Effect Of Restoring Old Website After Implementing 301 Redirects
-
After redesigning my old Drupal website and launching a new "improved" Wordpress version the new version is performing badly. Ranking is poor and conversions don't occur. I realize that my new design is bad (no call to action, poor structure, text heavy). New business inquiries have ceased. The site contains 450 pages.
After spending $25,000 and a year of my life I see the new version is not an improvement!
What would be the effect of reinstating the old version of the site and doing 301 redirects back to it? Would the old rankings be restored?
I need to decide whether I should revert or focus on fixing flaws in the improved design.
Any thoughts??
Thanks,
Alan -
Hi Chris:
Thanks for your response.
301 redirects were implemented properly. The redirects were to pages that contained the same content as the original ones.
Previously out of 50 target phrases maybe 15 were in Google's top ten ranking. Now maybe 3 are.
You are probably right, no going back need to focus on improving the Wordpress site.
Thanks,
Alan -
- I'm not getting a sense that you dealt properly with the transition from the old site to the new one. Did you look at the old site's back links and the search traffic it received and make decisions on the 301s that had to be implemented? If not read these:
- Moving your site - Webmaster Tools Help
- Redirection - SEO Best Practices - Moz
- 301 Redirect Relevance
The things you're talking about aren't the typical topics involved in transitioning from an old site to a new one. It may be best to relax a bit, make the decision to move forward with the new site and begin the process of learning the SEO process. The benefit of using a wordpress site is that you can do most everything you need to do yourself, where your Drupal site wasn't that friendly. Still, you'll have to understand what's what, as far as SEO, and proceed in an orderly fashion. A good place to begin is with The SEO Guide From Moz. You can still evolve the site into the one you want it to be but that won't happen by accident--you're going to have to develop your search marketing knowledge and apply it wisely--it's what your competitors are doing, you've just got to learn to do it better than they are. Moz is a good place to figure out how to do that.
If I've misunderstood, and you're more advanced than that
-
Thanks Chris:
The URL is www.nyc-officespace-leader.com
On an positive note the following is pretty good:
-Code validates
-Site speed is fastThe following is weak:
-Yoast has not yet been uses to optimize for keywords on the vast bulk of the 500 pages
-The way CDN on Amazon has been set up, Google only sees photo filename as alphanumeric tags. Also, I can't edit more than the first ALT tag of photos. The ALT tag repeats on each photo. More than 800 of 1100 images have yet to be indexed. Out of 290 property listings, 110 have yet to be indexed. CDN (Amazon) was supposed to be an improvement. It is turning into a nightmare. DOn't know if it is contributing to the drop in rank.
-My developer did not use useful ALT tags in the header. My name is used for two images. Very wasteful use of SEO real estate.
-In terms of general design, it looks aesthetic but I don't think it is clear to the visitor what they need to do. Very weak design. A nightmare, and an expensive one at that!!Am I missing something really obvious about the site?
THANKS!!!
ALAN -
Kingalan,
If you had reason to leave the old site behind, those reasons will still be there if you return to it. Without knowing any more than what you've said, I'd lean towards keeping the new site, making sure all the transitional SEO tasks were taken care of when you moved to the new site and just press hard on optimizing/marketing the new wordpress. Did you make sure you followed through on all the SEO that had to take place when you moved from the original site?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Subdirectory site / 301 Redirects / Google Search Console
Hi There, I'm a web developer working on an existing WordPress site (Site #1) that has 900 blog posts accessible from this URL structure: www.site-1.com/title-of-the-post We've built a new website for their content (Site #2) and programmatically moved all blog posts to the second website. Here is the URL structure: www.site-1.com/site-2/title-of-the-post Site #1 will remain as a normal company site without a blog, and Site #2 will act as an online content membership platform. The original 900 posts have great link juice that we, of course, would like to maintain. We've already set up 301 redirects that take care of this process. (ie. the original post gets redirected to the same URL slug with '/site-2/' added. My questions: Do you have a recommendation about how to best handle this second website in Google Search Console? Do we submit this second website as an additional property in GSC? (which shares the same top-level-domain as the original) Currently, the sitemap.xml submitted to Google Search Console has all 900 blog posts with the old URLs. Is there any benefit / drawback to submitting another sitemap.xml from the new website which has all the same blog posts at the new URL. Your guidance is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HimalayanInstitute0 -
Google Is Indexing my 301 Redirects to Other sites
Long story but now i have a few links from my site 301 redirecting to youtube videos or eCommerce stores. They carry a considerable amount of traffic that i benefit from so i can't take them down, and that traffic is people from other websites, so basically i have backlinks from places that i don't own, to my redirect urls (Ex. http://example.com/redirect) My problem is that google is indexing them and doesn't let them go, i have tried blocking that url from robots.txt but google is still indexing it uncrawled, i have also tried allowing google to crawl it and adding noindex from robots.txt, i have tried removing it from GWT but it pops back again after a few days. Any ideas? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cuarto7150 -
301 redirect to avoid duplicate content penalty
I have two websites with identical content. Haya and ethnic Both websites have similar products. I would like to get rid of ethniccode I have already started to de-index ethniccode. My question is, Will I get any SEO benefit or Will it be harmful if I 301 direct the below only URL’s https://www.ethniccode/salwar-kameez -> https://www.hayacreations/collections/salwar-kameez https://www.ethniccode/salwar-kameez/anarkali-suits - > https://www.hayacreations/collections/anarkali-suits
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | riyaaaz0 -
Hacked website - Dealing with 301 redirects and a large .htaccess file
One of my client's websites was recently hacked and I've been dealing with the after effects of it. The website is now clean of malware and I already appealed to Google about the malware issue. The current issue I have is dealing with the 20, 000+ crawl errors which are garbage links that were created from the hacking. How does one go about dealing with all the 301 redirects I need to create for all the 404 crawl errors? I'm already noticing an increased load time on the website due to having a rather large .htaccess file with a couple thousand 301 redirects done already which I fear will result in my client's website performance and SEO performance taking a hit as well.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FPK0 -
Persistent listings or 301 redirects better for SEO?
Imagine these 2 scenarios for an ecommerce listing. 1. A listing that only closes once stock runs out 2. A listing that relists every 7 days assuming stock has run out and doing a 301 redirect to the latest version of that listing (imagine it relists several times) You might ask why on earth we would have the 2nd scenario, but we are an auction site where some listings can't be bid on. In other words those Buy Now only listings are also part of the auction model - they close after 7 days. For me it is a no-brainer that scenario 1 is better for SEO, and I have my ideas on why this is better for SEO than the second scenario such as age, SERP CTR, link equity not being diluted by 301 redirects not changing every 7 days when the listing relists multiple times etc. I was wondering if someone could articulate better than I possibly could why scenario 1 is better for SEO, and why scenario 1 would rank better in the SERPS....would it? Many thanks! Cheers, Simon
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sichristie0 -
301 Redirect from now defunct website?
Hi guys Quick question about 301 redirection between domains. I currently manage a website, lets call it website A. Website A sells a particular product range, however the decision has been made by the powers that be to pull the plug on the business and sell the products previously sold via Website A via another website within the parent companies control.....lets call it Website B. I need to make it clear to customers of Website A that the company no longer operates but want to pass the SEO equity that has been built up over time to the relevant pages on Website B. My plan was to 1. 301 Redirect all key landing pages on Website A to the most relevant pages on Website B 2. Initially keep the website A homepage live but change the message to say "Website A no longer operates, but Website B can help etc. etc." Remove all sub links from navigation. 3. Monitor referral and direct traffic levels and consider 301 redirecting website A homepage to Website B homepage in the long term. My questions: Does this sound like the best approach? If not, what alternatives are there? Will Website A look like a link farm for Website B? I dont want this obviously!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DHS_SH0 -
Should I run 302 first before implementing 301?
I just want to ask if it is necessary to run 302 redirections first before redirecting old to new URLs permanently. I heard that we should run temporary redirects first so we can check after and to avoid passing the link juice but I want to hear thoughts from experts. Do i need to test 302s for old pages that are still live or should we redirect old URLs once these pages already removed from the site?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | esiow20130 -
301 redirects.
Hi everyone, I am having some issues with an a few dynamic URLs that are not redirecting; Example: http://www.example.com/shop-online?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage_images.tpl&product_id=69164&category_id=303 I first tried to carry out a standard 301 which looked like this; Redirect 301 /longurlwith&category_id=303 http://www.example.com/new-url Which didn't work. After a little bit of research I added the following into the htaccess file; RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.example.com$ [NC]RewriteRule ^/shop-online$(.*)$ http://www.example.com/shop-online$ [NE,L,R=301] Which caused the website to error 500 (Not cool). So now I am stumped. Any help would be really appreciated as I'm sure it's an easy fix but I can't quite my finger on it. Thanks in advance :).
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AduroLabs0