Expanding to Other Geo Locations
-
Our company originally started in one city, now it is in multiple and the city we started in is actually now less important to our business than some of the new cities.
We've of course have Google Places for Business listings for all our cities and are listed in the other prominent directories for each City (Bing Places, Manta, Superpages, etc etc)
We have created once city page for each city in our domain. All this has improved our Local SERPs for those cities but they pale in comparison to our dominance in the city we started out in. We did have the first city in our home page title, we took that out.
The obvious problem is from an SEO standpoint your home page is your "strongest" page but how do you make your home page rank top for multiple location intent searches: "{city} {target keyword}" ?
The 3-pack is KEY. For example, for one city we make it into the local 3-pack but we are not in the organic SERPs on page 1 outside of the 3-pack.
As far as I can tell the major factor in 3-pack ranking is of course proximity of business to the user's location or user's location intent. I would say followed by the natural ranking factors (or at least a large subset of them) that Google uses for its normal organic rankings, followed by Google Places reviews. You would think the Google places reviews really make a difference, but not as much as you think.
So how do you dominate local searches in different cities when competing against local-only companies? My only guess is you need to create as much content as possible. You don't want to make micro sites I think as you lose all the link juice going to your main site. But how much content can one make that isn't duplicative. You can describe the same products and services over and over for each city but that's not useful nor wise. I guess you could do some re-writing. But other than a different address, phone, and staff members, if your service is identical for each city it doesn't leave a lot of room for useful content creation to improve local search SERPS.
I guess this begs the overall question, can a multi-city company ever dominate local SERPS when the search has a location intent (city name in the search) it there is even just a couple competing local companies doing some SEO work. it seems it is an extreme uphill battle if not next to impossible. (Never say never.)
-
Hey Searchout,
I've been seeing that too! We get a little blue face next to the review and the words highlighted in blue. This is great for people who write their own reviews and cheat because google is going to start showing customers real words when customers type in what they want. I find fake reviews are always written by the same person and are variations on a theme.
Have you also noticed your GMB listing dynamically serves what you do? When someone types in Root canal we come up as Smileworks 'Endodontist' and when they type in Invisalign we appear as 'Orthodontist' It's because I marked our specialists up as specialists in the schema. I had no idea what It would do but just thought 'well hey, we have specialists so why not tell the world' and google made something of it.
There's going to be more of that coming in the future i'll bet you.
PS: 'm not talking about the crappy services yell and the like try to sell you when you claim your citation. I'm talking about a Whitespark Audit. It's different. They understand - like really understand - the score. And they do a TON of work for a few hundred bucks. Here's my results. Not bad when you think of that uplift as a percentage of 4,000 positions. Best money I ever spent. But I don't know why I bother sometimes. Nobody does it. they think it's a scam or that I'm an affiliate. I don't care about their company and there's also other ones out there who do the same thing. just that these got us a really great result so I tell everyone. - then they ignore me lol!
-
I'm still a firm believer that NAP audit and correction services are primarily hyped as far as their actual effect on rankings. No one gets paper phone books anymore and there's no reason to buy advertising from the likes of Yellowpages, Superpages, etc, so they are desperate to create new revenue streams. Hence when you submit your business on all these sites they automatically show you a list of even more obscure sites you are not on or your NAP doesn't match. Our best performing location has two different NAPs out there about a mile from each other. One was an old mailing address. It's 3-pack 99% of the time for all our target keywords. My determination is that what makes the difference is that the business is listed with one of the main three databases Axciom, Localese, Infogroup. Paying attention to NAP in all the second and third tier directories using a paid service is a complete waste of time and money in my opinion. I've scoured the Internet for any sort of well done study to prove the effect on rankings of NAP consistency. They can't be done as there are too many other ranking factors anyone I've found to publish any sort of article on the subject is in the industry that sells those services. You think you moved the needle making your NAPs more consistent, but most likely the timing was just coincidental. I know I sound jaded, but I've just been around the block too many times and see the money making schemes from a mile away. If you got time and money to waste, it definitely can only help if at all. If you NAP error is in another city or something, then obviously you'll have conversion issues. I'm talking about missing suite number on some or Street versus St. That kind of stuff. But I've gone off on a tangent sort of, sorry.
Here's an interesting tidbit I recently noticed. Words in the reviews are a ranking factor believe it or not. You will notice on Google 3-pack, sometimes you will see an excerpt of a review with one of your search keywords highlighted. I threw in an obscure word into a search test once where we should never come up in the 3-pack for and we did because the word was in one of our user's reviews. Very interesting.
I also think Google likes schema markup and makes much more of a difference than NAP consistency every will.
-
Good, Ed. I was sure you, specifically, understood this, but was concerned that others might not understand the distinction between being legally named something, and keyword stuffing the GMB business title field.
-
Couldn't agree more. Although we are tiny compared to some sites and still outrank them purely on content and user task accomplishment. Most of the big players have hammy or thin content written by their agencies. Any expert in her niche can do better than this and wipe them out. It does take more time in the map pack though. I can seem to find meaningful correlations between different terms ranking and not ranking. So I figure it must be based on external factors out of my control.
So I just bang on with the best practice and hope for the results some day I would invest in some sort of local citation audit though. You can get them for cheap and they will make 100% sure NAP&W is right as right can be. This moved the needle for us although our starting position was not super strong so it may not move the needle for a company who's been accurate and dilligent with their local and H-local citations from the get go (we weren't)
ALso if you've got anyone with a degree in your business get them to sign up to their university alumni organisations, build relationships and then go for a guestpost in the news section. If it's the University you're new location is in this can be a real gold star local link.
-
Yep That's absolutely right. And also having the name of what you do in there is local spam. But we just have different legal entities (sometimes more than one) for each location. It's better that way for SEO and taxes here in the UK (all legal of course).
Don't worry, I'm ALL OVER Stopcraponthemap and have had companies taken off the Liverpool maps like 'Dermaroller Liverpool' and 'Invisalign Liverpool' - actually a company called 'Pure Dental' was doing that. A dentist? You'd think Dentists wouldn;t try to cheat the system but they were. Even with the hardest of hard evidence and photographs and screenshots from Companies house, it's still really hard to get them taken down and can take weeks.
Being a guide helps. And reading what Joy says also helps. Our first company was called 'Smileworks Liverpool' because there were so many other 'Smileworks' dentists. I actually just wanted to stand out from the rest but it ended up being hugely beneficial for us.
Even two years ago google was saying 'we rank entities' but they still don't. So I want to spell it out for my customers and for google.
-
Hey Searchout!
Some great points from Ed here. I'll add a few thoughts, in case it helps:
-
Yes, local pack rankings are key and you are right that they are not static. Don't over-focus on rankings, because searcher-proximity causes so much variety. While it's nice to see rankings go up, it is far more meaningful to see actual conversions go up (visits, phone calls, bookings, in-store traffic, sales, forms, etc.)
-
If your brand has built enough authority (think Taco Bell) you are likely to find yourself ranking for pretty much everything with very little effort. If you're not Taco Bell yet, then, yes, you need to work on the old combo of content+links and invest whatever effort you can in wise engagement with the ever-growing list of Google Local Knowledge Panel features (reviews, photos, Q&A, posts, bookings, menus including the new service menus, descriptions, etc.) Track and see what is moving the conversion needle. No one thing is going to do it. As you mentioned, review count and star ratings do not move the ranking needle as much as you might expect. You see businesses with fewer or worse reviews outranking those with more and better reviews every day. When you see that phenomenon, it makes you realize that focusing only on reviews would be foolish, but, at the same time, you don't determine from this that reviews can be ignored. They are part of a bigger picture.
-
Basically, what you are shooting for is building the overall authority of your brand while implementing best practices at a location-specific level every step of the way you can. Over time, you are trying to become one of the Taco Bells of your industry, at which point, for reasons we can't fully explain, your "authority" seems to build strength on its own. On your way there, be sure you are complying with all guidelines, making use of all relevant features, investing in creative content, and most importantly, offering the kind of service that makes your customers do much of the work of building your authority.
Hope this helps!
-
-
So great you are sharing your research here, Ed!
One thing I wanted to point out. You mention:
"Also I've got the city names in the names of my business. So there's BusinessTown and BusinessOtherTown as the names of the companies. This is really important. "
Important to clarify that, unless you've legally named each of your branches X+CityA, X+CityB, etc., then it's a violation of Google's guidelines to add city names to your GMB listing business titles. Wanted to be sure this is pointed out, as the keyword stuffing of the GMB title with city names is, perhaps, the #1 form of local spam.
-
Absolutely right. If it's B2B then there's this thing that nobody ever goes into that will give your pages the edge over the competition. It's a little thing called 'the price'
B2B are often very cagey about prices and that makes people wary. So maybe some location specific price articles will do well. If you don't know the price then just put in a range or use a case study with all the details and put a price tag on it so people can get an idea. Users (so google too) are getting really frustrated that prices for B2B things are not available and I've found my best performing pages are price pages.
Dentists also are cagey about prices. It's very B2B in that respect. You have to come in so we can assess you and talk to you and it's how long is a piece off string etc. but that's not true. If you're honest with yourself you can put basic prices and ranges on there and it will help enormously - if you haven't already.
I agree with the local citations, they seem stupid but NEED to be done. Outsource NAPS to someone who can write and make sure you're on them all.
As for google local star rating. I too was disappointed. We have 250 at 4.9 and some competitors are above us in the maps with 3.9 and 40 reviews. It IRKS ME! lol. But once you get to a magical 150 point, we saw the dial move. Also review diversity is important. So just google reviews is no good, I rotate the girly and guys on the front desk to ask for Facebook, Google, Trustpilot and 'Save Face' a local reviewer each week of the month. Remember to email people at home for reviews. If they're all coming from your IP they'll be discounted. Unless you get a VPN, but I worry that might land me with some sort of penalty.
If you have an alt tag on the page that says Houston and the Schem says NYC. Google will (In my opinion and experience) favour the Alt text. The 'strongest place' if you like for microdata is in the header of the site. That's set in stone and overrules and review widgets or the data highlighter. Problem is you keep needing to go in there and update your number of reviews each wee for the stars to show in the serp. Do you have stars showing in your new city serp results. You can get them instantly organically with a WP plugin called Google reviews Business and you get a really nice slider that breaks up text with your 5 star reviews. Also can you port reviews over from one city to another? That's worth looking into I remember a conversation somewhere about that but don't remember whether it was a yes or a no.
Search your newer city for those little opportunities with the chamber of commerce, the local government, write an article for a local bank or the local newspaper (if you can get in). I am on this 'high growth local bank' membership where they just give you a link from a huge DA (but local) bank for just paying like a £25 subscription fee and going to a few meetings. We speak to our competitors about things we sell that they don't and things that they don't sell that we do and literally write articles and link to one-another. If you need a surgical nose job we send you to a local cosmetic clinic here in the city. They LOVE that and always return our patients to us (because they want the relationship to continue) and they've linked to us and it's had a huge impact on local pack.
You're doing the right things. Get hyper local though and start engaging with the local community (where it will get you links). Also I wrote for the local university. GOLDEN link - one of the strongest we have. And the people at Universities are dying for technical content about SEO and marketing.
Hope this helps. email me if you like (on profile) . I'll send some examples of the "No BS" prices articles you could model your article on them. They are ranking Nationally here Position 1-3.
-
Thanks for such a lengthy reply. Much of it I'm not surprised as I sort of assumed it's a time issue combined with DA which benefits both local and national.
To give more specifics. The business is a B2B service business. The problem is, the service also has a highly popular associated product. So I guess in a way I'm lucky as the thing that segregates people looking for product info versus service info is in most cases a location intent. The product search will never have a location intent. The service search will sometimes NOT have a location intent. That is fine with us as we only have a by appointment only location only in a small subset of cities.
I've been testing and testing too. I've been surprised how little weight Google puts on number of reviews and average review rating. I guess it's because that aspect can be fairly easily 'gamed.' It seems the proximity to user location or intended location and normal organic ranking factors like DA are king. The former being most important obviously for local 3-pack when you have competitors with similar non-map organic rankings.
We also have our original city name in some of the image alt tags etc on our home page. Our business location schema is perfect. I think one factor is some of the other cities have not shown up yet on some of the business directories the original city has - but really, how much weight does Google give Superpages and the like when you virtually never see those domains in the SERPS with a location intent search?
I think the key is time and keep creating good, original content optimized for each city.
-
OK I can help you with this because it's what I've been working on for the last three years. Testing, testing and then more testing. First of all, are you a brick and mortar business? When you say you've expanded into new cities does this mean that you have a new store or physical address in these new cities? I'm going to assume because you've got GMB for the new cities that you have a physical address. So the things to consider are these:
There are kind of three types of searcher that I look at when solving these types of SEO problems. You've got searchers who are searching 'product+location' these are actually diminishing in number and more people now are just searching 'product' or 'buy product' or 'product near me' and are using voice and maps and expecting google to know where they are and use their location. So you're right, being in the map pack is key. So I have some traffic from the product+location people and they are usually high commercial intent. They want to buy.
Then the people who just type 'product' and who are near my location will have a higher number of searchers but lower searcher intent. Because they may just be looking for information and happen to be in my city. These are also more difficult to optimise for. Over-optimising location keywords is something to watch out for. But do remember to use the location specific anchor text in your internal linking structure. That's helped me lots. I say something natural(ish) like, For Braces visit our main page: _Braces Liverpool. _This seems spammy but google said slightly over-optimising internal links isn't going to hurt you like external ones will.
Then there are the people not in my city who type 'Product' - this is very high volume and very low commercial intent. Because if you are a local business and someone 100 miles away types in 'product' and you show up, they are unlikely to visit your store.
However, I still optimise for all three of these searchers. I have some articles that are for information only and I want them to rank nationally, pick up TONS of traffic and give my site authority and traffic and send nice user signals to google. I'll often also have the featured snippet or national number one position. These articles almost always also rank locally for Product (where searcher is in vacinity) and product+location. So don't just focus on product+location because you don't get enough traffic and google doesn't give you as much authority.
So you should have your location city name in the URL of your new city locations and optimise for local searchers by getting your local citations absolutely perfect. This means Moz Local, maybe spend some money on a Whitespark Citation Audit. This was the best $300 I ever spent and they helped me get from 4% map pack to 11% and that's out of literally thousands of positions. It's a dynamite service and I'd 100% recommend.
Also bear in mind that your new cities are newer and it takes a few months or even years to start really ranking for local searchers. I've taken - in some cases - 18 months of consistent optimisation and testing to get into the local packs where other competitor services have maybe been there for 5 years! You can't just expect to pop up number one in the map pack straight away. You need to build loads of local and hyper local citations and also LINKS from other local businesses and local partners in those new cities. This takes time and tons of effort. You can't expect to dine out on your strong original city. But also don't expect to internally compete with yourself if you're a new address in a new city with a new location in the URL, business name etc. Re-write the articles for that city like you're starting again but model them on your old successful ones. You'll find doing it a second time it's 100% better than the first.
I'll be honest, I don't know whether it's been all my SEO work or just time that's gotten us to the number one spots locally and on the maps and sometimes I actually find it easier to rank nationally than locally. National ranking is easy. You just need the best article, comprehensiveness and and a strong DA / great click through rate in the serp.
Also I've got the city names in the names of my business. So there's BusinessTown and BusinessOtherTown as the names of the companies. This is really important. Google says it no longer matters about having the name of your product or service in the URL and business title but it's less clear about the location and I've found it to be a massive help. Joy Hawkins or rand might disagree here but this is what I've found from testing it out.
Link signals and GMB signals are the key. Plus lots of reviews for your new location on it's GMB profile. Like 150+ is where it seems to start making a big difference. This is still the best article on the subject. From our friends at Moz. Also check out Joy Hawkins who is the oracle of local and I think she's a mod on this very platform although I might be mistaken. She will have a better answer for you than mine and loves helping people. Also I hope EGOL chimes in because they can help too.
But I'm betting your problem is father time. It's frustrating but Google just doesn't trust newer businesses to take up a spot in the three pack unless you're really giving it gangbusters optimisation in ALL of the areas outlined in the article by moz above.
Hope this helps some. Give us some more specifics to go on and let's get right into it. I love this stuff
PS: There was a very interesting case recently of a Zero Day Exploit where a genius hacker found a way to steal DA from another website - Check it out here it gives us an insight into the fact that google does indeed transfer DA across cities, states and even countries - so give it time (but don't do what this guy did! It's black hat and dangerous stuff. Just an interesting story not a suggestion.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Geo-location by state/store
Hi there, We are a Grocery co-operative retailer and have chain of stores owned by different people. We are building a new website, where we would geo-locate the closest store to the customer and direct them to a particular store (selected based on cookie and geo location). All our stores have a consistent range of products + Variation in 25% range. I have few questions How to build a site-map. Since it will be mandatory for a store to be selected and same flow for the bot and user, should have all products across all stores in the sitemap? we are allowing users to find any products across all stores if they search by product identifier. But, they will be able to see products available in a particular store if go through the hierarchical journey of the website. Will the bot crawl all pages across all the stores or since it will be geolocated to only one store, the content belonging to only one store will be indexed? We are also allowing customers to search for older products which they might have bought few years and that are not part of out catalogue any more. these products will not appear on the online hierarchical journey but, customers will be able to search and find the products . Will this affect our SEO ranking? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks - Costa
Local Website Optimization | | Hanuman881 -
Mysterious Location Based SERP Disappearance
Hi Everyone, I've got a bit of a confusing SEO issue which I'm hoping you'll be able to help with. Apologies in advance for the long post, I've put an abridged version below also. We have one main keyword and it seems to have disappeared in some locations. The main keyword is "clothing manufacturers" and up until recently we had stability for almost a year. We're based in London, England and we regularly check "clothing manufacturers" to see where we're showing in search, and we usually see between 3rd - 5th. We use AHREFS to track rankings and noticed recently that "clothing manufacturers" had disappeared totally. We asked some people in different areas of the country to check where we were showing in search - one in Somerset, one in Liverpool, one in Beckingham and we used a VPN in Manchester. In all of these areas we aren't ranking for our main keyword at all. In London though we're 5th which is the lower end of normal. We then checked other keywords and it turns out "Clothes manufacturers" is one we're also not ranking for outside of London. However for "clothing manufacturers uk" and "clothes manufacturers uk" we are ranking for in every location we have tried. "Clothing manufacturers uk" is currently the keyword which brings us the most traffic. There are no manual penalties in webmaster tools, but looking at analytics it looks like our impressions for the main keyword have been down over the past 90 days, so we think we have had a problem and not realised for some time. Around a week before we see that our traffic for "clothing manufacturers" dropped, we made some structural changes to the website homepage, where we added LSIs, more H2s, more long tail keywords and more content, taking the copy from around 500 words to around 1100 words. This was in an effort to make the homepage less keyword stuffed and more natural. As a result of this we saw an overall increase in traffic and enquiries, and that's the reason we didn't notice for so long that traffic from "clothing manufacturers" has dropped so badly. Our first thought is that this might be something to do with Schema. Our website was until last week using a schema which included our "postal address" which is our physical office location in London. The schema was implemented in June 2017 and we have noticed that 3 months after implementing the schema, in October, our traffic fell dramatically for our main keyword, "clothing manufacturers". At the same time, our traffic for "clothing manufacturers uk" increased dramatically. Interestingly, the schemas used by our competitors don't include their office addresses and they show up all over the country for "clothing manufacturers" and "clothes manufacturers". One of our competitors is physically within half a mile of us. Have you guys seen a schema limit a company to searches only in one locality before? We have now removed the address from the schema to see if we start ranking all over the country again, like we used to before we implemented it. If this is the problem then it could take 3 months to turn around like it did for us to get in to this situation (Schema implemented June 2017, traffic fell October 2017). We're therefore trying to investigate every possibility to ensure we leave no stone unturned. Do you have any thoughts on the problem and if it could be schema related, or possibly something else? Thank you in advance! TL:DR Keywords "clothing manufacturers" and "clothes manufacturers" no longer ranking around the UK. Still ranking in London where we are based. Still ranking well for "clothing manufacturers uk" and "clothes manufacturers uk". Traffic for "clothing manufacturers" dropped 3 months after implementing schema and one week after making changes to website homepage (increased word count, added long tail keywords, LSIs and H2s). Schema included "postal address" which we notice none of our competitors have. They rank all over the country for "clothing manufacturers". One of our competitors is based within half a mile of us in London. Could having the address in the schema limit us to one locality? Could it be something else entirely?
Local Website Optimization | | rswhtn0 -
Looking to create a "best practice" doc on location pages. Anyone know of a useful resource?
I'm working for a few regional brands and would like to create a best practice doc for the structure of a location page. Has anyone seen anything recent regarding a structure for local, regional and national pages? Thanks all, Kevin
Local Website Optimization | | Kevin.Bekker1 -
Local SEO for Multiple Locations - Is this the best approach?
Hi everyone! I previously have worked with single-location companies, and am now working for a company that is continuously growing and adding new locations. We are a financial institution that currently has 12 locations, and we should have 15+ locations by year-end 2017. Seeing as we have all of these locations, I thought the following approach would be the best for increasing our presence in local search. Our primary keyword is "credit union in location". Our search traffic has increased heavily over last year, but is down from the beginning of the year. I've gone through and done the following: Freshened up the content on the main website Created pages for each of our locations around April-end Attributed these location page URLs to our Google My Business locations Verified each location Wrote unique content for each page Our primary keyword rankings seem to fluctuate weekly. My next steps are to get our web design company to add the following: Structured Data on all location pages The ability to change SEO title and meta descriptions on location pages Sitemap (there is none currently, and I've been fighting them to get one added because it isn't needed.) I also plan on utilizing Moz Local to manage our local listings. After this is done I plan on finding ways for us to build links for each location, like the chambers of commerce in each city and local partnerships. Is this the best approach for our overall goal, and should I continue? Is there anything I should change about our current approach? I appreciate the help!
Local Website Optimization | | PelicanStateCU0 -
Multi Location SEO Page Structure
I am trying to optimize my website for multiple locations. I have setup a landing page for each location. Now I want to optimize services we offer at those locations such as floor scrubber rentals. I'm confused on the best approach for this for ranking locally. I offer the same equipment for rent at each location. So... should I have a link on the location landing page that takes you to an individual floor scrubber rental page for each location optimized for that locations city or should I have just one floor scrubber rental page and would I optimize it for both cities or just optimize it for floor scrubber rentals in general? I have many different categories like this that are offered @ both locations. If I do individual pages all the products and rates will be duplicate but I could change the areas we deliver to and description to be more geared towards that city.
Local Website Optimization | | CougarChemMike0 -
Ways to expand your marketing area
I have a local business and put additional city names (7 of them) into the main title page along with the biz description in order to expand into these areas. I included these same cities on 3 other pages in the site as well, along with the custom descriptions for these pages. Is this overuse of city names in title pages? Will it negatively affect my rankings? What are the best ways to expand your marketing territory for a local biz? Thanks for any and all responses.
Local Website Optimization | | music1000 -
Multi Location business - Should I 301 redirect duplicate location pages or alternatively No Follow tag them ?
Hello All, I have a eCommerce site and we operate out of mulitple locations. We currently have individual location pages for these locations against each of our many categories. However on the flip slide , this create alot of duplicate content. All of our location pages whether unique or duplicated have a unique title Tag, H1, H2 tag , NAP and they all bring in the City Name . The content on the duplicated content also brings in the City name as well. We have been going through our categories and writing unique content for our most popular locations to help rank on local search. Currently I've been setting up 301 redirects for the locations in the categories with the duplicated content pointing back to the category page. I am wondering whether the increase in number of 301's will do more harm than having many duplicate location pages ?.. I am sure my site is affected by the panda algorithm penalty(on the duplicated content issues) as a couple of years ago , this didn't matter and we ranked top 3 for pretty much for every location but now we are ranking between 8 - 20th depending on keyword. An Alternative I thought, may be to instead of 301 those locations pages with duplicate content, is to put No Follow tags on them instead ?... What do you think ?. It's not economically viable to write unique content for every location on every category and these would not only take years but would cost us far to much money. Our Site is currently approx 10,000 pages Any thoughts on this greatly appreciated ? thanks Pete
Local Website Optimization | | PeteC120 -
Local SEO + Best Practice for locations
Hi All, Based on a hypothetical scenario, lets say you are a plumber. You live and operate within Chelsea in London. You have established a Google places profile and incorporated schema data to tell Google your fixed place location. In addition you operate in several nearby towns with no fixed location presence. i.e Brentford, Bromley, Catford, Cheswick and Tottenham. I create a feature rich page on 'How to find a quality plumber'. Within the page I incorporate the following description: blah blah, as a quality plumber serving the community of Chelsea, we also offer our services to nearby towns of Brentford, Bromley, Catford, Cheswick and Tottenham. I create hyperlinks for the towns (Brentford, Bromley, Catford, Cheswick and Tottenham) that allow the user see in details a full list of services, operation hours, etc. Naturally all towns will have there own unique content (no duplication). Question
Local Website Optimization | | Mark_Ch
Is the above scenario the correct way to provide local seo or is this approach considered spammy to Google? Thanks Mark0