An apparent ranking mystery...
-
I built the site https://www.sylvaniachurch.com about 5 years ago, but the site has been live for more than a decade. Tyler has hundreds of churches and Sylvania Church currently site ranks second for most variations of "churches in tyler tx." Sylvania has a well-optimized homepage, several well-optimized subpages, a consistent sermon audio feed, and an increasingly used blog. In addition to what's on the site, there are a few other relevant sites that link to the Sylvania site and I have completed profiles on virtually every business listing site known to man.
Here's the oddity. The website that ranks third and even displaces Sylvania for the second place spot from time to time (http://www.crosspointecc.com/) has only been a live URL for a few years, has no readable text on the homepage other than the nav menu, has very little content on the subpages, no blog that I can find, and fewer links from less authoritative sites.
What's even odder to me is that Sylvania Church has the following numbers according to the MozBar:
PA: 26
mR: 3.64
mT: 3.28
DA: 14
DmR: 3.27
DmT: 2.74
The numbers for CrossPointe:
PA: 24 (2 less than Sylvania)
mR: 4.68 (1.04 higher than Sylvania)
mT: 5.30 (2.02 higher than Sylvania)
DA: 13 (1 less than Sylvania)
DmR: 2.98 (.28 less than Sylvania)
DmT: 3.49 (.75 higher than Sylvania)
The obvious question is, "Why does Moz like this site better than mine? What am I missing?"
Thanks for any help you guys can give!
-
That's great, Chad. Good luck in the work ahead!
-
I appreciate both of you. This is beyond helpful! Off to local SEO work I go!
-
Haha - thank you Egol! I think you really got to the heart of the matter in your reply here. The decision regarding what it is most beneficial to rank for (just churches or a particular religion's church) is really the point here and you spotted that immediately. Your comments are always of such insight and value.
-
Oh... Good. Miriam replies.
She knows a lot more about local search than I do, and a lot more than just about anyone.
Thank you Miriam.
-
Hi Chad!
Congratulations on all of the hard work you've been doing for this church. They are lucky to have someone who is so concerned about making the best possible effort.
What I see in looking at your stats compared to the other church is that you are pretty much neck-and-neck. You are higher in some areas and they are higher in some areas, so the fact that the two churches have similar rankings for this and that seems normal to me.
I agree with Egol's assessment that it would be better for you to be more specific in your optimization efforts. I can only base this on my own experience. If I am a Catholic and am new in town, I'm going to search Google for 'Catholic Church' in my town. I'm not just going to search for 'churches'. Similarly, if I am a Baptist or a Reformed Baptist, and am decided about my religion, I'm going to search for my religion's particular type of church. The only reason I can see for any religion to want to simply rank for 'church' would be if they are trying to promote themselves to people who have no decided religion ... or possibly to tourists who like to visit various interesting churches as places of interest on vacation. So, I'm not sure if the decision on your part to simply rank for 'churches' stems from an evangelical effort to interest people who are not already Reformed Baptists or if there is some other thinking behind this. To me, wanting to simply rank for 'church' is a bit like wanting to simply rank for 'store'. It's more clear and direct to be a 'Reformed Baptist Church' or a 'Shoe Store', right?
In fact, here's something odd and anecdotal: setting my location to Tyler, Tx and searching just for 'churches', Google isn't even understanding my intent in their local pack of results. Instead, they think I'm looking for Church's Chicken Restaurant! Oops! But, if I search for Reformed Baptist Church with my location set to Tyler, you'll be happy to know that your church is ranking #3 organically and has a full result, complete with its Google+ Local information. Reformed Baptist Churches as a different search gives me a local 2-pack and you are #1 in it. For just Baptist Churches however, you are not in the 7-pack but are in the organic results. Forgive my ignorance on this - I'm not totally sure what the difference is between a Baptist Church vs. a Reformed Baptist Church, but if Baptists can choose to go to various types of churches, this would be a search I'd think it was valuable to rank in the local pack for.
Given all this, what I would suggest would be:
1. Consider fine tuning your on-page optimization to be specific rather than generic about your religion.
2. Looks like you're in lots of the major citation sources but there are inconsistent and incomplete listings, according to our Moz Check Listing tool:
Clean these up and be sure you're listed on all 15 platforms, as well as other citation sources. Pay close attention to any listing Moz Check Listing surfaces as a duplicate.
3. Your Google+ Local page has only earned 5 reviews. This could be improved, for sure!
4. Take a close look at your Google+ Local categories. You have them listed in this order: Church, Reformed Church, Baptist Church. Google wants categories to be as specific as possible, so, if you determine that ranking for Baptist Church is more important than just Church, I'd make Baptist Church your primary category. Correct categorization is so important!
5. Don't forget that Local SEO hinges largely on the concept of the user-as-centroid these days. Your congregation members on one side of town will likely be seeing a different ordering of the results than those on the other side of town. Don't overlook this important point, because it relieves some of the pressure you may be feeling about attaining some kind of ultimate #1 rankings; there are no ultimate #1 rankings - everyone sees different ones. Consider the user as centroid and the possibility of some additional hyperlocal optimization. See: https://moz.com/blog/mastering-serving-the-user-as-centroid
6. Take a close look at the mindset behind how you are promoting the church, in terms of whom you consider your competitors to be. In my view, your competitors are other Baptist Churches - not Catholic Churches, Methodist Churches, or just 'Churches' in general. Making this distinction could help you view your website and other marketing efforts in a whole new, more accurate light.
Hope this helps! My comments can't replace a formal audit, but I hope they are a useful start.
-
Thanks for your reply. Your tip about the title tag is particularly helpful.
Both sites should rank for variations of "churches" because most people who search "churches" aren't looking for a church directory website. They are looking for Google to list out the websites of individual churches in the area. That said, I do see that including the word "churches" could make us look more like a directory to Google, but we rank #2 in organic search in a city with hundreds of churches, so I'm concerned to make too many adjustments that won't clearly benefit.
Regarding local SEO, I have done lots of that, but we still don't rank at the top. Do you see any obvious local SEO factors that we've left undone?
-
What am I missing?
Moz numbers do not determine Google rankings.
Google likes the other site better for this query. Neither of your sites are appropriate destinations for a person who searches for "churches in tyler tx". Neither of your sites should be ranking for this query.
Google might not care for your site because your title tag begins with "Churches Tyler Texas". That title is appropriate for a church directory but not for your website. Google knows that your site is not a directory of churches in that community. If you search for "Baptist Church in Tyler Texas" (which I think is the perfect query for you to attract visitors) and look at how your title tag is shown, you should see that Google has changed your title tag. They don't enjoy it for this query.
If I ran this site I would change the title tag to Sylvania Baptist Church - Tyler Texas (or something similar, being very direct about what the site is about and not trying to use the title tag to present your site as a directory of churches.
To accomplish to goal of being visible when someone searches for a Baptist Church(es) in Tyler Texas, I would focus my efforts on local search, rather than organic search. A good place to start learning about local search is here... https://moz.com/learn/local
Being optimized for local search will qualify your site to be listed on the map of churches that appears for the query "baptist churches in tyler texas" OR "churches in tyler texas". These queries are where the action is at for your target searcher.
I see that you are on the map and in the local pack for "churches in tyler texas". Getting better optimized for local search might help you do better for this more important query.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rankings have dropped but why?
Recently our keywords have plummeted with regards to anything hen related on our stag and hen website. We were on the first page ranking 6<sup>th</sup> for terms such as Newcastle hen and hen weekend Newcastle. Now were around 15th this has also began to happen with other keywords. Content wise our pages score 90+ on page optimisation, we do have various keywords on the pages alike our competitors and use the highest searched for term as our page title. Our page speed is good on mobile and desktop. I’m struggling to see why we can’t seem to crawl back up to the first page when people who are outranking us have minimal content on slow sites. I know we lack back links but this can't be the only reason? Our website is hangoverweekends.co.uk
On-Page Optimization | | andy_simpson0 -
Unexpected ranking
We recently built a page for a client which consisted of a one paragraph of about 30-40 words, We weren't expecting this to rank, but it has ranked at #3 on UK Google. So, we are now trying to work out the likely reason for this, as pages which we have optimised do not rank this well. We realise there are a number of factors which influence ranking, but on this particular page we have a news module at the bottom of the page containing 8 short intros to other related content. Could it be that search engines are ranking for the main content shown by the menu link and the 8 short intros associated with that main content? Hope that makes sense. Thanks Ian
On-Page Optimization | | Substance-create0 -
Ranked page is not desired page
I have a question on a problem I am currently faced with. There is a certain keyword that my employer wants to rank for. The good news is that sometimes it does rank in the top 5 pages of Google. (It drops in and out) The bad news is that it is going to a page that we need to keep, but not the ideal place we want people who are looking for that keyword to go to. I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with this type of situation and what tactic they used to get people to the better page.
On-Page Optimization | | trumpfinc1 -
Did anyone Rankings drop massively last weekend ...Is this new google update ?
Hi all, My Site rankings took a battering in the past week , From what I have read, I know that google have updated their algorithm and supposedly it only affects less than 1% of queries but I was very surprised to have fallen in that list... Just wondered, am i the only site to have been hammered this past week ? or is it more of a case that maybe the new algorithm means I need to be more savvy with our SEO. Just posting a quick general consensus question ... thanks Sarah
On-Page Optimization | | SarahCollins0 -
301 Redirect to mobile site effecting rankings
On my site I redirect users when on a mobile device to be redirected to my mobile version of my site. In the last couple weeks I added that redirect in my htaccess file. I just realized today that I am doing a 301 redirect. In the last few weeks my ranking have gotten lower. I am starting to think that because of the redirect my mobile site is not as optimized as my regular site and therefor is effecting my rankings. My question is how can I redirect my users to my mobile site but not use a 301 AND how do I get google to use my main site content for ranking on the mobile side. I want to go back to getting my search rankings on the mobile side using my main sites content. Can I simply remove the 301 on the redirect? Hope that makes sense.
On-Page Optimization | | cbielich0 -
Inner page rank higher than domain
Hey there, Today my site received it's first Google pagerank and noticed something strange. My domain got a PR of 2 whilst most of the other inner pages got PR1, so far so good. But then one particular inner page which is just 2 weeks old and has zero backlinks has PR 3. I'm not one to fixate on PR but this just struck me as weird. What do you guys think?
On-Page Optimization | | barabis770 -
Meta Description Tags and Rankings
Hi there, I have a lot of pages set up on my site but most have no content. If I add the correct meta description tags to those pages, will that help rank for the root domain? I am slowly getting the content added for each page but wanted to see if I could boost rankings in the meantime. http://www.petmedicalcenter.com Example: most of pages under "Services" are blank. Thanks for the help!
On-Page Optimization | | PMC-3120870 -
Main landing page does not rank as good a single news article - why?
We are running several special interest websites in the German speaking market, covering outdoor sports and vacation topics. We are trying to focus on one main landing page for events and keywords, this should be number one für search engines. Besides we are producing numerous content (news, pictures, videos), which are supposed to rank well and to be found on Google News, but not to rank higher for the specific keyword than our designated landing page. It seems, that we fail with this attempt. Example one: The main page for the alpine Ski World Championships on our skiing portal www.skiinfo.de was supposed to be this one: http://magazin.skiinfo.de/3170--ski_wm_2011_garmisch-partenkirchen.html for the Keywords 'ski wm 2011' in Germany. We missed this goal. Many of our own news articles ranked higher. When searching for 'ski wm 2011' on skiinfo.de only directly after the World Championships, the main page was ranked on 33rd position - 32 of our own articles ranked higher. Why does the landing page rank worse than an article like this: http://magazin.skiinfo.de/3173-ski-wm-2011-tina-maze-gewinnt-riesenslalom-keine-deutschen-medaillen.html ? Another example: Our designated landing page for the Event 'International Mountain Summit' (a major mountaineering and climbing event in Bressanone/ITA) is this: http://www.bergleben.de/klettern/2148--international_mountain_summit.html (Keywords: international mountain summit, IMS). We are experiencing that our news articles rank higher, when they are 'fresh', this one still does: http://www.bergleben.de/klettern/2149-international-mountain-summit-4.html. Why? It would be perfect, if good content would strengthen the designated landing page. We are linking back to this landing page from each article in the breadcrumb, but this does not seem to be very successful. How can we achieve this?
On-Page Optimization | | Beatbuster0