Should I delete past blogs that are "unoptimized"?
-
Hi guys,
I was recently brought on to do basic contracted content marketing for an ecommerce website built on Shopify. They have a ton of old blogs that were written with NO keywords in mind. The meta tags are totally different for what they want to get found for, links, ALT tags, etc. Should I delete all of those blog posts? Or just start optimizing new blogs?
Thanks so much,
Adam
-
EGOL, thank you! I'll try re-working a couple of the popular blog posts. Appreciated!
-
Thanks Tom, your insights are really helpful! I appreciate the time you took to respond.
-
The only thing I would ask is: What do you aim to achieve by deleting them?
They may not be 'optimised' posts, but if they aren't doing any harm - and by that I mainly been duplicate or thin content - then I don't see any reason to delete them. There is a school of thought as well is that a site with more indexed pages will, roughly speaking, be seen more as an authority site (and we all know Google loves authority).
So I'd not worry about them and focus on your fresh content and just optimise them. I'll just say as well, you don't always want to write with keywords in mind - your audience should be the primary goal, but of course it pays to have keywords in things like title tags, h1s and metas etc. Just don't stuff the thing with the keyword throughout (I'm sure you already knew this).
TL;DR - No worries mate, just write away!
-
See if any of those old blog posts are pulling in traffic or links. Maybe you will be surprised. If they are pulling in current traffic improve them. If they are not pulling in current traffic and the content is good, work with it. If the content is crap and pulling no traffic then you might redirect it.
In the past few days I did some slight revisions to an existing article to put a different spin on it. Then linked to it from my blog. One of my competitors linked to it and I am amazed at the traffic they are sending to me. I thought that I owned this niche.... not I gotta go see what they are doing.
Another article written four years ago, was in need of an update and ranking at about position #19. So I wrote to the company who is the leader in the field, asking if they would allow me to use a few images and answer a couple questions. I was surprised that the owner wrote back and gave me a lot of help - great images and great information. Enough to make the article "best-on-the-web". That was early this month. Now my article is on the first page of Google.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hard to rank difficulty level 25 - 35 keywords for brand new blog?
For the brand new blog, Is it hard to rank keywords using difficulty level 25 - 35 keywords?
Keyword Research | | OECSL20190 -
Keyword Research - Min "Volume" recommendations
Hi, I've began doing some keyword research, the terms I am after are yielding "11-50" Volume in Keyword Explorer. Should I bother optimizing for such a low volume? Looking for existing member / community feedback. Thank you.
Keyword Research | | idlwebinc1 -
On Google Analytics under search queries, the most popular query is "(not set)", how do I find out what this is?
I am trying to discover what users are searching for and what keywords drive traffic to our site.
Keyword Research | | Sable_Group0 -
If I insert a "stop" word into a long tail keyword, will it break it up?
I'm in the legal industry, and a lot of the long tail keywords I'm finding are search queries that are pinpointed for my location. As a result, I come up with [subject] + [location] as good keywords... for example: "subpoena duces tecum new york." (basically it's a subpoena, just the fancy name). However, I have no clue how to use something like this in a sentence....if I say "subpoena duces tecum IN new york" does the "in" break up the keyword, or is "in" just a stop word that doesn't affect the keyword? Countless examples of similar keywords "Car accident new york" etc. Thanks!
Keyword Research | | cgs2303 -
Filler words like "for" in keyword phrase
Hey, I wonder what the effect of filler words like "on" or "for" is when I try to rank for a certain phrase. Here is an example, lets say i try to rank for "best apps iphone" but the grammatically correct usage in the headline or text is "best apps for iphone". Is there any difference or should I use the exact keyword without "for"? Thanks!
Keyword Research | | SebastianKnopp0 -
How can I "target keywords"?
Hello everyone, Could you please explain how can I "target keywords"? So from my understanding, I do a research on keywords, then find those which I can rank for easily, and then what? Do I build links to my website pages with these keywords? Or do I create different articles on the website with this keyword?
Keyword Research | | moneywise_test0 -
Am I blind or has Google finally shut down its "Related Searches" option?
I know I just used this a few days ago, so I was surprised when doing keyword research today that I could no longer access the "Related Searches" feature in Google search. Has anyone else noticed this? It's a pity if it's gone, although I think Google announced it was going to shut this down over a year ago. They said the same thing about the "Patent" search too, but it is still available. I know using "Related Searches" was really popular with SEOs so I am wondering if anyone else is as sad-faced as I am? Or perhaps was it just bumped today so Google could have fun with their April Fool's beta test of Google "Nose" ?
Keyword Research | | danatanseo0 -
Keyword analysis/optimization for blog sites (avoiding self cannibalization)
Hi there, I work on a site that has regular blog and article posts (or at least, we're shooting for regular), and I'm trying to work on a fluid approach for keyword analysis and optimization. I am wondering...is it best to research new keywords for each new post? I am unsure of what the effect is of optimizing multiple pages for the same keyword. I've been using the SEOmoz report card tool to grade my on page optimization, and I noticed one of the criteria was to avoid self cannibalization. Will I be competing against myself if I optimize multiple pages for the same keyword? I'm worried about what will happen in a month or two when I run out of common keywords and have to start optimizing our latest posts around really obscure keywords. Am I thinking about this the right way? Thanks!
Keyword Research | | MikeQ-BACC0