, well known brand with a massively authoritative site sitting at the top of your SERPS!
By having just the one hyper-specific one/two page site you're narrowing the topics/keywords your going to be competing for and potentially limiting the reach of your site. If there's traffic there and you can compete then maybe this is exactly what you want to do - but it's a bit like having all your eggs in one basket.
A safer bet is probably a broader site, but keeping the pages specific to particular subjects but again this depends on the resources/time/money you have to develop and maintain content for a bigger site.
What are your goals for the site? What is the website going to have to do to satisfy both your goals and those of your visitors? It can be tough to do that with a one-pager. Who are your audience and what do you need to do to reach them.
-
It's an interesting idea. I think i'm going to side with having multiple pages.
1. As long as your site architecture is done right, even a new page should be supported with good authority from the domain
2. The old post can still have good content on it and receive long-tail visits that the new page will not receive
3. Wouldn't the user experience be much better for a site that you can move around in, not a 30,000 word page? Your bounce rate might seem abnormally high too, which will affect rankings.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unique Pages with Thin Content vs. One Page with Lots of Content
Is there anyone who can give me a definitive answer on which of the following situations is preferable from an SEO standpoint for the services section of a website? 1. Many unique and targeted service pages with the primary keyword in the URL, Title tag and H1 - but with the tradeoff of having thin content on the page (i.e. 100 words of content or less). 2. One large service page listing all services in the content. Primary keyword for URL, title tag and H1 would be something like "(company name) services" and each service would be in the H2 title. In this case, there is lots of content on the page. Yes, the ideal situation would be to beef up content for each unique pages, but we have found that this isn't always an option based on the amount of time a client has dedicated to a project.
On-Page Optimization | | RCDesign741 -
Avoid Multiple Page Title Elements...
Hi guys i'm just going trough some pages with the seomoz one page optimization tool. As one of the "easy fix" suggestions it says: "Avoid Multiple Page Title Elements" "Explanation: Web pages are meant to have a single title, and for both accessibility and search engine optimization reasons, we strongly recommend following this practice.Recommendation: Remove all but a single page title element." By single element does it mean 1 single word? Is that realistic?
On-Page Optimization | | Immanuel0 -
Positioning one site in two languages
Hi all, I have used the plugin wpml in order to have one site in different languages (Spanish and English). The problem is that this plugin doesn't work with all in one SEO plugin so that the spanish home and the english home have the same title. Google has positionated in the first position the english one in google.es. How can I revert the situation if I fix the problem with other plugin? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Dealing with updating blog posts
I run a travel and culture blog which means that I write about a lot of upcoming events which recur each year. Usually I title (and slug) the page with the event name and date. When it comes to update the article the next year, sometimes it's as little as changing the date, other times more has changed and it needs to be substantially re-written. Until now, what I've done is update the title, content, and then re-posted (sometimes altering the slug where it's needed to be done). Sometimes it works fine and Google keeps me ranking well, but other times the changes dont get such a great response. I have these options (as far as I can see). Which do you think is best? 1. To create a new article each year and put a message at the start of the previous one to say, click here to read about the 2012 event 2. To continue what I'm doing updating, changing the slug, and re-posting (ie changing the date). 3. To write a new article and insert a 301 redirect. I need to make sure the article appears as a new article in my RSS feed and also on the homepage. Look forward to your ideas! Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | ben10000 -
Forcing keywords into domain structure
Hi there, Over the last few years, I've seen people structuring their site so that their main content is all housed in a folder named after the site's primary keywords. For example, if I had some content about home insurance, normally naming conventions state that I might put the content at a URL such as: www.mydomain.com/home-insurance However, some sites, may change this structure to include their main keyword again in the URL string: www.mydomain.com/insurance/home-insurance The folder 'insurance' would normally hold the site's Sitemap to increase internal linking strategy too. I'd be really interested to hear whether anyone has seen any serious benefits from re-structuring their site in this way? What are your thoughts on this? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | theshortstack0 -
Should you try to rank for misspelled keywords?
Hi there, 2 part question: Is it best practice to try to rank for misspelled keywords that bring in lots of traffic or should you instead just try to rank for the correct spelling of that keyword and hope that you rank better on the misspelling as an indirect result? E.G. The misspelled keyword "Hamilton island accomodation" is a common misspelling that brings in traffic but we have an "F" rank for that term (obviously because we spell accommodation correctly on our site). We don't want to misspell anything but are there techniques to rank better for misspellings that won't hurt content quality? The On-Page Optimization tool says that our website doesn't rank in the top 50 on Google Aus for "Accomodation Hamilton Island" or "Hamilton Island Accomodation" but when i do a manual search, we actually are the first result. Is this an error with the On-Page optimization tool? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | HamiltonIsland0 -
Keyword self cannibalization
Hello, I'm confused about the recommendations for avoiding keyword self cannibalization. I have a niche blog and some of my sticky posts on the homepage contain my site's main keyword in their title. For example, say if my homepage has "dog training" as it's main keyword, then there are going to be links to more longtail pages with titles such as "dog training London", "dog training Liverpool" etc. When I do this SeoMoz's on-page optimization tool tells me that this is keyword self cannibalization. I am building links to the inner pages using the longtail keywords only. 1. Do I need to rename pages with just "london" and "liverpool" etc and remove "dog training" from those links? 2. What is the best thing to do in this situation? Thanks, Kevin
On-Page Optimization | | KMack0 -
Three Sites or One?
I have a client who provides three distinct, although related, services. Some of his competitors only provide one of those services, and thus their sites are more saturated with that particular service. Would it be best to develop three different sites optimized for each particular service, or could I achieve the same effect by optimizing different sections of one site for each service?
On-Page Optimization | | kscotbarr0