How do i determine if an SEO person i hired is good and should continue on
-
I know SEO is important and i am hiring an SEO person, as well as company. however, they both seem to contradict each other and so im lost as to know who is good and bad. what should i look for in their work report, and what questions should i ask.
Background:
i have tried to read alot (100+ articles) on the new panda and penguin so at least i know what people are talking about without being clueless. So my site got hit recently with the updates and got penalised, and i think that is predominantly because of the backlink profiles, before being built too much around keywords. so my understanding is that backlinking now should be natural, diverse (many alt tags instead of a few), concentrate on branding and less on keywords.
The person: she believes in branding, and acknowledge the problem with my previous backlink profile. so now she said the backlink ratio should be around 40-50% based on the brand. so she has been doing alot of backlinks wtih alt tags for my website url, name, as well as my name. She said once that ratio is close to that target of 40-50% i should see a jump in ranking, which woudl be in around a month of work. but here is my concern
1 - the other company said she is spamming, which kinda scarred me already
2 - while in principle, what she has said is backed up by my reading materials, it seems she only concentrate on three alt texts so far, my url, my business name, and my name. i thought they need to be diversified
3 - the links seem to come from alot of places. she said it does not need to be high quality now as we just need to get that ratio/profile correct, and then we can concentrate on the high quality links later. she is doing around 40 links per day. which apparently take 8 hours per day.
4 - i guess i worry that that if all these new links suddenly become spams later, does that mean i woudl need to either build more links to offset the more spam links, or have to spend more time removing bad links
Please advise. is she performing spamming. how do i check her links/works. is there a tool. is it wise to build more links, or is it better to identify previous bad links and remove them?
Thank you for your help.
-
Thank you so much Lynn. it has helped so much for my understanding of reading these data, as well as seo. I will definitely take these knowledge to my future sites as well. loosk like natural linkings is the way to go
-
Hi,
Well you have started on the right track with moz and the other tools! Personally I would take a step back from the link building and get a good grounding in the basics first. The moz beginner guide is a great place to start.
In regards your link profile, the moz metrics can be a bit deceptive if you have done a lot of link building in comparison to your competitors, the authority numbers can be somewhat inflated even though the links are not high value (and indeed are even hurting you). Your link profile to me looks problematic, especially the non www which has quite a few linking texts which seem completely unrelated to your site (check the anchors cloud in the ahrefs links above). Is this the reason for your ranking problems? Maybe and there is a good chance you will need to try to get rid of some of those links if possible. Might be worth asking whoever built these links if it is possible to unwind some of them, but this is a whole different conversation and worth a separate qa question where someone with more experience in getting rid of bad links might jump in with more specific advice.
What I can certainly say now is I would stop the link building you are currently doing as it looks problematic and there is no point in making it even worse. Then go through the moz guide, get a good grounding in the basics and in the first instance concentrate on building links from relevant sources from your offline world. What I mean is incorporate your real world contacts and actions with your site, register your business/site with relevant local business directories or local photography groups for example. Be a normal business with normal business activities in other words and incorporate these when relevant to a link here or there. There is no 'acceptable' rate of link building, but honestly for a local wedding photography site a 'natural' rate could be only a link or two a week! 40 a day is simply asking for a penalty, why would a site like this be getting so many links if not to try and game the search engines?
Hope that helps!
-
thank you lynn.
so i have joined up seomoz, and other places to get reports on the backlinking profile. so my page authority is much higher than the competition, im no where on the first page on a lot of keywords, so im just trying to figure out what is the problem.
1- according to cognitiveseo, i have 39% links that are unnatural, and my domain alt tags is only 23%. but then
but everything else seems ok. so does mean my link profile is the main problem here? what woudl be an acceptable rate of link building per days. i assume if i was to concentrate on natural link buildings from now on, targeting on high quality backlinks only, it will be safer in the long run and results would eventually shown?
-
Hmm thats a point re the non www vs www. That being said, there are still a fair amount of new domains linking to the non www version also. Generally, I would not like the looks of that link profile one little bit. In all honesty, I would pause that link building until you get a better handle on what is being done vs what you need to be getting done. As Maximise points out, you might well have a real slog to get rid of the bad links later on, so don't make it any worse now.
In regards ahrefs generally backlinks are individual linking pages and domains are individual linking domains (could be one or more pages on that domain linking, its still one domain). I would look at the new/lost domains and then click on a day and look underneath to see the newly found linking domain. If most of the domains are crap directories, spam comments and generally low value links, then you do not want them.
-
oh right, thank you kindly for clearing that up. its great to know.
-
No this isn't a problem because all the www requests for your site are being correctly 301 redirected to the non www version. But all the links being built for the www version will also count for the non www version.
-
interesting. so you are saying i need to remove one or the other right? this is bad as google is splitting my ranking juice across the two sites?
-
Lynn posted a link where lit looks like you are losing links but have a look at this version:
https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains/www.ppp.net.nz
It looks like your SEO is building links to www.ppp.net.nz instead of ppp.net.nz and the link acquisition rate shown above is definitely going to look unnatural.
Low quality links are not worth the hassle. if you are building 40 a day that is most likely going to end up in links that you have to try remove in the future which is much, much harder work. I've spent months cleaning up a link profile before Google lifted the penalty.
-
Hi Lynn thank you for your reply. ok in all honesty, i am not an seo person. i do try to educate as much as i can so i can say seomthing here and there, but not im not an expert.
i have tried to use ahrefs, but i dont know what the data means. if i may, what is domains, in comparison to backlinks? and i looked at the new/lost for backlinks and i seem to be loosing lots of backlinks as well. but coudl this be spam comments via Wordpress?
i know we have not been getting rids of bad links at all. she said in order to change the backlink profile to about 50% ratio of brand link to others, she tries to get that number of brandlinks up with the alt tag targetting the url and brand name. so is that true? to get that ratio correct first before I can see any movement in the ranking in seo? i do lots of blogs, my social media linking seems to be ok, but the backlinks is what killing me, because of what previously has been done. so she is determined that we need to fix this profile first. i have read in several places the the alt tag distribution must now be less on keywords and more on brands. so i guess in principle she seems correct. but i just worry she is building brand profile through more badlinks, which might give me short term benefits, but probablywill kill my page later on.
-
Hi,
As the others say I would be concerned. You can get an idea of what is going on by using ahrefs, the free account will give you some basic data on new links so you have a rough idea. Check here: https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains/ppp.net.nz
That being said, the link profile does not look like what you would expect with a link building campaign like you describe going on, both total links and linking domains seems to have a significant downward trend, unless at the same time as building your links you are actively trying to get rid of previous bad links? Either way, if you have a look at the newly obtained domains report here: https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/refdomains-new/subdomains/ppp.net.nz you are not going to see very much quality in there! Directories from all over the world, some comment links etc.... thats not a good link profile, watch out!
-
hi doug, this is what I am afraid of as well. especially with the new updates which seems to only want quality and natural linkings, hence my fear. my website is ppp.net.nz.
-
Would it be useful to post up the excel sheet as to what has been done?
my website is www.ppp.net.nz. thank you.
-
From what you've said it I'd be concerned.
40 links / day sounds aggressive and almost certainly low value (and potentially risky) links. If your site has been penalised in some way I strongly suspect that this is more likely to be digging you a bigger hole than helping you to recover.
You've got to understand the reason why you've been penalised and what's caused it. (Have you had any Google Webmaster tools warnings?)
Looking at you backlink profile and making assumptions that you can fix things by throwing more links at it doesn't say "robust recovery strategy" to me.
If the other company are saying she's "spamming" what do they suggest you do?
If you're happy to tell us your website then I'm sure someone would take a look. (If you'd rather, I'd be happy to take a quick look if you want to send me a private message with your site details in.)
-
I would be very concerned with this strategy. If they are building 40 links per day then these are almost certainly going to be low quality and artificial looking links. The anchor text of a link is not the only way that Google judges if a link is artificial or not. You could be digging yourself into a much bigger hole. I also think the general consensus is that branding should be higher than 50%, maybe around the 70% - 80% mark.
Personally I would focus on obtaining some high quality, authoritative links and at the same time try to remove as many of the spam links as possible.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Odd. Unique seo question - Can you help?
This should be an interesting question - gobble up all those MOZ POINTS folks : ) Our company website is real estate based. We have nearly 30,000+ paid members on the inside that put up real estate listings (properties for sale). The members do this on their own. From an SEO stand point it sort of feels like we have a huge team of content creators putting up unique content for us. To see what I'm talking about I'll drop some links so you can review: In this first link you'll see a member of ours advertised on the NYTIMES and the clickable anchored text waterfront leads back to us or I should say the members listing. See the link below: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/realestate/city-island-a-quainter-side-of-the-bronx.html This second link is the listing page for our member that the anchored text led to. https://www.nystatemls.com/profiles/NY/SAINT_ALBANS/NEW_YORK_ESTATES_GROUP_INC/Dale_Davids/68966/listings/ When I use MOZ i can see that we got some serious link juice from the above. **This is what is happening naturally: ** When someone joins as a member the public profile of their name & office is ranking in the SERPS. Example: Higgins Realty / it's ranked #1 and brings back 100 visitors per month. https://www.nystatemls.com/agency/NY/BROOKLYN/HIGGINS_REALTY_GROUP_LLC/5575/ When someone creates a listing with our system and publishes it the address is ranking. Think of this on a mass scale. Even though they are small niche names, offices, keywords it's generating traffic. & every once in awhile the name of an office is closely related to a major keyword and we pick up something that generates say 500 to 1,500 visitors per month. When someone advertises their public profile or their listing depending on the site they advertise on or the anchored text they use it's helping our domain. Again, all of this is happening on its own we aren't pushing SEO. This simply is real estate agents and brokers doing their job and in return our Domain Authority and Page Rank is climbing. Our monthly traffic is climbing. The number of keywords we rank for is increasing. This situation must be unique because wouldn't you say that in most cases with a website they have a blog. Someone needs to write good content then try to get it linked. But in our situation our members are creating (unique content) and publishing it. How do we capitalize on this though? or I should say capitalize in a bigger way? To help everyone benefit would it be to possibly teach the members some basic SEO. What if the name of their public profile was key worded or what if we explained advertising that listing, Sharing it, getting it on other sites would benefit them. To have them link back to their profile or listing page. Maybe give them a list of suggested sites? Maybe give them a list of possible anchored texts they could use which would be keywords we want to rank for? What are your thoughts? Do you have any clever or creative ideas that would help all parties? If you want to do some research our main website is www.nystatemls.com you can review the ranking keywords, linking domains that sort of thing. Thanks for the input - Chris After
Link Building | | Cfarcher0 -
Is are Scoopon type sites a good place to get a link?
We have noticed that our competitors have links with equality from sites like this: http://www.groupon.com.au/ Scoopon type sites like this can be an effective way to generate sales for a business, I'm just wondering if these types of sites also have added value for SEO as sites like these do have a strong Domain Authority? Any thoughts on this subject would be most appreciated. Thanks!
Link Building | | Gavo0 -
How relevant are citations to SEO?
'How much do citations help your seo in view of the direction that google seems to be headed where content is king? Should the citations not be relevant to your site?'.
Link Building | | arthureray0 -
Does having our products on Amazon or EBay help with our SEO ranking?
We have an ecommerce web site, which ranks ok , but we are trying to build up our SEO scores. We're looking at links and were wondering if having our products listed on either Amazon or Ebay (or both) will actually help with ranking of our site? We sometimes have products listed on ebay with a reference to the higher price that the item is selling for on our main site. Thank you.
Link Building | | onwardsandupwards0 -
Do incoming links from my feedburner account help my SEO?
Hi, I know this is kind of an amateur question. I just created my first feedburner account here http://feeds.feedburner.com/posicionamientowebenbuscadores/edxv and I noticed that all the links to my blog articles are do follow and from a PR7? Will this boost my PR or SEO? Thanks Carla
Link Building | | Carla_Dawson0 -
"New" Digg - SEO benefits?
Quick question for the group - I've not used the new Digg. Does it have SEO benefits? I wasn't sure if Google counted these or not. thanks
Link Building | | yandl0 -
Opinion regarding SEO Sabotage
Hello Mozcommunity, I would like opinions regarding potential spammy inbound links from others . In theory you would want excellent useful content on your site that other web properties would link to in a natural way..link bait. But what if links were pointing to your site with malicious intent. For example a competitor bombs yours site with spammy/black hat links. This is clearly a dilemma for search engines since anyone can link to your site...even though you can block incoming with .access I don't believe many smaller in-house seo teams (or do it yourself small business owners) use Google analytics to routinely monitor referring sources.
Link Building | | johnshearer0