Hreflang
-
Hi there,
I have 2 websites, one being .co.uk the other .ie, both websites have the exact same content and both websites using the English language, is there any point in using the hreflang?
Thanks for any feedback
-
Yes, this makes total sense why the .ie website is still ranking.
Regarding the drop for a lot of my keywords, some of them were positioned top 3, and now nowhere to be seen, no even in the index. The pages have still kept there PR but as far as SERPs go, nowhere.
I was ranking for some keywords (top 10) without any link building at all, only a few right enough, however these keywords are nowhere to be seen in the SERPs, why would Google penalize these keywords if it was Penguin 1.1?
Some keywords are still ranking, but overall very poor.
-
Rel=canonical is just a suggestion to google, they will sometimes overlook it it's determined not necessary. Google probably sees the domains on two different TLDs and is ignoring the tag. That's why your ie website is still in the SERPs.
"[rel canonical] lets site owners suggest the version of a page that Google should treat as canonical. Google will take this into account, in conjunction with other signals, when determining which URL sets contain identical content, and calculating the most relevant of these pages to display in search results."
-
Looking at my traffic from Google at the end of May beginning of June, my daily traffic halved.
I have look at this page: http://www.seomoz.org/google-algorithm-change I see the penguin 1.1 was rolled out at this may what have hit my SERPs
Regarding the canonical is it said by using this, for example on the .ie website, the website should not rank anymore, do you why this is not the case?
-
From what you said, it seems like your .ie site's traffic and ranking have remained the same. So the rel canonical is having no effect on the ie site.
I personally don't think its necessary though but it doesn't seem like it's hurting to have it up there.
-
Hi Derek,
Most of the keywords dropped end of May. Around 60-70 keywords dropped, however looking at the bigger picture I think it was probably an algorithmic change rather than the duplication issue.
However I thought I would test this by using the rel canonical on the .ie website just to see if my keywords would recover for the .co.uk website, however it's been more than a month since this was implemented and there has been no change.
Do you think I should remove the rel canonical?
-
I would conclude that something else is causing the drop in rankings. How significant was the drop?
Both sites are still being indexed and I would assume that if co.uk site dropped from duplication that adding the rel canonical would adjust the problem. However, rel canonical is just a suggestion to google on which site to display.
Using the hreflang tag is best practice for your situation.
I did a branded search in google.ie and google.co.uk and each respective site appeared. I don't think your co.uk website dropped because of duplicate content. I would suggest focusing on other factors to bring the site back up.
Do you know the specific date when your ranking dropped? Any change in your on- or off-page optimization?
-
Thanks Derek.
Yes, I came across this video before we actually went live with the .ie website and this video made me decide that is should not be an issue, however before I placed the rel canonical on the .ie website if I copied and pasted a paragraph of text into Google.co.uk it would be the .ie website that would appear in the listings not the .co.uk, I'm not sure how much of a signal that is to say there could be duplication issues?
However, if you were searching for a specific keyword in Google.co.uk, it would always should the .co.uk website not the .ie website
The reason I placed the rel canonical on the .ie website pointing to the .co.uk website is that I saw a drop in rankings for the .co.uk domain, however the canonical has been on the .ie website for quite sometime (Well just over 1 month) and there has been no improvement to the rankings in the .co.uk website, so can I be clear in saying that the drop in rankings is not because of the duplicate content?
Thanks
-
Yes, I looked at a few pages of both sites and saw the content to be similar with some slight variations. I think with the domains on two different TLDs that Google won't penalize you for duplication.
Google can determine which site to display in the SERPs depending on the location of the user.
I wouldn't worry about only two sites on two different TLDs with similar content, just keep currency and phone number relevant to area and you should be OK. I saw a video by Matt Cutts a while back about this - it should help confirm.
-
Hi Derek,
Yes, I have read this before.
Did you have a look at both websites?, do you think there could be an issue with duplicate content? As a precaution I have used rel canonical on the .ie website pointing to the .co.uk website as this is the preferred domain.
Now normally but using the rel canonical, the .ie website would not rank in Google.ie, however the .ie is still ranking well.
Thanks
-
Excerpt From Google Webmaster Support:
Duplicate Content and international sites
"Websites that provide content for different regions and in different languages sometimes create content that is the same or similar but available on different URLs. This is generally not a problem as long as the content is for different users in different countries. While we strongly recommend that you provide unique content for each different group of users, we understand that this may not always be possible. There is generally no need to "hide" the duplicates by disallowing crawling in a robots.txt file or by using a"noindex" robots meta tag. However, if you're providing the same content to the same users on different URLs (for instance, if both
example.de/
andexample.com/de/
show German language content for users in Germany), you should pick a preferred version and redirect (or use the rel=canonical link element) appropriately. In addition, you should follow the guidelines on rel-alternate-hreflang to make sure that the correct language or regional URL is served to searchers." -
Actually no. I checked and both sites are in google.com the .ie and the .co.uk
I don't know if this will be considered duplicate content. However the fact that google automatically detects this in their webmaster tools makes me think that this will most likely be ok he way it is.
-
I pasted:
Into Google.ie and it's the .ie version that appears, was this what you got? If so would you say everything is ok?
-
No because Google already knows that this site is the same for two different Google search engines. A good test to ensure that this is not looking like duplicate content is by taking some content from one of the sites (that is exact on both sites) and pasting it into Google.ie to see if it is duplicated. If both sites come up then it may look like duplication. However i'm not 100% sure about this.
-
Ah! Ok.
In terms of Geographic this is done for both countries, in fact Google recognised this automatically in webmaster tools, there was no need to change anything.
The article talks about:
Meta Content:
Declaring a meta content attribute helps make it easier for engines to understand which language is being targeted. This also makes it easy to make it clear which version of a language is being targeted. For example, the UK version of English is shown below.
As the article is about 3 years old now, is the above irrelevant? I am using hreflang tags on both websites:
Is there any need to do a noindex on the .ie website?
Any feedback is appreciated.
-
I deleted it myself.. Sorry I deleted after I reread the question : )
I found this article it should help:http://www.seomoz.org/blog/seo-guide-international-versions-of-websites
-
Hi Admin,
Why has Donnie's comment been deleted?
Thanks
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using hreflang="en" instead of hreflang="en-gb"
Hello, I have a question in regard to international SEO and the hreflang meta tag. We are currently a B2B business in the UK. Our major market is England with some exceptions of sales internationally. We are wanting to increase our ranking into other english speaking countries and regions such as Ireland and the Channel Islands. My research has found regional google search engines for Ireland (google.ie), Jersey (google.je) and Guernsey (google.gg). Now, all the regions have English as one their main language and here is my questions. Because I use hreflang=“en-gb” as my site language, am I regional excluding these countries and islands? If I used hreflang=“en” would it include these english speaking regions and possible increase the ranking on these the regional search engines? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SilverStar11 -
Do I need to use a trailing slash to homepage in canonical and hreflang?
Currently I have a 301 redirect from
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lcourse
https://www.mysite.com/
to
https://www.mysite.com And in my canonical and hreflang and also insite links I use consistently https://www.mysite.com without trailing slash. Is this OK? Or do I need to add a trailing slash?0 -
Can multiple geotargeting hreflang tags be set in one URL? International SEO question
Hi All, Thank you for this great post! I have a question please. If i target www.onedirect.co.nl/en/ in English for Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg, are the tags below correct? English for Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg: http://www.example.co.nl/en/" hreflang="en-nl" /> http://www.example.co.nl/en/" hreflang="en-be" /> http://www.example.co.nl/en/" hreflang="en-lu" /> AND Targeting Holland and Belgium in Dutch: Pour la page www.onedirect.co.nl on peut inclure ce tag: http://www.example.co.nl" hreflang="nl-nl" /> http://www.example.co.nl" hreflang="nl-be" /> thanks a lot for your help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Onedirect_uk0 -
Can the Alternate/hreflang tags harm SEO?
Hello, Recently one of my regional websites, targeted for Denmark (xxxx.dk (TLD)), received a manual penalty from Google, specified as “pure spam”. The reason for this (as I suspect) can be the fact that the Danish site’s content, is fully translated from English, on the main site (.com). To fix that problem with Google, I want to use the “alternate/hreflang” tags on both sites
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kung_fu_Panda
URL’s (the main and the regional), before submitting it for a second review on WMT. Following this, I would like to ask you few questions: 1. Is there any RISK in using alternate tags between two sites (a “healthy” site to the one that got the penalty), Can it harm the SEO of the main site (.com)?
2. Once done, Will it resolve my problem with Google? Will they remove the manual penalty?
3. Based on your experience, would you recommend me to rewrite all the content on the Danish site, instead of just translating it (the current status)? Would love to hear your opinion on those issues. Thanks a lot!0 -
Hreflang doubt use correctly
Hello,I have a question, I want to know which option is best for implementing a multi languages. We have a client whose website will have English and Spanish languages, both languages have the same content but English we focus on the US and UK, and Spanish only for the country Spain, the question arises what is the correct nomenclature we use or would it be the best value.**Option 1:****Option 2:**Or any of the two options is correct What would be the correct ?. Another question, if a German user is in Spain, and do a search on (Google Spain), what will be the best option that should be implemented, / is-de / or single / de /, which one will position before ( provided that the statement I is correct). A greeting and thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | omar-moscat0 -
Cross domain canonical and hreflang
Hi Guys, So we are close to launching our new site and just need to be sure that our canonical, duplicate issues are sorted before launch. So here is our current situation. The current site is on trespass.co.uk. Then new site will be on trespass.com. The new launch is global and we will have the 3 stores within magento all in english. Trespass.com for the UK
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Trespass
Trespass.com/US for US
Trespass.com/ROW for all other countries On trespass.com we have the following: On trespass.com/US we have the following: On trespass.com/ROW we have the following: This is how the magento developers.design company have set it up but am I right in saying the canonical tag for each store (/ROW and /US) should point to Trespass.com as the only difference is in the pricing £ $ and euros? Thanks for your help0 -
Hreflang="x-default"
Hello all This is my first question in the Moz Forum, hope I will get some concrete answers 🙂 I am looking for some suggestions on implementing the hreflang="x-default" properly in our site. Any previous experience or a link to a specific resource/ example will be very helpful. I have found many examples on implementing the homepage hreflang, however nothing on non-homepage urls within your site. The below will be the code for the "Homepage" for /uk/. Here /en-INT/ is a Global English site not targeted for any country unlike en-MY, en-SG, en-AU etc. Is this the correct approach? Now, in case of non homepage urls, should the respective en-INT url be "x-default" or the "x-default" shouldn't exist altogether? For example, will the below be the correct coding? Many thanks Avi
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Delonghi_Group0 -
Using rel=alternate hreflang element on ccTLDs
We have multilingual websites with some content variations but 60% of the content on site remains the same. Is it still advisable to use:rel=alternate hreflang option on ccTLDs when ccTLDs are in itself strong signal for Google to display result in respective countries 1. example.com 2. example.co.uk 3. example.co.jp 4. example.de
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CyrilWilson0