Several short articles, or one long one?
-
This may be a very basic question...
In terms of the overall benefit to the SEO of a website, is it better to have, say, 4 pages about different aspects of the same subject (i.e. wooden lintels, steel lintels, concrete lintels and cavity lintels) or to have one page containing all the information?
I have a site with roughly 250 pages, which could probably condense down to almost half that. The vast majority of inbound links point to either the homepage or one of the 20-odd most vistited pages. Of those, 2 or 3 pages count for roughly 70% of entrances.
So should I concentrate on adding new pages, or improving/expanding the existing pages?
-
I suppose that is true, e-commerce and editorial sites will organize information differently. With e-commerce the last thing you want is to clutter a page with tons of products to make it difficult for users to find exactly what they are looking for. But with editorial sites like wikipedia it would make more sense to have the most comprehensive page you can create.
-
Sure Daniel, your example makes sense for an e-commerce site. The question above asked about "different aspects of the same subject," so I would write a thorough article about that subject, which I assume is an editorial here or Russ would have said product, that covers all aspects mentioned. Personally, I wouldn't want to click through a maze of pages to find the info I wanted; I'd like it right there in front of me. Just a preference here.
So I'm going to have to disagree with you about the 5 separate pages for 5 key words in this case. Granted, content for e-commerce sites like your example should be much more focused than a blog or review about a product, as there is a lot of SEO magic you can do with reviews using microformating and RSS, but if you're writing a tutorial or editorial, I'd go with a complete full page with those 5 key subjects organized in paragraphs with key words used in headings, bold text, image alt tags, anchor text, bullet lists, and content. The page rank would be much better than 5 separate pages.
-
I would place my bets that Amazon's page won on the basis of domain authority.
-
I have a number of long articles that were produced by merging the content of multiple short articles. These single-page articles bring in a lot more total traffic than all of the short articles combined. They pull that traffic because of the enormous diversity of words on the page but also because of higher overall rankings.
If you merge these lintel articles and produce a title tag like below, I think that the page will be a candidate for the "lintel" and "lintels" SERPs plus all of the subterms such as "wooden lintels"......
<title>Structural Lintels: Wooden, Steel, Concrete, Stone, Cavity</title>
Pages like this should have a general description of lintels at the top and then subheading paragraphs for wooden, steel, concrete, etc. A menu of on-page anchor text links will be obviously displayed at the top of the page - much like you see in a long wikipedia article. These on-page anchor links, in my opinion, have almost as much optimization power as a title tag.
I agree that a big page like this might not immediately rank as well as individual pages, each optimized for a single keyword. However, these big impressive pages will attract links faster than several short articles. Those links will power them to higher overall traffic and rankings in the long term - which is what I am playing for.
-
In your example, I believe a substantive page about lintels has a better chance to rank for the term lintel. However, if you want to rank for wooden lintel, steel lintel, etc. then you have a better chance with content targeted toward each keyword. Each of these pages would even link to each other.
That's my opinion though because I go after the long tail traffic. If you want to try and rank for lintels, then great, make a comprehensive page about them. But if you want to rank for something specific like wooden lintels, then you need a page about wooden lintels, not a comprehensive guide to lintels.
-
In your example, both Border's and Amazon have a page about the exact same subject. Amazon said more about the subject, so they won out in quality. This doesn't mean you have to spew all the information imaginable onto a page.
If you have 5 keywords, then 5 great pages of content are going to be much, much better than one huge page of content in achieving rankings for all 5.
Imagine I review fitness equipment. I want to rank for treadmills, ellipticals and exercise bikes. Is it better for me to clutter one page with as many reviews of every treadmill, elliptical and bike as I can? Of course not, I want my treadmills on one page, ellipticals on another, and exercise bikes on another.
But what I want to do is be as substantive and in depth as possible on each of those pages, not some superficial sentence or two. So while I believe you are right, large pages are good, you should not have large pages covering multiple topics and keywords. Go in depth on your one topic and rank for your keyword and its variations.
Back to my example, my treadmill page could rank for treadmills, treadmill reviews, treadmill ratings, best treadmills, home treadmills, etc. If my page covers treadmills, ellipticals and bikes it's definitely not rankings for all those treadmill terms. Targeted content wins, but like you and others are saying, it needs to contain substantial content.
-
Hum. I've watch videos from Matt Cutts and read in quite a few places that large pages win in SERPs. One comparison I'm sure you can find was between Amazon and Borders and how Amazon's page for the same product was over three times as long and contained 5x the content. Subsequently, it ranked higher than Border's page.
I create pages with relevant content, easy-to-read formating, descriptive images, and SEO recommendations from Google and SEOmoz. Takes me longer to get things done, but I'm pretty happy with my rankings.
-
What are the keywords you're optimizing for and what are other people with the same keywords writing? Look for gaps where you can create unique content that contains your key terms. That might result in a big rewrite, or some minor tinkering (probably not given only 20 of 250 pages are being found) or something in between.
It's also worth identifying the pages that drive most visitors to buy / get in touch / click ads / whatever. Why are these pages more successful than the others? Traffic that converts is the best traffic.
Hope that helps.
-
I have lots of articles on websites and the ones that earn the most links, pull the most traffic and rank the highest in the search engines - for the most difficult keywords - are the ones with the most substantive content.
When I write an article about a subject I want the person to land on the page and say WOW! - without having to read it.
In your example, if someone was writing an article about buildings and used the word lintel and wanted to link to a page that explained them, which do you think they would link to? A short page about wooden lintels or a substantive page with descriptions and photos of many types of lintels?
-
More pages is better as long as you are not repeating yourself. This way you can make very targeted content for very targeted keywords. It would be hard for a page about wooden lintels, steel lintels, concrete lintels and cavity lintels to rank for for the term "steel lintels." However, if you have a page solely about steel lintels, its a lot easier to get rankings on that phrase.
The key is not to repeat yourself. You don't want duplicate content. Ehow got dinged on this in the Panda update and so did about.com because they would have two articles about essentially the same thing, like "how to use a screw with a flathead" and then "how to use a screw with a phillips head." techinically, they are slightly different, but they are essentially going to say the exact same thing except for the one detail about the shape.
So don't make a bunch of articles that are all nearly identical, but create as many pages as you can to get very targeted content.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Tag Clouds in Google Despite Canonical Links for Single Tags/Articles
I am frustrated to see a lot tag clouds in Google even though I programmed my tagged pages to display a canonical link to the linking article if the is only one result for the tag cloud. The goal to to make sure that the article, which is of better quality than the tag page, ends up in Google without a bunch of thin tag pages getting in there. For instance this article should be in Google and this tag should not be because that tag has a canonical URL for that article. I do not have a lot of experience with tag cloud SEO because I prefer to limit such pages to categories, but I have found tag clouds to be important for aggregating information for specific issues, people, or places that are not already a site category. Some tags I have used to power social media pages that update automatically from RSS feeds for their related tag archives. That is quite useful for pages like that. Should I start using Meta noindex for those instead of rel canonical? I have already done that for author profiles because author profiles get a lot of on site links compared to individual articles because my gridviews use javascript for paging. The same is true for the tags, so if a tag is tagged in 30 articles it will have links from 30 articles but if those articles are not in the latest 20 for that tag only the latest 20 will have links back from the tag archive. I also suspect having a lot of tag pages with little content to negatively impact my indexing rate. I will see a number of recent tag pages added before new articles.
On-Page Optimization | | CopBlaster.com0 -
How/when do you trim your article pages?
Hi all, I wanted to ask what have you all done to your article section that has made a difference to the site's SEO performance? What's the criteria for deciding which articles top cut or 301 redirect to the main page For example: 1. you have a slightly irrelevant article to your website topic, low conversions, but a lot of quality links to page, but no primary keywords in article title. 2. You have a slightly irrelevant article to your website, low conversion, but a lot of quality links AND you have your site's primary keywords in article title 3. You have a relevant topic to the site, but low engagement and low conversions Thanks for all your help!
On-Page Optimization | | SDavis111 -
Can any one give some advise on how to work out which back links are bad
we are trying to clean up our site and believe we have bad back links can any one tell me how to work out which ones to disavow
On-Page Optimization | | CostumeD0 -
Too many forum posts - may I delete the oldest ones?
Hello, We've got product pages with comments. We have collected so many comments for the last two years on these pages so they made problems to our website. We plan to cut every posts older than one year to solve this problem. Could it be bad for SEO? (Yes, these are really unique and relevant posts...) How could I predict the consequences? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | DDL0 -
Large block of several thousand words on homepage of Ecommerce site - opinions?
I work for a local SEO company who are continually adding content to the home page of clients websites. While i do agree that it is a good idea to add content to the home page and to link to inner pages, the home page of several clients exceeds 6,000 or more words. Every month, an article based on a brand or category (which already has its own page which is optimised with an article) is added to the home page with links to inner pages. I have stressed that it is not a good idea to have so much content on the home page, and even more so that it shouldn't target all the same keywords. I have pointed out that many of the brand and category pages do not rank well for their keywords, whereas in most cases it is the home page which is ranking instead, which i have suggested this is because the home page is too well optimised for those keywords. What are your opinions on this? Are you for or against continually adding content (which already has its own designated page) to the home page of an Ecommerce website? I should also add that this content is within a drop down div box at the footer on some sites and just above the footer on other sites. The category and brand pages also have drop down divs with an article just below the header.
On-Page Optimization | | Kinsel0 -
Is it damaging to have TOO long a title tag these days? i.e. well over character limit
Is it damaging to have TOO long a title tag these days? i.e. well over character limit. I learned that title tags should be around 70 characters. I am new at this, but have a client that has three times that, with the same three keyword phrases repeating 3-4 times. And then NO h1's or h2's in the text......advice? Rookie here 🙂
On-Page Optimization | | cschwartzel0 -
I have one page on my site... but still get duplicate name and content errors.
i have only the index.html page. my domain has a permanent 301 to the root. why am i getting duplicate problems? i only have one page the index .html???
On-Page Optimization | | one4u2see0 -
Should one page with markers or six separate pages?
Hi - I'm working on a site that was set up with 6 bios on one page, with markers jumping to each person's name. I was thinking about separating those into 6 different pages, but not sure if that's the right thing to do. Advice about keeping the bios on one page vs splitting them up? (Am I more likely to rank for those peoples' names if I have a unique page, or is the one page url with each different marker in it, just as good?) Ranking well for those names isn't a huge goal of the site, but it would be nice to make the choice that would help with that rank. Thanks for your input Emma
On-Page Optimization | | emmas0