Un Natural Links Removal Strategy
-
Hi All,
I want to discuss one of my strategy that i applied on my website to dilute the value of TOXIC links those are coming on my website.
Issue:
- Poor, Spam quality links were created for the home page and some inner pages.
- Google considered those links Unnatural and took manual action
- All rankings were disappeared
Strategy
- Deleted all landing pages those are over linked from spam websites.
- Created new landing pages with some modifications and new content.
- Because home page(index.html) was also penalized by Google, i made the changes in index.html and put no follow no index tag so that bad links value couldn't pass from index.html to other inner pages (Newly created pages and pages those were not over optimized).
- Created new index.php page. Give option to the user to the Enter the Website from Index.html (Default Home Page) to index.php.
- Blocked all bad URLs (Un Natural Links) through .htaccess file. When user or Google bot will come through those blocked URLs (Un Natural Links), server responses 403 (Access Denied).
The domain for which i did above experiment is http://www.thebaildepot.com/index.php
Now, i have doubts on below points:
- Blocking unnatural links (403, access denied) from .htaccess file will really work?
- No follow no index to default page and than give option to the user to navigate to newly create index.php
I did this experiment around 10 days before still rankings are not coming in Google top 100.
-
It happens A lot of links are hard to remove. If you're sure you have a penalty from links, I'd build a list of those links you've tried to remove, submit a disavow file to Google, and explain what happened in a reconsideration request. In that request include where the links came from, what you've done, and how you'll continue to clean things up and play by the rules in the future.
-
Hi Carson,
Thanks for your reply. As i earlier mentioned that link removal process it not working. I tried many times but all the times Google rejected are reconsideration request. I don't know where i am lacking.
-
Hi Ruchi,
I think your approach to removing landing/sub pages is fine, but ultimately less effective than removing links. If the page has nothing but bad links pointing to it, I'd say kill it off (you can just give a 410 response) and refresh your content as best you can. Cut the landing pages, but also try to cut the links at their source.
The root, however, is going to be tricky. noindex/nofollowing your home page is not something I'd suggest. It might not work because Google will just assume index.html is the same page and count the links towards the index anyway. I won't worry about the theory on that, because it could be worse if it does work. You'd also be blocking any good links pointing to your root page. It's also a pretty terrible user experience if you direct users away.
Definitely do not try to block links in .htaccess. This doesn't work - at best it prevents Google from crawling your site on that occasion. At worst it sends Google the message that your site isn't reliably online.
Try to remove all of the links you've built, starting with the lowest-authority and anchor-text-heavy links. If your removal fails, consider using the disavow tool on spammy links. Hope this helps
-
Thanks Federico,
I agree with you but we have already tried to remove most of the unnatural links and filed reconsideration request with proper evidences. We find out unnatural links through different tools such as Google Webmaster tools, Cognitive SEOs etc. but all the times Google rejects our reconsideration request with the reason that our website is still receiving unnatural links.In the reconsideration request response Google also shares some sample of unnatural links.
The worst part is that after lots of deep analysis, we still not able to find out the list of whole unnatural links.
-
I don't think you are taking a good approach...
Instead of noindexing the pages, or blocking those that have bad backlinks, you should fix the backlinks.
Run a complete analysis on the entire backlink profile, go over each and every link trying to remove it by contacting the Webmaster, document everything you do on the process.
Once you are left with those link that you don't want and the webmaster didn't remove, create and upload a disavow file listing all those links.
Then you can proceed to send a reconsideration request, explaining Google what happened, what you did to fix it and send the proof of your work.
If you continue with your strategy, you basically need to create several new pages to block any bad link, and wait for the penalty to expire (nobody knows how long it takes). Then if and only if you removed all those pages that have bad backlinks you won't be penalized again, so this could take months, or even years... it isn't a good strategy at all...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What should be the SEO strategy for a very big target?
Currently I am doing SEO of an Arabic website. I need to optimize it for GCC region. Its target is very big i.e. 1 million unique visitors per month (organic). The domain is new means there is no domain authority right now. What should be the best strategy in this scenario?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sohail10 -
Should I remove all vendor links (link farm concerns)?
I have a web site that has been around for a long time. The industry we serve includes many, many small vendors and - back in the day - we decided to allow those vendors to submit their details, including a link to their own web site, for inclusion on our pages. These vendor listings were presented in location (state) pages as well as more granular pages within our industry (we called them "topics). I don't think it's important any more but 100% of the vendors listed were submitted by the vendors themselves, rather than us "hunting down" links for inclusion or automating this in any way. Some of the vendors (I'd guess maybe 10-15%) link back to us but many of these sites are mom-and-pop sites and would have extremely low authority. Today the list of vendors is in the thousands (US only). But the database is old and not maintained in any meaningful way. We have many broken links and I believe, rightly or wrongly, we are considered a link farm by the search engines. The pages on which these vendors are listed use dynamic URLs of the form: \vendors<state>-<topic>. The combination of states and topics means we have hundreds of these pages and they thus form a significant percentage of our pages. And they are garbage 🙂 So, not good.</topic></state> We understand that this model is broken. Our plan is to simply remove these pages (with the list of vendors) from our site. That's a simple fix but I want to be sure we're not doing anything wring here, from an SEO perspective. Is this as simple as that - just removing these page? How much effort should I put into redirecting (301) these removed URLs? For example, I could spend effort making sure that \vendors\California- <topic>(and for all states) goes to a general "topic" page (which still has relevance, but won't have any vendors listed)</topic> I know there is no distinct answer to this, but what expectation should I have about the impact of removing these pages? Would the removal of a large percentage of garbage pages (leaving much better content) be expected to be a major factor in SEO? Anyway, before I go down this path I thought I'd check here in case I miss something. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MarkWill0 -
Lower quality new domain link vs higher quality repeat domain link
First time poster here with a dilemma that head scratching and spreadsheets can't solve! I'm trying to work out whether to focus on getting links from new domains or to nurture relationships with the bigger sites in our business and get more links. Of the two links below which does the community here think would be more valuable a signal to Google? Both would be links from within relevant text/post copy. Link 1. Site DA 30. No links currently from this domain. Link 2. Site DA 60. Many links over last 12 months already from this domain. I suspect link 1 but given the enormous disparity in ranking power am I correct?! Thanks for any considered opinions out there! Matthew
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mat20150 -
OSE link report showing links to 404 pages on my site
I did a link analysis on this site mormonwiki.com. And many of the pages shown to be linked to were pages like these http://www.mormonwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Planning_a_trip_to_Rome_By_using_Movie_theatre_-_Your_five_Fun_Shows2052752 There happens to be thousands of them and these pages actually no longer exist but the links to them obviously still do. I am planning to proceed by disavowing these links to the pages that don't exist. Does anyone see any reason to not do this, or that doing this would be unnecessary? Another issue is that Google is not really crawling this site, in WMT they are reporting to have not crawled a single URL on the site. Does anyone think the above issue would have something to do with this? And/or would you have any insight on how to remedy it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ThridHour0 -
Links from non-indexed pages
Whilst looking for link opportunities, I have noticed that the website has a few profiles from suppliers or accredited organisations. However, a search form is required to access these pages and when I type cache:"webpage.com" the page is showing up as non-indexed. These are good websites, not spammy directory sites, but is it worth trying to get Google to index the pages? If so, what is the best method to use?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | maxweb0 -
Best strategy for duplicate content?
Hi everyone, We have a site where all product pages have more or less similar text (same printing techniques, etc.) The main differences are prices and images, text is highly similar. We have around 150 products in every language. Moz's algorithm tells me to do something about duplicate content, but I don't really know what we could do, since the descriptions can't be changed to be very different. We essentially have paper bags in different colors and and from different materials.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JaanMSonberg0 -
Are Navigation links different to static links
We are trying to reduce the number of links on our homepage. We could remove some fly out navigation links, We rank 1st on Google for some of these links. Would removing these hurt our SEO. The links are accessible 1 level down if we remove the homepage.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Archers0 -
Looking for a link builder
Hey guys I'm looking for a freelance link builder to work with my agency. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks Jaime
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | flemingsteele0