Moz Crawler URL paramaters & duplicate content
-
Hi all, this is my first post on Moz Q&A
Questions:
- Does the Moz Crawler take into account rel="canonical" for search results pages with sorting / filtering URL parameters?
- How much time does it take for an issue to disappear from the issues list after it's been corrected? Does it come op in the next weekly report?
I'm asking because the crawler is reporting 50k+ pages crawled, when in reality, this number should be closer to 1000. All pages with query parameters have the correct canonical tag pointing to the root URL, so I'm wondering whether I need to noindex the other pages for the crawler to report correct data?:
Original (canonical URL): DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/BS?search_location=cabo-san-lucas
Filter active URL: DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/BS?search_location=cabo-san-lucas&booking_date=&booking_days=1&booking_persons=1&priceFilter%5B%5D=0%2C500&includedPriceFilter%5B%5D=drinks-soft
Also, if noindex is the only solution, will it impact the ranking of the pages involved?
Note: Google and Bing are semi-successful in reporting index page count, each reporting around 2.5k result pages when using the site:DOMAIN.com query. The rel canonical tag was missing for a short period of time about 4 weeks ago, but since fixing the issue these pages still haven't been deindexed.
Appreciate any suggestions regarding Moz Crawler & Google / Bing index count!
-
Happy to help!
We crawled roughly 49k pages because there were that many links on the site that we could find. 50k is also the new standard crawl limit for campaigns in Standard and Medium subscriptions. Adding a rel=canonical to a page doesn't mean it won't get crawled by our campaign crawler, only that the crawler is to refer to the canonicalized link for reporting purposes.
Without going into too specific of URL details, these pages are considered duplicates because their canonical tags point to different URLs. For example,
is considered a duplicate of
DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR?booking_date=&booking_days=&booking_persons=limit%252525253D20
because the canonical tag for the first page is
DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR?offset=20
while the canonical for the second URL is
DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR
Since the canonical tags point to different pages it is assumed that DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR?offset=20 and DOMAIN.COM/charters/search/mx/QR are likely to be duplicates themselves.
Here is how our system interprets duplicate content vs. rel=canonical:
Assuming A, B, C, and D are all duplicates,
If A references B as the canonical, then they are not considered duplicates
If A and B both reference C as canonical, A and B are not considered duplicates of each other
If A references C as a canonical, A and B are considered duplicated
If A references C as canonical, B references D, then A and B are considered duplicatesThe above example from your campaign actually falls into the fourth example I've listed above. Hope this helps clear things up
-
Thanks Sam!
I've read the post and checked my canonical tags but still can't seem to find what's causing the canonicalized pages to be indexed by RogerBot. The same page shows up in Moz's crawl test 100 times with slightly different parameters.
I'll keep investigating but some specific feedback from Moz staff would be appreciated
-
Hi!
I'm going to leave the strategy discussion open to the community but from a technical standpoint, we will count rel=canonical on dynamic urls as long as they are implemented correctly. Dr. Pete has a great post where he talks about canonicals that might be helpful as well. Updates to campaigns happen on a weekly basis depending on when the campaign was created. So if it was created on a Tuesday, you'll see updated campaign data every Tuesday after. You can run a crawl test (accessible from Research Tools) to get 3k page crawls in between your updates though. Hope this helps!
-
Thanks for the info searchbuzz. So if I understand correctly, new pages are crawled and kept in the index (up to the campaign limit), but issues on indexed pages are reported separately.
My issue is that due to the dynamic URLs used in search filters on my site I actually have 49k issues detected (over 95% are duplicate content and long URL issues because the crawler is indexing the same page many times for each URL parameter combination). The crawl test can't index the entire site because it generates a huge amount of pages.
It's a travel-related website with listings in 233 cities and multiple filter functionality, so each unique 'page' of results is indexed more than 100 times, even though there's a rel="canonical" tag pointing to the non-parametrized URL of that page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz Pro: Redirect Chain warning given to pages that don't have redirects
When I look up crawl errors for a page, I'm always told the page suffers from redirect chaining. However, when I do a redirect check (in this case, using the Redirect Path Chrome extension), it indicates that my page does not use a redirect. Why would Moz detect redirects, while no other redirect checker resource does? For example, this URL gets Moz's redirect chain warning: https://www.aem.org/news/january-2018/5-reasons-iot-projects-fail/ But there is no redirect associated with this URL.
Moz Bar | | jrichter0 -
Moz is reporting weird email address URLs as 'Meta refresh' errors? Anything to worry about?
Under site crawl, Moz is reporting weird email address URLs as 'Meta refresh' errors. The URLs are: http://support@ihasco.co.uk and http://enquiries@ihasco.co.uk Once clicked, they redirect to our homepage. Anyone else ever had this? Is it anything to worry about? I don't think it is, but would be good to get some reassurance.
Moz Bar | | iHasco0 -
Duplicate Page Content
The site crawl is registering duplicate page content for our storefront site, but the pages aren't the same. They're ascending pages within the same category (ex: Featured, Featured pg2, Featured pg3, and so on). What can be done to fix these errors or prevent them in the future?
Moz Bar | | MGuid550 -
Duplicate Content on Website with Multiple Locations
Hi there, I've spent hours reading posts on duplicate content and googling this but I'm still not sure what to do. We created a site that has two WP installs for a company with two different locations - the landing page is website.com and links to WP install 1 (website.com/city1), and WP install 2 (website.com/city2). They specifically wanted two different sites so they could be managed by staff at either location. However some of the pages have the same content - ie. services, policies, etc. so all of those are showing errors for duplicate content. All pages have different city-specific URL's and meta-descriptions but that clearly doesn't help. We can't redirect the "duplicate" pages because then it would take the user to the other city's specific site. Is there anything we can do?? Is this going to significantly damage rankings? Thanks kindly for any help you can provide.
Moz Bar | | charlie0071 -
Getting 'Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible' error msg when trying to run On-Page Grader
I just signed up for MOZ Pro for the first time today. Tried to run the 'on-page grader' tool on some of my pages but I'm getting a 'Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible' error msg. I have verified against the robot.txt file that the pages are NOT blocking any crawlers. Can anybody help?
Moz Bar | | spinoki0 -
Moz Local | Download Template
Dear Moz I've received your email about Moz Local. A fantastic tool but it does not allow you to download a template. Clicking 'Download this template' simply reloads the page. I am testing it under incognito mode of Chrome with no add-ons Thank you!
Moz Bar | | Bio-RadAbs0 -
SEO MOZ ERROR
Hello moz comunity, I tried to use the moz keyword difficulty service in the last 2 days and I get this error over and over again... see photo: http://www.evernote.com/shard/s238/sh/5775a179-1be7-4e76-8563-cf087c37cf2b/576bda1a72f446a8806a0f1914193829 Oops Gosh! It looks like something has gone a bit wrong. Don't worry though, we know and are fixing it. How Can I solve this? I need to check a lot of keywords for my websites. Any alternatives? Thank you !!!
Moz Bar | | Sebastyan220