Local and Organic Listings
-
Hi,
My client has a number of stores across the country (UK) and ideally I would like them to appear in both the local and organic listings - at the moment I appear more often than not on page one for one or the other - I have noticed however that some pages appear in both.
I understand that Google will not place a listing for the same page in both local and organic so I need to optimise a page on the site for organic and point my local listing to a different page (home page?). On some results though I am seeing my local result appearing with the home page URL listed but the actual link points to the internal store page which is the same page that is appearing in the organic listing (both on page one). Other local listings of mine appear with the store page URL showing in the result.
I haven't set anything up differently for these stores. Can anyone explain why this is happening?
Thanks,
Dan
-
You are very welcome, HippieChick. Glad this helped to clear up a big question at your office!
-
Thank you, Miriam! I've had my boss so mad at me for loosing page 1 ranking (we have Local ranking) and I couldn't explain what happened, even when I've worked so hard on the SEO of the site. (I'm no expert but there's a only a small budget at our company, and I'm the cheapest option). I've explained this to him and finally everyone's happy!
-
Thanks for your help guys,
I'll do some testing and see if I get any positive results.
I'll let you know if anything works.
Cheers,
Dan
-
Hey Dan,
Sorry, got ya.
You know, I am not sure how you go about this with any kind of reliability. Like you say, sometimes it crops up that someone has both but not very often in our experience. That said, the more abstract and hopeless the results then the more wacky and repetitive the organic results seem to get of late.
You could try and optimise some of your citations to get them up in the results on page one and possibly look at content on other sites to try and crowd out the results some with other pages that ultimately link to your clients site. We have had some good success with that for local clients.
Or, alternatively, like Miriam mentioned, try and create other, authoritative pages on the site that are also highly relevant but that may be a bit of a thankless task compared to the relative ease of standard local work.
Sounds like a greedy client wanting both.
Marcus
-
Obviously, not a direct answer, but you could always look at getting some of your citations to rank within the results for your targeted search terms. Also, this is where possible content on other sites can be used to further crowd out those results a little more.
It's good when all rivers run to the same place!
-
Hi Dan,
In general, you are correct that Google doesn't commonly show a double organic/local ranking on the first page for most companies. There are two main exceptions to this:
-
If the query,locale or both have little competition or Google lacks data about them.
-
The scenario in which a second page on the website is authoritative enough to gain an organic listing, independent of the page that is being linked to from the local result.
Around the Venice update in early 2012, double rankings became almost impossible to find. Slowly, it appears to me that they have become more common in recent times, typically in the above scenarios. There may be other exceptions, as well, but I believe these are the most typical.
-
-
Hi,
I suggest the following for Local SEO
- Add address in footer with local schemas
- NAP - Get your site with its address if possible in local directories or magazines or blog
- Add Site to Google's Map Maker
Good luck
Carla
-
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for your reply.
I think I pretty much have all bases covered that you mention, I probably didn't explain myself very well. Probably best I give an example:
A search for 'Self Storage Barking' brings up both local and organic listings obviously but I don't understand how Big Yellow have a local listing and organic listing pointing to the same page. A search for 'Self Storage Eastbourne' again brings up similar results this time for Safestore - both results point to the same page but a search for 'Self Storage Bristol' adds the long store page URL to the local listing, I guess stopping an organic listing too...
I don't understand why one local listing displays the home page URL and points to the store page and another displays the store page URL and blocks the organic listing if they are all set up the same.
Hope that explains better.
Dan
-
Hey Dan
That's kind of confusing to wrap my head around. Have you got an example you can post?
In essence, if you have a local business with multiple locations you are doing two categories of work here.
1. Organic SEO for the site as a whole
2. Local SEO for each location
Local SEO for each location requires a few things to work well in my experience.
2.1. A page on the site optimised for each distinct location (think address, schema, NAP etc)
2.2. An individual Google+ Local listing for each location linked back to the location page
Then the normal rules of local SEO apply and you need citations, local links, reviews etc for each of your individual locations.
A consistent address is important for businesses with a single location but here the scope for things to go wrong is greater so you have to be fastidious in your approach to keeping this consistent.
Audit existing citations, standardise everything, try to get reviews for each location and if they can mention location and service it seems to help more ("If you could mention the office location and service in your review we would really appreciate it").
Your locally optimised page for each store should be able to pop up in local and organic depending on obvious factors (competition etc) and you are creating a solid landing page for localised organic traffic and pure local results (7 pack etc).
The one point here is that you will usually have lots of citations kicking about that you have not created so be sure to audit the existing listings and treat each location as a separate entity. Competition and the approach may be different in Birmingham, Manchester, London etc and the approach may need to be tailored for each location depending on the strength of competition in each area in each location.
Hope that helps!
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moved brand's shop to a new domain. will our organic traffic recuperate?
Hello, We are a healthcare company with a strong domain authority and several thousand pages of service related content at brand.com. We've been operating an ancillary ecommerce store that sells related 3rd party products at brand.com/shop for a little over a year. We recently invested in a platform upgrade and moved our site to a new domain, brandshop.com. We implemented page-level 301 redirects including all category pages, product detail pages, canonical and non-canonical URLs, etc.. which the understanding that there would not be any loss in page rank. What we're seeing over the last 2 months is an initial dive in organic traffic, followed by a ramp-up period of if impressions (but not position) in the following weeks, another drop and we've steady at this low for the last 2 weeks. Another area that might have hurt us, the 301 redirects were implemented correctly immediately post launch (on a wednesday), but it was discovered on the following Monday that our .htaccess file had reverted to an old version without the redirect rules. For 3-4 days, all traffic was being redirected from brand.com/shop/url to brandshop.com/badurl. Can we expect to recover our organic traffic giving the launch screw up with the .htaccess file, or is it more of an issue with us separating from the brand.com domain? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eugene_p
Eugene0 -
Persistent listings or 301 redirects better for SEO?
Imagine these 2 scenarios for an ecommerce listing. 1. A listing that only closes once stock runs out 2. A listing that relists every 7 days assuming stock has run out and doing a 301 redirect to the latest version of that listing (imagine it relists several times) You might ask why on earth we would have the 2nd scenario, but we are an auction site where some listings can't be bid on. In other words those Buy Now only listings are also part of the auction model - they close after 7 days. For me it is a no-brainer that scenario 1 is better for SEO, and I have my ideas on why this is better for SEO than the second scenario such as age, SERP CTR, link equity not being diluted by 301 redirects not changing every 7 days when the listing relists multiple times etc. I was wondering if someone could articulate better than I possibly could why scenario 1 is better for SEO, and why scenario 1 would rank better in the SERPS....would it? Many thanks! Cheers, Simon
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sichristie0 -
How to deal with number swaps for organic results?
Hi mozzers, We used to have a proxy URL for our paid search campaigns and we just transferred all of that into the main domain(that ranks organically). Since we were using phone numbers swapping for paid search, I am afraid that it will harm our organic local results as I am seeing phone number swapping. Can the bots distinguish a swap number and a real phone number or will it impact our local SEO results( because of an inconsistent phone number)? Thanks for letting me know!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Yext in MOZ local in Conjuction
Can you use yext and moz local in conjunction with out having to worry about duplicate listings. I know yext let you opt out of listings. So my questions is will my website be hurt if i do both?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WindshieldGuy-2762210 -
Will changing a subdirectory name negatively effect local ranking?
We submitted a group of 50+ franchise stores into UBL to fulfill directory listings back in September. We are now looking at changing the some of the URL structure to include city names. Example: website.com/store/store-name(not city) to website.com/location/city-store-name Will changing the subdirectory and resubmitting to the directory aggregators negatively effect their search results? Thanks, Jake
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AESEO0 -
Local SEO Plus Performance Based Pay Per Call Multiple Phone Numbers
In my learning about Local SEO recently, I keep reading the importance of NAP (name, address, phone number). But what if you are only using different phone numbers because you are tracking pay per call. How would set up my Local SEO strategy? The newest phone numbers are NOT going to match all the websites, social media and previous listing in directories, etc. Is this a bad move? Should I suggest that we do one or the other going forward with other clients but not both? Thanks a lot...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | greenhornet770 -
Local Business schema / markup
What markup should local businesses employ on their website? I'm aware of the newer schema.org markup but does Google still use rich snippets, geotags, etc.?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BryanPhelps-BigLeapWeb0 -
Hundreds of thousands of 404's on expired listings - issue.
Hey guys, We have a conundrum, with a large E-Commerce site we operate. Classified listings older than 45 days are throwing up 404's - hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. Note that Webmaster Tools peaks at 100,000. Many of these listings receive links. Classified listings that are less than 45 days show other possible products to buy based on an algorithm. It is not possible for Google to crawl expired listings pages from within our site. They are indexed because they were crawled before they expired, which means that many of them show in search results. -> My thought at this stage, for usability reasons, is to replace the 404's with content - other product suggestions, and add a meta noindex in order to help our crawl equity, and get the pages we really want to be indexed prioritised. -> Another consideration is to 301 from each expired listing to the category heirarchy to pass possible link juice. But we feel that as many of these listings are findable in Google, it is not a great user experience. -> Or, shall we just leave them as 404's? : google sort of says it's ok Very curious on your opinions, and how you would handle this. Cheers, Croozie. P.S I have read other Q & A's regarding this, but given our large volumes and situation, thought it was worth asking as I'm not satisfied that solutions offered would match our needs.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sichristie0