Facebook experts, I need help: is this 'strategy' idea legit or nonsense?
-
Hi guys,
I have a friend who works in a large university where each faculty has their own Facebook page. The pages are rarely maintained and experience very poor levels of engagement.
The university's main Facebook page has a very large following (195,000+ likes), but again, the engagement is very poor - on average each post gets about 20 likes, 2 comments and 1-2 shares if that.
Now, my friend works in one of the faculties and doesn't happen to have a Facebook page (his particular faculty is concentrating their efforts on other areas of inbound marketing). However, the social media manager for the university is insisting my friend’s faculty create a page and contribute to a wider ‘campaign’ being undertaken at the uni - however my friend is not convinced (and neither am I) that the logic behind this campaign makes sense. Here's how the campaign has been described:
1. The main university page (with 195k likes) posts a generic image ('whats happening this week at the uni'), which asks people to ‘look in the comments’ to see what's happening among all the different faculties
2. The faculty pages all at once submit comments on the post about 'what's happening' in their area
3. The faculty pages 'like' the main image post, share it, and like the other comments left by faculties
The social media manager says this campaign approach will ensure the main post gets into the feed of the 195k followers (and more) and increase the reach of the other faculties’ pages because of the high level of 'engagement' and 'aggregation' on the post.
My friend and I feel this idea is flawed for a number of reasons:
1. Routinely it’s the same people and faculties engaging with the post - so the vast majority of the 195k won't be reached virally anyway
2. The 195k have demonstrated they aren't engaged, due to the poor prior performance of the page – it’s unlikely the posts even make it to their feeds organically
3. The image is generic (it is literally a picture of a building which says 'what’s on this week') and doesn’t entice people to take an action - you can't see the comments as they're collapsed in the feed, so unless users actually are compelled by the image to click into the comments the post is useless
4. The message isn't targeted - a number of random faculties provide comments to the post, so it's very possible what's offered by the faculties isn't relevant to the wider audience.
Anyway, I'd really hope someone with a deep understanding of Facebook could help provide some clarity on this campaign proposal. It seems like a flawed methodology which advocates manufacturing engagement and an ineffective use of time and resource.
Many thanks
-
Hi there Jane,
Thanks a lot for taking the time to read and respond to my question.
Your response confirms my thinking that the premise is flawed, and brings into question why the faculties just don't activate their own audience as and when required.
Thanks again, appreciate it!
-
I feel the basic marketing principle behind expecting an entire student body to be interested in the happenings throughout the entire university is flawed - the math majors aren't interested in who the visiting poet to the English department is this week (if this is the type of information that is shared). If they are modelling what engagement should look like off the percentage of fans who like / share a post compared to something like the university athletics page, they are going to be disappointed.
The faculties sharing the generic status with everyone's weekly happenings seems similar to having an important page two clicks from the home page instead of one: why would I want to search through 20 faculties' updates to see what's on in the psych department when, as a fan of the psych department, the psych department could have posted their schedule themselves? I understand the idea behind having all the departments contribute, but it seems to misunderstand the audience and how they want to consume information. Facebook posts rely on the browsing attention span of the audience, which isn't long!
Facebook's algorithm will rank poorly-shared content in quite a low location on the newsfeed if people have their newsfeeds sorted by Top Stories, which is the default. It's hard to say exactly how their algos work (although a lot of study has gone into this in a similar way to how people have studied Google), but a page with 195k fans whose posts routinely receive 20 likes will not be assigned great metrics on the back of that.
My alma mater has fairly decent engagement (40k likes; a couple to a few hundred likes on popular posts, but as low as 15 on less popular stuff). Every post gets just a few shares and a little more comments, but keep in mind that a comment or a like will make a public post show up on that person's timeline as well, so it's similar to a share in terms of visibility (I am not 100% sure about how the placement of a post changes on others' newsfeeds depending on whether their friend has liked, commented or shared, however). What my alma mater is doing, however, is posting university-generic stuff, not news about specific departments unless it's catchy or particularly interesting (the PhD. in squirrel psychology did well because it's a) cute and b) odd; interestingly they did not link to the relevant faculty and I can't find a press release or course page, which seems like a big oversight, even for new news!).
I would contend that a federal model (if you like) of marketing with a bit more power given to the faculties would work - things of interest to the faculties are dealt with on their pages whilst the central university page deals with generic interest.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google SERP shows wrong (and inappropriate) thumbnail for Facebook videos?
Hello I'm running into a strange issue with at least one of my client's video. The video is posted on Facebook. When searching for the video on Google, the SERP shows a completely wrong, and inappropriate, thumbnail image. (And in one case the preview video starts playing within Google SERP.) It also seems that Google is indexing various countries' facebook page for the same video separately (it-it.facebook.com, fr-fr.facebook.com, etc). Note that only the thumbnail and preview video within Google are wrong; if you click on the link, you see the correct video and page. I hesitate to divulge the actual client video, but there are some reports on Google's search community about the same behavior: Here's one that stargs back in March: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/33760205?hl=en and a more recent one: https://support.google.com/websearch/thread/71452151?hl=en It looks increasingly like a bug in some google algorithm, but nobody at google seems to acknowledge that. I've unpublished the original video from FB and submitted an 'outdated content' removal to Google, which is pending. In the meantime, my questions for our group of experts here: Has anyone else experienced this and any other suggestionso n how to fix? If we assume that this is not a google bug: how could a malicious actor or black-hat SEO influence Google's algorithms to cause this? Thanks, mickey
Social Media | | infamia0 -
Facebook Name Change and Effect on SEO
Hey Mozzers! Trying this one again as my timing was probably pretty bad with Easter. Working with a company who has about 20K followers on Facebook and about 500 backlinks to their current facebook page. They want to change the name of the page to better reflect the business. I need to advise on this but I'm not sure of and how it will effect them. Any one had any experience in this area?
Social Media | | wearehappymedia0 -
How do search engines understand what social pages are official pages of my brand? If my Facebook page name is not my brand name (even though there are links from website to page and vice-versa) will that confuse search engines?
My question is about social shares, and how search engines understand what profiles are linked to what businesses?
Social Media | | PlanetDISH0 -
Facebook City Places Pages
I would like to know how a business with multiple geographic locations can be listed on the Facebook City Page for each of it's separate office locations? Would you need to list the address of each office on the business' Facebook Business Page? Is it even possible to list more than one address per Facebook Business Page? Thanks!
Social Media | | CQMarketing0 -
B2b pest control social media strategy. Any ideas?
Our client is a b2b pest control company. they are making software and sell leads and some day want to rank for bed bugs. they want to get into social media but I am having the hardest time coming up with ideas.
Social Media | | OxzenMedia
Can you help?0 -
Using LinkedIn for Facebook likes?
Now I know that shortcuts are usually not a good sign for SEO. However if I am on a group on linked and there are Facebook like exchanges going on I am getting real people in the right market, right? See picture for more details. Is this valuable? NGpT0.png
Social Media | | SEODinosaur0 -
Possible to get information about Facebook Likes, Google+ and Tweets via API
As subject reads - I wonder if it possible to get the information about Facebook Likes, Google+´s and Tweets by using your API? It would help a lot.
Social Media | | SEOmannen0 -
Dud facebook likes / fake profiles.
I've seen a few companies pop up offering 'facebook likes' for sale. I'm assuming these are all dud accounts that are subject to get deleted in a second if facebook catches on. Anyone else have something to add?
Social Media | | qlkasdjfw0