Sudden disappearance from google organic ranking
-
I have been ranked in top 5 for all relevant search terms for years. I have been in business for 25 years and am modestly speaking the best in our field. The name of my company is "Alaska Yacht Charters" and suddenly I have disappeared from Google search. Google "alaska yacht charters" and I am nowhere to be found. This all occured within days of my suspending my adwords account which I felt I didn't need because of my great organic ranking. What has happened?Geoff Wilson www.alaskanyachtcharters.com
-
Have you claimed your site in Webmasters Tools? If so, do you have a manual penalty?
You also have a LOT of duplicate content issues. Google could be choosing not to index your site because (not much) nothing is original. I pulled 10-15 sentences individually off your site and found so much duplication. I would suggest re-doing your whole homepage content while you sort out the link issues. Also, many inner pages need some re-work on content as well.
I agree though, it looks like a link issue. 170+ referring domains with 1700 links in Ahrefs is usually a dead giveaway of 2007-2011 link building. Disavow, reconsideration request & you should be back in the index. Your site needs a LOT more proper SEO work to rank well but that's a start to get you back in the index.
-
I agree with Marie. I see indications that your site has been negatively impacted by Google Penguin 3.0.
Viewing your site on semrush, I see that your loss in traffic occurred in October '14 -- the same timeframe in which Penguin 3.0 was rolled out.
I also see only "money" keywords populating your website's link profile (e.g. "alaska yacht charters," "alaska charter boats," "alaskan yacht charters", etc.). In other words, these links appear to be links that were created by you (or by extension, an SEO company) for the purpose of increasing Google rankings. Google considers this to be a "link scheme" and penalizes this activity: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66356?hl=en
To move forward, I would first make sure that your website is verified/connected to Google's Webmaster Tools (https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/home?hl=en). It's 100% free and you can simply upload a verification file to your server to get started. From there, you can review your website's inbound links and anchor texts. I would do a lot of research on DIY link audits before considering doing one yourself, but I can tell you that Google recommends being ruthless. Don't just pick a link or two that come from a Russian site. You have to be objective and honest about the links pointing to your site and whether or not they were created for the sole purpose of improving your ranking for a keyword. https://www.seroundtable.com/google-disavow-machete-16844.html
The first step for removing links is to simply reach out to the webmaster of a site/directory containing a dubious backlink and kindly ask them to help you remove it. If you had an SEO company build these links for you, ask them if they can provide you access to the user profiles they created to make these links. Hopefully you can just log in and get rid of the link yourself.
Your success rate in removing links by email solicitation may be very low. Most won't respond. Some may even ask for money. Never do this(!!!). It isn't the end of the world if you can't remove a link. Google has provided us a disavow tool that you can use to simply write off these links instead. They won't count toward your SEO anymore, but they can't count against you either (in theory). https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487?hl=en
If you can clean up your backlinks, then you have a shot at recovery, but this can only happen once Penguin refreshes again. We have no idea when this will be. It took over one year(!) between Penguin 2.1 and Penguin 3.0.
For that reason, you may actually want to consider building a new site in the meantime. More info on whether you should do that or not here: https://www.seroundtable.com/google-penalty-new-site-18200.html
-
If you search the Moz Q&A there are many posts on disavowing. But, if you're not sure what you're doing it may be best to have someone experienced in disavowing take a look.
Also, in 2-3 weeks from now I'll be publishing a Beginner's Guide to Disavowing on Moz.
-
So you're only taking about branded links then otherwise what a link actually is these days is not so clear.
Dude you need to figure out if you even have a poor link profile before you start thinking of disavowing anything. You could have poor content or duplicate content on your domain that caused the drop or as you suggested because you closed PPC... very conspiratorial! Is there a correlation between adwords and google search?
Something the EU anti-trust commision on the break up of Google need to look at that if it's true.
-
A natural link is one that would be there even if links didn't matter for SEO. The best natural link is one where someone really wants to recommend you or to tell their readers about your content and then they link to you. Some industry connection links are ok. For example, if you are a vendor for a certain product and they list you on their vendors page that's good. Also, some directory links are ok.
Here are a some articles that might help:
http://moz.com/ugc/what-is-an-unnatural-link-an-in-depth-look-at-the-google-quality-guidelines
http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2360254/is-that-directory-link-unnatural
-
Can you give me an example of what a natural link looks like or is these days?
-
Great! How do I disavow and how do I remove?
-
Can you pinpoint the date of your drop? Was it October 17 of this year?
Your backlink profile looks pretty typical for sites that were affected by the Penguin algorithm. Penguin was designed to demote sites that have gained an unfair advantage by creating links for the purpose of SEO.
Look at your anchor text profile...this is not natural:
You have many unnatural links such as these:
http://buysellin.co.uk/travel-c17-p1.html
http://gostylascott.blogspot.ca/2010/12/scott-gostylas-story.html
http://dollarlinksdirectory.com/business/Travel/
The reason why links matter for SEO is because Google thinks that if someone else recommended you (by linking to you) then you are probably a good site to show to searchers. But, if those links are self made, then these are not links that Google wants to count.
Can you recover? It depends on whether you've actually got truly natural links in your link profile. If so, then you can try to remove the unnatural links, disavow those that you can't remove and then wait until Google reruns the Penguin algorithm. Once this happens, provided you have done a good cleanup, then you will have escaped the Penguin filter and will be ranking where you should rank according to the good links you have and the quality of your content.
-
That appearance is from "google plus" not from my url...You will not find my url on top 100
-
You seem to be appearing at the bottom of page 1 when i search for your suggested phrase
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Review snippets not shown on google search results
Hi, In Moz it shows that we have a review snippet for a keyword/page, but it is not shown on google SERP. Can anyone explain why it isnt shown on Google search results, and what we should do in order to get it shown ?
On-Page Optimization | | jensatlieto0 -
Ranking keywords
Is there a way to utilize our currently ranking keywords. I don't think editing the url would be a good idea. What areas of these pages should we improve? Or is it better not to do anything.
On-Page Optimization | | Timberwink0 -
Ranking well for 3 keyword phrase but not for 2?
Hi all, We have a site that sells whisky and is ranking well for a specific 3 keyword phrase for example "glendronach hielan whisky" (brand, product, type) which is great but the site isn't doing well for 2 keyword phrase for example "glendronach whisky" or "glendronach hielan". I'm a little confused as to why it wouldn't rank higher for the 2 keyword phrases given that there present in the 3 keyword phrase. Is there a massive jump between ranking well between 3 and 2 keyword phrases? If so what could anyone suggest to try and rank on the 2's?
On-Page Optimization | | Jon-S0 -
Why does Google not show my Meta Descriptions Sometimes ?
Hi Friends We have Meta Descriptions on our Pages but when certain keywords are typed into google search , different meta descriptions are created , for example when searching for "fancy dress" we see our meta description which is correct - Shop with Party Domain for all your Fancy Dress. 1000s of Fancy Dress Ideas at CHEAP Prices. Halloween Fancy Dress. Next Day Delivery and Same Day ... However when searching for "fancy dress costumes" the same page is ranked but the meta description is Fancy Dress. Female Pirate Fancy Dress Costume. £ 13.80. Female Pirate Fancy ... SKU: G11034. Pirate Captain Fancy Dress Costume. £ 12.22. RRP: £ 15.02 ... Thanks Adam
On-Page Optimization | | AMG1000 -
.co.uk ranking in serps and .com ranking on local
Hi im not sure what the best course of action is my client has one site but it has 2 TLD the .co.uk and the .com they wanted all .co.uk redirected to the .com but the .co.uk is ranking in the serps postion 2 and the .com is ranking in local, but is way back in the serps. So i have a bit of a dilemma, by the way it is a local business based in the uk. what should i do?
On-Page Optimization | | juun0 -
How the hell do you get microformat to show up on google serp?
Preface: I implemented Microformat aggregate review (http://data-vocabulary.org/Review-aggregate) for our e-commerce website and included only on the homepage. The vote and count are actually coming from real reviews we are getting from our customers, and in the homepage some reviews are shown prominently and a link points to the full list of all the reviews. Microformat markup is correct, validated in GWT. Have been online for a while (probably a couple of years). Our website: http://www.gomme-auto.it The star rating never showed up. When checking competitors I could see their microformats where not showing up either. But now things changed, if I check one competitor (the market leader www.gommadiretto.it) searching for it with their brand name “gommadiretto” no star rating is showing, but if I search for tires of a specific manufactured like “pneumatici barum” I can see their result in serp is showing the star rating for that specific internal page (the brand page) where they simply put the website overall aggregate review microformat mark up, they actually put it on every page. And that make me scratch my head and start asking myself some questions: is google showing their microformats because they manually awarded them somehow? no other competitor seems to have got the star rating in serp is google showing their microformats because they have so much more reviews than I have? I have around 1700, they have around 11000. is google showing their microformats because their reviews are certified by TrustPilot? is google showing their microformats because they put it in the product page? well of course since I am not putting it there (in the brand page) it's a factor, but isn't it recommended to put the website aggregate reviews microformat only on one page? and shouldn't we show the brand reviews on the brand page? isn't it best practice/recommended to put the website aggregate review microformat only on one page? is google showing their microformats because of some other reasons I can't see? What the hell is google criteria for showing the star rating? Does anyone know?
On-Page Optimization | | max.favilli0 -
Ranking Oddities
In my local marketplace, I have competitors who have the following: unoptimized title tags and description tags (really long using keyword stuffing), stuffing keywords into the Meta keywords tag, lacking keywords in the body copy, using spammy footers or sections of text with a lot of local cities listed where no physical business is located, unattractive design (in my humble opinion), lower page authority, lower domain authority, lower number of back links and are organically outranking my site that I have tried to optimize using the MOZ tools, Market Samurai, other tools, and other great advice provided by people much more knowledgeable than myself about SEO. I don't understand how these sites that lack SEO continue to rank in the #1 or #2 spots in Google for my main keyword phrase + location, while my site is either not in the top 50 or in the top 40s range. How is it that sites with little to no optimization, no blogs, and very few backlinks, continue to rank quite well? These are not all new sites. Domain ages range from 1 to 10 years. What I am seeing appears to go against the grain of SEO recommendations. Any general thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | ajgrossman1 -
Schema.org and Google +
Now that google merged local into Google+, should we be changing the way we do the reviews on our sites to be out of 3? I had one out of 5 and it showed up in the SERPS, but since the change now nothing shows.
On-Page Optimization | | netviper0