Clarification on duplicate content
-
Hi, if I have a page that unintentionally ranks for a term that I want to create a page for - say "atlanta apartments" - should I still create a page specifically intended to rank for "atlanta apartments"? Will canonical tags be crucial in this case?
Hoping to avoid creating duplicate content and instead create the correct content for a specific term.
-
@smiller76 Hey there, this is something I've plenty of experience with.
Canonical tags are helpful when there's a single page that's accessible by multiple URLs, or different pages with similar content.
In this instance, your page is ranking for 'atlanta apartments,' but is it in the first organic position? Is 'atlanta apartments' the target keyword for the page? These are improtant questions to ask, because they'll help you understand what your next steps are.
A page will rank for many different keywords, but it's unlikely to rank in the first position for every keyword.
Let's say your page ranking for 'atlanta apartments' has content relevant to apartments in Atlanta, but this isn't the main target keyword. Well there's an opportunity to create a new page with unique content targeting that keyword ('atlanta apartments'), and so long as the content is unique and doesn't include duplicate content from the other page, the canonical tag should point to the new page URL.
To summarize, if the new page is unique, the canonical tag should point to the new page URL. If it's a duplicate of the existing page (which I wouldn't recommend), the canonical tag should point to the existing page URL to avoid duplicate content penalization.
Keyword research will help you develop your content strategy and understand what keywords to target without cannabilizing current keyword rankings. Here's a helpful blog post from a colleague at our agency: SEO keyword research guide
Hope all of this is helpful and good luck with your content creation efforts!
-
@smiller76 If I were You, I would create a specific page for a keyword you mentioned as long as it's worth your effort. That means it's a kewyord with some popularity.
It should raise up conversions. If the content doesn't match to keyword the position may be temporary. So if the keyword popularity is decent I would add some more content to the current page to match the keyword.
If you choose new address, don't forget to link it well.
I am doing exactly the same stuff. My business website is about SEO in general, but I prefer to have exact address with the details about SEO.
Take a look:
https://piotrstarzynski.com
https://piotrstarzynski.com/pozycjonowanie/I choose the second approach to have one page, but stronger at start. In the end I plan to add dedicated address for few the most important SEO subservices.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Content
I have a client based in the UK and one of their distributors based in the UAE have copied the content for their own website, will this affect my clients rankings because of duplicate content?
Content Development | | CreativeCow0 -
Content Spinner Tool??? Worth? Recommendations?
Hi all !! We have different websites in the english language (UK, IE, US, etc...), but we focus our content strategy (landing pages) in just one of them. We were thinking about using a Content spin tool to use this content in the other websites and give them an extra push in terms of SEO (content is the king :)). Did you have any idea if they work fine? Did you have any experience with them? Can you recommend any? Are they tools really worth or they are not working fine and after the spin a full review (and probably some re-write) is necessary? Of course I´m talking about the paid ones.... Not even thinking about the free tools 😉 Thanks for your help in advance !!!
Content Development | | AutoEurope0 -
Possible to recover from Thin/Duplicate content penalties?
Hi all, first post here so sorry if in wrong section. After a little advice, if I may, from more experienced SEOers than myself with regards to writing off domains or keeping them. To cut a long story short I do a lot of affiliate marketing, back in the day (until the past 6 months or so) you could just take a merchant's datafeed and with some SEO outrank them for individual products. However, since the Google Panda update this hasn't worked as well and now it's much hard to do - which is better for the end user. The issue I have is that I got lazy and tried to see if I could still get some datafeeds to rank with only duplicate content. The sites ranked very well at first but after a couple of weeks died massively. They went from 0 to 300 hits a day in a matter of 24 hours and back to 2 hits a day. The sites now not rank for anything which is obviously because they are duplicate content. The question I have is are these domains dead, can they be saved? Not talking about duplicate content but as a domain itself. I used about 10 domains to test things, they ranged from DA 35 to DA 45 - one of the tests being can a domain with reasonable DA rank for duplicate content. Seeing as the test didn't work I want to use the domains for proper sites with proper unique content, however so far although the new unique content is getting indexed it is suffering from the same ranking penalties the duplicate (and now deleted content) pages had. Is it worth trying to use these domains, will Google finally remove the penalty when they notice that the bad content is no longer on the site or are the domains very much dead? Many thanks
Content Development | | ccgale0 -
Syndicating content with rel=author tag in it
If I have an article with my rel=author tag attached to it, and then I syndicate that article to another web site, should I keep the rel=author tag in that synbdicated article? Basically, what I'm worried about is that there will be 2 duplicate articles with my author tag on 2 different web sites. (I intend to put a canonical tag in the syndicated article so there is no duplicate content penalty) What is the best practice for this?
Content Development | | greggseo0 -
Does this count as Copied Content ?
Hi, we are publishing news on our website blog. In the news we use excerpts from other websites but do mention the source like "according to XYZ news source" etc. Does it count as copied content as sometime copyscape shows alsmot 30% duplicated content due to inclusion of references from different sources in our news stories ? Regards, shahzad
Content Development | | shaz_lhr0 -
Duplicate Websites
What would you do if a competitor had their main domain, and then another domain targeting your local area with the same exact content? That's currently happening to me, and I'm not sure what I should do about it, if anything: http://www.bozemanchevrolet.com and http://www.montanachevy.com
Content Development | | ResslerMotors0 -
Remove Scraped Content?
There is a site I work for that has content that, when you search in Google a snippet of text from, they are not the top result for. I believe what has happened is that they had written blogs and articles and added them to their site and article directories at the same time and the article directories got cached first. If we're not coming up first for our article, that means we are not believed to be the original author, correct? Should I remove all content from our site where this is happening, even though we actually did create these articles?
Content Development | | poolguy0 -
Define: Good Content
I am curious to hear what you guys consider to be the characteristics of good content and in which order if you have a preference. Here are a few I can think of: Informative (you can learn something new) Substantial (enough of it and thorough) Complete (doesn't give half-baked information or ideas) Unique (not regurgitated original content) Helpful (practical actionable information) Visual (content complemented by media) Referenced (claims made are substantiated through citations) Entertaining (or otherwise emotional, e.g. surprising, sad, shocking, controversial) Formatted (easy to read and follow) Timely (right content at the right time, applies for news) Professional (writing style, grammar, spelling and sentence structure) Can you add to this list?
Content Development | | Dan-Petrovic1