Should I be taking a gradual approach to link removals?
-
Quick background: My parents run a travel company and have seen their google ranks drop dramatically in the last few years (usual story: they employed an SEO agency, saw good results to begin with, and then a massive decline in their rankings post-Penguin).
Over the last few months I've been working to remove as many of the spam links pointing to their site as I can. However, as I've been doing so, our keyword rankings have been declining even further, not improving. This time last year we were bottom of page 1 for one keyword, then we suddenly dropped to page 5 around Nov with the Penguin update, and now, since I started cleaning up our backlinks, we're no longer in the first 20 pages - we've vanished. Similar situation for other keywords (though not as dramatic)
I've been pretty careful to only delete links that are clearly spam (article directories, forum signatures, spam comments on blogs with a keyword-rich username linking to our domain etc). It may be that some of these links were still helping us, but I'd be surprised - they were pretty obvious cases of spam.
My question: Is it normal to see this sort of decline at the start of a clean-up campaign? Does google see a sudden decline in the number of links, spam or otherwise, as suspicious? I've devoted weeks already to trying to work on the problems affecting my parent's website, and the situation just seems to be getting worse and worse! Do websites ever recover from a severe Penguin hit?
-
Travis, your comments are a massive help. Thanks so much. That Screaming Frog tool is also really helpful.
I had noticed that different backlink checkers were giving me different results, and so I've been working with several (Webmaster tools, webmeup, Moz, and ahrefs) Originally, i was just working with webmaster, and so it was something of a revelation when I first looked at the data provided by the others and found that there were about five times as many spam links pointing to our site as I had first suspected. I think many of the sites pointing to ours have been deindexed, so won't show up in webmaster tools.
I had also noticed that recent reports I'd generated were picking up on far fewer spam links than older ones, despite me not having managed to get rid of that many links. The post from Robert Fisher helps explain why.
With most of the links I'm deleting, I think they're clearly spam. The seo company we used depended mostly on article directories, but also some forum and comment spam - some on legitimate sites, most on forums that were clearly just created for SEO spam. What I'm thinking is that I will focus on deleting the links with the most repetitive anchor text, and leave a few of those with more varied anchor text. From my understanding of penguin, google doesn't so much penalise you for having a large number of links from spammy sites - it penalises you for having a large number of links with identical anchor text, so I'm prioritising those links with keyword rich anchor text ('Tanzania safari', in our case) and leaving in place for the time being some of the smaller number of links with less repetitive anchor text (a small number say 'trips to Tanzania', for instance).
The content audit looks like a mammoth job, but I'll try and work on that this weekend. I know that our site has a lot of duplicate content, for one thing (in some cases for good reasons). Perhaps we've been hit by panda as well as penguin.
Thanks again.
-
It sounds like you've been doing link removal manually. That's all well and good. You should manually inspect inbound links. There are quite a few that jump right out, like easylinkseodirectorygooglerankings4ulol.com.
Though there isn't any easy 'yes' or 'no' to this one, especially without knowing the site. So with my bed-wetting white hat on, I would say; "Cleanse and burn - scorched earth, sir." With my realistic hat on, I would say; "Don't go terribly overboard. Really think about what you're doing. Sure the pure spam should go, but be careful."
The interesting thing is that Google has to pick The Best of The Worst. Travel can be a particularly spam-ridden vertical. But I would look into backlink profiles for competitors in your niche - say African Safaris. Round them all up.
Know that your sources of backlink data are flawed. A lot of spam sites have started blocking popular backlink data provider's bots. That means you have to crawl all of your 'deleted' links while spoofing Googlebot. You can do this with Screaming Frog. It also makes Google Webmaster Tools data more important, even though it's lacking in volume. Robert Fisher and his team at drumBEAT caught this skulduggery.
Get all of the backlink data you can. We're talking Majestic SEO, Ahrefs, Moz OSE, Google Webmaster Tools, Bing Webmaster Tools and The Kitchen Sink. Seriously, get all of the backlink data you can. Throw them all into a spreadsheet, then eliminate duplicates. Just know that it's a big internet and you will never have the complete picture.
While it's kind of an expensive tool, you should more than likely go with Cemper Link Detox once you have your master spreadsheet. It will give you a pretty solid understanding of where the site stands in general. From there, you should manually review each link. There are false positives and false negatives, but the tool is getting better all the time.
If the tool states the site has a Risky or Toxic profile, then you will want to start looking at a prudent disavow list. Removing bad links is great, if you can, but it's not entirely reasonable nor is it expected.
But if it's not saying your backlink profile is Toxic or Risky - you definitely have other problems. Still, you should always try to earn quality backlinks. Here's a great guide from Moz if you're not sure where to start.
You can also use Cemper's tools to get some good ideas from your competitors.
Man, that was a screed.
TL;DR:
Definitely get a better idea of where your backlink profile stands from a top level perspective. There are tools that will get you there. When you know where you really stand, you will know your priority.
The next Penguin update may be a long time away. It may come tomorrow. Take some time while you're getting all of this together. Then do a content audit on your site. And use the link building guide to move forward. (I slipped that ginormous sucker in there at the end... XD.)
-
Thanks, Travis. I will look more into potential on-site problems. I've been devoting a lot of time to removing backlinks but not much else.
So, just to clarify, you wouldn't advise that I slow down in the link removals? Get rid of all the spammy links, even if it means a decline in our rankings for the time being, and then focus on good links?
-
Yes, there are sites that recover from what appears to be a Penguin related penalty. It's generally a good idea to get rid of the spam backlinks. However you must also replace the spam with quality links. Low quality links can still somewhat prop up a site.
There has been a significant delay between Penguin updates. Now would be a good time to focus on acquiring quality backlinks.
You might want to give siteliner.com a try. There are also the Moz Pro tools that can help determine if the site has some on-page problems. There's usually always more than one main problem.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Would it be a valid "link building' strategy to pay youtube video owners, to link to our company website in the decription of a certain video. ( For popular video's that are relevant )
I was wondering if it would it be a valid "link building' strategy to pay / work out a deal with youtube video owners, to link to our company website in the decription of a certain video they posted? ( For popular video's that are relevant to our business. ) Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks in advance! Steven
Link Building | | RockyMountainFlyboard0 -
Are links from charities really better than 'normal' links.
Hi Guys. Just wondering about this idea that links from Charities are particularly good. I've heard people say that links from .org sites are particularly strong. But anyone can get a .org domain, it's just that charities tend to use them more often. Right? I just don't get the logic. Can anyone give more detail about this? Is it a myth? Is there quality info on this topic I can check out? We're working with several charities at the moment, and they all seem happy to blog and link to us...so I just wanted to know a little more. Isaac.
Link Building | | isaac6630 -
Manual Links Vs. Smart Links
Hey Everybody, Is there any downside to the smart link plugins that I see all over wordpress? Basically in short I enter a keyword and where I want that link to go (primarily internal) and set the parameters of repetition etc and it automatically adds the link to that. Now other than the obvious situation where it might put a link in an awkward place, is there anything wrong with this sort of software? Part of me things that this sort of software would not be liked by Google, and that it isn't really getting counted as a true link, but i wanted to see if there were other thoughts or experience with this.
Link Building | | HashtagHustler0 -
Internal Links - How to Increase them, Categories not being considered as Internal Links
Hi All: As per my understanding, Internal Equity Passing Links is a metric defining PA. Now my website has around 65 internal links while few of my competitors have more than 180 links. I am unable to understand how to increase the internal links passing equity on my website, because I can see, more number of links on my website than my competitors but opensiteexplorer does not show that. I am really confused. Please help out if anyone knows something about this issue. Thanks in advance.
Link Building | | sidjain4you0 -
I have well over 110 identical backlinks of widely varying quality - is it worth taking the page they're linking to down?
The site on which I'm working has been experiencing a month-to-month decline since the Panda and Penguin updates - I didn't get an unnatural links notification, but have clearly fallen off the face of Google with many of the more important rankings. After running a scan on my backlinks, I found over 110 identical backlinks (it looks like the same medical definition and my website is listed in the endnotes as a source - just the URL, not anchor text), some from reputable websites with high pageranks and others that look very 'spammy.' We've redesigned the architecture of the site, so the actual link itself has a 301 redirect on it, but I'm just wondering exactly how much of a liability is it to have these links out there? I'm guessing it's an all or nothing kind of thing given the identical content on each page - on one hand, I'm pretty frantic to get to the root of the Google penalties and get back in their good graces. On the other hand, I don't want to kill the site completely by going after a set of valuable links. Has anyone dealt with this before?
Link Building | | travis-taylor0 -
Thoughts on creating a resource/recommend links page in order to attain links?
Hey guys, Just wondering, how does Google view reciprocal link building nowadays? I've heard in the past that it's something that Google isn't particularly keen on. However, more recently, I've also read that - as long as the links are decent (and in moderation) - link exchanging is by no means a bad thing. The reason I ask is that I'm thinking of creating a "resource/recommended links page" for a client of mine. Because of their industry, it's really apparent that attaining links is often only possible if there is the opportunity of a reciprocal link in return. Therefore, I'd need to have a resource/recommend links page of my own. Is this something I should go ahead with to make it much easier to attain links? Or should I try to avoid reciprocal links and attempt to pinpoint one-way linking opportunities - even if they're thin on the ground? Any help much as appreciated as always. Cheers.
Link Building | | Webrevolve0 -
Incoming Spam link removal
I spotted a few bogus links today on one of my clients sites got in touch with the sites via email asking for them to remove the links. also did a whois and emailed them but have had no reply. Whats the best solution to this if they wont remove the links ? Is there anything you can do. I am just worried these links may have a negative effect on the site.
Link Building | | onlinemediadirect0 -
The Value Of A Link
Hi There, Let's say I am able to get a link from a very well trust worthy blog that writes abot things related to my business. Now my question is how much value does another link with the same anchor text, from the same blog has compared to the first link, or compared to a new link from a slightly less powerfull blog? Or in another words, if I got 1 link from this great website should I invest my time to find another website where I can get a link from or should I invest it in getting another link from the website I already got a link from ( which might be easier)?
Link Building | | liors0