Which CMS Should Use?
-
I have a desinger working on a new webiste and he's suggesting that WP creates design limitations (He's doing quite a bit of HTML 5 I believe...I'm not sure) and obviosly has secruity concerns.
He suggested TextPattern, which I've never heard of. Has anyone had any experience with it?
Also, what CMS are you using (besides WP) that you really like and is SEO friendly?
Thanks
-
We have sites built in Wordpress, Joomla, Drupal and also custom built CMS's.
All of these are search engine friendly. Wordpress in particular has a number of excellent SEO guidance tools to put you on the right track.
The consensus of opinion from the comments given is that you need to question your web developer's opinions. Making the wrong choices now will only land you in hot water in the future.
Good luck with your project
-
The CMS should be up to the designer to use - obviously you as a client should make sure that there is a good product delivery and that the back-end meets your expectations.
I would agree with your Developer that WordPress is very limiting. Whilst good for Blogs and News-oriented websites it was not built to cater for other websites. CMS like TextPattern or Symphony allow much better control on the structure and output, allowing for better dissection re-use of code and potentially better SEO. I've been using Symphony for over 2 years and I've found it brilliant - I can control and make small SEO tasks much simpler, as I structure the data the way I would like it, rather the standard way the CMS thinks is correct.
Note that SEO has nothing to do with the CMS itself, its more about the implementation as done by your developer. Whilst WordPress has some plugins to make this easier it is not necessarily the only and best way.
-
I really can't sing Wordpress praises highly enough. By far it has given me and my clients the best results from an SEO perspective, as well as allowing even the most basic of users to add and update content. In terms of security, I recommend Sucuri.net which will monitor and fix any hack/virus/malware etc and they provide great advice and support to keep your WP install secure.
-
textpattern was all the rave couple of years ago with easy to use templating Designers were free to achieve various looks and designs with html and no php when wordpress was not know for it flexibility beyond blogging platform. Those were early days of wordpress when it was first ported from b2. since than thanks to open source wp community wordpress and many other far eclipsed textpattern and those benefits that text pattern initially offered. Many will tell you chose a cms per project basis as many are good at one thing while not at other but i will say that with joomla and wordpress and their most valuable asset their ecosistem of devs and plugins you will be hard pressed to find a typensite that you cannot build with these top 2 free cms platforms...
sorry for typos hate typing on my pad
-
Wordpress for me. There's a great theme designed specifically for customization (weaver), blank themes with no CSS whatsoever so you have total control and the updates/bug fixes and support are consistent. Joomla is sluggish, even with cache modules and Drupal, which I really wanted to like, is downright annoying. I've had a support question in their forum for 3 months now with no response.
-
I'm a huge fan of MODX. Integrating custom design is very easy to learn and the community rocks. You have 100% control over all markup output. No "theming" structure to learn like most CMSs.
-
I think you might want to consider finding a new designer / developer
Creating this type of visual is not a problem in wordpress. It may jsut be that your designer si nto overly confident with wordprss customisations so maybe you need to look for someone who is? I don't have any experience with textpattern, but wordpress could certainly create this type of visual. By the looks if it this is just an ordered list with some CSS styling.
I would certainly recommend go wth wordpress over textpattern for maintainability - if your designer can't continue to support your website for any reason getting someone with textpattern knowledge is going to be much harder than wordpress, plus wordpress has all of the cool SEO plugins that ahve already been discussed by others.
-
I've heard of textpattern but never really used it. It's WP all the way for me. You can chop it and change it to fit your needs and the fact that there is so much support out there when you hit a brick wall there's always someone who can help.
-
If you like at this site and scroll a little beneath the fold you'll see a visual representation of the business process. I asked for a similar visual but the desinger mentioned he wasn't sure if he could do it in WordPress. What do you think?
-
The site's going to be used for an SEO consultany.
-
Excellent Point.
-
Hi Spencer, I only have experieince with 2 CMS's. I was an early adopter of Word Press so I wouldn't know my way iaround n it at all anymore as it's changed so much. I currently use Joomla 1.5 . It's relatively SE friendly, but then again so is WP theses days (so I've heard) I've also heard the current WP is much easier to customise than the older versions.
What is the purpose of your website going to be? (eg. blog, ecommerce, etc.)
-
Hi Spencer,
I am a huge proponent of WordPress, and it is (in my opinion) the best SEO CMS available. For starters there are excellent Plugins such as HeadSpace2, and the All-In-One-SEO-Pack, which allow you to manage title tags, meta data, redirects, ect.
WordPress also has other excellent plugins for SEO including SEO Friendly Images, and SEO Tag Cloud. Also, WordPress has awesome sharing widgets such as Sexy Bookmarks.
So in conculsion any design limitations are far outweighed by the overwhelming amount of SEO and sharing widgets available. The real limitations for WordPress is not in the design department it is in the Intranet department. However, if having an intranet is not important then I would say WordPress all the way.
C
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Website Platform would you use?
We are considering 1 maybe 3 websites (1 new 2 redesign) there are so many options with technology rolling over every 3 years it seems. Here are my obstacles: Wordpress: dynamic but easily hacked, often needs updating Joomla: attractive, but cumbersome to manage Custom: sleek and easier to manage, but gets outdated quickly Here are some variables: 80+ products, E-Commerce, Dynamic, Blog, Tons of images, SEO friendly, MUST not lose our rankings! OK, Moz friends, What do you recommend?
Web Design | | KevnJr0 -
Using a query string for linked, static landing pages - is this good practice?
My company has a page with links for each of our dozen office locations as well as a clickable map. These offices are also linked in the footer of every page along with their phone number. When one of these links is clicked, the visitor is directed to a static page with a picture of the office, contact information, a short description, and some other information. The URL for these pages is displayed as something like http:/example.com/offices.htm?office_id=123456, with seemingly random ID numbers at the end depending on the office that remain static. I know first off that this is probably bad SEO practice, as the URL should be something like htttp://example.com/offices/springfield/ My question is, why is there a question mark in the page URL? I understand that it represents a query string, but I'm not sure why it's there to begin with. A search query should not required if they are just static landing pages, correct?. Is there any reason at all why they would be queries? Is this an issue that needs to be addressed or does it have little to no impact on SEO?
Web Design | | BD690 -
Nav / Sitemap Question. Using a "services" page vs just linking directly to individual service page?
Okay, so our company offers video production, web design, and web marketing services. While we do offer these services individually, our goal is to get our clients to integrate these services together. Our nav is currently like so : home - about - video - web design - web marketing - blog - contact Now I've seen businesses and agencies also use a nav with a "services" button instead of listing out their service offerings (if they have more than 1, like us). The services button usually links to a category page or has a drop down with links to the company's individual services. I'm wondering if there is any benefit to having a main services page like this and linking to the individual pages off of it (video ,web design, marketing, etc). Or if we should just keep it the way we have it now (since we've already got some page authority on the individual service pages). I know this may not be the most important aspect of our site and we may be over-thinking it but any thoughts/ideas would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
Web Design | | RenderPerfect0 -
Is it a good idea to use sub-domains?
Hello everyone! I have a question about whether we should be using sub-domains. We are currently in the process of redesigning our site so this would be the time to do it. We are a reseller of brand name IT equipment (servers, storage, etc...) should we create a sub-domain for each brand for example: hp.domain.com dell.domain.com or should we just use folders instead like: domain.com/hp domain.com/dell does one have any more SEO value than the other? Thank you!
Web Design | | igor.pinchevskiy0 -
Is Anybody using any of those Shopping Cart? Do you recommand them?
I want to move my existing online store, ( osCommerce) http://www.filtrationmontreal.com/ to a new SEO friendly Multilingual shopping cart. Does anybody use one of the following and tell what is there appreciation on it. Americommerce CoreCommerce Pinnacle Cart Ashop Thank you for your help, BigBlaze
Web Design | | BigBlaze2050 -
Does anyone use Ultimento for Magento?
We're working on a re-design and want to start with SEO rather than leave it until the end. Of course, saving time and money on a custom template would be great. Ultimento found at www.ultimento.com boasts great SEO features. Has anybody used it? Please comment. Thanks in advance! Kevin
Web Design | | kwoolf0 -
The use of foreign characters and capital letters in URL's?
Hello all, We have 4 language domains for our website, and a number of our Spanish landing pages are written using Spanish characters - most notably: ñ and ó. We have done our research around the web and realised that many of the top competitors for keywords such as Diseño Web (web design) and Aplicaión iPhone (iphone application) DO NOT use these special chacracters in their URL structure. Here is an example of our URL's EX: http://www.twago.es/expert/Diseño-Web/Diseño-Web However when I simply copy paste a URL that contains a special character it is automatically translated and encoded. EX: http://www.twago.es/expert/Aplicación-iPhone/Aplicación-iPhone (When written out long had it appears: http://www.twago.es/expert/Aplicación-iPhone/Aplicación-iPhone My first question is, seeing how the overwhelming majority of website URL's DO NOT contain special characters (and even for Spanish/German characters these are simply written using the standard English latin alphabet) is there a negative effect on our SEO rankings/efforts because we are using special characters? When we write anchor text for backlinks to these pages we USE the special characteristics in the anchor text (so does most other competitors). Does the anchor text have to exactly I know most webbrowsers can understand the special characters, especially when returning search results to users that either type the special characters within their search query (or not). But we seem to think that if we were doing the right thing, then why does everyone else do it differently? My second question is the same, but focusing on the use of Capital letters in our URL structure. NOTE: When we do a broken link check with some link tools (such as xenu) the URL's that contain the special characters in Spanish are marked as "broken". Is this a related issue? Any help anyone could give us would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, David from twago
Web Design | | wdziedzic0